<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Bogey</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-db6d05f9" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/Bogey/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:02:23 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Obama's Sotto Voce To Canadians: I'm Demagoguing On NAFTA</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017147.php#comment-189502</link><description>in case you haven't noticed, I'm a free trader.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I merely state the obvious reality that in states like Ohio and Michigan, NAFTA and "free trade" in general is a dirty word.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bogey</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:02:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama's Sotto Voce To Canadians: I'm Demagoguing On NAFTA</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017147.php#comment-189500</link><description>hehe.&lt;br&gt;indeed I am.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm more about change, than about hope.... but I can't allow hope to be completely extinguished, can I?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bogey</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:01:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Geldof: The Unexpected Bush</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017155.php#comment-189480</link><description>for all the abuse Bush takes in the media (even while deserved imho, most of the time), it's perfectly fair to point out his record of caring and achievement vis a vis Africa is a story that has not been properly told.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bogey</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:49:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McCain In Front: LA Times Poll</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017136.php#comment-186736</link><description>sex drugs and rock n roll (or make that hip hop now) are the future of the country.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;best proof of this is how preposterous charges sound now compared to as recently as 15-20 years ago.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Remember Douglas Ginsburg, down "in smoke" because of previous pot use?&lt;br&gt;remember Slick Willy - "I didn't inhale"?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;then came W and years of cocaine and drinking binges defined as "youthful indisgressions" (good to hear late 30's now qualifies as youthful, I like that! )&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and now the coup de grace.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama says re inhaling - that was THE POINT.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and the country nods and chuckles as they remember all of their own "youthful indisgressions".&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;the recent McCain/NYT dustup is also illustrative. After the GOP Puritans and ideological zealots pursued Slick Willy for years over marital matters that were none of their business, it's now considered very tacky/gauche to even pry into other people's, even politicians' private lives.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bogey</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:44:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: William F Buckley, RIP</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017141.php#comment-186651</link><description>should also be noted that Buckley was very uncomfortable with the hijacking of the "conservative" agenda by the biblethumpers, rightist doo gooders and Puritans.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;he actually supported legalizing drugs - today we have a  "war" on them (more Goebbelsian laguage)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;just like Barry Goldwater supported gays in the military.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bogey</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:57:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Remembering WFB</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017145.php#comment-186619</link><description>on this I think I can absolutely agree with you 100%</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bogey</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:21:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama's Sotto Voce To Canadians: I'm Demagoguing On NAFTA</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017147.php#comment-186617</link><description>it's called politics. Like Ohio.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;same reason Mr. Romney could actually promise to bring back car jobs to Michigan without laughing out loud while allowing such lies to pass thru his lips.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bogey</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:19:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bloomberg Shifts From King To Kingmaker</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017148.php#comment-186616</link><description>why would Bloomberg's "endorsement" matter?&lt;br&gt;who cares?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;other endorsers bring a political machine or contributer lists..&lt;br&gt;Bloomberg bring neither, really.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He was politically viable only in the event the country didn't get an Obama/McCain matchup because a lot of people who aren't ideologues wouldn't have been interested in a right/left troglodyte matchup.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bogey</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:17:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McCain In Front: LA Times Poll</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017136.php#comment-185386</link><description>McCain was the only possible GOP candidate with a shot.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;that's because in the view of many people. he's just about as far removed from the current administration one can get while staying within the GOP.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;so these polls don't shock me. McCain is a compelling personal story.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;it would have been far more amusing had Willard been the nominee, especially in his "Rick Santorum" Willard 2.0 re-invention.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;or Santorum himself.. or.. oh wait.. this is great.. someone on this forum actually mentioned John Bolton.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;John Bolton!  hahahahha&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;the day that guy gets elected in any national office is the day I take my iceskates down to hell.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bogey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:57:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McCain In Front: LA Times Poll</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017136.php#comment-185375</link><description>First one was far far better than given credit for.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;History will judge him kindly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The second will take his place alongside Warren G. Harding in the presidential pantheon.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;the third may have been the best, but because of his last name, we'll never know.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bogey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:52:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McCain In Front: LA Times Poll</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017136.php#comment-185367</link><description>Iran already dominates the Persian Gulf, courtesy of our invasion of Iraq.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;AQ wasn't in Iraq, it was in Afghanistan, though it certainly has Persian Gulf war connections thru its mother's teat and beehive in Saudi Arabia.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;if you were really that worried about AQ and the Persian Gulf you would have invaded Saudi Arabia.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bogey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:50:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McCain In Front: LA Times Poll</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017136.php#comment-185361</link><description>salient points.&lt;br&gt;there are no cheap easy answers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;but going into somewhere you're  not wanted and sitting on a powderkeg is surely the most expensive and dangerous tactic of all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;stevez overplays the relevance of Saddam's "whipping up the insurgency".  If he were the central figure behind it, it would have died down upon his capture. It did not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And having Odierno's IV come in from Turkey certainly wouldn't have prevented Saddam from sneaking out and escaping somewhere. Would have simply made it more difficult. Non Arabic speaking, non native troops don't make for good "hounds".</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bogey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:48:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: William F Buckley, RIP</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017141.php#comment-185340</link><description>He wrote the best Iraq failure columns ever. Brilliant.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; ``Mr. Bush is in the hands of a fortune that will be unremitting on the point of Iraq,'' Buckley said in an interview that will air on Bloomberg Television this weekend. ``If he'd invented the Bill of Rights it wouldn't get him out of his jam.''&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Buckley said he doesn't have a formula for getting out of Iraq, though he said ``it's important that we acknowledge in the inner councils of state that it (the war) has failed, so that we should look for opportunities to cope with that failure.''</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bogey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:43:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McCain In Front: LA Times Poll</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017136.php#comment-184106</link><description>btw I liked that answer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;but not "re-invade".&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;invasions and countrybuilding are for the birds.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;go in, waste and destroy and leave. And warn if it occurs again, we'll come back to waste and destroy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And let the locals shape their own futures.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bogey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:28:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McCain In Front: LA Times Poll</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017136.php#comment-184099</link><description>sure let's stay there for a 1000 years.&lt;br&gt;sitting on top of a tinderbox, hoping it doesn't blow up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think you should definitely run on a "why leave at all" platform. :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;now that the Sunnis have turned against AQ it will never find a haven in iraq, not even in a civil war (unless the Sunnins were desperate enough to admit them in again to fight the majority Shiites)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;the problem is we went into a country that wasn't an AQ haven, and allowed the haven everyone knew about, Afghanistan to deteriorate and go to crap.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bogey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:26:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McCain In Front: LA Times Poll</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017136.php#comment-184089</link><description>btw. all these polls now are worth as much as the early Clinton-Obama polls were.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;but it should be an interesting summer.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bogey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:23:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McCain In Front: LA Times Poll</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017136.php#comment-184087</link><description>well, for me it's a no loss situation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm a little annoyed that it's McCain and not some troglodyte "real Republican" running, that would get crushed like a cockroach.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;but the accompanying GOP freak show, as shown by abovementioned Cunningham and friends... I mean how can you support a candidate they'd vote for?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;the same dilemma one faces with Dems and the likes of feminazis (gop has their own version, the bible thumpers) and Code Pink.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;btw.. William F Buckley just died.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;RIP.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;a REAL conservative with a brain (unlike the radio host set who are entertainers)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bogey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:21:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McCain In Front: LA Times Poll</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017136.php#comment-183677</link><description>is there any way we can get Cunningham, Coulter and Limbaugh out on  the campaign trail to repeatedly talk about Barack HUSSEIN Obama?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ya know, like including it at least once or twice in EVERY sentence? (then play coy and say it's just his middle name)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(these are the same people who got upset when one called Romney, by his given name Willard.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;oh, and please include no lip "it's a relief our Iraqi casualties are volunteers instead of draftees)&lt;br&gt;Mitch McConnell with the road show to present a special presentation on just how great things are going in Iraq.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;in fact, I'd contribute to help fund such a traveling road show.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Any one else?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bogey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:48:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Did Saddam Figure's Millions Influence Obama?</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017121.php#comment-182739</link><description>No, I like McCain.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;my dream matchup was Obama-McCain&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;had the choice been Romney or Hilary, then I'd have to catch up on my high school French.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bogey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 03:20:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Did Saddam Figure's Millions Influence Obama?</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017121.php#comment-180527</link><description>please send me a pic of your bewildered face on Nov 5th.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm going to to enjoy it fora very very very long time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bogey</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:14:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Did Saddam Figure's Millions Influence Obama?</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017121.php#comment-180521</link><description>yes I get it now hahahahaha&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Saddam=terorrists&lt;br&gt;terrorists=Al Qaeda&lt;br&gt;Al Qaeda=Bin Laden&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ergo Barack Hussein Obama =Osama Bin Laden.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;this yet another brilliant analysis from our friends on the right  :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bogey</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:12:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Look Into Fidel Castro's Cuba</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017090.php#comment-180505</link><description>don't you wish I were caught lying.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;but if it makes you feel b etter you keep on deluding yourself.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;it's so obscure it appears almost nowhere on the web outside your own little link</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bogey</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:09:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Look Into Fidel Castro's Cuba</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017090.php#comment-179740</link><description>at least that spelling and such a word is possible.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;but it's very obscure Mexican slangs, even if it exists.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;you might not want to bet that 1000, cretin.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;on the other hand, I can certainly use it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bogey</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:30:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where's The Diplomatic Beef?</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017113.php#comment-179729</link><description>well if I'm being a bit over the top,. it's for the benefit of some of the "real conservatives"  :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;but conservatism and has been hijacked.&lt;br&gt;and corrupted.&lt;br&gt;alas.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bogey</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:19:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where's The Diplomatic Beef?</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/017113.php#comment-179420</link><description>anyone notice the NY Philharmonic is performing in North Korea today?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;how many people do we have performing in Cuba?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and better yet, when the renowned Cuban  timba/salsa group Los  Van Van tried playing concerts in the US, the lunatics in Miami went insane, banning them from performing in Miami proper, and then disturbing public peace when another nearby municipality allowed them to perform.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;the banana republic of South Florida.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;the lunatics running our asylum.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bogey</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 04:15:13 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>