<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for BillV</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-07ba26cf" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/BillV/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 01:46:39 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Sometime the conversation does need some rules &amp;ndash; and respect</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/index.php/2009/10/12/sometime-the-conversation-does-need-some-rules-and-respect/#comment-19879229</link><description>Semi-anonymous instant communication and social (snort) networking has de-evolved our social abilities. Many like to point out anecdotes that would seem to counter this, but I see the results every day. We're going backwards. There are new tools all the time giving the deviants among us the ability to *be* deviants with almost zero risk.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillV</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 01:46:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CobWEBs Daily Edition podcast &amp;#8211; Newspapers can&amp;#8217;t be saved and shouldn&amp;#8217;t be</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/index.php/2009/09/22/cobwebs-daily-edition-podcast-newspapers-cant-be-saved-and-shouldnt-be/#comment-17208858</link><description>While they're at it, they should bail out the steam engine and 8-track industries.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillV</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 05:00:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook is really beginning to worry me</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/index.php/2009/09/18/facebook-is-really-beginning-to-worry-me/#comment-16894556</link><description>Their ballistic growth may just be temporary, making all this moot. If they don't expand their server capacity soon, they're going to start shedding users like a mutt in the bathtub shedding fleas. Facebook and all it's applications have been growing buggier by the day, with some functions being totally down for hours at a time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillV</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:41:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Confusing Microsoft Windows 7 Upgrade Chart</title><link>http://www.mwd.com/2009/08/confusing-microsoft-windows-7-upgrade-chart/#comment-14468700</link><description>Makes perfect sense to me, although I think there are still too many versions. Should be one tweaked for home users, one tweaked for business applications. Or better, ONE version, that prompts you for the modules you want, depending on whether you say you're a home user, or a business user. Any more than that just over-complicates things. I love it when I get a tech-sup call, and the first 5 minutes is trying to figure out what version of Vista they have so I know what route to take. I sincerely hope the next big OS release is module-based, even if you have to pay for them individually.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillV</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 05:12:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: So sick of seeing this</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/index.php/2009/08/03/so-sick-of-seeing-this/#comment-13848832</link><description>So what should they do? Stop doing business?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillV</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 16:11:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why is a company that geotards the world worth $35 million in funding</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/index.php/2009/07/10/why-is-a-company-that-geotards-the-world-worth-35-million-in-funding/#comment-12578262</link><description>Well, keep in mind....other countries don't pay royalties to US artists for the most part. The game you're discussing is very complicated and convoluted. There are also pending lawsuits regarding terrestrial stations...the RIAA and the like are demanding that they, too, pay up huge fees...the 'free advertising' agreement which has worked for over 100 years is apparently no longer good enough..but if they get what they want it would shut down all but the corporate-backed stations. I know a DJ at a local station here...ANY fee would shut them down..they operate 'hand to mouth'..and many others do, too. "Greed" is the order of today.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillV</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:02:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;rsquo;s no wonder people think Mac&amp;rsquo;s are elitists</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/index.php/2009/05/23/its-no-wonder-people-think-macs-are-elitists/#comment-9848744</link><description>This is the internet, so good luck with that. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Refer to John Gabriel's Greater Internet Dickwad Theory. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Normal Person + Relative Anonymity + An Audience = Instant Dickwad.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillV</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 02:28:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;rsquo;s no wonder people think Mac&amp;rsquo;s are elitists</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/index.php/2009/05/23/its-no-wonder-people-think-macs-are-elitists/#comment-9848579</link><description>Dang...I forgot to fun of the typos HE made in his complaint about yours.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillV</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 02:09:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;rsquo;s no wonder people think Mac&amp;rsquo;s are elitists</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/index.php/2009/05/23/its-no-wonder-people-think-macs-are-elitists/#comment-9848571</link><description>Wow...all those interesting points he made, and all you can come up with is a missing apostrophe? I'm a bit of a grammar Nazi myself, and even I let that kind of thing slide. So I suppose now we're all supposed to bow to your obviously superior intellect, since nobody else could have possibly ferreted out that glaring error.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tool.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillV</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 02:08:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter fallout after the Oprah Effect</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/index.php/2009/04/22/twitter-fallout-after-the-oprah-effect/#comment-8600218</link><description>I'm seeing something here....I'm reminded of the first time I saw it for what it was, and hate to use the word 'elitism' because that's not quite right. I was about 15 years old, and I was talking to a friend who I knew liked Green Day, and had for quite some time. Green Day had just released their first major album, so I asked him about it. "Pfft." he said, waving his hand at me. "Now everyone listens to them..they sold out, they're not cool anymore." I analyzed his comment for a while, because it was odd, the album was good...very good. Better than much of the stuff they'd done pre-label. They'd found 'their sound" and were doing what they wanted to do, and doing it well.&lt;br&gt;Now that Twitter is finally REALLY mainstream, the early-adopters are just going to have to do some soul-searching: Do I bail on it now that it's doing what some of us actually SAID we hoped it would do, or do I stick with it, and adapt to change?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your call.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillV</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 03:19:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: We Want These: Crayon Rings You Can Wear and Color With -Refinery29 Pipeline-</title><link>http://pipeline.refinery29.com/the_goods/we_want_these_crayon_rings_you.php#comment-7820818</link><description>Also only size 7, far too small for the office meeting crowd.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillV</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 04:16:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: We Want These: Crayon Rings You Can Wear and Color With -Refinery29 Pipeline-</title><link>http://pipeline.refinery29.com/the_goods/we_want_these_crayon_rings_you.php#comment-7820810</link><description>Very interesting, but WAY overpriced, considering how little work goes into making them. I've made various objects out of crayon wax, it's not a huge chore.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillV</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 04:15:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Don&amp;rsquo;t judge a proggie by it&amp;rsquo;s UI</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/index.php/2009/03/29/dont-judge-a-proggie-by-its-ui/#comment-7750238</link><description>I also run Firefox, and had no trouble downloading whatsoever. I also found No-Script to be far more trouble than it's worth, for reasons just like this. Don't blame Super© for your choice of FF plugins.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillV</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:32:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Don&amp;rsquo;t judge a proggie by it&amp;rsquo;s UI</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/index.php/2009/03/29/dont-judge-a-proggie-by-its-ui/#comment-7644013</link><description>Excellent point, Rassie. While most of the core code is borrowed via open-source and the like, they DiD put it all together into one powerful converter. I'd be very pleased to see more effort on their part to streamline the UI. It's intimidating at first, and they'd likely get more followers if this could be improved, who might then actually purchase some of their other non-free releases.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillV</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:43:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Having a problem with all this Social Media crap</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/index.php/2009/03/21/having-a-problem-with-all-this-social-media-crap/#comment-7400566</link><description>The modern westerner is getting lazier and lazier, with no recollection or knowledge of the days when "networking" had to be done face to face, going to clubs, doing lunches, have a quick martini after work to keep in touch with former collegues. I know so many people with thousands of "friends" that have zero social skills because they spend all their time in front of the computer or hunched over the Blackberry. Social networking is a plague. It would be useful if not taken to extreme, but we all know, that taking things to extremes is something our civilization thrives on and encourages.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillV</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:32:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: So close yet so far away</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/index.php/2009/03/11/so-close-yet-so-far-away/#comment-7157212</link><description>I've never owned an ATI card, but I hear endless complaints about their drivers, and delays in releasing/fixing them. Don't hold your breath, brother. You might be sitting on that pretty little thing for a while.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillV</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:25:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Police Comments</title><link>http://everythingrandom.net/post/82158215#comment-6974636</link><description>Some cops are jerks, just like some chefs are jerks, some firemen are jerks. Cops get nailed as jerks because they bite back when people treat them like shit, which most people do. Here's a tip jerks: Don't break the law, and be halfway decent to any cops you run into, and 95% of them will be decent right back. Really. They're just people, doing a damned hard job, and spending their days dealing people trying to bullshit their way out of things that both the suspect and the cop know damn well that they actually did.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillV</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 04:33:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Furong Reservoir - Giant Man Eating Catfish Hoax</title><link>http://www.hoax-slayer.com/giant-man-eating-catfish-hoax.shtml#comment-6731215</link><description>That specimen is over 12 feet long, hardly a "baby". It is an adult. Far from maximum size of 40 feet, but nowhere near being a "baby". I also see no indication that the animal is "being held down". A live whale shark is far more powerful than a handful of humans, and would toss them off like toys if it were still living. Also, whale-sharks are not air-breathers, so this animal would expire rather quickly once removed from the water. They appear to be attempting to move the carcass, but a still image is poor evidence of activity. There is also no indication in the article or photos of how the animal died. It may have died of illness, stranded itself on the beach, been trapped or netted, among many other possibilities.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm so tired of people going off about things like this before actually learning something about the subject first. Like it or not, subscribed to ill-educated bleeding-heart hippie culture or not, animals eat other animals, animals use other animals for resources and survival. It's not "horrendous"...it's called LIFE.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Get over yourselves.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All that said, I'd like to see less whale sharks taken, since they have been placed on the "vulnerable" section of the IUCN Red List.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillV</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:12:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Attention Psion Teklogix &amp;ndash; you bunch of idiots</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/index.php/2009/02/21/attention-psion-teklogix-you-bunch-of-idiots/#comment-6470195</link><description>Or, as pointed out on FF, they're hoping the big boys will just toss them some cash to stfu. It's a pretty common business model, really. They may have been waiting on purpose until the companies with deep enough pockets used the term.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh...netbook .netbook .netbook .netbook .netbook .netbook .netbook .netbook .netbook .netbook .netbook .netbook .netbook .netbook .netbook</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillV</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 15:40:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Attention Psion Teklogix &amp;ndash; you bunch of idiots</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/index.php/2009/02/21/attention-psion-teklogix-you-bunch-of-idiots/#comment-6470072</link><description>If you wait to defend your trademarked term for so long it becomes an integral part of modern speech, you're screwed. If you then try to defend it after this point, you simply open yourself to being made fun of. Nobody is going to take them seriously. This issue has been tackled in court before, and the entity filing suit usually loses. Imagine Johnson &amp; Johnson sending C&amp;D's to everyone that refers to adhesive bandages as Band-Aids. How successful do you think they'd be? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Idiots. Either they're hoping bad press is better than no press, or they're as clueless as they appear.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillV</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 15:29:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: One down .. one to go</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/index.php/2009/02/09/one-down-one-to-go/#comment-6359754</link><description>How long did it take you to clean your desk for the pic? &amp;lt;snicker&amp;gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillV</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:57:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My wife&amp;rsquo;s Valentine card to me</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/index.php/2009/02/16/my-wifes-valentine-card-to-me/#comment-6359722</link><description>LOL, you go Kim:)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On another note, from what I've read, pictures less risque' than that one dropped off at photo processing centers have landed parents on the sex offender lists. Of course, that's here in the US, where we've taken such things beyond the realm of insanity.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillV</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:55:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It might only be an illusion but DAMN!</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/17319/it-might-only-be-an-illusion-but-damn/#comment-5848849</link><description>I love this guy's work. Most of the blogs that post his stuff end up with comments of "OMG WTF HAX that's shopped I ca see the pixels fake blarg"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He's amazing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillV</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:58:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: File Archiver: 7-Zip - Compact your crap!</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/index.php/2009/01/14/file-archiver-7-zip-compact-your-crap/#comment-5161077</link><description>I like to use open source whenever I can. The lack of a direct price tag, obviously, the fact that my donations are helping more than just some suits' bonus, and open source software is usually just plain BETTER than the stuff you pay money for. It's built by people who build what they themselves would use. No bloat, no crap, no useless features that some advisory panel told them is the Next Big Thing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillV</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 02:47:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boy does Apple know how to give it to the fan boys</title><link>http://www.shootingatbubbles.com/index.php/2009/01/13/boy-does-apple-know-how-to-give-it-to-the-fan-boys/#comment-5102231</link><description>I've owned 2 iPods, both of which needed battery replacements, neither of which I ever bothered to get. They're still around here somewhere......dead, for a total of 400 USD worth of hardware that I can't use until I spend another 140 USD, perhaps less if I have them done by someone other than Apple. I'll have to ship, because the nearest "Genius" Bar is over 200 miles away.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BillV</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:25:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>