<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for AndyFinkle</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/AndyFinkle/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:54:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Importance of Routines&amp;#8230;and Stocktwits</title><link>http://howardlindzon.disqus.com/the_importance_of_routines8230and_stocktwits/#comment-13740407</link><description>Awesome discipline .... It's so tough out there ... "I'm a Bull - I'm a Bear, I'm a Bull- I'm a Bear" - keep doing what u do, it works excellent for u -</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:54:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CV.IM - A New Kind Of Investment Management Account</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/cvim_a_new_kind_of_investment_management_account/#comment-13197172</link><description>Thanks</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 06:31:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CV.IM - A New Kind Of Investment Management Account</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/cvim_a_new_kind_of_investment_management_account/#comment-13121669</link><description>Fred - this seems like a real game changer to me.  Congratulations on your investment in Covestor!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@A_F</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:24:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stocktwits as Matchmaker&amp;#8230;Congrats UpsideTrader and Todd Stottlemyre on &amp;#8216;Desert Shore Capital&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://howardlindzon.disqus.com/stocktwits_as_matchmaker8230congrats_upsidetrader_and_todd_stottlemyre_on_8216desert_shore_capital82/#comment-12996448</link><description>Couldn't happen to nicer guys *nore smarter ones - Congrats Todd &amp; Joe</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 10:09:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deep Market Thoughts&amp;#8230;There are NO Guru&amp;#8217;s!</title><link>http://howardlindzon.disqus.com/deep_market_thoughts8230there_are_no_guru8217s/#comment-8927563</link><description>Shhhhhhh ...waht are you trying to get Cramer fired?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 10:12:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If Twitter Is Your RSS Reader ...</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/if_twitter_is_your_rss_reader/#comment-8543325</link><description>Thanks Fred - I have always felt that RSS should stand for Really STUPID syndication ...It is IMO a "lazy" method that "grandma" would never use.  Following @AVC now :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;twitter.com/A_F</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:23:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deep Market Thoughts&amp;#8230;From Fear to Fear!</title><link>http://howardlindzon.disqus.com/deep_market_thoughts8230from_fear_to_fear/#comment-8347570</link><description>hmmmm ...a fearandgreedometor .... Theirs gold to mine in that thar Stocktwits data me thinks</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 10:00:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN Does Not Want to Lose to Ashton Kutcher - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://tvnewser.disqus.com/cnn_does_not_want_to_lose_to_ashton_kutcher_mediabistrocom_tvnewser/#comment-8285910</link><description>R U all Stupid??  I mean it's bad enuf that Gov is raping our children with a multi-TRILLION dollar deficit to bail out their Goldman Sachs lead crony's on wall st.  But now - You are gonna perpetuate the myth that this is something more then a really bad PR publicity stunt?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Get a life... Tweeple aren't as stupid as that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/A_F" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://twitter.com/A_F&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:22:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the GOOG 411</title><link>http://stocktwits.disqus.com/the_goog_411/#comment-8273727</link><description>WOW! after hours Goog ran to over 410 - and now back to 385 and in between @upsidetrader bought and sold it!  EVERY SINGLE PERSON in this thread is/was right!1  Didn't think that could be possible but it is ....congrats @stocktwits!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:07:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Building Atop Twitter? Keep It Simple</title><link>http://philpearlman.disqus.com/building_atop_twitter_keep_it_simple/#comment-8250371</link><description>Don't let it go to your head... YES - I was referring to you being very Cerebral ...but Let's not forget who it is that is leaving the comment "...Me and my  army a stupids" - Eric Von Zipperhead</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:52:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Building Atop Twitter? Keep It Simple</title><link>http://philpearlman.disqus.com/building_atop_twitter_keep_it_simple/#comment-8246231</link><description>thnanks A_F... every now and again i catch a bone...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ppearlman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:36:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Building Atop Twitter? Keep It Simple</title><link>http://philpearlman.disqus.com/building_atop_twitter_keep_it_simple/#comment-8245746</link><description>So true Phil ... KISS - Keep It Simple Stupid (if I believed in Tat's I would have it written on my body).  Not only a brilliant post, but likin it because for the first time I can understand what you are saying :-) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/A_F" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://twitter.com/A_F&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:24:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Really Need Twitter Search Alternatives?</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/do_we_really_need_twitter_search_alternatives/#comment-8136774</link><description>Hi Adam - no I did understand your comment, I just do not agree.  Personally I think the ultimate winner will NOT be Summize (Twitter), more likely will be Google - or a 3rd party who can do *live search* but not limited to the Twitterspere.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;PS - in answer to your other comment - One can already search within Twitter and limited to only certain follows using powertwitter</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:03:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Really Need Twitter Search Alternatives?</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/do_we_really_need_twitter_search_alternatives/#comment-8136551</link><description>That's not what I'm saying at all ... but the Twitter search engines compete directly with Twitter ever since Twitter bought Summize.  Other areas, like clients, mobile apps, or niche communities (ie - Stocktwits) are areas Twitter likely won't touch, making them better investments imho.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adamostrow</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:52:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Really Need Twitter Search Alternatives?</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/do_we_really_need_twitter_search_alternatives/#comment-8127871</link><description>WOW...So according to that logic - no one should ever build something for any ecosystem (including Twitter) ...what a hoot!  Twitter (let alone Twitter Search) is in the 1st inning.  Not only WILL great money be made...It is being made currently ... Just look at &lt;a href="http://unboundtech.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;unboundtech.com&lt;/a&gt; as just one example of mining social data from Twitter and others ... They get anywhere between $3k to $50k a pop from their agency and brand clients ... Now go back to your Twitter search box and search for "Do we really need search alternatives" so you can monitor the buzz your article gets.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/A_F" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://twitter.com/A_F&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:15:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bit.ly Spelled backwards is &amp;#8216;DEVIL&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://howardlindzon.disqus.com/bitly_spelled_backwards_is_8216devil8217/#comment-7893850</link><description>Love that. I would love to be able to see and unbundle the link to avoid the rickrollers of the world, something we do on stocktwits</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">howardlindzon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 00:21:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bit.ly Spelled backwards is &amp;#8216;DEVIL&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://howardlindzon.disqus.com/bitly_spelled_backwards_is_8216devil8217/#comment-7893770</link><description>Can't believe no-one has figured out Bit.ly's brilliance yet... "Twitter in less than 10 characters!" ...brilliant&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;FTW &amp; ROTFL!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/A_F" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://twitter.com/A_F&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 00:13:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chartbeat - Real Time Analytics</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/chartbeat_real_time_analytics/#comment-7802296</link><description>Fortunately I wear pants</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:58:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chartbeat - Real Time Analytics</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/chartbeat_real_time_analytics/#comment-7800099</link><description>Very cool Fred - But  kinda feels like i'm looking up your blog's dress</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:36:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Killed My Blog!</title><link>http://howardlindzon.disqus.com/twitter_killed_my_blog/#comment-7762533</link><description>Lol</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">howardlindzon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 18:28:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Killed My Blog!</title><link>http://howardlindzon.disqus.com/twitter_killed_my_blog/#comment-7762485</link><description>hmmm ...me thinks this post was just an excuse to mention an upcoming excuse  that you haven't golfed since last year....LindzonPalooza golf outing this upcoming weekend... hmmmm timing very suspect...verrryyy suspect.  Besides - If you stopped blogging where would we come for out daily dose of potty mouth online?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/A_F" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://twitter.com/A_F&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 18:26:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: $1000 Prize: Guess the Nasdaq Close Challenge</title><link>http://marketfolly.disqus.com/1000_prize_guess_the_nasdaq_close_challenge/#comment-7756844</link><description>1465.50</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:07:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Cool YouTube Mashup</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/a_cool_youtube_mashup/#comment-7257156</link><description>No,  but I'll check it out</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fredwilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:41:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Cool YouTube Mashup</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/a_cool_youtube_mashup/#comment-7255706</link><description>Fred - I think this is just the tip of the iceburg - Had you seen an earlier blog post I wrote about this last year?;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.afpr.com/2008/11/mashups-new-content-is-king.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.afpr.com/2008/11/mashups-new-content...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/A_F" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://twitter.com/A_F&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:37:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Street.Com&amp;#8217;s NEW Jim Cramer &amp;#8216;VIP&amp;#8217; &amp;#8216;Chairman&amp;#8217; Club</title><link>http://howardlindzon.disqus.com/the_streetcom8217s_new_jim_cramer_8216vip8217_8216chairman8217_club/#comment-6744400</link><description>I have to say, as a Real Money subscriber, I get more by being on stock twits than anything I read on the Street these days. Tony Crez. puts out some good stuff but if anyone had been listening to Vince or a few others they would be busted by now.  Cramer, you never know which way he is going minute by minute. Seriously, his writings should be on stock twits as much as his opinions change per day. The format he has now does not suite his style.  To me, Real Money is something that use to be useful but in all seriousness, you have some pretty good market guys on stock twits that are better than a lot on real money.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">UCLA BRUIN</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 11:32:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>