<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for AndyFinkle</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-46ad1e09" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/AndyFinkle/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:54:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Importance of Routines&amp;#8230;and Stocktwits</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4182#comment-13740407</link><description>Awesome discipline .... It's so tough out there ... "I'm a Bull - I'm a Bear, I'm a Bull- I'm a Bear" - keep doing what u do, it works excellent for u -</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:54:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CV.IM - A New Kind Of Investment Management Account</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/07/cvim-a-new-kind-of-investment-management-account.html#comment-13121669</link><description>Fred - this seems like a real game changer to me.  Congratulations on your investment in Covestor!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@A_F</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:24:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stocktwits as Matchmaker&amp;#8230;Congrats UpsideTrader and Todd Stottlemyre on &amp;#8216;Desert Shore Capital&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4176#comment-12996448</link><description>Couldn't happen to nicer guys *nore smarter ones - Congrats Todd &amp; Joe</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 10:09:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deep Market Thoughts&amp;#8230;There are NO Guru&amp;#8217;s!</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4122#comment-8927563</link><description>Shhhhhhh ...waht are you trying to get Cramer fired?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 10:12:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If Twitter Is Your RSS Reader ...</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/04/if-twitter-is-your-rss-reader-.html#comment-8543325</link><description>Thanks Fred - I have always felt that RSS should stand for Really STUPID syndication ...It is IMO a "lazy" method that "grandma" would never use.  Following @AVC now :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;twitter.com/A_F</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:23:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deep Market Thoughts&amp;#8230;From Fear to Fear!</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4113#comment-8347570</link><description>hmmmm ...a fearandgreedometor .... Theirs gold to mine in that thar Stocktwits data me thinks</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 10:00:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN Does Not Want to Lose to Ashton Kutcher - mediabistro.com: TVNewser</title><link>http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/cnn/cnn_does_not_want_to_lose_to_ashton_kutcher_114287.asp#comment-8285910</link><description>R U all Stupid??  I mean it's bad enuf that Gov is raping our children with a multi-TRILLION dollar deficit to bail out their Goldman Sachs lead crony's on wall st.  But now - You are gonna perpetuate the myth that this is something more then a really bad PR publicity stunt?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Get a life... Tweeple aren't as stupid as that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/A_F" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://twitter.com/A_F&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:22:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the GOOG 411</title><link>http://blog.stocktwits.com/2009/04/the-goog-411/#comment-8273727</link><description>WOW! after hours Goog ran to over 410 - and now back to 385 and in between @upsidetrader bought and sold it!  EVERY SINGLE PERSON in this thread is/was right!1  Didn't think that could be possible but it is ....congrats @stocktwits!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:07:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Building Atop Twitter? Keep It Simple</title><link>http://philpearlman.com/post/96639585#comment-8250371</link><description>Don't let it go to your head... YES - I was referring to you being very Cerebral ...but Let's not forget who it is that is leaving the comment "...Me and my  army a stupids" - Eric Von Zipperhead</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:52:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Building Atop Twitter? Keep It Simple</title><link>http://philpearlman.com/post/96639585#comment-8245746</link><description>So true Phil ... KISS - Keep It Simple Stupid (if I believed in Tat's I would have it written on my body).  Not only a brilliant post, but likin it because for the first time I can understand what you are saying :-) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/A_F" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://twitter.com/A_F&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:24:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Really Need Twitter Search Alternatives?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/13/twitter-search-alternatives/#comment-8136774</link><description>Hi Adam - no I did understand your comment, I just do not agree.  Personally I think the ultimate winner will NOT be Summize (Twitter), more likely will be Google - or a 3rd party who can do *live search* but not limited to the Twitterspere.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;PS - in answer to your other comment - One can already search within Twitter and limited to only certain follows using powertwitter</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:03:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Really Need Twitter Search Alternatives?</title><link>http://mashable.com/2009/04/13/twitter-search-alternatives/#comment-8127871</link><description>WOW...So according to that logic - no one should ever build something for any ecosystem (including Twitter) ...what a hoot!  Twitter (let alone Twitter Search) is in the 1st inning.  Not only WILL great money be made...It is being made currently ... Just look at &lt;a href="http://unboundtech.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;unboundtech.com&lt;/a&gt; as just one example of mining social data from Twitter and others ... They get anywhere between $3k to $50k a pop from their agency and brand clients ... Now go back to your Twitter search box and search for "Do we really need search alternatives" so you can monitor the buzz your article gets.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/A_F" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://twitter.com/A_F&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:15:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bit.ly Spelled backwards is &amp;#8216;DEVIL&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4096#comment-7893770</link><description>Can't believe no-one has figured out Bit.ly's brilliance yet... "Twitter in less than 10 characters!" ...brilliant&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;FTW &amp; ROTFL!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/A_F" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://twitter.com/A_F&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 00:13:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chartbeat - Real Time Analytics</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/04/chartbeat-real-time-analytics.html#comment-7800099</link><description>Very cool Fred - But  kinda feels like i'm looking up your blog's dress</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:36:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Killed My Blog!</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4093#comment-7762485</link><description>hmmm ...me thinks this post was just an excuse to mention an upcoming excuse  that you haven't golfed since last year....LindzonPalooza golf outing this upcoming weekend... hmmmm timing very suspect...verrryyy suspect.  Besides - If you stopped blogging where would we come for out daily dose of potty mouth online?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/A_F" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://twitter.com/A_F&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 18:26:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: $1000 Prize: Guess the Nasdaq Close Challenge</title><link>http://www.marketfolly.com/2009/04/1000-prize-guess-nasdaq-close-challenge.html#comment-7756844</link><description>1465.50</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:07:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Cool YouTube Mashup</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/03/a-cool-youtube-mashup.html#comment-7255706</link><description>Fred - I think this is just the tip of the iceburg - Had you seen an earlier blog post I wrote about this last year?;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.afpr.com/2008/11/mashups-new-content-is-king.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.afpr.com/2008/11/mashups-new-content...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/A_F" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://twitter.com/A_F&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:37:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Street.Com&amp;#8217;s NEW Jim Cramer &amp;#8216;VIP&amp;#8217; &amp;#8216;Chairman&amp;#8217; Club</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4066#comment-6743722</link><description>I have to admit that I have not visited &lt;a href="http://thestreet.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;thestreet.com&lt;/a&gt; since 1999 so perhaps they do this anyway - &lt;br&gt;In the spirit of Disqus et al (the new distributed content model) I would think that thestreet.com's ultimate biz model is in the syndication of their content.  This is especially true in light of all the cuts news media has/will have to make to get lean.  Perhaps the anti-portal?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 11:01:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Founder Dilution - How Much Is "Normal"?</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/02/founder-dilution-how-much-is-normal.html#comment-6474624</link><description>I don't disagree ...I was more thinking some of the larger Public netco's buying at good valuations &amp; LOTS of small mergers of equals.  Re your 3rd category...Lots of companies in the deadpool (IMO) never needed to get there.  Even my very 1st startup (1996) is STILL alive (albeight not making meaningful money)...and is TOTALLY self sustaining &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/tqvUi" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://bit.ly/tqvUi&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 22:05:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More on Lindzon/StocktwitsPalooza</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4055#comment-6473202</link><description>There was a TYPO in your script ...It should be Great "Debt-pression", not "Depression</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:45:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Founder Dilution - How Much Is "Normal"?</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/02/founder-dilution-how-much-is-normal.html#comment-6466944</link><description>I would think that data from a few years back will be different as a result of the economic environment we are in currently.  With the IPO market locked up, I think we will see more exits like delicious. I think this will be especially true in the lower tiers (sub $75 valuations).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hope that Sim's survey asks for dates as well, it will be interesting to see HOW things have changed (if my assumption that they have is even correct)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/A_F" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://twitter.com/A_F&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 11:35:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deep Market Thoughts&amp;#8230;Buy, Buy, Buy?&amp;#8230;or is Long Side the Wrong Side?</title><link>http://howardlindzon.com/?p=4052#comment-6401171</link><description>no reason to be a bull yet...just sayin</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:45:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does Apple Have A Blind Spot About Flash?</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/02/does-apple-have-a-blind-spot-about-flash.html#comment-6305606</link><description>I guess the question of 'when' is subjective. I do not think they will wait to long.  Nor do I think it is time yet.  I do not believe that Apple looks at Nokia as a threat (whether they should or not).  Apple more likely has RIMM in it's war room today - and likely Android in the future.  Today, &lt;a href="http://www.skyfire.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.skyfire.com&lt;/a&gt; (mobile browser fully supporting flash) works on Nokia, and the once dominant Windows mobile platforms. I believe it will be only a matter of weeks before skyfire is available for RIMM's blackberry phones.  Then Apple will have a quarter's worth of market share data to chew on before it needs to decide anything.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/A_F" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://twitter.com/A_F&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:58:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does Apple Have A Blind Spot About Flash?</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/02/does-apple-have-a-blind-spot-about-flash.html#comment-6304754</link><description>We all know that proprietary  (closed) always looses in the end (Witness AOL's demise as just one example) but it doesn't mean it's a failed strategy.  Apple should (from a business perspective) keep a lock on all their franchises until they can not.  It is only at THIS point that they should "eat their own lunch before someone does it for them".&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Does this mean I do not want Flash on an Iphone? No, as a consumer I like everyone else want open/cross platform/etc  But if I were in Jobs shoes, I would not do it any differently. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;htttp://twitter.com/A_F</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:12:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Co-Founder on Hiring PR: &amp;quot;No Plans Just Yet&amp;quot; - mediabistro.com: PRNewser</title><link>http://www.mediabistro.com/prnewser/news/twitter_cofounder_on_hiring_pr_no_plans_just_yet_108679.asp#comment-6254820</link><description>That's bcause Biz Stoned is an idiot ... Twitter thrives in spite of the 3 stooges ...what a waste... a $1 Billion valuation could have been a $15 Billion Val.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AndyFinkle</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:59:56 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>