<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Daniel S</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/9f0ac432ca1a8c0ab612952ab08d3b2d/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:01:44 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Apple Software Update</title><link>http://johnlillyblog.disqus.com/apple_software_update/#comment-1419441</link><description>Hm, that's actually what Apple did with the Beta versions of Safaro for Windows as well. You could update to the latest Safari Beta and Quicktime as well as iTunes were checked to install as well, even though I didn't ever had them installed. So nothing new actually.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Besides, I don't think this is going to help Safari in any way.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel S</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:01:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Internet Explorer 8 to Pass the Acid2 Test?</title><link>http://inpursuitofmysteries.disqus.com/internet_explorer_8_to_pass_the_acid2_test/#comment-1264911</link><description>They added a third mode. I've followed itnerviews, the HTML WG etc all along.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We are going to get a third rendering mode in IE8. But we will only be able to use it, when we opt-in. This can be concluded from Chris Wilson's statements over the last year. Remember, IE7 broke many IE6 site, this shall not happen with IE8. Thus a third rendering mode.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There's also the possibility that the HTML5-Doctype will be one of the opt-in keys to the "very standards mode".</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel S</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 07:59:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Internet Explorer 8 to Pass the Acid2 Test?</title><link>http://inpursuitofmysteries.disqus.com/internet_explorer_8_to_pass_the_acid2_test/#comment-1264914</link><description>I don't think anything like this will be standardized, as this is mostly a problem of Microsoft. In a recent IRC Chat Wilson said the opt-in will probably be a meta-tag. This doesn't seems optimal but shouldn't do any harm.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There was also the discussion that HTML5's doctype really should opt-in automatically. I hope this IE-future is just half as interesting as I currently think it is :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel S</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 05:28:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rest in Peace, Netscape</title><link>http://inpursuitofmysteries.disqus.com/rest_in_peace_netscape/#comment-1265004</link><description>I so knew this was going to come.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So after Netscape 4 and Netscape 7 which still creates headaches for webdesigners we now have another Version that will make webdesinger's life harder in 3 years and beyond.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What I think is the worst thing of all that they're still going to let people download NN 4 and all the other crappy versions of their browser.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Even if Mozilla came out of Netscape. It just should be forbidden to download any Netscape browser. This is worse than Microsoft!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel S</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 15:26:03 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>