http://disqus.com/people/9ed797ace45a4a35a94cc53e20b9c0a4/enTue, 29 Apr 2008 18:12:01 -0000http://mathewingram.disqus.com/iphone_canada_pay_me_now_or_pay_me_later_55/#comment-394594I agree Mathew, the data plan is key. Right now I have an HTC touch through Bell (and foolish me for getting the phone and the plan) and frankly both are terrible. The Window Mobile Browser is awful. The HTC touch interface is awful. The Bell service is worse than awful. The iphone is a superior product but I suspect the data plan will be cost prohibitive and they will lock you in for god knows how many years. Something you may want to follow up on is the online petition of potential Roger's Iphone customers <a href="http://www.petitiononline.com/iPhone99/" rel="nofollow">http://www.petitiononline.com/iPhone99/</a>Sudha KrishnaTue, 29 Apr 2008 18:12:01 -0000http://paidcontent.disqus.com/free_wsjcom_would_need_12x_traffic_to_offset_loss_dj_buy_to_shave_a_penny_from_nws_analyst/#comment-18831281I agree with the comment that $6 CPM seems way too low for WSJ. I understand WSJ has video ads and they are charging upwards of $90 per CPM for 15 second pre-roll ads. That information is from their video sales sheet. Now, that Murdoch owns WSJ there are all sorts of opportunities to leverage existing video news assets, and as online video usage increases I suspect those revenues will increase as wellSudha KrishnaThu, 03 Jan 2008 02:29:51 -0000