<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Francois Tremblay</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/9c72f933afcff0c77a1a4a7bc11f7521/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:43:48 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Should Objectivists Become Mormons?</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/should_objectivists_become_mormons/#comment-3710581</link><description>This entry was pure nonsense.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Which would you rather be: someone who lives in prison for 100 years, or someone who lives free for 50 years?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Longevity has not nearly as much to do with "flourishing" as you make it to be.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Francois Tremblay</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 01:20:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Support Gay Marriage, Support Religious Freedom</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/support_gay_marriage_support_religious_freedom/#comment-8243432</link><description>"If you’re privately funded, you should be free to do as you like. Want to discriminate? Fine. Just don’t take tax money to do it."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Neo-liberalist bullshit. As long as you're not public, you can be totally unaccountable and exploit whole societies as much as you want, as long as you don't "take tax money" (but you can lobby for new laws, secretely contract with foreign governments, buy slave labour, and so on).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"And… if you support discrimination laws that touch purely private interactions and that benefit yourself, then you can hardly complain when others want those same benefits for their groups, too."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hey, what about the discrimination made against unmarried people by marriage laws? How come gays shut up about that? Could it be because they want the money pot?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Francois Tremblay</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:43:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; Hydrogen Fuel Cell Toy Now on Sale</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/ohgizmo_raquo_archive_raquo_hydrogen_fuel_cell_toy_now_on_sale/#comment-1758147</link><description>Talk about high-tech propaganda.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Francois Tremblay</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 11:48:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; Magnetic Floating Bed</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/ohgizmo_raquo_archive_raquo_magnetic_floating_bed/#comment-1758169</link><description>"I hope this kind of ?studies? is not the only goal of its creator : it?s funny to sleep on a 1,200,000 euros bed when childrens die of hunger in the streets !"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A million euros will not get those government removed, but it will at least buy you a bed. I say that's a good deal.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Francois Tremblay</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 10:22:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; Navy To Get Electromagnetic Railgun</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/ohgizmo_raquo_archive_raquo_navy_to_get_electromagnetic_railgun/#comment-1758298</link><description>Great, another way for the state to kill us.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Francois Tremblay</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 12:42:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; HP&amp;#8217;s Digital Slimming Effect</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/ohgizmo_raquo_archive_raquo_hp8217s_digital_slimming_effect/#comment-1759309</link><description>I still can't believe this is not a joke.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Francois Tremblay</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 11:48:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Richard Lindzen, Skeptic</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/richard_lindzen_skeptic/#comment-13620255</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Meteorologists have zero to do with the debate on global warming. It is a purely economic debate.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Francois Tremblay</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 12:53:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Division of Labor</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/the_division_of_labor/#comment-13620449</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is ridiculous- didn&amp;#39;t you realize how easy your example is to refute? If one of them opens a business and the others don&amp;#39;t, obviously the one who does is NOT equal to the others. He has more desire for entrepreneurship!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Francois Tremblay</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 13:07:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Buying Local</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/buying_local/#comment-13620526</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Brad that sounds like a great idea!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Francois Tremblay</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 12:08:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How foreigners view the President</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/how_foreigners_view_the_president/#comment-13620626</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yea, that&amp;#39;s all well and good to say now, but the State merely forbade what it first permitted.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Francois Tremblay</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:11:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Separation of Procedures</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/separation_of_procedures/#comment-13620718</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey, how about a simple separation of justice and State? Like it used to be before the monarchies took over the court system to favour their rich friends? Just an idea out of left field here...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Francois Tremblay</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:20:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tolstoy on Hayek</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/tolstoy_on_hayek/#comment-13622487</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;That said, the existence of leaders who did make big differences--both for good and ill--demonstrates the validity of the Bush outlook. People like Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Castro, Churchill, Lincoln, Thatcher, Reagan....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;So basically they are all immoral assholes. Well, I guess that proves something, but perhaps not what he meant...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Francois Tremblay</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:57:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>