<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for ML</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/9adedadb1aa302f4c9a7a629c4e239c6/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:57:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Why tabs in FF2 suck compared to FF1.5</title><link>http://jaanus.disqus.com/why_tabs_in_ff2_suck_compared_to_ff15/#comment-22510559</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Alternatively, you could just mid-click anywhere on a tab, active or inactive, to close it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ML</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 15:54:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stargate: SG-What?</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/stargate_sg_what/#comment-21609077</link><description>Vic, you're a man after my own heart.  :P I agree with everything you wrote. It's as though you were pulling those thoughts from my brain!  :shock:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Someone upthread posted that SG-1 didn't get formed until "Emancipation." That's incorrect. In the Pilot, Hammond instructed O'Neill that he would lead a unit designated as SG-1, with Kawalsky leading SG-2. So Teal'c didn't join until episode 2. But the brass had to be convinced of his joining and he did at the end.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ML</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 09:59:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cristiano Ronaldos trudelutt sämst hittills</title><link>http://perzandersspanienblogg.disqus.com/cristiano_ronaldos_trudelutt_samst_hittills/#comment-21024246</link><description>Hahahaha! 0:25 är ju det bästa av allt, AAAAAMOR mio.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ML</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 08:37:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://siditty.blogspot.com/2008/02/circumcision-aint-that-kind-of-cruel.html</title><link>http://siditty.disqus.com/httpsidittyblogspotcom200802circumcision_aint_that_kind_of_cruelhtml/#comment-20979399</link><description>I figure that people should have the right to decide for themselves whether they want part of their genitals cut off.  If you wait, it hurts less, is less dangerous, and the results are cosmetically better.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;If my son wants to be circumcised when he's 18, then I'll pay for it.  Until then, it's &lt;B&gt;his&lt;/B&gt; body, and no-one's going to cut off the most sensitive part of his penis off.&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ML</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 04:55:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://siditty.blogspot.com/2008/02/circumcision-aint-that-kind-of-cruel.html</title><link>http://siditty.disqus.com/httpsidittyblogspotcom200802circumcision_aint_that_kind_of_cruelhtml/#comment-20979396</link><description>Men's genitals are a lot easier to keep clean than women's genitals, but women don't need surgery.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Doing it straight after birth is the worst possible time.  It's safer, hurts less, and cosmetically better to wait.  The owner of the penis also then gets a say about whether or not they want the most sensitive part of their penis cut off.  (That's right, it's not just there to protect the glans).&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ML</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 10:32:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox Sidebar + Google IG = Useful on any platform</title><link>http://ericajoy.disqus.com/firefox_sidebar_google_ig_useful_on_any_platform/#comment-2369699</link><description>Thanks alotz buddy ... great tips ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ML&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ML</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 14:22:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quicken 2005 Mac vs. PC version | A View from Judi Sohn</title><link>http://momathome.disqus.com/quicken_2005_mac_vs_pc_version_a_view_from_judi_sohn/#comment-2373381</link><description>All of you who are unhappy with Quicken might want to try out [iBank](http://www.iggsoftware.com/ibank/).  It imports Quicken files &amp;amp; runs really smoothly on the Mac.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ML</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2005 22:34:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; The DoorKnob Condition Ensures Privacy</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/ohgizmo_raquo_archive_raquo_the_doorknob_condition_ensures_privacy/#comment-1763005</link><description>Though this is a great idea, I was wondering could the knob be pushed in from the outside? That could pose a big problem is no one's inside the room...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ML</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:06:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Power Grid Neutrality</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/power_grid_neutrality/#comment-1446577</link><description>It seems to me that you are afraid of an industry capture of whatever body ends up "regulating" the internet. What player in the industry would you suspect ends up capturing this regulator agency? AOL, MS, L3 or one of the other back end providers? To me it appears that the internet, unlike the power industry, has so many more players with so many more competing interests, no one of them could end up capturing the agency. Well maybe Microsoft...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ML</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 14:03:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Contract talk</title><link>http://etblogs-sports.disqus.com/contract_talk/#comment-5695809</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I understand the age thing with Schilling, but I think he has proven himself to be a hard worker and a great pitcher over the years. I am sure the Sox have entered in to much worse contracts over the years. If we resign him for 13 Mill for 2007 and he only pitches half the season and gets hurt, it wont go down as the worst mistake in Red Sox history by any means.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just sign the guy! He has earned it!&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ML</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:47:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who wants to see an albiino raccoon?</title><link>http://etblogs-sports.disqus.com/who_wants_to_see_an_albiino_raccoon/#comment-5695815</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If you run into Del "Dog Man" Christman (Spinners Club House Manager), get an interview with that guy! I got a chance to speak with him at one of his Grandson's basketball games up in southern NH. He has some great stories about the Major leaguers that go down while rehabbing and the Red Sox organization as a whole.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ML</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:19:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Install OpenOffice 3.0 in Ubuntu 8.04 and 8.10 | Tombuntu</title><link>http://tombuntu.disqus.com/install_openoffice_30_in_ubuntu_804_and_810_tombuntu/#comment-7122475</link><description>Worked a treat, thanks!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ML</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:51:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://deepedition.com/2006/01/25/3835/</title><link>http://deepedition.disqus.com/httpdeepeditioncom200601253835/#comment-12774374</link><description>jag bär alltid mitt guld där!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ML</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 13:56:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Morgon</title><link>http://deepedition.disqus.com/morgon/#comment-12771043</link><description>Renault is the shit!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ML</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:08:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Madonna</title><link>http://deepedition.disqus.com/madonna/#comment-12774789</link><description>jag tyckte att hon var hot när jag gick i femman men nu nääääääää</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ML</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:10:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Energy Usage Increases Despite Efficiency Efforts</title><link>http://treehuggerdev.disqus.com/energy_usage_increases_despite_efficiency_efforts/#comment-17194190</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It would be useful to include a link to the mentioned study, or a least its exact reference.&lt;br  /&gt;&lt;br&gt;Furthermore, from this post it is unclear whether the increase in electricity usage is due to an increase in power consumption of typical devices (such as the average TV), an increase in the number of devices per household, an increase in the number of "households" around the earth, an increase in the number of people per household. The world population has increased about 28% since 1990 so if the electrical household consumption only increased by 3.4%, it would seem to me that people are on average using less electricity at home.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, the study can only be accessed for a fee, but I would be interested to find out exactly what the 3.4% figure is about.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Matt&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ML</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 01:49:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gravitational Vortex Power Plant is Safe for Fish</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/gravitational_vortex_power_plant_is_safe_for_fish/#comment-17508026</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There are many applications this could be used for that do not involve streams and would not harm wildlife. This concept could be utilized anywhere water is stored and flushed out, such as water treatment plants or even water towers. If the full potential of this concept were realized this concept could even work on a smaller scale within sewage systems and underground piping. Even public pools could use this technology to recover evergy when draining the pool. This concept could really take off if people bacame really inventive and considered the distance water travels before it is redirected back into our waterways.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ML</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 23:29:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Energy Usage Increases Despite Efficiency Efforts</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/energy_usage_increases_despite_efficiency_efforts/#comment-17616410</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It would be useful to include a link to the mentioned study, or a least its exact reference.&lt;br  /&gt;&lt;br&gt;Furthermore, from this post it is unclear whether the increase in electricity usage is due to an increase in power consumption of typical devices (such as the average TV), an increase in the number of devices per household, an increase in the number of "households" around the earth, an increase in the number of people per household. The world population has increased about 28% since 1990 so if the electrical household consumption only increased by 3.4%, it would seem to me that people are on average using less electricity at home.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, the study can only be accessed for a fee, but I would be interested to find out exactly what the 3.4% figure is about.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Matt&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ML</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 22:49:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.crimene.ws/2007/12/megan-had-it-coming-is-hoax-part-iii.html</title><link>http://trenchreynoldscrimenews.disqus.com/httpwwwcrimenews200712megan_had_it_coming_is_hoax_part_iiihtml/#comment-17983803</link><description>The original posts have been taken down from MHIC ; the final post is still there though. I was able to still pull up the old ones through Google Cache last night, but not today.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ML</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:56:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.virtualization.info/2009/07/gartner-vmware-may-be-next-novell.html</title><link>http://virtualization.disqus.com/httpwwwvirtualizationinfo200907gartner_vmware_may_be_next_novellhtml/#comment-18264296</link><description>at least Gartner knows how to spell VMware.... :)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;VMware aren&amp;#39;t going to get wiped out any time soon but they certainly are going to lose market share to Microsoft, particularly in the mid-market space that VMware has so fair failed to capture due to primarily price.   There were some figures released a few months back that suggested that 70% of the market that has not virtualised yet sits in the SMB/E environment....the majority of this will fall to Microsoft rather than VMware...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;VMware for Enterprise virtualisation with all the bells and whistles.....Microsoft for those that are just doing simple consolidations..</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ML</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 22:54:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: THIS IS IT!</title><link>http://nicklasidol2009tv4.disqus.com/this_is_it/#comment-20383892</link><description>klipp inte av dig luggen!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ML</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:57:27 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>