<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for http://www.dominicsayers.com</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/98fac8646ac658c6078ae8b597deb5d1/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 04:46:44 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Microsoft to support OpenID</title><link>http://phildawesstuff.disqus.com/microsoft_to_support_openid/#comment-2753526</link><description>I have nothing interesting to say, I'm just using my OpenID to leave a comment for the sake of it :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.dominicsayers.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 05:44:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft to support OpenID</title><link>http://phildawesstuff.disqus.com/microsoft_to_support_openid/#comment-2753527</link><description>I have nothing interesting to say, I just wanted to leave a comment using my OpenID to sign in :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.dominicsayers.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 05:45:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft to support OpenID</title><link>http://phildawesstuff.disqus.com/microsoft_to_support_openid/#comment-2753529</link><description>Malcolm and JP's blog tell you that your comment is awaiting moderation. Not sure about mine.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyway, can you delete one of my comments to stop me looking such a tit?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.dominicsayers.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 08:35:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Transactional Memory is the wrong path to concurrency</title><link>http://phildawesstuff.disqus.com/transactional_memory_is_the_wrong_path_to_concurrency/#comment-2753532</link><description>I think he's right that it could get abused, but he's wrong to say it is therefore a Bad Thing. Database programmers and designers try to avoid contention but the locking and transactional mechanisms are there because it is unavoidable. Not being a multi-core programmer I don't know how well this analogy stretches but it seems to me that code should be shared-nothing as far as possible but that transactional memory is a Good Thing to have for those occasions when shared state is inevitable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Probably a good thing that I don't write code anymore :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">http://www.dominicsayers.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 04:46:44 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>