<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Warren Baird</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/981345590e018c2ea13c4ad0032bf3c8/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:08:19 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Virtual Adventures</title><link>http://theappslab.disqus.com/virtual_adventures_50/#comment-2547117</link><description>I've been using VMWare Fusion on my macbook pro for probably 6 months now, and I'm pretty happy with it...  I've run both XP and Linux images and they work quite well.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They are even pretty responsive if I'm not running anything too memory hoggish on the native side...  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Too bad Oracle VM isn't available for the Mac yet...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Warren Baird</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 17:46:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Play Name the Platform</title><link>http://theappslab.disqus.com/play_name_the_platform_36/#comment-672664</link><description>Out of curiosity - why not stick with either mix or connect?   Both are great names for the concept.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think it's quite defensible and not confusing to call the platform 'Mix', and to describe 'Connect' as an internal deployment of Mix.    Or vice-versa.  :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Warren Baird</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:55:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OS X, Ubuntu and Other Fun Stuff</title><link>http://theappslab.disqus.com/os_x_ubuntu_and_other_fun_stuff_89/#comment-1051911</link><description>actually - vpnc can connect to Cisco VPN.   Out of the box it won't work with Oracle's VPN, since the support for certificates is turned off, but I understand that if you build from source and turn on certificate support it works fine with Oracle's VPN.   I plan on trying it sometime soon - I'll let you know if it works.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Warren Baird</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:09:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OS X, Ubuntu and Other Fun Stuff</title><link>http://theappslab.disqus.com/os_x_ubuntu_and_other_fun_stuff_89/#comment-1053518</link><description>I think my experience has  somewhat mirrored Rich's --- I've used linux since the bad-old-days of kernel 0.9.x on a 386, and I must admit that when I moved to a macbook pro for my personal machine - I didn't miss *at all* the mucking around with config files, and recompiling kernel modules I had to do on linux.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That being said, it is true that Ubuntu is getting closer and closer to the point where you don't need to mess about too much.   but it still has a long way to go.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just one small example - external monitors.  I can plug my mbp into an external monitor, and after a moment my desktop automatically grows to include the new monitor, and I can continue working.   it almost always guesses the right resolution, and it's easy to tell it the orientation, and it remembers the orientation and resolution if I connect to a similar monitor later.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With Linux (Ubuntu 7.10 at least), the only approach I've found that works is to edit the Xorg.conf file to have configurations and layouts for all my monitors - and then I have to kill my X session and start a new X session manually with the correct layout.   Not my idea of 'usable'.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Warren Baird</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:32:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OS X, Ubuntu and Other Fun Stuff</title><link>http://theappslab.disqus.com/os_x_ubuntu_and_other_fun_stuff_89/#comment-1055424</link><description>well - if you find a solution to the multiple monitor thing - definitely let me know.   I've heard that the Xorg people are making strides in that direction - but I don't think they've solved the problem yet...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Warren Baird</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:51:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OS X, Ubuntu and Other Fun Stuff</title><link>http://theappslab.disqus.com/os_x_ubuntu_and_other_fun_stuff_89/#comment-1060749</link><description>The problem with PC's is that the "same hardware" isn't.   My laptop is a dell d410, and when I was offered it through work, I checked the linux hardware compatibility pages, and it was listed as having a fully supported wireless chipset (Don't remember if it was intel or atheros).   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When I got mine however, it had a broadcom chipset, so I had months of futzing with it before I could get wireless working reliably.  Fortunately Broadcom support has improved a lot since then.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The problem is that unless you roll your own hardware, you generally have no idea what mobo, chipset, video, etc you are going to get if you go with a big name box...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;IMO that's one of the advantages of Apple - they don't just shove whatever's cheapest that week in the box, you get very consistent hardware from machine to machine...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Warren Baird</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:33:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Measuring the Cost of a Computer</title><link>http://theappslab.disqus.com/measuring_the_cost_of_a_computer_18/#comment-1125059</link><description>Yeah, I agree with the comments about hardware not necessarily being a commodity.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When I bought my macbook pro - I would have been fairly open to buying a non-apple laptop and running linux on it.   However, my criteria included:&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;ul&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;li&amp;gt; 15" display, with graphics card powerful enough to drive a 30" 2560x1600 monitor&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;li&amp;gt; no more than about 6 lbs weight&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;ul&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;That was enough to narrow it down to the mbp (which has about 3 hours battery life), or an alienware laptop that reportedly got about 45 minutes of battery life.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now, maybe my requirements aren't that common, and this was 8 months ago, so the landscape may have changed, but I went through a very similar process when I bought a 12" ibook about 4 years ago.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Certainly every laptop I've bought, the decision has been primarily made on hardware considerations rather than OS.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Warren Baird</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 13:48:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Want to Help Socialize OpenWorld?</title><link>http://theappslab.disqus.com/want_to_help_socialize_openworld_12/#comment-1732680</link><description>&amp;gt; Now, if only I could get a hotel room in the city and skip the 30 minute drive&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; up from the airport hotel where I’m currently installed. Ideas?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;check back at the OOW housing page *often*.   a co-worker clued me in to a better hotel yesterday, and I managed to get moved from near the airport to hotel just a couple of km from Moscone...   But it was the *only* open room at the hotel...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I was contemplating writing a screen-scraper that'd check for better rooms every five minutes and notify me if it found anything - but (as is so often the case) the old-fashioned approach won first.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Warren Baird</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:08:19 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>