<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Venkatakrishna Nalamothu</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/97c351b9c4f8ca28d19b74f129a54bf6/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:46:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Thinking About GOOG This Morning</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/thinking_about_goog_this_morning_21/#comment-184287</link><description>I fully agree with your opinion. Investors sometimes over react to bad news. Go long and earn money. I will invest in Google.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Venkatakrishna Nalamothu</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:02:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Knol is Google's Wikia (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/knol_is_googles_wikia_scripting_news/#comment-1030364</link><description>But whether you like it or not, Knoll is going to kill Wikipedia. Most of the wikipedia traffic is through search which will be occupied by Knol. Knol is windows while Wikipedia will become Linux. Experts may use Linux but ordinary netizens will use Knol.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Venkatakrishna Nalamothu</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:47:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does the rapid descent of Google&amp;#8217;s stock mean anything? Nobody knows.</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/does_the_rapid_descent_of_google8217s_stock_mean_anything_nobody_knows/#comment-14683076</link><description>It is investor's over reaction. Accumulate more of Google stock. Google is a fundamentally sound company with good growth prospects.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Venkatakrishna Nalamothu</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 06:48:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: 15 Tips on Improving Search Engine Visibility</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/louisgraycom_15_tips_on_improving_search_engine_visibility/#comment-3877026</link><description>.com domain is waste if your content is related to a particuclar country. I selected .in domain for my blog on Indian stock markets which helped me in getting good Google traffic. Good article otherwise.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Venkatakrishna Nalamothu</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:46:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Knol starting to smell spammy</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/google_knol_starting_to_smell_spammy/#comment-1034492</link><description>Gogle may find it difficult to separate authoritative content from spam. Ratings may help to some extent.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Venkatakrishna Nalamothu</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 04:51:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why You Cannot Make Quick Money Off Blogging</title><link>http://gauravonomicsblog.disqus.com/why_you_cannot_make_quick_money_off_blogging/#comment-3037549</link><description>If you get around 1000 page views per day, you can easily earn $10 per day. It depends on the niche and adsense optimisation. You should optimise your blog for search engines.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Venkatakrishna Nalamothu</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 13:42:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2006/12/14/19-ways-to-make-social-sites-pay/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_0492/#comment-5910540</link><description>What a collection. I have heard that some sites offer money sor spotting trends.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Venkatakrishna Nalamothu</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 02:51:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Acquiring Feedburner?</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/google_acquiring_feedburner/#comment-5946563</link><description>Feedburner is a perfect fit in the future growth plans of Google. Though RSS is still not widely used, acquisition of feed burner will give Google a new market of advanced publishers.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Venkatakrishna Nalamothu</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 08:06:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/03/05/adobe-air-apps/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_60507/#comment-5996766</link><description>Google analytics web application is very good but stockQ needs further development.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Venkatakrishna Nalamothu</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 10:09:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 50 Steps to Establishing a Consistent Social Media Practice</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/50_steps_to_establishing_a_consistent_social_media_practice/#comment-8521944</link><description>Extensive useful list for every blogger. Some ideas like profile updating helps enormously. Link building should be a continous process. Web 2.0 helps in this regard.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Venkatakrishna Nalamothu</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:04:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Never underestimate Microsoft&amp;#8217;s ability to turn a corner</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/never_underestimate_microsoft8217s_ability_to_turn_a_corner/#comment-9711648</link><description>Microsoft announced online ad product and live search. What happened? nothing. Why? Lack of execution skills. This is the biggest problem with Microsoft in recent days. What happened to ipod killer? Still, I am not underestimating them. Strange!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Venkatakrishna Nalamothu</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 22:06:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s Old is New: Web Site Marketing Tips</title><link>http://toprankblog.disqus.com/what8217s_old_is_new_web_site_marketing_tips/#comment-17128667</link><description>According to Google experts, 25% of search queries are new ones. It is better to focus on content instead of seo and others.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Venkatakrishna Nalamothu</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 21:36:59 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>