<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Steve</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/95b8a6df6d265cf57a4d89ee4856ea98/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:37:46 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Why I Don't Like The iPod Touch</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/why_i_dont_like_the_ipod_touch_22/#comment-85851</link><description>iPod Touch is fantastic for video (podcasts and TV content), and for web browsing. I have a number of web-enabled phones (inc. a Nokia e61) and the iPod browser is the best mob. browser bar none.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Buying an iPod Touch primarily for music is a bit of a waste, and I'm not surprised you don't love it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:18:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Congrats, Mike &amp;#8212; nice April Fool prank</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/congrats_mike_8212_nice_april_fool_prank/#comment-1312658</link><description>&lt;a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/social/?p=126" rel="nofollow"&gt;I spotted it too&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 18:00:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Interviews: phone, email &amp;mdash; which is best&amp;#63;</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/interviews_phone_email_mdash_which_is_best63/#comment-1313844</link><description>A good journalist knows which tool is best for which job. Email interviews work well with some people, with a certain kind of story. The advantage is speed and accuracy of quote. On the other hand, I wouldn't 'cross examine' an interviewee via email.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:52:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MSFT: Hey, we can do p2p video too</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/msft_hey_we_can_do_p2p_video_too/#comment-1315093</link><description>Hi Mathew,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I got to check out LiveStation today. &lt;a href="http://www.last100.com/2007/07/06/review-livestation-more-live-tv-on-your-pc/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Here's my review&lt;/a&gt;. As always, and as you say, it will come down to content.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 13:32:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MSFT: Hey, we can do p2p video too</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/msft_hey_we_can_do_p2p_video_too/#comment-1315094</link><description>Thanks for the link :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 17:40:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Whose bandwidth is it anyway&amp;#63;</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/whose_bandwidth_is_it_anyway63/#comment-1315569</link><description>Thanks for the link Mathew. Hope you're good :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Steve</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 12:59:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: mesh2008 dates &amp;#8212; and meshU</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/mesh2008_dates_8212_and_meshu_11/#comment-90248</link><description>Phew! When I saw the headline with the word "meshU" I thought you were about to launch yet another social network. :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:21:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogs and the attribution dilemma</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/blogs_and_the_attribution_dilemma_38/#comment-452644</link><description>I think you're spot on Mathew, and tbh, I've always thought you set the right high standard here. A link costs nothing, and if you look at blog stats as often as I do, a very small percentage click through anyway, so it's like you're sending thousands of people away!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 16:40:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google: Find it, then help you watch it</title><link>http://mathewingram.disqus.com/google_find_it_then_help_you_watch_it_64/#comment-761901</link><description>As always, thanks for the link :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Steve</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:22:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Revision3 raises $8M more for niche TV</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/revision3_raises_8m_more_for_niche_tv/#comment-14676136</link><description>Hi -- great post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here's my thoughts on the investment:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.last100.com/2007/06/25/revision3-gets-8-million-dollar-cash-injection/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.last100.com/2007/06/25/revision3-get...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 08:29:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sources: HTC&amp;#8217;s Google Android phone is &amp;#8220;weeks away&amp;#8221; from launching</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/sources_htc8217s_google_android_phone_is_8220weeks_away8221_from_launching/#comment-1440680</link><description>Interesting stuff, and very plausible re: the launch date. However, maybe &lt;a href="http://www.last100.com/2008/08/13/why-google-should-have-developed-its-own-gphone/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Google should have made a Gphone of its own&lt;/a&gt;? Only time will tell, and we don't have to wait too much longer.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:52:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ReadWriteWeb dumps AltSearchEngines</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/readwriteweb_dumps_altsearchengines/#comment-3493292</link><description>Love the headline :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;More over at last100 (I was late as I was at a hospital appointment and therefore offline).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.last100.com/2008/11/04/last100-has-left-rww/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.last100.com/2008/11/04/last100-has-l...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:53:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ReadWriteWeb dumps AltSearchEngines</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/readwriteweb_dumps_altsearchengines/#comment-3493298</link><description>&lt;a href="http://last100.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;last100.com&lt;/a&gt; too :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.last100.com/2008/11/04/last100-has-left-rww/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.last100.com/2008/11/04/last100-has-l...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:54:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Joost Pursues Live TV</title><link>http://znf.disqus.com/joost_pursues_live_tv/#comment-1509739</link><description>Silverlight UI?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Live TV?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sounds like LiveStation to me :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Keep up the great blog,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Steve, &lt;a href="http://last100.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;last100.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:00:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DivX Looks Outside The Codec For The Future Of Web Video</title><link>http://znf.disqus.com/divx_looks_outside_the_codec_for_the_future_of_web_video/#comment-1513750</link><description>What a fantastic article. Thanks :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 09:53:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Done With GTA IV</title><link>http://znf.disqus.com/done_with_gta_iv/#comment-1513777</link><description>You just burst my bubble. It was next on my list after I complete Assassin's Creed on the PS3.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 11:16:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Done With GTA IV</title><link>http://znf.disqus.com/done_with_gta_iv/#comment-1513781</link><description>@ Dave&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Phew!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 12:12:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube and Apple: my predictions were right</title><link>http://lucafiligheddu.disqus.com/youtube_and_apple_my_predictions_were_right/#comment-3050560</link><description>You might be interested in this post on last100&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.last100.com/2007/06/06/joosts-new-ceo-points-to-a-set-top-box-future/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.last100.com/2007/06/06/joosts-new-ce...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 18:13:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube and Apple: my predictions were right</title><link>http://lucafiligheddu.disqus.com/youtube_and_apple_my_predictions_were_right/#comment-3050562</link><description>Thanks Luca (and for publishing the update!).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 13:47:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 10 Blogs I read</title><link>http://lucafiligheddu.disqus.com/top_10_blogs_i_read/#comment-3051221</link><description>Hi Luca,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm honored that you read last100 first in your technology feeds. Thanks for sharing that with your readers. We'll try to live up to it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Steve, &lt;a href="http://last100.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;last100.com&lt;/a&gt; editor</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:42:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: LinkedIn Opening Platform</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/linkedin_opening_platform/#comment-1636994</link><description>I posted on this &lt;a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/social/?p=207" rel="nofollow"&gt;over at my zdnet blog a week or so ago&lt;/a&gt;. I think LinkedIn needs to do something to add more value for non-paying users.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:10:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In search of the valley - DRM free</title><link>http://wwwgadgetguyde.disqus.com/in_search_of_the_valley_drm_free/#comment-2401937</link><description>Thanks for the support!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Steve (Director)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:10:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2006/11/14/yourpitch-on-mashable/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_1201/#comment-5908857</link><description>That's an interesting concept. Looking forward to seeing how it works out.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:42:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2007/02/24/bittorrent-store/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_0177/#comment-5922897</link><description>Check out &lt;a href="http://www.victortrac.com/streamburst-brilliant" rel="nofollow"&gt;Streamburst&lt;/a&gt;, an interesting alternative to DRM. It's a paid-for download service that offers non-DRM downloads in MPEG4, with high quality (Mac/PC/Linux), portable (e.g. iPod, PSP), and mobile options.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm using to service to distribute my film, &lt;a href="insearchofthevalley.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;In Search of the Valley&lt;/a&gt;: thre friends' journey into the psyche of Silicon Valley.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 07:13:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2007/06/16/youtube-mobile-site/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_163/#comment-5951231</link><description>I tried out the service today and found it to be seriously lacking. &lt;a href="http://www.last100.com/2007/06/17/review-youtube-mobile/" rel="nofollow"&gt;See my full review&lt;/a&gt;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 13:58:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2007/07/05/livestation/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_696/#comment-5965297</link><description>I got let into the Beta today, and have &lt;a href="http://www.last100.com/2007/07/06/review-livestation-more-live-tv-on-your-pc/" rel="nofollow"&gt;published a hands-on review&lt;/a&gt;. It's a nice app, but as ever, it will come down to content -- which at the moment is non-existent.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 13:27:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2007/10/14/blog-action-day/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_98286/#comment-5981141</link><description>Here's our Blog Action Day contribution:&lt;br&gt;5 Environmental Internet TV offerings&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.last100.com/2007/10/15/blog-action-day-five-environmental-internet-tv-offerings/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.last100.com/2007/10/15/blog-action-d...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 09:53:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2007/10/31/free-and-legal-music/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_0226/#comment-5983702</link><description>A bit misleading. I'm pretty sure MP3 blogs aren't legal, in that the downloads aren't licensed in any way.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:39:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Abandoned Metal Gear Solid 4 (for now)</title><link>http://daleisphere.disqus.com/i_abandoned_metal_gear_solid_4_for_now/#comment-5510852</link><description>I even found version 1 on PS to have too many cut scenes. By the sound of it indulgent is an understatement on version 4. GTA on the other hand is perfect in this respect.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:00:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: E3 2008 Sony: Movie-TV Service Launch - Not Much More</title><link>http://daleisphere.disqus.com/e3_2008_sony_movie_tv_service_launch_not_much_more/#comment-5510875</link><description>Nice summary Dale.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Also worth noting: there will be no video store in Europe until sometime next year!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.last100.com/2008/07/18/no-playstation-3-video-store-in-the-uk-untill-sometime-next-year/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.last100.com/2008/07/18/no-playstatio...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:48:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woz on stage at University of Washington Computer Science department</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/woz_on_stage_at_university_of_washington_computer_science_department/#comment-9657595</link><description>Woz fans might be interested in hearing about my debut documentary on Silicon Valley, called &lt;a href="http://www.insearchofthevalley.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;In Search of the Valley&lt;/a&gt;. It features Woz and many Apple and Silicon Valley legends.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Steve&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.insearchofthevalley.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.insearchofthevalley.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 14:44:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reading feeds</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/reading_feeds/#comment-9685797</link><description>Great resource, your link blog and OPML file. I was about to email you this cool guest post over at last100  &lt;a href="http://www.last100.com/2007/07/11/microsoft-on-your-telly-a-history-of-the-companys-internet-tv-strategy/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.last100.com/2007/07/11/microsoft-on-...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Enjoy!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:37:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: Can Skype replace your landline?</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/poll_can_skype_replace_your_landline/#comment-9505356</link><description>@andray&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The poll widget comes from &lt;a href="http://wordpress.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;wordpress.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Steve</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 10:07:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mozilla Labs working on making mobile browsing a snip</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/mozilla_labs_working_on_making_mobile_browsing_a_snip/#comment-9505349</link><description>I'm enjoying Nokia's browser on my e61 (based on Apple's Safari). But I think the 'Joey' idea could work well.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 10:26:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Joost &amp;#8216;opens&amp;#8217; to the public &amp;#8212; full review</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/joost_8216opens8217_to_the_public_8212_full_review/#comment-9505473</link><description>I'm catching up with the invites! Thanks for stopping by everyone :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 17:11:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When will Steve Jobs open up the AppleTV?</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/when_will_steve_jobs_open_up_the_appletv/#comment-9505554</link><description>@l0rdr0ck&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The AppleTV plug-in Loader does look promising. I'm waiting for a GUI installer for the whole lot, rather than having to SSH in etc. Then it matters less whether Apple officially let's in third party developers.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 17:47:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BT and Sony to bring VoIP to PSP</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/bt_and_sony_to_bring_voip_to_psp/#comment-9505561</link><description>I've updated the post with more details, and it seems that the service will only work with BT Internet connections -- which I don't think includes FON.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 13:48:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will ISPs spoil the online video party?</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/will_isps_spoil_the_online_video_party/#comment-9505573</link><description>@Aaron, I meant to put the word illegal in speech marks as I do later in the article - as in "illegal". Of course the networks themselves aren't illegal, just some of the activity that takes place on them. I've updated the post.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 12:27:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Introducing Babelgum (Joost isn&amp;#8217;t the only game in town)</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/introducing_babelgum_joost_isn8217t_the_only_game_in_town/#comment-9505614</link><description>Joost on my Mac mini recognised the Apple Remote. So I expect any programmable remote could work with either service.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 16:44:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft set to reveal answer to iPhone</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/microsoft_set_to_reveal_answer_to_iphone/#comment-9505618</link><description>@Peter&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Very Good!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 09:57:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iTunes hides account details in DRM-free downloads</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/itunes_hides_account_details_in_drm_free_downloads/#comment-9505633</link><description>@Decklane&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree that it's wrong to charge more for DRM-free music, and also wrong not to tell customers that there is hidden data in the file.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@lIHd&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I still wouldn't call it DRM because it's not managing your rights using technology. It doesn't stop you doing anything legal e.g. making a backup, or converting to use on different devices. It just makes copies tracable -- which of course you *should* be told about.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 16:33:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone release date; ad campaign begins</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/iphone_release_date_ad_campaign_begins/#comment-9505637</link><description>I'm also waiting for the UK release. The ads are some of the best from Apple in years. I don't know why they don't market the Mac OSX in the same way -- instead of just showing off the hardware looks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 15:30:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wii Media Center?</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/wii_media_center/#comment-9505641</link><description>@Andrew&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Whilst it clearly isn't intended as a media center, it works very well at accessing Flash-based video online. And sales-wise it's trumped the others as a gaming device too.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 09:51:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Joost&amp;#8217;s new CEO points to a set-top-box future</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/joost8217s_new_ceo_points_to_a_set_top_box_future/#comment-9505650</link><description>I didn't know that BitTorrent was running on Symbian mobiles. It's been disappointing not to see a Skype client for my Nokia e61.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 14:22:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Joost&amp;#8217;s new CEO points to a set-top-box future</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/joost8217s_new_ceo_points_to_a_set_top_box_future/#comment-9505652</link><description>@Ryan&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nice setup, especially the use of mouse gestures.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 08:57:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Joost&amp;#8217;s new CEO points to a set-top-box future</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/joost8217s_new_ceo_points_to_a_set_top_box_future/#comment-9505664</link><description>@Motorcycle Guy&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I never suggested that Joost would make the set-top-box themselves but that they would partner with other companies like Skype has. So think Netgear, Linkysys or even other players in the space such as Microsoft, Sony or Apple.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 06:21:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: RealPlayer 11</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/review_realplayer_11/#comment-9505677</link><description>@Sherif&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hear you! Having said that, the download feature and iTunes-like jukebox library works well. But if you have no need for these features, fair enough. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:07:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone&amp;#8217;s support for 3rd party apps won&amp;#8217;t please everyone</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/iphone8217s_support_for_3rd_party_apps_won8217t_please_everyone/#comment-9505719</link><description>@Mitch&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Flash support on iPhone has not been confirmed, and I'm doubtful it will happen. My reasoning is two-fold: First, Steve Jobs would have made a big deal about it today, surely? Second, YouTube is already converting its catalogue to Apple's favored h.264 codec ready for AppleTV. Which would also suit the iPhone.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:12:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone still missing support for Flash</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/iphone_still_missing_support_for_flash/#comment-9505728</link><description>Many blogs are reporting that Apple staff at WWDC have confirmed that the iPhone won't support Flash, at least not *yet*.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:31:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone&amp;#8217;s support for 3rd party apps won&amp;#8217;t please everyone</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/iphone8217s_support_for_3rd_party_apps_won8217t_please_everyone/#comment-9505721</link><description>I agree Voice over IP would be a major block to Apple "selling" to iPhone to mobile operators.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:22:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Steve Jobs: iPhone is magical (battery life increased)</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/steve_jobs_iphone_is_magical_battery_life_increased/#comment-9505765</link><description>@Heath&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I couldn't have said it better myself (want to write for last100? ;) )&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If the iPhone's connectivity is below par, then it will really impact on the device's usefullness. Which, as you say, is made more dependent because any 3rd party apps will be web-based. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With a 2 year plan required (if that remains the case), you could be locked in on a broken promise.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:44:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft rebrands its IPTV plaftorm, adds PC to TV functionality</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/microsoft_rebrands_its_iptv_plaftorm_adds_pc_to_tv_functionality/#comment-9505758</link><description>@Bill&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You are completely correct that none of those companies invented their product category. If you look at innovation vs invention, in the tech industry it's often about who is able to innovate in terms of bringing said product to market. iPod for example, is a lovely product, and in some ways was better than other digital music players before it, but also was marketed very differently -- based on simple features and "1,000 songs in your pocket" -- coupled with the elegant iTunes jukebox/store.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:09:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Opera responds to iPhone-envy</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/opera_responds_to_iphone_envy/#comment-9505778</link><description>@Daniel&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for clearing that up -- thought as much. It reminds me of the way Palm's (previously Handspring) Blazer browser worked, if I remember correctly.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:16:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VeohTV has Joost in its sights</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/veohtv_has_joost_in_its_sights/#comment-9505776</link><description>@Ido&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't have any invites I'm afraid. Hoping to get some, so keep an eye out on last100.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:59:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Could RealPlayer 11 encourage more DRM?</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/could_realplayer_11_encourage_more_drm/#comment-9505783</link><description>@Claude&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don't get me started on DRM!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 16:59:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Five resources to create a Wii media center</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/five_resources_to_create_a_wii_media_center/#comment-9505800</link><description>@Kate&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks, corrected! That's what I get for not drinking enough coffee. (Now should I delete your comment and pretend it never happened?)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:11:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Apple doesn&amp;#8217;t need Universal Music</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/why_apple_doesn8217t_need_universal_music/#comment-9505934</link><description>@Jeff&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Everybody I know has an iPod, even my Dad :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 19:25:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Zattoo - live TV on your PC</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/zattoo_live_tv_on_your_pc/#comment-9505916</link><description>Every Internet TV service I've tested which offers mainstream content, suffers from World rights issues. It's a pain to say the least. The strangest one is that UK users can't usually access BBC World (the commercial Int. offering of BBC content), even though we pay for the Beeb!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 19:28:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: VeohTV</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/review_veohtv/#comment-9505961</link><description>@Kate&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Being a Mac user myself, I know how you feel. Joost has a mac version but it's Intel Mac-only. RealPlayer's support for Mac has always been poor, but I'll ping them to find out if a Mac version of 11 is planned.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Zattoo has a great Mac version, but only works in a few European countries!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Have you checked out Democracy Player (soon to be renamed and re-launched)? We'll be reviewing that soon.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Steve</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 19:04:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: VeohTV</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/review_veohtv/#comment-9505964</link><description>@Kate&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I pinged my contact at Real, Matt Spragins (Dir of Product), about a Mac version of RealPlayer 11, and he said to expect a Beta "before the end of the year". Yay.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 17:46:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: LiveStation (more live TV on your PC)</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/review_livestation_more_live_tv_on_your_pc/#comment-9505978</link><description>@Klian&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There will be a Mac version eventually, from what I heard. The application is built on Microsoft's Silverlight technology which runs on multiple platforms.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 06:16:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does live TV over the net make sense?</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/does_live_tv_over_the_net_make_sense/#comment-9505984</link><description>Talking of BBC Worldwide, the strangest thing to me is the number of Internet TV apps I've tried which offer BBC Worldwide content (the overseas commercial arm of the BBC), but only to non-UK Internet users. Very odd -- something to do with not allowing ad-supported BBC content to be seen by license-fee paying Brits.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 11:13:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft on your telly: a history of the company&amp;#8217;s Internet TV strategy</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/microsoft_on_your_telly_a_history_of_the_company8217s_internet_tv_strategy/#comment-9505994</link><description>Thanks for the link Mark. We'll look into that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:17:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Use iTunes to stream music over the Internet</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/use_itunes_to_stream_music_over_the_internet/#comment-9506026</link><description>There are definitely other ways of streaming your iTunes collection over the web. However, we found that Simplify Media made it particularly simple to do. So it's a nice alternative to other methods.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 18:26:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Zune users to be paid for sharing songs?</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/zune_users_to_be_paid_for_sharing_songs/#comment-9506029</link><description>Sounds like it ;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:16:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;MusicPal&amp;#8221;, Freecom&amp;#8217;s new portable Internet radio</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/8220musicpal8221_freecom8217s_new_portable_internet_radio/#comment-9506046</link><description>I agree -- the RSS feeds are fun on the Squeezebox, and will be on MusicPal, but the screen is too small to really be useful beyond catching a sports score or breaking news headline. I also agree that the pricing is very reasonable for the MusicPal. If my house didn't already stream iTunes to every room but the bathroom, I'd buy one. Hang on a minute, there's an idea!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 17:03:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft&amp;#8217;s Internet TV strategy: today and in the future</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/microsoft8217s_internet_tv_strategy_today_and_in_the_future/#comment-9506060</link><description>@Ryan,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for letting us know of your setup. Looks cool.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:12:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VeohTV could feel the wrath of content owners</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/veohtv_could_feel_the_wrath_of_content_owners/#comment-9506049</link><description>@David&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regular search engines don't display all the content, but rather, link to it. So it actually sends traffic back to the originating site. So it's slightly different.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 18:50:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democracy Player is dead, long live Miro</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/democracy_player_is_dead_long_live_miro/#comment-9506072</link><description>@Mike&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's a great idea, and something we've been looking at. In the interim, I might write a round-up post, recapping and comparing all the Internet TV services we've covered since we launch two months ago.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 18:09:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Survey: consumers want an Internet-connected TV</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/survey_consumers_want_an_internet_connected_tv/#comment-9506088</link><description>I think there are a number of factors. First, as the article mentions, not everybody has a local area network (WiFi or otherwise), yet. This is changing fast, as more people get broadband and want it to be spread around the house. The second factor is ease-of-use. Things are getting easier to network, but not easy enough. The third factor is, as always, content!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:12:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Democracy Player is dead, long live Miro</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/democracy_player_is_dead_long_live_miro/#comment-9506074</link><description>@Greig&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's not a copyright issue -- in fact downloading potentially creates more IP issues. I also believe that streaming will be added in the future.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 11:34:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Five UK Internet TV offerings compared</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/five_uk_internet_tv_offerings_compared/#comment-9506124</link><description>@Ben&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There must be a platform agnostic DRM out there. I believe Jaman, which offers paid-for downloads, is Mac and PC compatible, for example. Apple not licensing its DRM is only relevant to any discussion around the iPod/iPhone. So, yes, it's poor play by Channel4, BBC and the rest, who've all bought into Microsoft's Windows Media solution.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:06:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 8 Internet TV apps in 8 weeks</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/8_internet_tv_apps_in_8_weeks/#comment-9506165</link><description>@Charles&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As the iPlayer only comes out tomorrow, we haven't had a chance to get our hands on it yet (we tried to get in on the Beta). But, rest assured, we'll have a review a.s.a.p.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:06:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft on your telly: a history of the company&amp;#8217;s Internet TV strategy</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/microsoft_on_your_telly_a_history_of_the_company8217s_internet_tv_strategy/#comment-9506016</link><description>Nice one oneup. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 18:31:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Video of the week: &amp;#8220;Ask A Ninja&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/video_of_the_week_8220ask_a_ninja8221/#comment-9506270</link><description>I have to confess, I'm yet to check them out. That's set to change this weekend.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:28:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Old technology creates meaningful connections</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/old_technology_creates_meaningful_connections/#comment-9506279</link><description>@Mack: Well, perhaps Justin Timberlake isn't the best example (though I am only very slightly familiar with his music), but take, for example, Pink Floyd.  There is a very specific way that Roger Waters intended for you to listen to his music.  For me, I feel like on an iPod I am far more likely to jump in and listen to "Breathe" and then jump to Pearl Jam on the next track.  When I have my "Dark Side of the Moon" CD loaded up, I don't have that luxury (sure I could skip tracks on the CD, but I feel less likely to do that).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, there is something nice about holding a physical CD.  It has permanence, and nostalgia, and some sort of "realness" that I find MP3s lacking. (And don't get me wrong, I have a library of 10,000 songs on my computer that I listen to while I work ;) -- I'm not anti-MP3 (or AAC or WMA or Ogg or whatever floats your boat) by any means).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think Alex makes a good point when he says, "it boils down to is how you approach your own technology. You can use it to enhance your own preferences, or you can let it or other people influence the way you do things."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well said. :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(Then again, I could just be nuts -- always a possibility. :D)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 20:06:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Amazon invests in social music site</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/amazon_invests_in_social_music_site/#comment-9506350</link><description>A wordpress plug-in called "related posts" I think.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 05:23:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BBC iPlayer review - one week later</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/bbc_iplayer_review_one_week_later/#comment-9506345</link><description>@jo&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree that never watching the BBC again is overreacting but at the same time they've had years to sort out a cross platform strategy, and I'm very skeptical that they'll have a Mac or Linux version by the end of the year. I hope I'm wrong.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 14:57:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Interview: Zattoo co-founders</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/interview_zattoo_co_founders/#comment-9506384</link><description>Zattoo is great for live news and other speech-driven TV. I use it in the way many use radio. Background mostly, and then my attention is grabbed at certain moments.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 06:30:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple and Google alliance just got stronger</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/apple_and_google_alliance_just_got_stronger/#comment-9506391</link><description>@Kate I think the Safari 3 Beta solves the Google Docs problem along with a host of other web 2.0 type sites.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 12:26:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s next for the AppleTV?</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/what8217s_next_for_the_appletv/#comment-9506374</link><description>@Jeffa good point re: closed captions. Though not all content would add them, the option should exist.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 13:02:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple and Google alliance just got stronger</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/apple_and_google_alliance_just_got_stronger/#comment-9506397</link><description>@nb I did, you're right. Fixed! *coffee*</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 03:46:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s next for the AppleTV?</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/what8217s_next_for_the_appletv/#comment-9506379</link><description>@Lancelot9201&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I completely agree. This is even worse for short 3-4 minute video podcasts. Just *play all* please!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 03:47:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A collection of AppleTV resources</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/a_collection_of_appletv_resources/#comment-9506401</link><description>No problem Luck! Keep up the blogging.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 11:11:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 7digital, music downloads done right?</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/7digital_music_downloads_done_right/#comment-9505770</link><description>@Christopher&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree, 7digital haven't pioneered these ideas, but they are great features to copy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:35:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Skype outage makes for a quiet working day</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/skype_outage_makes_for_a_quiet_working_day/#comment-9506531</link><description>@John&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So would I :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:50:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Just for laughs: 8 comedy video sites</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/just_for_laughs_8_comedy_video_sites/#comment-9506676</link><description>@James&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You're kidding me? Nice try though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 11:49:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The ultimate portable media player</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/the_ultimate_portable_media_player/#comment-9506715</link><description>@Coleman&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's a good call, if it weren't for the mob. networks getting in the way. On the other hand, a beefed up iPhone with proper third-party dev support would quickly match the spec for an ideal PMP that Ryan has outlined. With 3G a possibility too.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 18:53:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows Media Center &amp;#8212; a Microsoft success story?</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/windows_media_center_8212_a_microsoft_success_story/#comment-9506766</link><description>@Charlie&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for stopping by :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:18:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows Media Center &amp;#8212; a Microsoft success story?</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/windows_media_center_8212_a_microsoft_success_story/#comment-9506771</link><description>@David, fair point. But the wider picture is that WMC is out there on millions of machines. Like you say, how many are actually using the functionality, is a valid question.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:21:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Gphone is coming; how Google could rewrite the rules</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/the_gphone_is_coming_how_google_could_rewrite_the_rules/#comment-9506845</link><description>@ Gopinath. I think that was the point, a speculative look at where the Gphone could take us. Also a kind of wish-list too. I enjoyed it :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:26:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 11 video download stores compared</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/11_video_download_stores_compared/#comment-9506973</link><description>@Michael,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I did try to look at Vongo, but could not get access to the site as I'm based in the UK. They actually use geo-blocking based on a user's IP address, so that you aren't even allowed to look. Pretty useless for getting an idea of what's on offer.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 19:08:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 11 video download stores compared</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/11_video_download_stores_compared/#comment-9506988</link><description>@Bryan&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the info Bryan! I've updated the post with the correct XBox Live info.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 14:24:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple evolves iPod line, introduces direct downloads</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/apple_evolves_ipod_line_introduces_direct_downloads/#comment-9507023</link><description>Should I buy an iPod Touch or wait for the UK release of the iPhone?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 11:24:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Internet streaming: five U.S. television networks compared</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/internet_streaming_five_us_television_networks_compared/#comment-9507033</link><description>@Andrew I'm tempted to leave it :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;OK, fixed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:53:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Internet streaming: five U.S. television networks compared</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/internet_streaming_five_us_television_networks_compared/#comment-9507042</link><description>@Leif, I thought pdfs were cutting edge ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The guide was just to give you an example of the five networks &lt;i&gt;current&lt;/i&gt; offerings to compare. If we published it as a URL I don't think it would &lt;i&gt;automatically&lt;/i&gt; update. Unless you know something I don't?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:25:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Internet streaming: five U.S. television networks compared</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/internet_streaming_five_us_television_networks_compared/#comment-9507048</link><description>@So...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the clarification. I've updated the post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Steve</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 07:36:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Winamp goes where iTunes doesn&amp;#8217;t dare</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/winamp_goes_where_itunes_doesn8217t_dare/#comment-9507082</link><description>"winamp has supported the remote feature for a couple of builds now…." I wasn't aware of that, but I'm sure they've added new device support, including the next gen. game consoles.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:17:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Winamp goes where iTunes doesn&amp;#8217;t dare</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/winamp_goes_where_itunes_doesn8217t_dare/#comment-9507086</link><description>@Dylan&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In iTunes you can subscribe to an RSS feed with mp3 enclosures, yes. Designed for subscribing to podcasts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But it doesn't have a built in web browser with pre-populated links to mp3 blogs does it?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This means you can surf an mp3 blog through Winamp, read about the music and see a playlist appear with any mp3s linked. You then get the option to download them. iTunes doesn't go nearly that far.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hardly FUD.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:29:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft announces Internet TV for Windows Media Center; new lineup of media extenders</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/microsoft_announces_internet_tv_for_windows_media_center_new_lineup_of_media_extenders/#comment-9507160</link><description>@Bryan fair point. Although, one thing the new extenders have over the XBox 360 is that they claim to run a lot quieter. I don't have a 360, but reports of how noisy they run, does put me off buying one as a media center.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What's your experience?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:43:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Joost on a set-top-box within 18 months</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/joost_on_a_set_top_box_within_18_months/#comment-9507172</link><description>@G&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course Volpi knew what he was saying, he's been saying the same thing for months, which is what I said in my previous post on Internet TV and STBs in general. The Joost crew having always played up the idea that Joost can in theory be made to run on hardware other than a PC e.g. a set-top-box or mobile device. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only new information is the 18 month time line, which, frankly, is a pretty long time to get a strategy to fruition (since they won't build the hardware themselves), and is perfectly feasible. It may have been an off-the-cuff comment, but he was hardly pressed to make it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If Joost hasn't partnered with a hardware device manufacturer within 18 months or there abouts, then it will likely have failed in the marketplace. 18 months or longer, Volpi was very clear that Joost needs to be on other platforms to go "mainstream".&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, Volpi used to be 'the router guy' at CISCO, so he knows hardware, and CISCO already make media extenders.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 19:18:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why have media extenders failed to take off?</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/why_have_media_extenders_failed_to_take_off/#comment-9507259</link><description>@G&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for this info. I'll look into it some more.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 09:48:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Joost on a set-top-box within 18 months</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/joost_on_a_set_top_box_within_18_months/#comment-9507177</link><description>Thanks Matt</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 18:21:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Music industry: five alternative business models</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/music_industry_five_alternative_business_models/#comment-9507285</link><description>@Daniel Hughes&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;eMusic isn't a subscription service in the strictest sense, since you don't have access to all of eMusic's catalog, just a certain number of tracks per month. It's more akin to a pre-paid model, like a pay-as-you-go mobile contract, whereby you pay for credit up front. Although, yes, you do get to keep the music you've downloaded, even if you stop being a "subscriber"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rhapsody, on the other hand, gives you access to the whole lot, so long as you stay a subscriber.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:55:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Music industry: five alternative business models</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/music_industry_five_alternative_business_models/#comment-9507286</link><description>@Bryan&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are lots of services that didn't get a mention, instead I tried to get the main alt. models across. Imeem and other music-based social sites, are certainly pushing another aspect to the ad-revenue side, along with doing a great job of music discovery.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What's clear is that the three main costs of the music biz are falling dramatically: production, distribution, and marketing. The social networks are helping with the last two.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:00:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Music industry: five alternative business models</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/music_industry_five_alternative_business_models/#comment-9507298</link><description>@George&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We Mac users live in a Windows world ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No, seriously, sorry about that. It's another Windows-only DRM affair. Do you see a pattern here?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:08:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone-envy: Nokia unveils S60 touch interface</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/iphone_envy_nokia_unveils_s60_touch_interface/#comment-9507334</link><description>@Abhishek&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree, the stylus is out! However, S60 is just a software platform, and the new touch UI is designed to offer the option of a traditional stylus approach or iPhone-like finger input. Obviously, the two require a different approach, with the latter needing big chunky on-screen buttons etc.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:09:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Netflix to steal Vudu&amp;#8217;s set-top magic?</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/netflix_to_steal_vudu8217s_set_top_magic/#comment-9507344</link><description>@G&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for this. I'd forgotten about the TiVo link.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:34:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In just 30 days, Amazon MP3 may be the No. 3 online music store</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/in_just_30_days_amazon_mp3_may_be_the_no_3_online_music_store/#comment-9507385</link><description>@mark&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;the post has been updated for clarity. Thanks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:16:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TiVo update adds progressive downloads, multi-room viewing, and TiVoToGo</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/tivo_update_adds_progressive_downloads_multi_room_viewing_and_tivotogo/#comment-9507406</link><description>@Berryman&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think you're right, and I've removed the ref. to multi-room sharing not working both ways.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:38:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Six digital music pioneers</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/six_digital_music_pioneers/#comment-9507483</link><description>@ J. Kyle&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks. Corrected.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 08:36:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The end is near? Yahoo! and AOL may shut down Internet radio service</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/the_end_is_near_yahoo_and_aol_may_shut_down_internet_radio_service/#comment-9507577</link><description>@ Alex&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Fixed. Thanks :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 07:27:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon&amp;#8217;s opening its network to any phone and software app is welcomed, but no surprise</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/verizon8217s_opening_its_network_to_any_phone_and_software_app_is_welcomed_but_no_surprise/#comment-9507572</link><description>@ Kevin. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Corrected, sorry about that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:55:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MTV Networks to put every South Park episode online</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/mtv_networks_to_put_every_south_park_episode_online/#comment-9507581</link><description>@ Aaron&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's not good news. What do you see when you try to view the site in Canada?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:44:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll: How should Apple spend its $15 billion cash reserve?</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/poll_how_should_apple_spend_its_15_billion_cash_reserve/#comment-9507614</link><description>@Bloggeer&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LOL, very good!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 14:34:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where to watch NFL, MLB, NBA, NHL online</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/where_to_watch_nfl_mlb_nba_nhl_online/#comment-9507646</link><description>@Danny&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the clarity. I've edited the post with ref to NFL.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 08:53:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where to watch NFL, MLB, NBA, NHL online</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/where_to_watch_nfl_mlb_nba_nhl_online/#comment-9507648</link><description>@PaulM&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The post is designed to give an overview of each sport's Internet offerings, including but not limited to their official homepages. We hope the table of each offering was of some use.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:04:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Digital music: 2007 year in review</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/digital_music_2007_year_in_review/#comment-9507713</link><description>@Greg&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the feedback :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I actually have my own digital studio (and have had for over 10 years) so I know a thing or two about the way music production has/is changing. But it's not something we have the scope to cover here.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 10:50:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Go!Messenger&amp;#8221; - video, voice and IM chat coming to PSP</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/8220gomessenger8221_video_voice_and_im_chat_coming_to_psp/#comment-9506782</link><description>@ Blaze&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's anybody's guess!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 16:52:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: With death of DRM imminent, what&amp;#8217;s next for iTunes?</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/with_death_of_drm_imminent_what8217s_next_for_itunes/#comment-9507738</link><description>@ Robert&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm not sure Apple will ever start a record label, for several reasons.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) It may conflict with their trademark since the Beatles-owned label Apple records still exists. They've already clashed in court with Apple, although some agreement was recently met - not sure if that gives way to Apple using the name more freely in a music-associated business or not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2) It would antagonize the four majors to such a degree that the iTunes Store could become a graveyard aside from Apple's own content acquisitions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3) Do artists really need a new label, even one as "cool" as Apple? A trend maybe to go-it-alone ala Radiohead. In which case, iTunes just needs to become more favorable to "indie" artists (with better terms).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 11:59:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Analyst estimates more than 1 million iPhones are &amp;#8220;unlocked&amp;#8221;; here&amp;#8217;s what it means</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/analyst_estimates_more_than_1_million_iphones_are_8220unlocked8221_here8217s_what_it_means/#comment-9507820</link><description>@Loren&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks and corrected.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 06:01:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Since when did Sony become &amp;#8216;pirate&amp;#8217;-friendly?</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/since_when_did_sony_become_8216pirate8217_friendly/#comment-9507882</link><description>@Dave&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree that the ability to get content off of the PS3 is the real point with regards to PlayTV, and very welcome too (for iPod encoding not least). Point well made. Here in the UK cable and satellite dvrs make it impossible to move content, I think. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, for me it's DivX support on the PS3 that is still blowing my mind. I have a PS3 and stream DivXs from my Mac flawlessly.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:22:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Report: Apple is exploring &amp;#8220;all you can eat&amp;#8221; and subscription models for iTunes Store</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/report_apple_is_exploring_8220all_you_can_eat8221_and_subscription_models_for_itunes_store/#comment-9507933</link><description>@ Marshall&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's not clear if it's MP3s or AAC with DRM, but I suspect the latter if it's similar to other offerings. Because of these kind of subscription schemes, I've long-argued that DRM isn't really dead at all.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:19:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Who needs Flash on iPhone more? Adobe or Apple?</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/who_needs_flash_on_iphone_more_adobe_or_apple/#comment-9507937</link><description>@ John Dowdell&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The quote from Narayen that, having looked at the SDK, Adobe can "now start to develop the Flash player &lt;b&gt;ourselves&lt;/b&gt;" seemed to imply that the SDK is enough to go-it-alone. However, I gather Adobe PR has backtracked on that statement. So I should update the post.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 15:59:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Whether people want it or not, AT&amp;amp;T will deliver live mobile TV in May</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/whether_people_want_it_or_not_atampt_will_deliver_live_mobile_tv_in_may/#comment-9507961</link><description>@ Dave Zatz&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the context of the SlingBox, live and recorded TV is a whole different ball game. Not least because it can be the best of all worlds - live, on-demand and at no added cost for going mobile (aside from the box itself).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The closest thing to a Sling experience that I have is the BBC's iPlayer on my iPod touch (over WiFi). I'm addicted.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:27:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I bought an iPod Touch and not an iPhone</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/why_i_bought_an_ipod_touch_and_not_an_iphone/#comment-9507368</link><description>@Anirudh&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The audio and video performance is great. Not sure what the fuss is about. They both use the same screen, and video and audio chip as far as I'm aware.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 10:01:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Netflix: three more set-top box partners by end of year</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/netflix_three_more_set_top_box_partners_by_end_of_year/#comment-9507996</link><description>@Dave&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You could be right as Microsoft does have a track record of partnering, contrary to their recent Apple-esque XBox and Zune strategies. But then again, surely MS would want a rev share with Netflix, and the latter is probably losing money on their unlimited 'Watch Now' service.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:48:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: HTC launches first true iPhone competitor just as Apple is about to take its phone to next level</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/htc_launches_first_true_iphone_competitor_just_as_apple_is_about_to_take_its_phone_to_next_level/#comment-9508049</link><description>@ Surur&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great line: "If you use popularity in USA as a measure of success, you must think CDMA, Country music and GW Bush were very successful also."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Made me smile :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On a more serious note, I think Dan's view of the iPhone is that in terms of overall user experience -- not pure feature set -- the iPhone has taken a lead. And now that it's adding parity feature-wise, with 3G and enterprise support, coupled with the fruits that will come with an SDK, the iPhone is ring fencing that lead, or at least attempting to.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, I think there is a broader problem with all iPhone analysis. On paper, other phones have more going for them, but the subjective real experience of using an iPhone is somehow different and, to lots of people, superior, and yet hard to describe why. It's not really about "touch" but the UI as a whole.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Having said that, Nokia, for example, makes some very nice devices, with a lot of power and rich features, that better the iPhone. But the UI is looking a little outdated, with too many menu hoops to jump through. That is something which Nokia, along with everybody else, is trying to address in light of iPhone. That's what Dan is referring to when he says they are on 1.0.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As an example, HTC's Diamond Touch goes out of its way to *hide* the Windows Mobile UI. Why is that?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 09:14:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A hint at what&amp;#8217;s to come? NBC streams &amp;#8220;The Office&amp;#8221;, &amp;#8220;30 Rock&amp;#8221; to iPhone</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/a_hint_at_what8217s_to_come_nbc_streams_8220the_office8221_822030_rock8221_to_iphone/#comment-9508063</link><description>I would have presumed it was geo-blocked i.e. USA only. And I'm pretty sure it would be optimized for Wi-Fi.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 18:45:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What if Apple re-enters the console gaming market through the iPhone?</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/what_if_apple_re_enters_the_console_gaming_market_through_the_iphone/#comment-9508068</link><description>I'm pretty convinced the patent, and Apple's gaming strategy, is really just about the iPhone/iPod Touch and future handhelds. As for the AppleTV, if Steve Jobs won't even open it up to third-party plugins, widgets and codecs etc., then I don't think gaming is even on the radar.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What is certain is that the iPhone SDK will lead to tons of games, and the device has a powerful graphics engine. Therefore expect the iPhone/iPod touch to evolve into: Mobile Web, Video and Audio, and Games.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 07:47:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The history and future of DivX</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/the_history_and_future_of_divx/#comment-9508065</link><description>It would be kind of ironic if Microsoft solves the cross platform DRM problem. But Silverlight looks like it may do.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 10:10:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;31 Days of the Dragon&amp;#8221;, a super duper HP notebook giveaway</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/822031_days_of_the_dragon8221_a_super_duper_hp_notebook_giveaway/#comment-9508015</link><description>@ M.Dinesh&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not long now :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 18:37:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Finding streaming content for iPhone, iPod touch: There&amp;#8217;s a lot available</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/finding_streaming_content_for_iphone_ipod_touch_there8217s_a_lot_available/#comment-9509614</link><description>@ kryptoz&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Updated the post. Thanks :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 12:17:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: HP HDX Dragon winner!</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/hp_hdx_dragon_winner/#comment-9509636</link><description>@ Anand Narayanaswamy&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It was a random draw from all the qualifying entries i.e. those who named their 5 fav digital lifestyle products and services as a comment on the competition post. Comments left elsewhere or duplicates weren't counted.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 10:53:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DLNA certified: how your computer, cellphone, games console, media streamer and other devices can play nicely together</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/dlna_certified_how_your_computer_cellphone_games_console_media_streamer_and_other_devices_can_play_n/#comment-9509642</link><description>@ Davis&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My thoughts exactly, although, as I said, the branding needs to be improved too, alongside better video standards support.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 17:03:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DLNA certified: how your computer, cellphone, games console, media streamer and other devices can play nicely together</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/dlna_certified_how_your_computer_cellphone_games_console_media_streamer_and_other_devices_can_play_n/#comment-9509646</link><description>@ Olivier&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'll update the post.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 05:57:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Location-based services like Whrrl on iPhone to usher in Internet of people, places, and things</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/location_based_services_like_whrrl_on_iphone_to_usher_in_internet_of_people_places_and_things/#comment-9509649</link><description>@ Dave Zatz&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No I haven't but... &lt;a href="http://justanotheriphoneblog.com/wordpress/2008/04/09/twinkle-new-iphone-twitter-client-uses-locate-me-features/" rel="nofollow"&gt;it looks very nice indeed&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is yet more proof that the iPhone official SDK will deliver some exceptional third-party efforts, and far exceed other mobile platforms - for now at least.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 08:47:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google demos Android again; it&amp;#8217;s full of promise, but we&amp;#8217;re still waiting for the real deal</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/google_demos_android_again_it8217s_full_of_promise_but_we8217re_still_waiting_for_the_real_deal/#comment-9509669</link><description>@ Jawad&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's a fair point, but in terms of UI and the Web browser (WebKit), the two platforms have a lot of common ground, so comparisons are inevitable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let's see how open the iPhone actually feels to end consumers, and what restrictions carriers / handset manufacturers put on so-called Gphones -- they will be free to alter the Android experience as they please, so it could lead to a lot of fragmentation, leading to mixed user experiences and expectations.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, my view differs slightly from Dan's: I think Android is looking pretty nice and, together with Apple, will really get others to raise their UI game (looking at you Nokia), and that's good for us all.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 16:16:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Android, it&amp;#8217;s the browser stupid</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/android_it8217s_the_browser_stupid/#comment-9509673</link><description>@ Daniel&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes an 'Android Certified' program would make a lot of sense, administered by the Open Handset Alliance. But that would require a lot of industry politics regarding what should and shouldn't be included in the spec, leading to accusations that Google wants too much control.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 08:02:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SanDisk kills off TakeTV and Fanfare</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/sandisk_kills_off_taketv_and_fanfare/#comment-9509695</link><description>@ Alan&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interesting inside view. I didn't know about the planned deals with TV manufacturers. Shame it never happened.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 14:43:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Joost in a browser is &amp;#8220;weeks away&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/joost_in_a_browser_is_8220weeks_away8221/#comment-9509708</link><description>@Ryan&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I dont know the answer but will try to find out. I understand that it will still use p2p delivery which i know flash server will or does support, although joost already licenses its own p2p solution.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:09:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stream or download more than 200 tennis matches through Wimbledon Live</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/stream_or_download_more_than_200_tennis_matches_through_wimbledon_live/#comment-9509723</link><description>@ Nathan&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for stopping by! Keep up the good work.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:15:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google enters the PC to TV arena</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/google_enters_the_pc_to_tv_arena/#comment-9509740</link><description>@ Offbeatmammal&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm afraid it doesn't transcode files, as far as I'm aware. Although there are a number of other UPnP AV servers that do that. See the our &lt;a href="http://www.last100.com/2008/05/27/dlna-certified/" rel="nofollow"&gt;DLNA certified guide&lt;/a&gt; that we link to in the post.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:30:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Video: ZeeVee&amp;#8217;s ZvBox (PC to TV)</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/video_zeevee8217s_zvbox_pc_to_tv/#comment-9509737</link><description>Agreed. Maybe they need to sell their technology to a cable company.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:49:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Coming soon: iTunes remote control app for iPhone and iPod touch</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/coming_soon_itunes_remote_control_app_for_iphone_and_ipod_touch/#comment-9509742</link><description>@ Dave Zatz&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interesting point. I can't wait for the app.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:03:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stream or download more than 200 tennis matches through Wimbledon Live</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/stream_or_download_more_than_200_tennis_matches_through_wimbledon_live/#comment-9509725</link><description>@jwd&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm sure they will but if not, let us know and we'll pile the pressure on.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 07:44:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sony to open its PS3 and PSP video download service tonight (updated)</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/sony_to_open_its_ps3_and_psp_video_download_service_tonight_updated/#comment-9509786</link><description>@ Dave Zatz&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Agree - Vudu gets good reviews, especially for the UI. However, I've long thought that it's up against it, considering you need to buy a single use set-top box just to enter the store. Other consumer boxes add more value, not just a video store e.g. gaming, media extender, support more than one web service etc. or are much, much cheaper.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:37:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No more downloads, Amazon moves its online video store to the cloud</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/no_more_downloads_amazon_moves_its_online_video_store_to_the_cloud/#comment-9509798</link><description>@ Dave Zatz&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for clarifying that - although I had presumed that UnBox would co-exist, especially with the TiVo deal. However, it's going to be confusing to customers. What they should do is charge once and offer both options, especially for to-own content. I can download it, stream it, and have it live in the cloud and be future proof for newly supported devices.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:56:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;ve jumped on the Netbook bandwagon (MSI Wind U100 / Advent 4211 review)</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/i8217ve_jumped_on_the_netbook_bandwagon_msi_wind_u100_advent_4211_review/#comment-9509773</link><description>@ stewart&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I played with an Acer Inspire One the other  day, also a very nice machine. One thing: you may find the trackpad button placements a bit hard to get used to.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 06:08:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 10 sites for free legal music</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/10_sites_for_free_legal_music/#comment-9506651</link><description>@ sabrina&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Using Limewire to download commercial music without paying for it is illegal. So be careful.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:38:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Just like your local record store&amp;#8221;, Universal launches Lost Tunes</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/8220just_like_your_local_record_store8221_universal_launches_lost_tunes/#comment-9509827</link><description>@ dc crowley&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm pretty sure there is no DRM since they play on iPods, and mp3s don't have DRM built-in. I think what they mean is the site allows for each track to be downloaded 3 times. Maybe. :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:00:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: LG&amp;#8217;s Netflix streaming Blu-ray player announced. What, no Wi-Fi?</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/lg8217s_netflix_streaming_blu_ray_player_announced_what_no_wi_fi/#comment-9509829</link><description>@ Dave&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I suspect those buying BR players are early adopter types with cash to burn. If they think they are "future proofing" themselves, then why not have Netflix support for if/when the library improves. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But yes, the PS3 is the best value Blu-ray / networked player. Now if only the Netflix XBox 360 partnership wasn't exclusive.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:31:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;ve jumped on the Netbook bandwagon (MSI Wind U100 / Advent 4211 review)</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/i8217ve_jumped_on_the_netbook_bandwagon_msi_wind_u100_advent_4211_review/#comment-9509776</link><description>@ Paul Schofield&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is possible to upgrade to 2GB but is pretty tricky as you need to basically take the machine apart and will probably void your warranty doing so.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 11:04:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Livestation coming to Mac next month</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/livestation_coming_to_mac_next_month/#comment-9509854</link><description>@ Dave Zatz&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes some channels are licensed in the US. In fact BBC World News is geo-blocked so that UK viewers can't access it but US viewers can!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Such is the public service regulations around BBC content.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 16:27:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Google should have developed its own Gphone</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/why_google_should_have_developed_its_own_gphone/#comment-9509882</link><description>@ Ontario Emperor&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Windows Mobile may be a great example of where the Android strategy could fail. See &lt;a href="http://www.last100.com/2008/08/04/review-htc-touch-diamond/" rel="nofollow"&gt;my recent HTC Touch Diamond review.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is also the risk that Android &lt;a href="http://www.last100.com/2008/07/24/qa-anddevorg-android/" rel="nofollow"&gt;could become fragmented&lt;/a&gt; if carriers decide to omit certain APIs or limit possible features.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:41:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Google should have developed its own Gphone</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/why_google_should_have_developed_its_own_gphone/#comment-9509884</link><description>@ Will&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Any member of the Open Handset Alliance, or anybody, can alter the source code in their own use. The Open Source license is very forgiving. See my earlier post:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.last100.com/2008/06/01/android-its-the-browser-stupi/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.last100.com/2008/06/01/android-its-t...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:06:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How-to: Stream media from a Mac to PlayStation 3</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/how_to_stream_media_from_a_mac_to_playstation_3/#comment-9508076</link><description>@ OT&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm afraid there is no way to stream movies or TV shows purchased from the iTunes Store to a PS3. That's because of the DRM (copy protection) system that Apple employs.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 14:45:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another crisis looming? Report: Apple threatens to shut down iTunes over royalty rates</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/another_crisis_looming_report_apple_threatens_to_shut_down_itunes_over_royalty_rates/#comment-9509974</link><description>@ Dave Mackey, bluejonhi&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The publishers are the ones who own the rights to the composition as aposed to the recording. If you've written and recorded a song, and still own the publishing rights, you get paid as both the artist and composer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Or, if you record a cover of somebody else's song, you have to pay the publisher a royalty. Hence acts who only perform other peoples material (the manufactured acts such as Britney etc.) don't make nearly as much money as you'd think.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:23:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Nokia E71 (my favorite smartphone yet?)</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/review_nokia_e71_my_favorite_smartphone_yet/#comment-9509937</link><description>@ Chintan&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Visit m.google.com/maps via your phone's browser.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:25:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My new Macbook and me (first impressions)</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/my_new_macbook_and_me_first_impressions/#comment-9509989</link><description>@ Dave Zatz&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I will probably try installing OSX on the rebadged Wind but have held back because you need to swap the WiFi card for one with OSX drivers available and you also lose the mic and headphone ports and built-in mic also. Hardly ideal. As for buying a Macbook, while I really like Netbooks, a 10.1 inch screen is just a tad too small for everyday blogging duties - certainly the way I manage my screen real estate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@ Daniel&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jealous? So you should be :-) Haven't even noticed the fan kick in yet. As for the Optical drive, not tested yet!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 10:30:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;ve been playing with Nokia&amp;#8217;s new touchscreen phone - the 5800 XpressMusic (aka the Tube)</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/i8217ve_been_playing_with_nokia8217s_new_touchscreen_phone_the_5800_xpressmusic_aka_the_tube/#comment-9510001</link><description>@ IncidentFlux&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I prefer the e71 yes. Although they are very different devices. If you're a QWERTY physical keyboard person then you'll love the e71.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:16:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;ve been playing with Nokia&amp;#8217;s new touchscreen phone - the 5800 XpressMusic (aka the Tube)</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/i8217ve_been_playing_with_nokia8217s_new_touchscreen_phone_the_5800_xpressmusic_aka_the_tube/#comment-9510004</link><description>To zoom in on a photo you tap the screen and up pops an on-screen plus and minus button and slider control. You can then either tap on the + and - sign or move the slider up and down to zoom in and out. To pan around an image just click and drag.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:24:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Zune Pass now offering rent to own music subscription model</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/zune_pass_now_offering_rent_to_own_music_subscription_model/#comment-9510026</link><description>@jt&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unfortunately, the Zune has never been officially released outside of the US. That's why there is no support for Zune Marketplace in the UK, and may never be.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:46:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Video demo: SkyFire&amp;#8217;s S60 mobile web browser accessing Hulu and YouTube</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/video_demo_skyfire8217s_s60_mobile_web_browser_accessing_hulu_and_youtube/#comment-9510029</link><description>@Pete&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Steven Hoober&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's interesting re: SmartFit. Perhaps it's more of an issue with the CSS of &lt;a href="http://last100.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;last100.com&lt;/a&gt;, although the standard Nokia S60 browser on the e71 does handle re-flowing of text fine.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:25:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I bought an iPod Touch and not an iPhone</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/why_i_bought_an_ipod_touch_and_not_an_iphone/#comment-9507375</link><description>@ Donkey&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The iPod touch needs a WiFi connection, so that rules it out for use while traveling. The only phone that can really access the full web without too much pain is the iPhone (aside from the G1 possibly). The iPhone's Facebook app is fantastic, as is the YouTube and Gmail access. Having said that, battery life on the iPhone might be a problem if your other half uses voice a lot too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But to try to answer the question, the iPod touch can be safely ruled out.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:34:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon&amp;#8217;s opening its network to any phone and software app is welcomed, but no surprise</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/verizon8217s_opening_its_network_to_any_phone_and_software_app_is_welcomed_but_no_surprise/#comment-9507574</link><description>@ Lucy&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No it doesn't, I'm afraid :(</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 15:57:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia N97 - I want one already</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/nokia_n97_i_want_one_already/#comment-9510054</link><description>@ Ronald G&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While I haven't tested the N97 yet, Nokia's track record suggests call quality and reception won't be an issue. I suspect, however it performs in web browsing and touch UI etc, as a cell phone it will be fine.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 17:25:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sony&amp;#8217;s eBook reader - the numbers are in</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/sony8217s_ebook_reader_the_numbers_are_in/#comment-9510074</link><description>@ Mari&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My Dad's reasoning was that he likes to buy a lot of 'cheap' fiction (mostly crime novels I think), along with more serious books, and doesn't want/need to have hard copies of everything he buys junking up the house. But, yes, he is also an avid reader, so who knows.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 11:44:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: G1&amp;#8217;s Android Market does a good job of copying the iPhone App Store [video demo]</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/g18217s_android_market_does_a_good_job_of_copying_the_iphone_app_store_video_demo/#comment-9510079</link><description>@ Pete&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes the market works in portrait mode, as do all apps as far I know.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 12:39:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Amazon MP3 arrives in the UK</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/amazon_mp3_arrives_in_the_uk/#comment-9510070</link><description>@ DC Crowley&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;'Mainland Europe'? Never heard of it ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Seriously, this is the problem with so many Internet-based content sites, the inability to set up shop world-wide due to pre-Internet licensing agreements.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:32:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Analyst: Apple to release &amp;#8216;closed&amp;#8217; Netbook with iPhone-esque App Store</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/analyst_apple_to_release_8216closed8217_netbook_with_iphone_esque_app_store/#comment-9510947</link><description>@ Shan Gee&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There's certainly pent up demand for an Apple Netbook that's for sure. On the issue of 'touch', I'm not convinced that it's need for a traditionally shaped clam shell notebook, I just don't see the appeal of leaning over and touching the screen. A tablet form-factor maybe, but tablet PCs haven't sold well.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:14:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekly wrapup: HP Magic Giveaway (win $6,000 worth of gear)</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/weekly_wrapup_hp_magic_giveaway_win_6000_worth_of_gear/#comment-9510954</link><description>@ Barbara&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They haven't yet. Last day is today (22nd December 08).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:33:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How do you use your Netbook?</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/how_do_you_use_your_netbook/#comment-9510959</link><description>@ Lady VoIP&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I love the idea of hangbag computing. Nice.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:46:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: We have our HP Magic Giveaway winner</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/we_have_our_hp_magic_giveaway_winner/#comment-9510974</link><description>It was an international competition and then a random draw. That's all. No conspiracy here folks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:36:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How do you use your Netbook?</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/how_do_you_use_your_netbook/#comment-9510962</link><description>Typing really fast is a bit of an issue for me. Not because the keyboard is small but because the keys are spaced very differently to my Macbook. If I wasn't switching between the two so frequently, it wouldn't be a problem (the Macbook keyboard took me a while to get used to in the first place).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:49:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Have we just witnessed the second coming of Palm?</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/have_we_just_witnessed_the_second_coming_of_palm/#comment-9510994</link><description>@ Alejo&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes, I meant the Storm. Corrected, thanks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 08:43:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DivX 7 adds support for Blu-ray rips</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/divx_7_adds_support_for_blu_ray_rips/#comment-9510997</link><description>@Xander&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A quick reality check. The original DivX became popular, in part, because it was (for better or worse) the format used most often for DVD rips found on filesharing sites. Outside of the codec connoisseurs, I never heard of anybody requesting DivX support on their consumer electronics devices other than to play back rips, most of which weren't of their own creation. Likewise, I and just about anybody outside of the format wars, have rarely, if ever, encountered an .MKV file that wasn't a Blu-ray or HD-DVD rip floating somewhere on the interwebs. If you read the article carefully, I never suggested that pirated content was the only use for an MKV (it is just a container like AVI) but that it was a very common one. People who claim otherwise are being a little disingenuous IMHO.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:54:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DivX 7 adds support for Blu-ray rips</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/divx_7_adds_support_for_blu_ray_rips/#comment-9511002</link><description>@Xander&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for retracting the moron statement. I was worried there for a minute ;-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I actually think we mostly agree and are talking across each other a bit here. Of course ripping the media you own is perfectly alright, all I was arguing is that certain formats have won over others because, for whatever reason (perhaps because they were superior?), they become popular for pirated content. Then DivX (the company) helped push non-PC support for said formats (DVD players, PMPs etc.).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I too hate DRM, that's why I sourced a non-DRM solution for my own movie - &lt;a href="http://insearchofthevalley.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;insearchofthevalley.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:13:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Nokia E71 (my favorite smartphone yet?)</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/review_nokia_e71_my_favorite_smartphone_yet/#comment-9509945</link><description>@ DJ&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes you can run Opera Mini on the e71, although I prefer Nokia's own web browser.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:13:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DivX 7 adds support for Blu-ray rips</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/divx_7_adds_support_for_blu_ray_rips/#comment-9511008</link><description>@cng&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As far as I know, the XBox 360 isn't officially DivX certified. Even if it was, it's down to Microsoft whether or not to add MKV support. Anybody's guess.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:21:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What if Apple sued Palm, would Microsoft come to the rescue?</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/what_if_apple_sued_palm_would_microsoft_come_to_the_rescue/#comment-9511015</link><description>@xxdesmus&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't think Apple would file a suit without thinking through how this will send ripples throughout the whole industry. I hope it doesn't happen too but not at the expense of stifling competitors taking the best bits and improving them. That's what I like most about innovation: building on top of existing ideas not having to bypass or ignore them because of patents. Besides, most companies copy really badly, so just let them. The problem Apple has is that Palm looks like it has done a really, really good job.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:04:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DivX 7 adds support for Blu-ray rips</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/divx_7_adds_support_for_blu_ray_rips/#comment-9511010</link><description>@ bosko&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To clarify. XBox 360 can play back "MPEG-4 Part 2, Simple Profile, and Advanced Simple Profile" AKA DivX files but, as I said, isn't officially "DivX Certified" by DivX themselves, unlike the PlayStation 3. This, of course, makes little difference in reality.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 09:40:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What if Apple sued Palm, would Microsoft come to the rescue?</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/what_if_apple_sued_palm_would_microsoft_come_to_the_rescue/#comment-9511021</link><description>@ mr bailey&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Microsoft buying Palm would be terrible news for Palm's future and would be a complete change of strategy from Redmond. They already have the upcoming Windows Mobile 7 OS in the oven and recently bought Danger, makers of the T-Mobile Sidekick. Let's see what that produces first. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Instead, maybe Nokia should buy Palm - they have the cash too and would benefit from Palm's UI and web services approach...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 09:47:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BBC iPlayer on more handsets: Nokia N85, Samsung Omnia, Sony Ericsson Xperia X1 and C905</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/bbc_iplayer_on_more_handsets_nokia_n85_samsung_omnia_sony_ericsson_xperia_x1_and_c905/#comment-9510082</link><description>@ frank williams&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I doubt you'll see iPlayer working abroad anytime soon. You may have to wait until the BBC launches its commercial Internet TV service, in which I expect there will be a subscription fee, and that is facing regulator review I think. So it could be a long time coming... it's also more complicated because the BBC doesn't have a world-wide license for all of its content as far as I know.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:08:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Sony&amp;#8217;s PlayTV is, and isn&amp;#8217;t</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/what_sony8217s_playtv_is_and_isn8217t/#comment-9506762</link><description>@ Paul @ Derek&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I doubt it. The PlayTV hardware is tied to the software, it's not a case of just plugging in a different tuner.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:50:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;ve been playing with Nokia&amp;#8217;s new touchscreen phone - the 5800 XpressMusic (aka the Tube)</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/i8217ve_been_playing_with_nokia8217s_new_touchscreen_phone_the_5800_xpressmusic_aka_the_tube/#comment-9510015</link><description>@Roboguard&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The 5800's screen is meant to lock and go blank when you place it near your ear, to prevent accidental screen presses. Maybe that is the "issue"?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:16:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: HD video coming to a Netbook near you</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/hd_video_coming_to_a_netbook_near_you/#comment-9511036</link><description>@ Mari&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's interesting. My MSI Wind (rebadged as an Advent) can't handle the 720p HD content shot on my camcorder. I'm hoping the new chipset will address that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:45:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;ve been playing with Nokia&amp;#8217;s new touchscreen phone - the 5800 XpressMusic (aka the Tube)</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/i8217ve_been_playing_with_nokia8217s_new_touchscreen_phone_the_5800_xpressmusic_aka_the_tube/#comment-9510019</link><description>@ Raihan Hasnain Rahman&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for that. Glad it's working out now :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:45:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia and Skype partnership has carriers in a fit</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/nokia_and_skype_partnership_has_carriers_in_a_fit/#comment-9511059</link><description>@Finnsense&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm also a long time Skype user. My mobile carrier "Three" already offers Skype on most of its handsets, and although it's not always as clear as a regular mobile or land line call, it is useful nonetheless, especially IM or to see when a contact is online and available to talk.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:00:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Nokia E71 (my favorite smartphone yet?)</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/review_nokia_e71_my_favorite_smartphone_yet/#comment-9509950</link><description>@ Sweet&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's for video calls over 3G. Perhaps your network doesn't support this feature or it isn't included in your mobile plan.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:42:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Nokia E71 (my favorite smartphone yet?)</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/review_nokia_e71_my_favorite_smartphone_yet/#comment-9509953</link><description>@ Brian Murphy&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What do you mean by costly?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you are referring to 'data' charges i.e. Internet, then you can tell Nokia Maps to 'go offline' via the tools menu I think. That way you're not using the 'assisted' part of A-GPS. But I'm not definite on this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Or are you talking about the Sat Nav monthly subscription for turn by turn directions?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 13:19:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Nokia E71 (my favorite smartphone yet?)</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/review_nokia_e71_my_favorite_smartphone_yet/#comment-9509955</link><description>@ Brian Murphy&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let us know how you get on.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:56:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How I replaced Apple&amp;#8217;s MobileMe at half the price</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/how_i_replaced_apple8217s_mobileme_at_half_the_price/#comment-9511067</link><description>@ neville shaw&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can use Apple's Mail application with virtually any email account, including BT, if that's what you are asking. You just need to set it up via BT's instructions. However, beware that if you start relying on a BT broadband email address and then change broadband provider in the future, you may have to pay BT to still keep using that email address. That may not be an issue and will still be cheaper than MobileMe. However, if you are using other MobileMe features, such as iPhone syncing, backups (iDisk), photo gallery etc. then the £60 could still be worth it, especially if you're comfortable with the service.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:38:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia N97 - I want one already</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/nokia_n97_i_want_one_already/#comment-9510059</link><description>@ Leanne&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Do you mean a TV tuner?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:51:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Nokia E71 (my favorite smartphone yet?)</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/review_nokia_e71_my_favorite_smartphone_yet/#comment-9509957</link><description>@ Gregoire&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The E71 comes with Nokia Sports Tracker (or you can download it). Not entirely sure but I think it will do the job you're asking for :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://sportstracker.nokia.com/nts/main/index.do" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://sportstracker.nokia.com/nts/main/index.do&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:57:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Review: Nokia E71 (my favorite smartphone yet?)</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/review_nokia_e71_my_favorite_smartphone_yet/#comment-9509959</link><description>@ Gregoire&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes I still use it as my main phone, and still really like it. No problems at all!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also have the new E75 on loan, really nice too. I'll post a review a soon.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:14:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iTunes variable pricing has nothing to do with &amp;#8220;supply and demand&amp;#8221;, just record label greed and stupidity</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/itunes_variable_pricing_has_nothing_to_do_with_8220supply_and_demand8221_just_record_label_greed_and/#comment-9511100</link><description>@Davis Freeberg &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Devils advocate is always welcome ;-) I understand your point, but it falls down slightly considering - using your analogy - there are free cinemas open 24 hours a day, showing all the most and least popular films (file sharing sites). That's the competition.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 12:55:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iTunes variable pricing has nothing to do with &amp;#8220;supply and demand&amp;#8221;, just record label greed and stupidity</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/itunes_variable_pricing_has_nothing_to_do_with_8220supply_and_demand8221_just_record_label_greed_and/#comment-9511102</link><description>@KPS&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Apple only has free-market incentive to lower their price if people are unwilling to pay what they are charging, for instance, if they can get it elsewhere for less money/effort."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Most are unwilling to pay and can get it elsewhere - for free. That's the point. The answer isn't to raise prices for offering the same but to lower prices and add more value that's harder to get elsewhere.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:20:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iTunes variable pricing has nothing to do with &amp;#8220;supply and demand&amp;#8221;, just record label greed and stupidity</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/itunes_variable_pricing_has_nothing_to_do_with_8220supply_and_demand8221_just_record_label_greed_and/#comment-9511105</link><description>@ Dale Dietrich&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not sure there is or ever will be real competition as the major labels set the wholesale terms. As a result it looks like Amazon and co. just followed suit:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.last100.com/2009/04/08/more-variable-pricing/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.last100.com/2009/04/08/more-variable...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Although ComputerWorld is reporting that Amazon is being favored over Apple as the labels continue to try to weaken Steve Jobs' grip on the music industry.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:04:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hands-on review: INQ1 a.k.a. the &amp;#8216;Facebook phone&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/hands_on_review_inq1_aka_the_8216facebook_phone8217/#comment-9511086</link><description>Yes it does but... The INQ1 is offered on a pay-monthly tariff on "3" that includes "unlimited" Facebook access and other data. And for PAYG, you're encouraged to take out the unlimited data package as a top up (£5 per month in the UK, I think). So if done right, you won't ring up a huge bill at all - it's pretty good value.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:20:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Gadget Show Live: LG Arena - not just another iPhone wannabe [video]</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/the_gadget_show_live_lg_arena_not_just_another_iphone_wannabe_video/#comment-9511110</link><description>The video is working fine.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:27:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BlackBerry address book integrates Facebook, apes Palm Pre&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;Synergy&amp;#8221; and INQ1</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/blackberry_address_book_integrates_facebook_apes_palm_pre8217s_8220synergy8221_and_inq1/#comment-9511113</link><description>Not as far as I'm aware, although I'm told that BlackBerry's can integrate IM friends lists too (Microsoft Messenger etc.), but I don't have one to hand to confirm.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:37:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Please Nominate dailyApps for 2008 Bloggies&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://dailyapps.disqus.com/please_nominate_dailyapps_for_2008_bloggies8230/#comment-13337567</link><description>Thanks for the nod!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Steve, editor last100</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:43:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogging Is the New Novel/Screenplay Writing</title><link>http://publishing20.disqus.com/blogging_is_the_new_novelscreenplay_writing/#comment-13568278</link><description>You got my attention - without trying :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"ItÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s kind of a Zen thing Ã¢â‚¬â€ you have to let go of your expectations before they can be met."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree totally - well put.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 18:49:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Publish2 In Private Beta</title><link>http://publishing20.disqus.com/publish2_in_private_beta/#comment-13573703</link><description>Hi Scott,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Drop me an invite and I'll keep it quiet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Steve O'Heae</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:28:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Interview with MyBlogLog CEO Scott Rafer</title><link>http://toprankblog.disqus.com/interview_with_mybloglog_ceo_scott_rafer/#comment-17127466</link><description>Great interview. At the risk of being spammy, I spoke to MyBlogLog co-founder, Eric Marcoullier, last month -- right before the Yahoo! buy out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/social/?p=45" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://blogs.zdnet.com/social/?p=45&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 12:54:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Veoh Launching New Online TV Service; Takes Streams From Content Sites Directly Into Its Player</title><link>http://paidcontent.disqus.com/veoh_launching_new_online_tv_service_takes_streams_from_content_sites_directly_into_its_player/#comment-18824310</link><description>&lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.last100.com/2007/06/20/veohtv-has-joost-in-its-sights/&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;Over at last100&lt;/a&gt;, I’ve posted my thoughts on VeohTV, picking up on the company’s plans to get its software into a set-top-box, &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/veohtv_launches.php&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;as reported by Read/WriteWeb&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;…we’re hearing more and more about software-based online TV solutions harbouring plans to get their services into a dedicated set-top-box, rather than relying on the PC. Joost has hinted at this direction, and recently we’ve reported on BitTorrent’s Software Developer Kit for set-top-boxes and other Internet devices, along with DivX’s work on a media streaming box. And let’s not forget Apple who have put a stripped down version of their desktop OS into the AppleTV so that it can act as a media extender for streaming iTunes content onto a TV, as well as, more recently, connect directly to YouTube.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:47:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Palm Aims For &amp;quot;Fat Middle Of The Market&amp;quot; With New OS Code-Named &amp;quot;Nova&amp;quot;</title><link>http://paidcontent.disqus.com/palm_aims_for_quotfat_middle_of_the_marketquot_with_new_os_code_named_quotnovaquot/#comment-18841819</link><description>I&amp;#39;m rooting for Palm, here&amp;#39;s why...&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.last100.com/2008/12/15/why-im-backing-palm-to-make-a-comeback/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.last100.com/2008/12/15/why-im-backin...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:22:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>