<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Steve Waterhouse</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/9529927014aaf8a78e360e6982876f3f/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 10:25:01 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Do You Have the Right Managers In Place?</title><link>http://salesblogcast.disqus.com/do_you_have_the_right_managers_in_place/#comment-22155958</link><description>I agree with Ed. You need to pre-assess them. We use the Predictive Index with our clients here in Florida and have wonderful results. You can see some of the case studies at &lt;a href="http://predictiveresults.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;predictiveresults.com&lt;/a&gt;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Waterhouse</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 10:25:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Personality Typing in Venture Capital</title><link>http://punctuative.disqus.com/personality_typing_in_venture_capital/#comment-3145969</link><description>You might also want to see the testimonial by Churchill Downs since it addresses this issue of using PI as a tool in M &amp;amp; A. You can find it at &lt;a href="http://www.predictiveresults.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.predictiveresults.com&lt;/a&gt; under"Testimonials from Senior Executives".&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As a Predictive Index consultant covering Florida I'm thrilled to see how you are using PI. The article failed to mention that PI has 50 years of validity studies that map PI patterns to specific business metrics. This data can be valuable when analyzing candidates for specific positions. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Steve Waterhouse&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="mailto:steve@predictiveresults.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;steve@predictiveresults.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Waterhouse</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 21:54:46 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>