http://disqus.com/people/94276775fe3847b3ed103c1cf50a11e1/enThu, 19 Jun 2008 10:29:32 -0000http://mathewingram.disqus.com/timespeople_nice_but_not_enough_88/#comment-706502"Why? Because the service contains exactly what it says on the tin: TimesPeople, and only TimesPeople. In other words, it’s for people who just read the New York Times, and all they really care about is what other people who read the New York Times care about."<br><br>Dear Mr. Ingram, I think what NYT had done so far is better than anybody else. At least, they have something which utilize their own material or craftsmanship. And this is better than nothing ...wim permanaThu, 19 Jun 2008 09:46:16 -0000http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_70465/#comment-6007487@Paul Glazowski,<br><br>Nice recap Paul. Anyway, I can only see that you're a little bit here. I wondering if this famous Mashable also want to create that stuff too. Yeah, ladies and gentleman, please help me on welcoming ... the MashablePeople (what about other name like MashableDude). But why not. Sometimes it's a good idea to have like this one too.<br><br>Viva NYT.wim permanaThu, 19 Jun 2008 10:29:32 -0000