<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for econ grad stud</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/938b0ab49aabe2da2b1fc44f27315659/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 21:46:59 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Time Is Relative, So Why Shouldn&amp;#8217;t Faith Be Relative?</title><link>http://goodwordediting.disqus.com/time_is_relative_so_why_shouldn8217t_faith_be_relative/#comment-2830832</link><description>I don't think relativism is necessarily naive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think it's naive to offer relativism to anyone who's asking serious questions expecting meaningful answers.&lt;br&gt;The human desire for something greater than ourselves seems unlikely to be satisfied by guiding someone to subjective answers. That should be obvious even to a relativist.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">econ grad stud</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 11:17:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Writing about Faith, Aliens, and Winnie the Pooh</title><link>http://goodwordediting.disqus.com/writing_about_faith_aliens_and_winnie_the_pooh/#comment-2830850</link><description>I'd be surprised if Steve Eley was a Christian. I've often encountered his quote in the mouth of atheists:&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;"Invisible Pink Unicorns are beings of great spiritual power. We know this because they are capable of being invisible and pink at the same time. Like all religions, the Faith of the Invisible Pink Unicorns is based upon both logic and faith. We have faith that they are pink; we logically know that they are invisible because we can't see them."&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe it's from alt.atheism on usenet.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">econ grad stud</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:55:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Time Is Relative, So Why Shouldn&amp;#8217;t Faith Be Relative?</title><link>http://goodwordediting.disqus.com/time_is_relative_so_why_shouldn8217t_faith_be_relative/#comment-2830842</link><description>Oh, Marcus I didn't take any offense.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I just wanted to clarify my point.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't believe we can satisfy the human desire for something greater but I believe we can present &lt;i&gt;someone&lt;/i&gt; greater.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Absolute certainty of the type that satisfies doesn't come all at once. At least it didn't happen that way for me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">econ grad stud</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:52:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Llama Llama Duck</title><link>http://chasingthewind.disqus.com/llama_llama_duck/#comment-11894789</link><description>Well, it did confuse my wife's cat when I had your blog running and I went to answer the door.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">econ grad stud</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 09:48:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Llama Llama Duck</title><link>http://chasingthewind.disqus.com/llama_llama_duck/#comment-11894791</link><description>If I could read cat's minds I'd be doing that for a living.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">econ grad stud</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 17:29:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Christian Carnival CLXXXVI</title><link>http://chasingthewind.disqus.com/christian_carnival_clxxxvi/#comment-11894794</link><description>Thanks for putting this together. That's a lot of work.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">econ grad stud</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:23:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Christian Carnival 208</title><link>http://chasingthewind.disqus.com/christian_carnival_208/#comment-11894933</link><description>Thanks for hosting. Quite a variety of posts this week. I appreciate the diversity.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">econ grad stud</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:55:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An Evil, Bipolar God</title><link>http://theologyforthemasses.disqus.com/an_evil_bipolar_god/#comment-15908746</link><description>I honestly don't see what the problem with this passage is. Human bodies are God's property. Eventually all people are brought to death in his Universe.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't see why we'd morally distinguish between people God kills in bed at age 85 from "natural causes" and people God orders his followers to kill at age 30.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There isn't a moral equivalency between the way you should treat me and the way God should treat me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">econ grad stud</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 21:46:59 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>