<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Jerm</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/92e3dffd48504fbe898b031fc4f12e49/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 19:09:33 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google Blog Platform</title><link>http://technosailor.disqus.com/google_blog_platform/#comment-2022465</link><description>I think you are getting your products confused throughout your post.  Wordpress is free and open-source, &lt;a href="http://Wordpress.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Wordpress.com&lt;/a&gt; is "free" closed source and cost money to do small changes.  Automattic really should support Atompub to transfer data around because it is a/the standard not WXR, the undocumented wordpress unstandard.  Lastly Akismet is far from open source and it cost hundreds of dollars if you site is popular.  You may be thinking of Typepad Antispam from 6A which is completely free and open source.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jerm</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:31:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Blog Platform</title><link>http://technosailor.disqus.com/google_blog_platform/#comment-2028632</link><description>Your logic is wrong.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;P1: WP is OS&lt;br&gt;P2: Business in Blogging&lt;br&gt;P3: WXR is easy&lt;br&gt;P4: Akismet is OS&lt;br&gt;P5: A large community for WP&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;C: port blogger to WP_MU&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;... &lt;br&gt;P1 is true and valid. &lt;br&gt;P2 can be true but not in this context.  &lt;a href="http://Wordpress.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Wordpress.com&lt;/a&gt; does NOT allow users to place ads on their blogs.  So is the business in blogging in WP the OS platform in P1 or &lt;a href="http://Wordpress.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Wordpress.com&lt;/a&gt; the closed source hosted version?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;P3: True, but still not a standard and little/no documentation.&lt;br&gt;P4: False, Akismet is not open source.  &lt;br&gt;P5: True for WP but not &lt;a href="http://WP.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;WP.com&lt;/a&gt; has limitations and you cannot have your own plugins, themes, etc. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now your conclusion is cool, like &lt;a href="http://edublogs.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;edublogs.com&lt;/a&gt; took WP_Mu and made a hosting service but would it not be easier for Google to just listen to their customers and the market and make changes to their system?!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jerm</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 08:14:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Breaking: Facebook Releases New Design</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/breaking_facebook_releases_new_design/#comment-1640751</link><description>I like it a lot so far!  There are def a hand full off bugs and oops.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jerm</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 22:36:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Releases New Design, Bugs Abound</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/facebook_releases_new_design_bugs_abound/#comment-1640793</link><description>A true BETA.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jerm</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 07:26:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Millions of Users Dumbfounded by New Facebook Design</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/millions_of_users_dumbfounded_by_new_facebook_design/#comment-2391466</link><description>I really don't see the big deal with the redesign.  The large majority of people in the against groups haven't left one shred of constructive criticism. Saying "it sucks" or "it is myspace" doesn't help and changes nothing.   Have you heard any "real" reasons people don't like the redesign?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jerm</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 19:09:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/08/12/six-apart-movable-type-pro/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_10497/#comment-6015040</link><description>How is it not open source?  MT is released under the GPL same as Wordpress.  If you want paid support, 6A developed addons you pay a small amount.  What isn't clear?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jerm</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:19:47 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>