Do they belong to you? Claim these comments.
Unregistered
aliases
- Erin, QueenofSpain
- erin queenofspain
- Erin Queen of Spain
- Erin
- erin, qofS
- QueenofSpain Erin Kotecki Vest
- QueenofSpain, Erin Kotecki Ves
- QueenofSpain, Erin
- Erin, queenofspain
- queenofspain
- Erin
- erin, queenofspain
- queenofspain
- erin
- Erin, Queenofspain
- Erin, aka QueenofSpain
- QueenofSpain
- Queenofspain, erin
- Erin Kotecki Vest, QueenofSpai
- Erin Kotecki Vest
- Erin Queenofspain
- Erin, QueenofSpain
- Erin Kotecki Vest, Queen of Sp
- Erin Queenofspain
- Erin queenofspain
Erin, QueenofSpain
Is this you? Claim Profile »
1 week ago
in We All Start Somewhere on Learn To Duck
I love this post. It's so honest and ...oddly even-handed for such a tough subject. Micah, you really need to write more life stories...when you do, you always knock them out of the park
1 reply
1 month ago
in Mere words? Mere common ground? on Xpatriated Texan
I appreciate you writing this post. But disagree with many of the things you say (of course). First of all I think it's important to point out that I also think everyone else should be OUT of the debate. Just as you and your wife and health care provider had made the decision, and you and your daughter did, the last people I want in that conversation are judges, lawyers, activist, or the government.
I do take issue with the idea that we can't find common ground on reducing abortions and on adoption. Access to health care is of course key, but so is real sex education. Which is PROVEN to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies. And while there may be many couples willing to adopt, many of our children remain in the foster system and stuck in red tape for too long.
I don't ever believe common ground is possible on abortion. It's the issues surrounding abortion I think we can work on.
I do take issue with the idea that we can't find common ground on reducing abortions and on adoption. Access to health care is of course key, but so is real sex education. Which is PROVEN to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies. And while there may be many couples willing to adopt, many of our children remain in the foster system and stuck in red tape for too long.
I don't ever believe common ground is possible on abortion. It's the issues surrounding abortion I think we can work on.
4 months ago
in Is Yelp Committing Extortion? on /Message
I'm glad you blogged this. I pointed out the accusations last week and was stunned by the silence of the digerati. Regardless of what comes to pass, it's an issue and it should be blogged and looked into. Is this a matter of a digerati turning their heads to the sweatheart start up? I'm curious
1 reply
stoweboyd
I wonder.
6 months ago
in 2008/12/28/should-facebook-end-breast-ban/ on Mashable - The Social Media Guide
As a bloggy friend once said "Breastfeeding can in NO way be compared to masturbation. Last I checked, masturbating is not necessary to survive, whereas feeding the infant when they are hungry IS."
Eating. IT's EATING.
It's not whacking off. It's not shitting.
IT's EATING.
If YOU can eat in a public place, so will my kid.
Eating. IT's EATING.
It's not whacking off. It's not shitting.
IT's EATING.
If YOU can eat in a public place, so will my kid.
6 months ago
in 2008/12/28/should-facebook-end-breast-ban/ on Mashable - The Social Media Guide
I love how my commenting on a mashable article is immediately linked to how I parent.
lol. cute.
Anyway...I wouldn't call what facebook is doing as 'oppressive' in the traditional sense
however they are feeding into the societal American belief that if you feed your kid
you should stay home. Heaven forbid anyone be subjected to a part of your boob
while the kid kicks off a blanket, or squirms.
Now, that being said, we have a horrific breastfeeding rate in this country because
it's not supported by American culture.
If I can start at Facebook to change that..then so be it. If one woman actually
leaves her home with her baby and gets out of her house and isn't subjected to
the ...yes, MORONS...at Facebooks and Applebees and malls across america...then so be it.
lol. cute.
Anyway...I wouldn't call what facebook is doing as 'oppressive' in the traditional sense
however they are feeding into the societal American belief that if you feed your kid
you should stay home. Heaven forbid anyone be subjected to a part of your boob
while the kid kicks off a blanket, or squirms.
Now, that being said, we have a horrific breastfeeding rate in this country because
it's not supported by American culture.
If I can start at Facebook to change that..then so be it. If one woman actually
leaves her home with her baby and gets out of her house and isn't subjected to
the ...yes, MORONS...at Facebooks and Applebees and malls across america...then so be it.
6 months ago
in 2008/12/28/should-facebook-end-breast-ban/ on Mashable - The Social Media Guide
Dear Morons of Mashable,
Feeding my child is not obscene. When you are forced to hide under a blanket to
nom on that double quarter pounder your fat ass really doesn't need, perhaps you'll
be upset as well.
In the meantime, let's clear some things up. For those uneducated on the ways of
breastfeeding, many of us have children who feed all the time. That means if you are
going to take a pic of me during this time in my child's life, odds are it's attached
Second of all, most of us were blogging on issues surrounding breastfeeding- thus
how the photos ended up online.
Third. My tits serve many purposes, much like YOUR tits. The main function of which
is to feed my kid. A NON pornographic experience.
Your tits and your mouth also serve many purposes. Your mouth eats, but it can also
be sexual. By American standards we're fine with mouth photos, but, I digress.
Breastfeeding in public is protected under the law in California. Facebook has the right
to do whatever the hell they want, but this is a prime example of a 'frat boy'
mentality that tits are for THEM.
The mothers involved have turned this into an issue because we refuse to hide, be sent to a bathroom to feed, or to cover up.
If more companies and people would support the World Health Organization's breastfeeding
standards, we'd have less disease, and better health in this country
Instead we call it obscene and freak out over photos on someone's facebook page.
Go back to looking at the barely legal teens in thongs showing their ass cracks on Facebook, clearly you care more about them then the health of our country's children.
Feeding my child is not obscene. When you are forced to hide under a blanket to
nom on that double quarter pounder your fat ass really doesn't need, perhaps you'll
be upset as well.
In the meantime, let's clear some things up. For those uneducated on the ways of
breastfeeding, many of us have children who feed all the time. That means if you are
going to take a pic of me during this time in my child's life, odds are it's attached
Second of all, most of us were blogging on issues surrounding breastfeeding- thus
how the photos ended up online.
Third. My tits serve many purposes, much like YOUR tits. The main function of which
is to feed my kid. A NON pornographic experience.
Your tits and your mouth also serve many purposes. Your mouth eats, but it can also
be sexual. By American standards we're fine with mouth photos, but, I digress.
Breastfeeding in public is protected under the law in California. Facebook has the right
to do whatever the hell they want, but this is a prime example of a 'frat boy'
mentality that tits are for THEM.
The mothers involved have turned this into an issue because we refuse to hide, be sent to a bathroom to feed, or to cover up.
If more companies and people would support the World Health Organization's breastfeeding
standards, we'd have less disease, and better health in this country
Instead we call it obscene and freak out over photos on someone's facebook page.
Go back to looking at the barely legal teens in thongs showing their ass cracks on Facebook, clearly you care more about them then the health of our country's children.
6 months ago
in I Am Gay on Learn To Duck
So this is exactly why when people ask me 'who is this Micah guy and why are you friends?' (because Micah likes to play it off like he's so tough and brash and blah blah blah) I tell them, without hesitation, I love Micah.
From now on maybe I'll just send them the link to this post.
From now on maybe I'll just send them the link to this post.
7 months ago
in Even Douchebags Are Thankful on Learn To Duck
I'm thankful MIcah really isn't a douchebag
7 months ago
in Gary Vaynerchuk - If we are going to call out Brit then we have to... on Gary Vaynerchuk
GO Jets...but um, Gary is not the president of twitter
http://www.viddler.com/explore/QueenofSpain/vid...
http://www.viddler.com/explore/QueenofSpain/vid...
8 months ago
in Fundamental rights and wrongs - the religious issues behind Proposition 8 on mrontemp
It's nice to see so many churches against prop 8
8 months ago
in louisgray.com: Prop 8 Tangles Religion, Tech and Politics on louisgray.com
As you know, I have a very hard time with this. And since my initial rant-o-rama I've been attempting to see that 'middle area' of which you speak. It's very difficult. But I"m trying.
On the surface,I see supporting discrimination is bigoted and is evil- even if it's not that simple. I have such a hard time wrapping my head around the many layers of complex issues that involve going from point a to point b- but must admit they DO in fact exist. I think when you mix deeply held religious beliefs that are in conflict with what appears to be civil rights, you can't help but be confused and befuddled. As I had friend after friend tell that just because they do not support gay marriage they were not a bigot, I found myself asking for the reasons why. Which lead to very long discussions regarding their beliefs.
I"m not sure I'm comfortable with any of their answers, to be honest. But I do respect that they know their beliefs better than I.
It doesn't help, as an opponent of the measure, to watch over 10 million dollars from Utah come into my state to fund something I wholeheartedly disagree with. I get angry, and I get upset and ...well..rants occur. lol.
I do think it's an important topic for this community and others and I'm glad to see you talking about it.
On the surface,I see supporting discrimination is bigoted and is evil- even if it's not that simple. I have such a hard time wrapping my head around the many layers of complex issues that involve going from point a to point b- but must admit they DO in fact exist. I think when you mix deeply held religious beliefs that are in conflict with what appears to be civil rights, you can't help but be confused and befuddled. As I had friend after friend tell that just because they do not support gay marriage they were not a bigot, I found myself asking for the reasons why. Which lead to very long discussions regarding their beliefs.
I"m not sure I'm comfortable with any of their answers, to be honest. But I do respect that they know their beliefs better than I.
It doesn't help, as an opponent of the measure, to watch over 10 million dollars from Utah come into my state to fund something I wholeheartedly disagree with. I get angry, and I get upset and ...well..rants occur. lol.
I do think it's an important topic for this community and others and I'm glad to see you talking about it.
1 reply
Louis Gray
Erin, I Twitter-spammed you because I remembered your article and
wanted to extend the dialog, with you included.
I agree with your comment in regards to out of states funds supporting
the initiative. I don't think Californians should send their money to
other states to support or denounce local propositions, or vice versa.
I also agree with your comment that supporting discrimination and
bigotry is wrong. My gay friends are the closest I have, including the
two aforementioned best friends from high school. I wish them the
best, and we have had long talks over the years with each other when
we have found differences in ideology.
My mother, and other church members, have wondered if their position
on this initiative is something like a litmus test. If you say you
support the church and its leaders, how then can you ignore or go
against them when they ask for your help here? How can we fully
understand why this has become such a major issue for them, without
knowing all things? To turn against their promptings and to vote with
my friends is the easy way out for me, and I'm doing what I can to
better understand why I would think to support the other side of the
issue.
Thanks for the visit and the comments. There is room for healthy,
respectful debate, and I hope to continue that. This is going to be a
big November of change at the national and state levels. Should be
very interesting.
wanted to extend the dialog, with you included.
I agree with your comment in regards to out of states funds supporting
the initiative. I don't think Californians should send their money to
other states to support or denounce local propositions, or vice versa.
I also agree with your comment that supporting discrimination and
bigotry is wrong. My gay friends are the closest I have, including the
two aforementioned best friends from high school. I wish them the
best, and we have had long talks over the years with each other when
we have found differences in ideology.
My mother, and other church members, have wondered if their position
on this initiative is something like a litmus test. If you say you
support the church and its leaders, how then can you ignore or go
against them when they ask for your help here? How can we fully
understand why this has become such a major issue for them, without
knowing all things? To turn against their promptings and to vote with
my friends is the easy way out for me, and I'm doing what I can to
better understand why I would think to support the other side of the
issue.
Thanks for the visit and the comments. There is room for healthy,
respectful debate, and I hope to continue that. This is going to be a
big November of change at the national and state levels. Should be
very interesting.
8 months ago
in It’s the Economy, Stupid on Technosailor
I swear I'm the only one NOT freaking out. Why? Well first and foremost as much as I love money, I know I can live without it. It's not fun, but it's been done and we can all do it again. Second, people survive. They are survivors by nature. We survived the Great Depression and once people can't get their $4 lattes, they will freak out enough to actually make changes. I also think you do need to rely (with a health dose of cynicism) on economists and people who actually do know their shit. But that means trusting them at some point, which I am not sure any of you are willing to do.
1 reply
Aaron Brazell
Funny you should mention $4 Lattes... In NYC this weekend, it looked like
the Starbucks drinks were alive and kicking.
the Starbucks drinks were alive and kicking.
9 months ago
in The Scoble Top Tech Blogger/FriendFeed/Social Media List on Scobleizer
Finally catching up with my reading...thanks Robert. See you again soon, I'm sure! I wonder if Austin has an ice room? ;)
9 months ago
in Not Everything is Quite as Important as You’re Making it Out to Be on Technosailor
I've been writing a post today (all day, between taking kids to preschool, dentist, and doing laundry) and my goal is to not mention the 'P' word once.
It's hard. But dammit, I'm doing it. And if I HAVE to say it, it will only be in the Mc*ain/Pword ticket form.
It's hard. But dammit, I'm doing it. And if I HAVE to say it, it will only be in the Mc*ain/Pword ticket form.
10 months ago
in BlogDay 2008 - is it still August 31? on mrontemp
Meh. You don't need the feed when you have me yammering on twitter all the time ;)
1 reply
ontarioemperor
I disagree. #suckit only makes so much impact on a microblog, but when you go to a regular blog, and augment it with a YouTube video, then the deeper meaning of #suckit can be explored more deeply.

business. I'll try and do more as the topics seem to be interesting...