<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for tony</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/91a38913e209da0d0ef4bdab6a7f6df9/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 00:03:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: AquaticPrime Warning</title><link>http://toxicsoftware.disqus.com/aquaticprime_warning/#comment-1655953</link><description>Is there any protection against simply copying the AquaticPrime framework out of the app, and replacing it with a framework that implements the same public classes but doesn't actually check anything?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At a glance, I see an AquaticPrime object with methods &lt;br&gt;- (BOOL)verifyLicenseData:(NSData *)data;&lt;br&gt;- (BOOL)verifyLicenseFile:(NSString *)path;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So if I write AquaticPrime object that always returns YES for those two methods, is it game over?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tony</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 00:03:14 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>