DISQUS

DISQUS Hello!  The comments on this profile are unclaimed and thus are unverified.

Do they belong to you? Claim these comments.

Bill's picture

Unregistered

Feeds

aliases

  • Bill
  • Bill
  • BillTheEditor

Bill

1 month ago

in Thoughts & Ruminations - Watch this video and then try to tell me that the... on Fr. Ryan's Tumblr
Those cops must be so proud of themselves. Not to mention Father Jenkins, under whose instructions they did this.

5 months ago

in How we look vs Who we are (Scripting News) on Scripting News
Sorry, Dave. No offense intended.

5 months ago

in How we look vs Who we are (Scripting News) on Scripting News
I thought the accordion player was Andy Kaufman. I never knew *why* you would pick him, but it always makes me smile.

Must be time to get my eyes checked.

5 months ago

in 2009/02/03/christian-bale-tirade/ on Mashable - The Social Media Guide
Who cares? A spoiled, overpaid, undertalented actor in a second-rate movie throws a foul-mouthed hissy fit. Big deal. You can see the same thing (less the profanity) in any kindergarten.

Move along, people. Nothing to see here.

1 year ago

in Voter Disenfranchisement, Texas Style? on Bang the Drum
The Clinton campaign gets more bizarre by the day.

Of course, I'm male and I voted for Obama in the TX primary, so that makes me a sexist.

Give me a break. For that matter, Hillary, give the Democratic Party a break and go away. You lost. Get it? You lost. Unless you want to burn the house down, forget about the VP nomination, too.

1 year ago

in Scoble has a productivity problem on Scobleizer
Bob, I was relating to you what I accomplish with my use of technology. If your objective is to prove you have a bigger d**k, hey, you win. Happy?

1 year ago

in Scoble has a productivity problem on Scobleizer
Bob, you young guys are always looking for a fight. I am not. I have work to do. Have a nice day.

1 year ago

in Scoble has a productivity problem on Scobleizer
Dear Bob,

I'm 62. Is that old? I got my degree in 1968 from a brick and mortar school, and did my graduate work 1972-1974 in another brick and mortar school. Is that old school?

I make my living with technology. Always have. I do not find it difficult to keep up. I do use social software, plus the gadgets you disdain. I also have time to walk the dog, play footsie with my wife, and entertain the grandchildren. Even sit on the couch and drink a beer.

I don't use social software to blather. I use it to communicate with my authors, to find people who know what they are talking about, and to keep up with trends. All very important to my success. Collaboration does in fact enable me to produce better knowledge and information products, and to do it faster. I don't have to know it all. I don't have to write it all. I do need to be smart enough to vet the information that my collaborators provide. My job and my goal is producing. My authors, my copy editor, a one-person production department, and I grind out an online magazine every week, and an e-Book every 2 to 3 months, plus a shelf full of dead tree editions. We serve a global community of 30,000 professionals, and we are adding to that number every day. We couldn't do that your way.

If you are happy with what you do and the way you do it, bully for you. Like Scoble says, it's all in your goals. If your goals are just big enough for one person to accomplish by working alone and with a minimum of technology, great. Mine are big enough that it takes more than me, and they would take more than 24 hours a day of my time if I went your route. I will guarantee you that I am both productive and happy, in both my business and my personal life.

1 year ago

in Buffet of human fool (Scripting News) on Scripting News
"It's messy, but we're learning a lot." Are we? The pundits and the MSM are learning that race is still an issue for a great many people. Those who live in the other 98% of the country already knew that, whether they like it or not, and they live with it every day, across race and ethnicity.
1 reply
Derek The next 24 hours should be fun.

If Rev. Wright is the wonderful human being you think him why did your candidate just throw him under the bus?

1 year ago

in Today's links (Scripting News) on Scripting News
I decided against Mrs. Clinton early on, when it became obvious that she thinks the Democratic Party OWES her the nomination. Mr. Obama rolled up his sleeves and went to work, rather than acting as if he were somehow privileged. That made all the difference to me. I'm voting in the March 4 Texas primary, for Mr. Obama. I'd rather see a hard-working person with common sense and ideas, even with less "experience" (also debateable, in my opinion -- and as a voter, it's my opinion that counts, not the pundits'), than an arrogant has-been. It also matters that the Republicans know how to beat Mrs. Clinton, but they are scared to death of Barak Obama because they don't know what to do about him.
1 reply
Harl Delos's picture
Harl Delos Obama versus McCain will be an interesting campaign.

Senator Obama'a campaign has been about politics, not about policies, and because Senator Clinton's policies aren't THAT much different than Senator Obama's, she hasn't been able to use that effectively.

However, Senator McCain can compare his conservative platform against the liberal platform of Senator Obama without being seen as nasty or racist. For years, Democrats have been scared to death of the L-word. Obama isn't scared of being a liberal; he embraces it, and is willing to sell it. He's going to say, "Look, we want and need services, and they aren't free to provide." But the GOP is still going to talk about tax-and-spend versus smaller government.

The red states and blue states have the politics they have because of their population density. People in red states do for themselves, because it doesn't make sense for government to, for instance, to run a mass transit system in rural North Dakota, and it does make sense to drive a big SUV, because little cars get blown off the road. (A few years ago, someone was driving a compact car on the bridge between the UP and LP of Michigan, and it blew right off the bridge into the water.) On the other hand, it's pretty foolish to drive a big car - or even ANY car - in Manhattan. You take the subway and let stores deliver your purchases.

The democrats will be talking about perpetual war - or at least 100 years - while the GOP will be talking about surrendering to Al Queda. The democrats will be talking about health care, and the GOP will be telling you to envision your doctor's office, only run by the DMV.

Barack will need to be careful, talking about McCain's age, because older Americans are the most likely to vote. McCain will need to be careful not to mention Barack's ethnicity, because the slightest tinge of racism will make lots of voters cringe. This may be one of the most polite political campaigns in decades - but it will be hard-fought, and it will be *close*. The party that thinks they can win this one with television advertising will end up losing. The winner will be the party that spends the most on donuts: they need to be organizing phone banks, organizing voter registration, organizing workers to get voters to the polling places.

This is NOT going to be a slam-dunk for the democrats. If Dubya were running for re-election, it would be, but the GOP isn't going to concede an inch. It'll be the same big few "swing" states that decide things.

1 year ago

in This could be a nightmare (Scripting News) on Scripting News
Another thought: If we go all the way to the Democratic convention without either Obama or Clinton retiring from the campaign, that means the Republicans will have a hard time throwing dirt and getting it to stick. There are enough differences between Clinton and Obama on the issues that matter to the Republicans that they can't attack both effectively.

Well, it's a theory. :)

With a little luck, Obama and Clinton will be smart enough NOT to run dirty campaigns. If they do that, the Democrats will rise up in a body and vote for the one that gets the nomination. The Republicans can go chew on each other (we could only wish!).

1 year ago

in This could be a nightmare (Scripting News) on Scripting News
Most Democrats I know say they would be happy with either Obama or Clinton. With some it just comes down to "any candidate but a Republican or a Communist." The current race is just to see which one gets top billing on the ticket. More than likely, both of them will be on it.

The challenge is with Clinton. If she is the nominee for President, even the ultra-conservatives will hold their noses and vote for McCain. They hate her that much. In my opinion, Obama would be the better candidate. As I've been saying for months, the Republicans are scared to death of Obama. They *know* how to beat Clinton and they have the dirt and the lies to do it. They don't know how to beat Obama.

1 year ago

in Twitter reactions to Apple’s OS update on Scobleizer
The install of Leopard went smoothly, although it took a very long time, and the CD failed the Integrity Check the first time. HOWEVER, some of my apps are now broken, and I mean the latest versions of them. Biggest issues are gimp (crashes with ugly error messages while starting) and OpenOffice (opens slowly, OS X says it timed out, then voila! it opens, but it also seems a little flaky on some operations). So now I'm doing my graphics work back on the PC, which is ok except for the pain in the neck moving files around. The latest upgrade to 10.5.1 has not resolved these issues.

On the whole, the experience has been about the same as when I upgraded the PC from W2K to Win XP, which broke about the same number of apps, percentage-wise.

I admit I haven't had the nerve to move to Vista, and I may never. It's the reason I bought the Macbook instead of a new Windows-based laptop. Too many ugly stories about Vista from people I work with who did install Vista -- and sfaik they installed it correctly; they aren't screw-ups.

1 year ago

in Apple's brand promise, and how blogging can fix it (Scripting News) on Scripting News
People generally pay way too much attention to fanboyz. Doesn't matter whether they are Mac fanboyz or Windows fanboyz. Every machine and every operating system has some stuff that's brilliant and some stuff that's truly ugly. That's true of Windows, OS X, Linux, what-have-you. And in the same way, some stuff in every system "just works" and some stuff "just sucks." I love my Sony Vaio desktop system running Win XP. I love my Macbook running OS X running Leopard. But I know that either one has turned around and bitten me in the past, and I am quite confident that both will do so again in the future. That's life. Normal users deal with it. Fanboyz refuse to admit the possibility. I'm happy about what the technology does for me, mainly because I'm old enough to have been a middle-aged adult before personal computer technology came along and I remember just how bad things could be when you were trying to get things done. Fanboyz generally seem to be deeply angry about something, but it's not important to me what that is.

1 year ago

in FedEx exec shows opportunity for online advertising on Scobleizer
For some (many?) corporations, the rationale behind their response to the question of "to blog or not to blog" comes down to one word: control. The same is true of their response to any viral opportunity. If the corporation is not primarily interested in control, then any opportunity to spread a message virally will be embraced. If control is a primary requisite, viral marketing will be shunned.

In addition, I would observe that any person with the title, "VP of strategic marketing" probably has his or her performance evaluated and budget determined based partly (or largely) on being able to demonstrate return on the dollar spent on marketing. Tough to do that with viral approaches.

I hear FedEx is serious about holding people accountable. That also probably figures into Mark's response to blogging. If he endorses it, and somebody says the wrong thing, his job just might be on the line.
Returning? Login