Hello!
The comments on this profile are unclaimed and thus are unverified.
Do they belong to you? Claim these comments.
mica
Is this you? Claim Profile »
3 months ago
in Listen: The Mission Veo on Consequence of Sound
ahmazing band i <3 them <3 them <3 them
4 months ago
in Enfin une bonne colle à l'eau on pingaddict @000
Ca colle plus les doigts que les plaques c'est une horreur et ça ne part pas de 4 ou 5 h quand tu en as sur les doigts, tu as beau te laver les mains 10 fois rien n'y fait, très pratique si tu comptes jouer après...
4 months ago
in Enfin une bonne colle à l'eau on Etats d'âme sur le tennis de table
Ca colle plus les doigts que les plaques c'est une horreur et ça ne part pas de 4 ou 5 h quand tu en as sur les doigts, tu as beau te laver les mains 10 fois rien n'y fait, très pratique si tu comptes jouer après...
4 months ago
in Enfin une bonne colle à l'eau on Etats d'âme sur le tennis de table
Ca colle plus les doigts que les plaques c'est une horreur et ça ne part pas de 4 ou 5 h quand tu en as sur les doigts, tu as beau te laver les mains 10 fois rien n'y fait, très pratique si tu comptes jouer après...
8 months ago
in A Better Sex Offender Registry on The Phoenix Real Estate Guy
Ruth - Your thesis for your comment on sex offenders is that you can't believe how many excuses people are making for sex offenders, presumably by being critical of my and other comments who see the negatives in sex offender registries. As "proof," you offer ONE case of some guy who apparently got off easy by a judge. However, one case doesn't prove your thesis one bit. If you had done as much research as I have on this issue from reputable sources (government sites, public interest sites, etc.), you would see the entire picture, rather than this one case in which you know. You'd see that registries have not protected anyone, have not saved anyone, and have not made people use their common sense. Instead, it's targeted a group of people (and their families and loved ones) who have committed offenses in the past (or who have been falsely accused in the past) and made them pay - over and over again. The recidivist stats cited by those who support registries are wrong, and are used to unjustifiably hold people accountable for crimes long since committed as if they would recommit them over and over again. Will some reoffend? Of course! Will most reoffend? Of course not! But the ASSUMPTION is that 100 percent will reoffend, thereby necessitating the registries to make the public vigilant against a future offender. The premise for 95% of those on the registries is wrong. Instead, it should post only those who have proven themselves to be a danger.
1 year ago
in A few Notes… on Immoral Matriarch: Catechizer
You can watch the first episode of The Tudors season 2 on Showtime's website! http://www.sho.com/site/vip/home.do?source=tudo... Royal
2 years ago
in An Interesting OS X 10.4 Predicament on ParisLemon
That's not the way it works. The next update would be 10.4.10 and after that 10.4.11. It doesn't have to make mathematical sense.
