DISQUS

Mike D., with his eloquent, expansive diction, makes my head hurt....

Thanks for the showing me that painful read, Mike. That douche wants to trade Votto and Bailey for Blanton -- what a dumbass. Wins as a manager: Paul Daugherty, 0.

Well..., there ARE several plot holes, to be fair. For example, how does Lou go from putting the game in his VCR to talking about the "antiquated button pressing of yore?" And how does Desmond... oh, wait, never mind.

I see that Lou's "gamer" ability seems to increase exponentially after about the second paragraph -- quick learner that guy.

You can't do that on the balcony, buddy?

Annyong!

That's great... Although, I would like you to add some more "fuck"s and such into Hendry's dialogue, for accuracies sake (as your enlightening meeting with him revealed, that is).

"I worry that there may be one person who relies on this blog as the sole source of his [ ] information."

You could've just said my name...

Yes, that's the good thing about Lou (over Dusty): he'll change what he's doing if it doesn't work. Though, one would think, that should be a requirement for a Major League manager... But, anyways, why start off with a stupid-ass lineup, just to plan on changing it WHEN it doesn't work out? Should we have Fukudome become the 5th starter? No. But what if Lou will relocate him back to right-field WHEN it doesn't work out -- if he'll move him if he can't produce there? Does that make it any more valid of a decision? Forgive the reductio ad absurdum, but I just think it's dumb to do something, well, dumb with the reassurance of future correctional changes...

Yep.

My whole floor, and I'm sure most other floors, as well, were sitting in our rooms or in the lounge on their computers (or studying with books) -- there are K201 and Finite Midterms today. So go suck on a cock, next time, before you try to mock me with no context provided (unless, like me, you suck at compliments, this was your attempt at one...)...

Where's Carpenter damn it? And how about Sheets? This FNF is disappointing...

Nah. I'm more of a (shitty-) idea person.

Just a suggestion: maybe you could get rid of either quality starts or shutout and put blown saves in their then make it like an outrageous +12 or something. If blown saves are allowed by Yahoo, then it would work pretty well. Only relievers can gain a blown saved and you don't need to be a closer to get one. It would give people incentive to gamble on a reliever that would be put in situations where his team is up just a little but blows it often (you don't even need to punish saves because that would give the opposite effect, and this is just to get a few shitty, but trusted, relievers into the mix). Would that work?

You are allowed to pitch 268 innings in a year?!?

De nada.

Things like this make me hope that there really is a heaven for great people to go to...

Can somebody remind me again -- you don't you need to go on your computer in order to be able to post a comment on a satirical blog, right? Well? 'Cause I kinda forgot and wasn't sure.... Also, you can easily find passing slants in google, correct? Aren't you able to just click the little selection next to "images" labeled "cruel words toward the following item" and enter in your selection and hit enter. Wouldn't that just pop-up with all the meany-head's sites in the world and highlight their awful crimes against humanity in the form of insults to the previously-searched item. Right? I mean, that would take mere seconds to find, correct? And you could easily perform that search, then post your all-important comments, in mere seconds, all while being able to be live your eternally-mportant life of continously sucking off your own boyfriend, who is currently signing a check, to the needy, for money from his well-deserved stash, impediment free. Am I wrong in my understanding of this? Am I...?

"You know what should be outlawed?

Shitty sportswriting."

Then what would Kermit have to write about about; and, by extension, what would we have to entertain ourselves with...?

Wow, last one... Lucky you guys.

Me, me, me!!!....

Just so you know, your picture title would have offended me 8 years ago.

Any respecting NSBBer would spit on this awful list of stats! Where are the fucking VORP's or OPS's? Where is range factor factored in? No wonder they have to go to SSM for their baseball rumors, this site is pitiful...

“I’m in!” in the comments section just yet.

First post!