<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Sarah</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/8ab01c8ab9fd1703382c6c9cd9d86634/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:21:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Office 2.0: 10 new things you can do in the (Google) cloud</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/office_20_10_new_things_you_can_do_in_the_google_cloud/#comment-2252443</link><description>At least it wasn't 100% Google stuff, just barely. There's something about it on this &lt;a href="http://www.atelier-us.com/events-and-conferences/article/googles-matthew-glotzbach-analyzes-a-year-of-cloud-computing-in-office-20-keynote" rel="nofollow"&gt;interesting article&lt;/a&gt;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sarah</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:13:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EPIC FAIL : This site may harm your computer.</title><link>http://adagency.disqus.com/epic_fail_this_site_may_harm_your_computer/#comment-17869154</link><description>That was a strange hour! It was oddly amusing, but it sure points a finger at how much we rely on Google on a daily basis. There's a great screenshot at &lt;a href="http://www.atelier-us.com/internet-usage/article/this-site-may-harm-your-computer" rel="nofollow"&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; where Google flags its own site as harmful:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.atelier-us.com/internet-usage/article/this-site-may-harm-your-computer" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.atelier-us.com/internet-usage/articl...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sarah</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:21:11 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>