Do they belong to you? Claim these comments.
webprofessor
Is this you? Claim Profile »
1 year ago
in Spammers Get Around Captchas on Marketing Pilgrim
thats not a new strategy at varient that I read about a few years ago and have used is to use captchas on a porn site. The captcha's though are just copied from what ever site you want to log in to. So users get their porn and you get your captchas solved. WIN! WIN!
1 year ago
in Markus Frind: The Craig Newmark of dating on Mathew's comments
Dude what are you talking about? His sites been on several television shows sometimes including him. He's been mentioned by the BBC, NPR, and other new organizations. I'd say he's pretty well known at this point.
1 year ago
in Digg Favorites Slapped By Google on Andy Beard - Internet Business Systems Discussion
Andy a few years ago I might have agreed with you that they received penalties but I don't now. Toolbar PR doesn't matter anymore and isn't an accurate indicator of Googles opinion on a site. You know that toolbar PR and incoming traffic are not related and any link buyer that isn't a novice knows that as well. The only measurable indicator that we currently have of Googles opinion of a site is traffic and thats what we should focus on when we discuss penalties.
2 replies
Skitzzo
It's not that Toolbar PR isn't valid, it's just that it's a snapshot from so long ago that it doesn't really matter for what happens now. However, it does show us that something happened at least when that snapshot was taken. It's like looking at a photo of someone hitting a home run. Sure it might have been 3 months ago but they still hit the home run.
As long as Toolbar PR is the only public measure we have from Google, it's going to continue to matter. By drastically dropping the PR of these high profile sites, Google is just asking to be hated.
As long as Toolbar PR is the only public measure we have from Google, it's going to continue to matter. By drastically dropping the PR of these high profile sites, Google is just asking to be hated.
1 year ago
in TechMeme list heralds death of blogging? on Scobleizer
I genuinely like that all the cat posts are going to Twitter. It makes the blogs I read more topical and interesting for me.
1 year ago
in Amanda splits with ABC — does anyone care? on Mathew's comments
Don't count her out just yet. I am sure we'll be seeing her cleavage somewhere else soon.
1 year ago
in Blogrush Testing and Tracking (Updated – John Reese Quote) on Andy Beard - Internet Business Systems Discussion
I understand what your saying but I don't think the same concept applies since its supposed to promote related articles not related widgets.
1 year ago
in Blogrush Testing and Tracking (Updated – John Reese Quote) on Andy Beard - Internet Business Systems Discussion
The difference is that Adsense is advertising. Most readers know that advertising should inherently be distrusted and viewed through neutral eyes.
1 year ago
in Blogrush Testing and Tracking (Updated – John Reese Quote) on Andy Beard - Internet Business Systems Discussion
Andy I have to object to your example on the grounds that your comparing apples and oranges.
If you created a syndicated feed of your favorite authors and shared it on your site you are telling your readers "Look here are some people I trust to provide good articles for you". Blogrush is another animal though because you don't know who your linking to.
When readers encounter links on your site they are trusting you to send them to a safe site that has something they should check out.
Does that mean you agree with all you link to? Of course not. It does mean once you give up control of who you link to you had better trust the selector of those links. Otherwise your squandering the faith your readers put into your site.
If you created a syndicated feed of your favorite authors and shared it on your site you are telling your readers "Look here are some people I trust to provide good articles for you". Blogrush is another animal though because you don't know who your linking to.
When readers encounter links on your site they are trusting you to send them to a safe site that has something they should check out.
Does that mean you agree with all you link to? Of course not. It does mean once you give up control of who you link to you had better trust the selector of those links. Otherwise your squandering the faith your readers put into your site.
1 reply
Andy Beard
I currently don't have my Bumpzee widget switched on, I should do that now, it is only turned off because they had some performance issues.
Stories on Bumpzee have appeared all the time from sites I wouldn't choose to link to and there was no way to block them.
If I included a Digg widget containing my Digg Friends submissions, I doubt I would be interested in more than 10% of them myself, or even if 10% of them would be relevant.
For a long time I was showing a feed from my Technorati Favorites, and I was reciprocating favorites as a way for my readers to share their content with me.
Unfortunately Technorati was still only showing the highest rated blogs in the feed.
I have also used The Good Blogs, that doesn't give you any control over which articles are shown, and from what I remember it didn't allow me to block URLs or keywords.
If you have problems with sharing content that is in some way related to your audience from unknown sources, don't include any widgets other than something like Google Reader sharing, but I have ethical problems with Google Reader not supporting a way to prevent sharing, despite all my own content being published under GPL.
Stories on Bumpzee have appeared all the time from sites I wouldn't choose to link to and there was no way to block them.
If I included a Digg widget containing my Digg Friends submissions, I doubt I would be interested in more than 10% of them myself, or even if 10% of them would be relevant.
For a long time I was showing a feed from my Technorati Favorites, and I was reciprocating favorites as a way for my readers to share their content with me.
Unfortunately Technorati was still only showing the highest rated blogs in the feed.
I have also used The Good Blogs, that doesn't give you any control over which articles are shown, and from what I remember it didn't allow me to block URLs or keywords.
If you have problems with sharing content that is in some way related to your audience from unknown sources, don't include any widgets other than something like Google Reader sharing, but I have ethical problems with Google Reader not supporting a way to prevent sharing, despite all my own content being published under GPL.
1 year ago
in Blogrush Testing and Tracking (Updated – John Reese Quote) on Andy Beard - Internet Business Systems Discussion
But Andy you did endorse the links by putting the widget on your site in the first place.
1 reply
Andy Beard
No, that means I am endorsing the widget as a viable syndication widget for blogs to maybe get more exposure.
If I was syndicating a feed from the best SEO blogs and included Matt Cutts from Google among that essential reading, that doesn't mean when he writes about paid links that I agree with his opinion.
I had someone from one of Blogrush's competitors drop a link in my comments yesterday with a challenge claiming they are going to give blog owners more traffic than Blogrush, or pay them $10.
I almost deleted it as self promotional comment spam, because I saw almost exactly the same comment posted on 20 different blogs, it was as if they were just working their way down a search result and using copy/paste.
I have left it only because I don't mind differing opinions, but they claimed that they will send me more traffic without any information on their site to determine how they plan to send me 700+ new targeted visitors without counting my referral credits.
They also claimed that Blogrush was purely a pyramid scheme, but based on my diagrams it is not.
How is othersonline planning to send me traffic when in 8 months they haven't managed to generate any of their own.
I don't really trust Alexa stats or Compete, and Compete might have a few additional bugs, but just look at the difference between my low traffic blog and Othersonline
If I was syndicating a feed from the best SEO blogs and included Matt Cutts from Google among that essential reading, that doesn't mean when he writes about paid links that I agree with his opinion.
I had someone from one of Blogrush's competitors drop a link in my comments yesterday with a challenge claiming they are going to give blog owners more traffic than Blogrush, or pay them $10.
I almost deleted it as self promotional comment spam, because I saw almost exactly the same comment posted on 20 different blogs, it was as if they were just working their way down a search result and using copy/paste.
I have left it only because I don't mind differing opinions, but they claimed that they will send me more traffic without any information on their site to determine how they plan to send me 700+ new targeted visitors without counting my referral credits.
They also claimed that Blogrush was purely a pyramid scheme, but based on my diagrams it is not.
How is othersonline planning to send me traffic when in 8 months they haven't managed to generate any of their own.
I don't really trust Alexa stats or Compete, and Compete might have a few additional bugs, but just look at the difference between my low traffic blog and Othersonline
1 year ago
in Blogrush Testing and Tracking (Updated – John Reese Quote) on Andy Beard - Internet Business Systems Discussion
Nice write up Andy.. best one I have read to date about Blogrush.
I don't see much upside in BlogRush, displaying posts of questionable quality for other sites just doesn't sit well with me. I might be more inclined to give it more of a chance if the widget wasn't broken 2/3rds of the time.
I don't see much upside in BlogRush, displaying posts of questionable quality for other sites just doesn't sit well with me. I might be more inclined to give it more of a chance if the widget wasn't broken 2/3rds of the time.
1 year ago
in BlogRush Widget Termination T Minus 24 Hours on Marketing Pilgrim
I killed it after I saw my third error message. Besides banner exchanges are so 90's
1 year ago
in Profile: Smilebox mixes Web and desktop on Mathew's comments
Nice insight about how time constraints of moms plays into how they need their apps built. Thats a good takeaway lesson from this.
1 year ago
in Blocking Ad Blocking on Marketing Pilgrim
Thats retarded. Free speech rights only applies to how the government treats us not what private citizens do. If I want to go through the Sunday paper and cut out all the ads before I read it I can. If I want to kick you off my lawn while you wave signs up I can. If I want to remove ads from a page I downloaded onto my computer in the privacy of my home.... guess what.. thats right I can.
Marketers can rant about this all they want but what they really should be doing is being creative with their marketing and not make enemies out of their audience.
Marketers can rant about this all they want but what they really should be doing is being creative with their marketing and not make enemies out of their audience.
1 year ago
in Blocking Ad Blocking on Marketing Pilgrim
How to detect adblocking? You simply use a javascript that checks your DOM for the ads you use. If you can't detect the ads in your DOM or they have been altered to be invisible then you don't display your page.
1 year ago
in Blocking Ad Blocking on Marketing Pilgrim
@HMTKSteve - Its easy to block those types of image ads too. You just block common banner sizes ( can't do this with adblock but I think Norton has a tool to do it ) and common names for advertising. The only real way to get advertising that isn't block is to actually use regular text links that go directly to the target.
1 year ago
in Blocking Ad Blocking on Marketing Pilgrim
David Google Adsense is one of the easiest advertising forms to block with adblocking software. You simply block the domain they serve it google adsense from. I haven't seen an Adsense block in ages since I installed AdBlocker.
1 year ago
in Blocking Adverts Might Cost You Money on Andy Beard - Internet Business Systems Discussion
Is it wrong to zip past adverts when I record a show on my Tivo or VCR? Of course not, its not my job to worry about the producer of the content. If you can't find a way to make money off the people blocking your ads then your just a poor marketer.
1 year ago
in A Small Peephole On Google Supplemental Results | BPWrap on BPWrap
Thats a really nice find. I don't know if I care much though about the supplemental index. I tend to just rely on my logs to determine if my pages are important enough for google. I mean honestly if I am not in the supplemental index but on page 10 of the serps is there really a difference?
2 years ago
in MyBlogLog Reacts to Boycott, Reinstates Shoemoney on Marketing Pilgrim
Your going to boycott a service because they banned someone that was trolling them and posting exploits ?
lol.. you are really to much.
lol.. you are really to much.
2 years ago
in Time to Say Goodbye to the NoFollow Tag? on Marketing Pilgrim
Since when is linking to someone in a non-offensive way a bold move ? No follow is a concept that was corrupted from the start by google trying to use it as a proxy war against paid links.
I don't sell pagerank, yet my site was hit.
These blog networks are interlinking, but then so is Yahoo, and so does Google.