<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for David Henderson</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/8a5838fca8839ecaaf53a2dbaf787d0f/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 22:35:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: And Then There Was Email</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/and_then_there_was_email/#comment-1574251</link><description>Except 12-24's don't use email for social!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is about them not us!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We get so caught up in our PowerPoints we forget that...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Henderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 12:00:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Was AOL Thinking?</title><link>http://socialtimes.disqus.com/what_was_aol_thinking/#comment-1574282</link><description>I have lots of ideas how AOL can leverage the social graph with AIM. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rule #1, you don not need to acquire a single social graph aggregation point! The social graph is open.... HELLO!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Henderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 22:35:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How SocialAds Will Revolutionize Advertising</title><link>http://allfacebook.disqus.com/how_socialads_will_revolutionize_advertising/#comment-1639712</link><description>That's an easy one.  They won't.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is about influence, social influence, but not necessarily ads....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Henderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:26:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>