http://disqus.com/people/88f4a4e53612ae63af621fc67a034897/enFri, 25 Apr 2008 16:35:10 -0000http://mathewingram.disqus.com/bitchmeme_do_blogs_deserve_advertising_00/#comment-352313i'm not sure what your point is. we don't need another derivative take on techmeme to understand what "louis said." he makes his points quite clearly.michael walensFri, 18 Apr 2008 11:56:21 -0000http://mathewingram.disqus.com/andreessen_msft_did_us_a_favour_36/#comment-378864"I don’t normally like to praise Microsoft for things. Not only am I not a Microsoft fan-boy, but I think some of the ways that the software company has done business in the past have been — well, bordering on unethical"<br><br>um, well..no shit. you do remember that a district court in washington convicted ms of being a predatory monopolist? still, there's something distasteful, if not juvenile, in your studied promotion of yourself as being in the anti-ms camp. there are no "good" or "bad" guys out there anymore.....google, yahoo, ibm, oracle - pick your poison. and i can think of many companies who regularly turn out lousy products. i suppose it's easy to pitch spitballs from the cheap seats. still, you do need to take a fresher look at what's going on in the business. time to hop on a jet sometime and visit the tech industry for a first-hand inspection, matthew.michael walensFri, 25 Apr 2008 09:13:40 -0000http://mathewingram.disqus.com/google_search_by_date_sign_me_up_17/#comment-381106ugh, sloppy stuff. we need better fact-checking here.michael walensFri, 25 Apr 2008 16:35:10 -0000