<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Cheswick</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/880bed7ff4637aefbea89e4c7acc16bb/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:31:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; The PQI U510 Reviewed.  Verdict: Not too shabby</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/ohgizmo_raquo_archive_raquo_the_pqi_u510_reviewed_verdict_not_too_shabby/#comment-1757781</link><description>Didn't they mean "the card is NOT JUST a card?"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 20:31:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; A Geek&amp;#8217;s Memories</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/ohgizmo_raquo_archive_raquo_a_geek8217s_memories/#comment-1760854</link><description>I remember when shutting a computer down was 'park'&lt;br&gt;I remember my first Geocities page, and how proud I was that it had page dividers and animated GIFs&lt;br&gt;I remember being amazed by a computer demonstrating Descent (the original) at a regional science expo&lt;br&gt;I remember buying Commander Keen: Goodbye Galaxy on 3.5" floppy for 50 cents, along with a game called Jetpack, when my local department store stopped selling games on floppy&lt;br&gt;I remember OS/2&lt;br&gt;I remember when keyboards had nothing between CTRL and ALT</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 15:42:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; Gadget Hip &amp;#038; Shoulder Holsters - Not That Kind Of &amp;#8216;Hip&amp;#8217; Though</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/ohgizmo_raquo_archive_raquo_gadget_hip_038_shoulder_holsters_not_that_kind_of_8216hip8217_though/#comment-1761844</link><description>60 bucks for a flashy fanny pack? That thing would need a lot more to get my attention, let alone money.  Hopefully it's just some sick joke.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 12:22:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; Lustre - Fake Chandelier Silhouette</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/ohgizmo_raquo_archive_raquo_lustre_fake_chandelier_silhouette/#comment-1762525</link><description>What light source is supposed to be casting that shadow though? Surely the chandelier wouldn't cast itself a unidirectional, non-volumetric shadow, but would instead provide a diffuse illumination and that dimly lit aristocratic ambiance.  Maybe I'm just being nitpicky though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 12:44:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; Cool Hat Chills You Out</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/ohgizmo_raquo_archive_raquo_cool_hat_chills_you_out/#comment-1762880</link><description>...or you could just get a normal hat wet?? please, this doesn't require a specialty product...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 18:01:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; MetalStorm: With Bullets, More = Better</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/ohgizmo_raquo_archive_raquo_metalstorm_with_bullets_more_better/#comment-1763211</link><description>I think I saw this about 6 years ago and was excited, until nothing came of it</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 01:06:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; Banana Holster Shields Bananas</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/ohgizmo_raquo_archive_raquo_banana_holster_shields_bananas/#comment-1763445</link><description>but, what if my banana doesn't have that exact curve?  Having to mash it into the holster isn't exactly a good solution...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 21:45:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; Ice Tray Freezes Tiny Fish Skeletons</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/ohgizmo_raquo_archive_raquo_ice_tray_freezes_tiny_fish_skeletons/#comment-1763470</link><description>too bad they probably melt in about 2 minutes due to the shape</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:47:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; EatMeCrunchy Bowl Keeps Your Cereal Crunchy, Has Stupid Name</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/ohgizmo_raquo_archive_raquo_eatmecrunchy_bowl_keeps_your_cereal_crunchy_has_stupid_name/#comment-1764404</link><description>Also, conveniently cultures all kinds of sick bacteria under the shelf, no matter how many times you wash it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:37:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: dreamGEAR Launches Wii Soft Sport Kit</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/dreamgear_launches_wii_soft_sport_kit/#comment-1764577</link><description>...but no matter how soft it is, I can't justify spending $35 for something which has no functionality other than telling me which direction I'm pointing the wii remote, which is in no way a problem now.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 11:36:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; DarFon Mouse Is Ticklish</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/ohgizmo_raquo_archive_raquo_darfon_mouse_is_ticklish/#comment-1767163</link><description>This sounds like fun for grandparents and people on drugs, not so fun for people trying to actually use computers.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 17:07:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jones loans himself cash</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/jones_loans_himself_cash/#comment-18157889</link><description>He's subsidizing somebody.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 23:41:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rezko watch&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/rezko_watch8230/#comment-18160898</link><description>Guessing, obviously:  They've basically found him not guilty.  However, they don't want to let him off scot-free.  So, they're trying to figure out the best way to hang him with just one count.  Maybe.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:22:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: And some of the bad news for Blagojevich&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/and_some_of_the_bad_news_for_blagojevich8230/#comment-18161750</link><description>Sobering and weird.  No talk of continuing bond pending appeal.  No talk of appeal, unless I missed it.  It could mean he's going to do the Soprano thing and not sing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 22:23:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Not a big deal</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/not_a_big_deal/#comment-18162204</link><description>That $2.6 million for maintaining the facility during the fair sounds like a good reason to increase exhibitor, supplier, carny fees, and more.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:40:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of  the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_891/#comment-18162272</link><description>Blagojevich - Robby Benson&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's who I see every time I see the governor, except less long-haired, less bearded, than what's on his web site. Turn down your speakers if you're at work.  OMG!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.robbybenson.net/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.robbybenson.net/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Okay. This here's a photo of Benson I was thinking of (it says popup, but it's not really):&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.robbybenson.net/photoGallery/popup11.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.robbybenson.net/photoGallery/popup11...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:38:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of  the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_891/#comment-18162274</link><description>I can't believe I said "this here's."  LOL!  I never talk like that.  Really.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, Robby Benson has the same voice as the gov.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:39:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of  the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_891/#comment-18162293</link><description>Judy Barr Topinka - Shirley MacLaine</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 16:21:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of  the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_891/#comment-18162294</link><description>Jane Byrne in a cameo appearance as herself.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 16:23:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Forgotten Illinois&amp;#8221;   *** UPDATED x1 ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/8220forgotten_illinois8221_updated_x1/#comment-18163497</link><description>&lt;a href="http://www.illinoisatlas.com/illinois/political/political2.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;Red = no show&lt;/a&gt;.  Lawrence County was light blue in 2002, then dark red in 2006.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:20:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Was IDOT building flooded?  &amp;#8220;No,&amp;#8221; says owner</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/was_idot_building_flooded_8220no8221_says_owner/#comment-18169234</link><description>There was at least one article in the SJ-R that said the state is going to purchase one-half (48%) of the building from the Foundation. Do any lawyers here know how that works?  Does the building go condo, or what?  Just curious.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, should we consider that while the governor has the affected employees and many of people of Springfield and beyond all up in a frenzy about him "dissing" Springfield, that maybe that's a only a byproduct of his real motivation for this move?  Just a theory:  I'm thinking that maybe what's really happening here is the governor sending a message to Bill Cellini that if he talks to the feds, the gov will pull more offices out of Cellini properties.  Obviously, this wouldn't bankrupt Cellini.  However, many of the properties are owned by other entitles and Cellini (and Somers) only manages them.  Is this too much of a leap?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:50:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Was IDOT building flooded?  &amp;#8220;No,&amp;#8221; says owner</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/was_idot_building_flooded_8220no8221_says_owner/#comment-18169239</link><description>Thanks for replying.  Little Egypt, true about Cellini, himself.  But, what about the other property owners he represents.  Do you think he cares about them enough to keep quiet to protect their interests from Blago's reorganizing of state offices?  For instance, this part owner of the Traffic Safety building:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.rumseyrancheria.org/government/council/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.rumseyrancheria.org/government/council/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"The Tribe is the largest landlord to the State of Illinois through its ownership of several buildings in Springfield, Illinois."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm not necessarily pushing this theory and realize it's pretty far fetched.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:52:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_657/#comment-18169318</link><description>Frank Lloyd Wright and all that he left us.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:06:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shameful embarrassment</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/shameful_embarrassment/#comment-18170423</link><description>The president will be busy at the re-dedication of the Lincoln Monument in Washington D.C. on February 12, 2009.  I imagine that's where the action will be (TV cameras), so the other invitees will want to be there, too.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:22:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of  the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_403/#comment-18176017</link><description>Favorite: Ray Poe because (1) as my state rep, I've found him to be quite affable even at my neighborhood gathering where he was in the political minority; and (2) love those hot dogs, hamburgers, and chicken (could go for some right now).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Least favorite:  Jim Thompson.  I can't quite put my finger on it.  But, it's like he's still got some kind of vested interest in the governor's office with his representation of George Ryan and Rod Blagojevich.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:47:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bloggers ought to show their mettle</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/bloggers_ought_to_show_their_mettle/#comment-18176765</link><description>VanillaMan, the â€œDo Rightâ€ pen, through it's own PR firm, talent agency, and booking department, is gunning for a tour of its own - coming to a town near you.  (I just made that up.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:15:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;  CBS2 airs ominous report about governor&amp;#8217;s future</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_just_in8230_cbs2_airs_ominous_report_about_governor8217s_future/#comment-18179473</link><description>Whoa!  This could explain why there were about 10+ cars in the front parking lot of the Springfield FBI office tonight between 8:30 and 9:00.  Usually, that front parking lot is empty at that time. (I drive by there almost every night.)  Well, I noticed and it made me wonder what was going on at the time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 01:02:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: THIS JUST IN&amp;#8230;  Judge rules on con-con question&amp;#8230; Language unconstitional&amp;#8230;  No new ballots&amp;#8230;  Judge wants leaflets handed out at polls and mailed to voters with revised languag...</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_just_in8230_judge_rules_on_con_con_question8230_language_unconstitional8230_no_new_ballots8230_/#comment-18180663</link><description>Objections were made.  See John Fritchy's comment earlier today (or was it yesterday).  I don't know what Pat Quinn's role was during the process, if any.  But, don't you think if Fritchy's concerns were dismissed, Pat Quinn's would have been too?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 22:02:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: THIS JUST IN&amp;#8230;  Judge rules on con-con question&amp;#8230; Language unconstitional&amp;#8230;  No new ballots&amp;#8230;  Judge wants leaflets handed out at polls and mailed to voters with revised languag...</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_just_in8230_judge_rules_on_con_con_question8230_language_unconstitional8230_no_new_ballots8230_/#comment-18180667</link><description>John, ideally, the people who flubbed this up would pay the legal expenses out of their own pocket.  Ideally.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:27:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_072/#comment-18181199</link><description>I just like the decorations.  I don't care what religion they represent.  Also, I like the lights he strings down from the top of the dome starting at Thanksgiving.  And, I really really like the soothing purple, red, and yellow lights on the north side of the Howlett Building, which I just noticed last Christmas, but which appear to have been left on all year.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 13:11:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tribune urges &amp;#8220;Yes&amp;#8221; vote on con-con; Erickson lays out what&amp;#8217;s at stake</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/tribune_urges_8220yes8221_vote_on_con_con_erickson_lays_out_what8217s_at_stake/#comment-18181401</link><description>== We will all have a chance on Nov. 4 to elect our representatives. ==&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not exactly, with 59 out of 118 state reps running unopposed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 22:13:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Morning shorts</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/morning_shorts_575/#comment-18183064</link><description>In case this hasn't been posted elsewhere:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NrobcJa_EV8" rel="nofollow"&gt;Choke Cubs Choke&lt;/a&gt; so sad... and yet freaking hilarious!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:33:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Schock to be investigated</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/schock_to_be_investigated/#comment-18183495</link><description>Whatever happens, there's a lesson here for notaries.  You are responsible for what you notarize, despite what a family member, a friend, or a boss, says.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:51:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another massive screw-up by voter group</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/another_massive_screw_up_by_voter_group/#comment-18183829</link><description>Much of this sounds like kids or pranksters trying to see if they could jerk someone around.  If so, it worked.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:52:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Morning shorts</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/morning_shorts_015/#comment-18183908</link><description>I'm really curious how the Illinois Dept. of Central Management Services came to be the middle-man for municipal salt purchasing.  Apparently, CMS does this for more than just the South Suburban municipalities.  Can all municipalities get in on this?  What about counties?  Does CMS get a fee for this?  So many questions.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:27:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_5430/#comment-18184068</link><description>If you've been banned from The Capitol Fax Blog....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:32:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Not so deep thoughts</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/not_so_deep_thoughts/#comment-18184160</link><description>== I remember when people lived within their means... ==&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good, then you probably also remember when people's means went a lot farther than they do today.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I remember when Lura Ryan opened the Governor's mansion every Halloween for kids to come and get free candy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I remember when some of us thought having both the legislative and and executive branch would be a good thing.  (Were we ever naive!)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I remember calling the toll free number (actually, it might have been a Springfield number) every day after school to find out what things went on at the 1970 Con-Con that day.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now, I'm looking forward to someone live blogging the 2010 Con-Con.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:15:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Not so deep thoughts</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/not_so_deep_thoughts/#comment-18184161</link><description>I remember when we could take the family out to the movies and everyone got popcorn, Cokes and candy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now we just go down to the governor's mansion to watch the snow melt on the driveway with our faces pressed between the wrought iron fence for our entertainment.  (Not really, but it sounds pathetic enough.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:24:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230; Cellini indicted  *** Cellini attorney responds ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_just_in8230_cellini_indicted_cellini_attorney_responds/#comment-18185466</link><description>Co-Conspirator A must be another TRS board member - former or present.  Probably present. (Just thinking out loud.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Macbeth, I don't know, except maybe to say he knew about it.  I do wonder if he and his wife are now in negotiations with Fitz for some kind of deal whereby he and/or she will not be prosecuted.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:53:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230; Cellini indicted  *** Cellini attorney responds ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_just_in8230_cellini_indicted_cellini_attorney_responds/#comment-18185470</link><description>Although I can't imagine what exactly Blago would have to deal with.  Stepping down?  Would Fitz even care about that?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:56:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: So, which way did you vote on the con-con?</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/so_which_way_did_you_vote_on_the_con_con/#comment-18186323</link><description>I voted an emphatic YES.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:59:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Evening results open thread</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/evening_results_open_thread/#comment-18186600</link><description>Rich, it's so great your dad is going to be in Grant Park tonight.  Would love to know his experiences.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;IlValleyGal - That is not right.  I bet if you were there with camera crew, satellite van, etc., you'd have gotten a different reaction.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 19:37:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Evening results open thread</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/evening_results_open_thread/#comment-18186625</link><description>State workers in Sangamon County just couldn't get past that pension issue to vote yes on Con-Con.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:15:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Illinois bennies from an Obama victory may be few</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/illinois_bennies_from_an_obama_victory_may_be_few/#comment-18187754</link><description>I recall reading somewhere that the only presidential library to be funded from U.S. tax dollars is the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library.  All the rest got private funding.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:21:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Afternoon content dump</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/afternoon_content_dump/#comment-18187794</link><description>Caption:  Nice suit.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 15:19:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Obama replacement circus gets even crazier</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/the_obama_replacement_circus_gets_even_crazier/#comment-18187920</link><description>Speaking of downstate, I wonder if David Phelps sits around wondering when his name will come up as Obama's replacement.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:52:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Morning Shorts</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/morning_shorts_935/#comment-18188289</link><description>The first &lt;a href="http://www.sj-r.com/opinions/x1772947454/Letters-to-the-Editor-Nov-14" rel="nofollow"&gt;letter to the SJR&lt;/a&gt; editor today is about why Medicaid patients in Illinois aren't getting dental care.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In part, "The Illinois Medicaid program has one of the lowest dental reimbursement rates in the nation for the most common dental procedures."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And the bottom line (same as all the other bottom lines):  "Since these patients are covered by a publicly financed program, it is the responsibility of the General Assembly and the governor to adequately fund the program."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:25:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Big budget problems, no cooperation and a huge hole on the horizon</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/big_budget_problems_no_cooperation_and_a_huge_hole_on_the_horizon/#comment-18188484</link><description>vole - You're right, it is a law.  The form and instructions are on this PDF form:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.revenue.state.il.us/taxforms/Sales/st44.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.revenue.state.il.us/taxforms/Sales/s...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've heard Illinois is losing a billion dollars a year by not collecting internet sales tax.  Does anyone know if that's true?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:10:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The meltdown cometh</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/the_meltdown_cometh/#comment-18189088</link><description>Also remember from about January of 1980, walking past the First National Bank and seeing one of those signs with the letters that stick in the little grooves saying something like, "Money Market 18.5% Come In Now!"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:30:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;   SENATE TO RECONVENE *** BLAGOJEVICH RELEASED *** OBAMA SAYS NO CONTACT *** NO STATEMENT FROM GUV? ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_just_in8230_senate_to_reconvene_blagojevich_released_obama_says_no_contact_no_statement_from_gu/#comment-18191599</link><description>Curious if the FBI invited a member of the press and/or photographer to the bust.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:10:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;   SENATE TO RECONVENE *** BLAGOJEVICH RELEASED *** OBAMA SAYS NO CONTACT *** NO STATEMENT FROM GUV? ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_just_in8230_senate_to_reconvene_blagojevich_released_obama_says_no_contact_no_statement_from_gu/#comment-18191602</link><description>Is there enough time to get all this done (impeachment, legislation, special election, whatever) in time for the new Congressional session, which I think starts on January 5th?  Obviously not.  So, if this is the route the legislature takes, Illinois will only have one sitting senator when the new session starts?  It seems like that should be a concern.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:20:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blagojevich attorney: Governor won&amp;#8217;t resign, did nothing wrong  *** UPDATES ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/blagojevich_attorney_governor_won8217t_resign_did_nothing_wrong_updates/#comment-18191767</link><description>What was that bit about him shaking hands with the prosecutor after the hearing today?  Is he that arrogant to think they're in the same league together.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:31:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blagojevich attorney: Governor won&amp;#8217;t resign, did nothing wrong  *** UPDATES ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/blagojevich_attorney_governor_won8217t_resign_did_nothing_wrong_updates/#comment-18191831</link><description>Did the feds freeze or seize any of his property, i.e., bank accounts - personal or campaign?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:05:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our day together</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/our_day_together/#comment-18191886</link><description>How can it be that the governor is in such financial difficulties?  Is that true, or was he just poor-mouthing?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:35:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Our day together</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/our_day_together/#comment-18191959</link><description>== What is the current status of guvâ€™s license to practice law? ==&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;According to the ARDC:  "Voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law  - Last Registered Year: 2008"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interesting.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:46:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Photo of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/photo_of_the_day_57/#comment-18192538</link><description>That is one sweet driveway.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:58:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_1231/#comment-18192613</link><description>== Corruption stems from lack of character, not geography. ==&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I totally agree.  But I often wonder if Rod Blagojevich wasn't sincere in his promise so many years ago to change the way things are done in state government.  Maybe I'm naive, but I think he was.  That is until the likes of Tony Rezko got his claws into him.  And Bill Cellini, too, I guess.  And probably others.  Maybe even his wife.  They had their own agenda and found a way to force it on the governor.  Blagojevich changed for the worse.  And then there was no going back.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well, maybe I'm just deceiving myself into thinking that Rod did have character at one point.  That way I don't have to feel so bad that he betrayed us all.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:47:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230; Tribune Company subpoenaed *** Schakowsky tosses hat in ring *** Roskam interested *** Radogno wants special election ***  Franks files bill to strip appointment powers ***  Lis...</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_just_in8230_tribune_company_subpoenaed_schakowsky_tosses_hat_in_ring_roskam_interested_radogno_/#comment-18192899</link><description>Why is everyone (anyone) opposed to having Quinn appointment a Senate replacement?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:44:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230; Tribune Company subpoenaed *** Schakowsky tosses hat in ring *** Roskam interested *** Radogno wants special election ***  Franks files bill to strip appointment powers ***  Lis...</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_just_in8230_tribune_company_subpoenaed_schakowsky_tosses_hat_in_ring_roskam_interested_radogno_/#comment-18192908</link><description>Bill Baar, I remember when that happened.  I'm sure when Quinn said that he was speaking of a  constitutional officer, someone who took the oath of office of governor of Illinois, who said it was a birthday gift and nothing else.  What are you going to do?  A lot of people on this blog and elsewhere were up in arms over it.  If I recall right, that's one of the things the government investigated.  But then nothing happened.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What else?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:27:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230; Tribune Company subpoenaed *** Schakowsky tosses hat in ring *** Roskam interested *** Radogno wants special election ***  Franks files bill to strip appointment powers ***  Lis...</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_just_in8230_tribune_company_subpoenaed_schakowsky_tosses_hat_in_ring_roskam_interested_radogno_/#comment-18192910</link><description>Well put, Carl Nyberg.  That's what I was thinking too.  As a citizen of Illinois, and a Democrat, I must this whole state really stinks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:30:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230; Tribune Company subpoenaed *** Schakowsky tosses hat in ring *** Roskam interested *** Radogno wants special election ***  Franks files bill to strip appointment powers ***  Lis...</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_just_in8230_tribune_company_subpoenaed_schakowsky_tosses_hat_in_ring_roskam_interested_radogno_/#comment-18192912</link><description>Big Mama T, Not sure, but no one can know in advance with the Illinois Supremes will do?  Also, any ruling made by the Illinois Supreme Court can be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court?  I don't know.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:34:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230; Tribune Company subpoenaed *** Schakowsky tosses hat in ring *** Roskam interested *** Radogno wants special election ***  Franks files bill to strip appointment powers ***  Lis...</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_just_in8230_tribune_company_subpoenaed_schakowsky_tosses_hat_in_ring_roskam_interested_radogno_/#comment-18192915</link><description>== Donâ€™t forget Dawn Clark Netschâ€™s words that the constitution cannot be ammended to allow a special election for a seat that is already open. ==&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't know that that is actually true.  It's not like changing a tort law in order to accommodate someone's lawsuit (as an example).  That couldn't happen.  Or shouldn't.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But this is procedural. Don't we change laws all the time to make way for new procedures due to snags things that were previously unknown when the event happened?  I think we do.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:44:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;   See AG Madigan&amp;#8217;s case for yourself   *** UPDATED WITH PRESSER TRANSCRIPT ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_just_in8230_see_ag_madigan8217s_case_for_yourself_updated_with_presser_transcript/#comment-18193157</link><description>The Supreme Court should not touch this case.  If they do, and there is later an impeachment and trial in the Senate presided over by the Supremes, Blagojevicy can say that the Supremes are not an impartial panel.  This is too much of a hot potato.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(I'm still reading the stuff.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:20:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;   See AG Madigan&amp;#8217;s case for yourself   *** UPDATED WITH PRESSER TRANSCRIPT ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_just_in8230_see_ag_madigan8217s_case_for_yourself_updated_with_presser_transcript/#comment-18193184</link><description>Lurker - It's in the Court's court now.  The Supreme Court can issue a TRO.  Today, possibly.  Or they can deny it.  Depending on what they do governs what happens after that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;735 ILCS 5/11â€‘101</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:44:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blagojevich: &amp;#8220;I&amp;#8217;ll have a lot to say at the appropriate time&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/blagojevich_8220i8217ll_have_a_lot_to_say_at_the_appropriate_time8221/#comment-18193383</link><description>The people need to hear from you now, Governor!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:20:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Remainders</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/remainders/#comment-18193454</link><description>Just to clarify:  If by hook or crook Balgojevich were to resign on Monday before 3:00, the need to pass a bill to strip senatorial appointment powers is removed.  (And any subsequent special election legislation.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Will the legislature withdraw the bill or go forward with it if Blagojevich resigns first?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 13:32:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Separating the real from the meaningless</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/separating_the_real_from_the_meaningless/#comment-18193526</link><description>The biased source's husband and I shared the people mover at the Atlanta airport (I think) many years ago.  I almost didn't read the article when I saw the author's name.  But I did.  Obviously, she wants to go after Fitzgerald in the courtroom.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Op-ed in the Wall Street Journal = shilling for business?  Maybe.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 19:52:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Impeachment resolution filed; House and Senate to convene***UPDATED X2***Impeachment inquiry committee resolution passed</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/impeachment_resolution_filed_house_and_senate_to_conveneupdated_x2impeachment_inquiry_committee_reso/#comment-18194298</link><description>So that's it? What a let down.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:40:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;  Supreme Court rejects AG Madigan motion  *** GOP asks for special session ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_just_in8230_supreme_court_rejects_ag_madigan_motion_gop_asks_for_special_session/#comment-18195337</link><description>As a citizen, I don't see it as political.  I thank Lisa Madigan for doing her job in representing the people even if it didn't work out.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:40:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ed Genson press conference</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/ed_genson_press_conference/#comment-18195374</link><description>Witch hunt?  The public feels betrayed.  They don't want him burned at the stake. They just want him to go away from the office of governor.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To me it seems Genson owns these proceedings.  Why is this being allowed?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:51:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AG Madigan, Genson trade barbs</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/ag_madigan_genson_trade_barbs/#comment-18196090</link><description>I thought Lisa Madigan's comments were completely appropriate.  She's speaking for the people, which few others seem to be doing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is Genson really staying at the governor's mansion?  If so, unreal!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:18:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A look ahead</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/a_look_ahead_66/#comment-18196739</link><description>People get continuances of court dates all the time.  Don't you think if Fitzgerald doesn't oppose, the court would grant a new date?  Assuming Blagojevich is still governor on the 14th.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 13:07:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;  *** Guv to appoint Burris *** White says No *** Blatant appeal to race *** Quinlan resigns ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_just_in8230_guv_to_appoint_burris_white_says_no_blatant_appeal_to_race_quinlan_resigns/#comment-18197259</link><description>Maybe Blago got Burris to agree to sublet Blago's DC condo.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 14:59:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;  *** Guv to appoint Burris *** White says No *** Blatant appeal to race *** Quinlan resigns ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_just_in8230_guv_to_appoint_burris_white_says_no_blatant_appeal_to_race_quinlan_resigns/#comment-18197343</link><description>This is so wrong.  How much credibility would one Roland Burris have in the U.S. Senate? Or anyone appointed by Blagojevich?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:08:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;  *** Guv to appoint Burris *** White says No *** Blatant appeal to race *** Quinlan resigns ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_just_in8230_guv_to_appoint_burris_white_says_no_blatant_appeal_to_race_quinlan_resigns/#comment-18197504</link><description>Burris looked relieved, like he really wanted to get away from reporters' questions, when he saw Bobby Rush.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They acted like Rush was a surprise visitor who just happened along.  Why wasn't he at the front of the room from the beginning?  But, obviously, his appearance was well-planned.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:42:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230; Burris heads to IL Supreme Court *** House posts elections bill, cancels hearing ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_just_in8230_burris_heads_to_il_supreme_court_house_posts_elections_bill_cancels_hearing/#comment-18197679</link><description>The Court put the Burris documents on the same &lt;a href="http://www.state.il.us/court/SupremeCourt/SpecialMatters/default.asp" rel="nofollow"&gt;page&lt;/a&gt; as the Lisa Madigan and Bambenek documents.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not a sign; just convenience I'm sure.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm putting on my big winter coat and going out.  Happy New Year everybody.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 21:39:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: House returns to town Wednesday &amp;#8211; may begin impeachment proceedings this week *** Burris bungles strange lawsuit *** Rush&amp;#8217;s flip-flops ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/house_returns_to_town_wednesday_8211_may_begin_impeachment_proceedings_this_week_burris_bungles_stra/#comment-18197875</link><description>Apparently the wheels of justice don't move fast enough for Roland Burris.  He filed a &lt;a href="http://www.state.il.us/court/SupremeCourt/SpecialMatters/petitionscomplaint_010209.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;Motion to Accelerate&lt;/a&gt;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 16:39:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Probe expanding? Plus: Which Adam was it?</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/probe_expanding_plus_which_adam_was_it/#comment-18198050</link><description>Just to clarify for the NY Times, there are two Illinois lawyers named Sam Adam.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One is Samuel Forbes Adam at 53 West Jackson. He was admitted to the bar in 1961.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The other is Samuel Eugene Adam at 6133 South Ellis Garden Suite. He was admitted in 1999.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Neither has Jr. or Sr. in their names.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 12:01:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;  Burris will testify Thursday *** Crack in the wall *** Poll: Block Burris *** Affidavit released *** Guv responds *** Affidavit posted *** Guv&amp;#8217;s criminal lawyer approache...</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_just_in8230_burris_will_testify_thursday_crack_in_the_wall_poll_block_burris_affidavit_released/#comment-18198711</link><description>Burris has filed some new docs with the Illinois Supreme Court.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.state.il.us/court/SupremeCourt/SpecialMatters/default.asp" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.state.il.us/court/SupremeCourt/Speci...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:20:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AP says Burris will be seated, but criticism has been ignored  *** Live press conference ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/ap_says_burris_will_be_seated_but_criticism_has_been_ignored_live_press_conference/#comment-18198828</link><description>I wonder what Roland Burris's testimony on Thursday is going to sound like.  Evasive or indignant?  Whatever, it won't be truly useful to the committee I'm sure.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:23:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_8617/#comment-18198947</link><description>Bill Daley is completely wrong.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But, assuming he is right, I believe a case can be made that if Chicago and environs quit sending their crooks and corrupt politicians to Springfield, and only sent their squeaky clean politicians to Springfield, we wouldn't have that problem.  Right?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:54:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_8617/#comment-18198982</link><description>Springfield is a place where the Daleys have sent their henchmen to do their dirty work.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:43:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Impeachment hearing open thread</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/impeachment_hearing_open_thread/#comment-18199098</link><description>So, what does Blagojevich's attorneys' failure to attend signify?  A new course of action?  Disillusionment?  Retainer fee ran out?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:18:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Impeachment hearing open thread</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/impeachment_hearing_open_thread/#comment-18199160</link><description>Nero, so does Mike Madigan's wife and Lisa's mom.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:21:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Impeachment hearing open thread</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/impeachment_hearing_open_thread/#comment-18199161</link><description>The Cook County Bar Association is seeking leave to file an Amicus Brief in support of Roland Burris.  They want to give the Court "the opinions rendered by legal scholars and persons of authority..."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:28:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Impeachment hearing open thread</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/impeachment_hearing_open_thread/#comment-18199162</link><description>Blagojevich and his people have nothing but disdain for the people of Illinois, laws, rules, veterans preferences, and the process to nominate a U.S. Senator.  Why should we accept his nominee?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Page four of the PDF (or page 1 of the report):&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"The OEIG found that in many of the reported cases, the HR Department of IDES, in conjunction with individuals in the Governor's Office of Intergovernmental Affairs ("GOIA"), manipulated titles, credentials, positions, position location, or other criteria to fit candidates sponsored by GOIA into positions at IDES without following State law or normal State hiring protocol.  This task was accomplished throught the use of mechanisms designed to avoid veterans' preference hiring in non-exempt positions as well as through the creation of positions, titles and job responsibilities."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Last two sentences on page 12 of the PDF (or page 9 of the report):&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"In regards to the hiring concerns voiced by [Tim] Walker, Cini told Walker that GOIA needed to place people in positions for which they have no experience, and they "can be dealt with later."  Cini also said that the Governor's Office determines the hiring process, not the agency (in this case, IDES)."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;End quotes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Walker was apparently doing the job of hiring the way he thought best for IDES.  Can't have that, so they later found a way to get rid of Walker.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:52:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_244/#comment-18199354</link><description>How much is that gov'nor in the window...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Or.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hokey Pokey...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ahem, I'd like to see him do Teapot, too.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:42:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_244/#comment-18199365</link><description>Oh, Bill, every so often you make us fall in love with you.  Great song.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:17:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_244/#comment-18199378</link><description>Don't Bring Me Down (Eric Burdon)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When you complain, and criticize&lt;br&gt;I feel Iâ€™m nothing in your eyes&lt;br&gt;It makes me feel like giving up&lt;br&gt;Because my best just ainâ€™t good enough&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Girl I want to provide for you&lt;br&gt;And do all the things you want me to&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, oh no, donâ€™t bring me down&lt;br&gt;Iâ€™m begginâ€™ you darlinâ€™&lt;br&gt;Oh, oh no, donâ€™t bring me down&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WC-iqjUWRPo" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WC-iqjUWRPo&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:47:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_244/#comment-18199389</link><description>18 minutes missing? - That's excellent!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:29:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Impeachment hearing open thread  *** Burris: No quid pro quo *** Genson: Adam not defense attorney, don&amp;#8217;t expect Adam to testify *** Burris wraps it up ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/impeachment_hearing_open_thread_burris_no_quid_pro_quo_genson_adam_not_defense_attorney_don8217t_exp/#comment-18199559</link><description>I heard someone say the room mic is up now.  Then, silence.  Is anyone talking?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:03:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Impeachment hearing open thread  *** Burris: No quid pro quo *** Genson: Adam not defense attorney, don&amp;#8217;t expect Adam to testify *** Burris wraps it up ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/impeachment_hearing_open_thread_burris_no_quid_pro_quo_genson_adam_not_defense_attorney_don8217t_exp/#comment-18199607</link><description>When Burris stalls, he reminds me of those pro bowlers just before they throw that 9th frame.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:37:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Impeachment hearing open thread  *** Burris: No quid pro quo *** Genson: Adam not defense attorney, don&amp;#8217;t expect Adam to testify *** Burris wraps it up ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/impeachment_hearing_open_thread_burris_no_quid_pro_quo_genson_adam_not_defense_attorney_don8217t_exp/#comment-18199612</link><description>Ask him about that mausoleum, where'd he get it, how much.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:40:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Impeachment hearing open thread  *** Burris: No quid pro quo *** Genson: Adam not defense attorney, don&amp;#8217;t expect Adam to testify *** Burris wraps it up ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/impeachment_hearing_open_thread_burris_no_quid_pro_quo_genson_adam_not_defense_attorney_don8217t_exp/#comment-18199623</link><description>So many hypotheticals.  Ridiculous.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyway, I thought the Republicans liked Roland Burris.  Why so much hostility?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:50:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Impeachment hearing open thread  *** Burris: No quid pro quo *** Genson: Adam not defense attorney, don&amp;#8217;t expect Adam to testify *** Burris wraps it up ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/impeachment_hearing_open_thread_burris_no_quid_pro_quo_genson_adam_not_defense_attorney_don8217t_exp/#comment-18199642</link><description>Off topic:  Why have we been lead to believe Sam Adam Jr. is part of the criminal defense team?  If he's not, what is he?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:11:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Impeachment hearing open thread  *** Burris: No quid pro quo *** Genson: Adam not defense attorney, don&amp;#8217;t expect Adam to testify *** Burris wraps it up ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/impeachment_hearing_open_thread_burris_no_quid_pro_quo_genson_adam_not_defense_attorney_don8217t_exp/#comment-18199655</link><description>What question remains unasked?  What more do we need from this witness.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:26:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Impeachment hearing open thread  *** Burris: No quid pro quo *** Genson: Adam not defense attorney, don&amp;#8217;t expect Adam to testify *** Burris wraps it up ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/impeachment_hearing_open_thread_burris_no_quid_pro_quo_genson_adam_not_defense_attorney_don8217t_exp/#comment-18199669</link><description>As a downstater, I'm much more confident in Roland Burris's abilities to represent the entire state than say Jesse Jackson, Jr., or Danny Davis.  I hope I don't regret saying that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:43:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fresh impeachment thread *** Racial pushback against guv *** Genson, Adam leave hearing *** Roll call begins *** New poll shows opposition to Burris appointment *** 21-0 FOR IMPEACHMENT *** Resolut...</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/fresh_impeachment_thread_racial_pushback_against_guv_genson_adam_leave_hearing_roll_call_begins_new_/#comment-18199741</link><description>Don't kill me for saying this. But when Roland Burris said "Absolutely, positively not" in response to Rep. Flowers' quid pro quo question, I was reminded of when O.J. said "Absolutely, positively, 100 percent not guilty" at his pretrial.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:50:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fresh impeachment thread *** Racial pushback against guv *** Genson, Adam leave hearing *** Roll call begins *** New poll shows opposition to Burris appointment *** 21-0 FOR IMPEACHMENT *** Resolut...</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/fresh_impeachment_thread_racial_pushback_against_guv_genson_adam_leave_hearing_roll_call_begins_new_/#comment-18199759</link><description>That Sam Adam thing was a bomb shell.  Obviously, it doesn't matter to the committee any more.  But, isn't there some attorney rule about making clear what you're doing before a tribunal or whatever?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Capitol View, you say he's the gov's outside counsel.  In what capacity?  Who's paying his fee:  The governor personally? The gov's campaign? The State of Illinois?  I think we're entitled to know, especially in light of his approaching Roland Burris and sitting in front of this panel next to the real criminal defense attorney the whole time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I thought it was interesting that he wanted to walk out after the first couple days.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Am I the only one who thinks this is a big deal?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:12:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The governor talks to the press</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/the_governor_talks_to_the_press/#comment-18200245</link><description>Did those "supporters" get a free lunch, per diem, something?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:35:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: May be only a matter of time before Burris is seated</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/may_be_only_a_matter_of_time_before_burris_is_seated/#comment-18200513</link><description>Anyone can go down to the Secretary of STate's Office and pay for a certified copy of any of a multitude of documents on file.  But just because you have a certified copy of the corporate charter of XYZ Corp., with a seal and signature of Jesse White, doesn't mean you own that corporation.  YOu just have a copy that was produced after the charter as it was filed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yet, the Senate is going to accept this from Roland Burris as a bonafide original credential.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:21:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Delusions and reality</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/delusions_and_reality/#comment-18200759</link><description>Doing a little searching.  Dream World, Inc., is an "FDA-Registered Company" according to Zapconnect.  The president of Dream World, Inc., is Scott Jhin according to the Secretary of State database.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, one Scott Jhin is in charge of the Chicago facility of Jinny Corp., in Niles, which is owned by his mother.  Jinny appears to be a hair care and beauty wholesaler.  I can't imagine they'd be lobbying for Rod's hairspray business to the tune of $50,000.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:52:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of  the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_8913/#comment-18200870</link><description>That big red suitcase and how the governor seemed to be clutching it to his chest.  (Maybe that last part was just my imagination.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:33:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deb Mell and impeachment &amp;#8211; Give her a break   *** UPDATED x1 ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/deb_mell_and_impeachment_8211_give_her_a_break_updated_x1/#comment-18201436</link><description>She can look those little girls in the eye with a clean conscience.  And 10 years from now she won't have to explain to them why she voted to impeach their father on her first day on the job.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:43:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Genson claims Senate process is &amp;#8220;rigged&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/genson_claims_senate_process_is_8220rigged8221/#comment-18201471</link><description>Fitzgerald's being tossed off the case (if that happens), doesn't mean the case won't be prosecuted by someone else any less zealously.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do wonder how the Senate will handle any requests for additional time by Blagojevich.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:20:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Genson claims Senate process is &amp;#8220;rigged&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/genson_claims_senate_process_is_8220rigged8221/#comment-18201475</link><description>Pot, this doesn't really answer your question, but I believe all the governor has to do is deny the allegations (articles), thereby making the Senate attorney (prosecutor) prove the allegations.  It would be during cross-examination of any prosecution witnesses that the governor would attempt to knock down that testimony.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm just guessing as I'm not a lawyer.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:44:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Genson claims Senate process is &amp;#8220;rigged&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/genson_claims_senate_process_is_8220rigged8221/#comment-18201476</link><description>So, no defense. Just deny.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:45:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Me</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/me/#comment-18201684</link><description>Rich, thank you for doing all you do and for keeping it all straight for those of us in the peanut gallery.  We couldn't live without ya.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:14:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of  the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_0405/#comment-18201970</link><description>Move himself and his family into the governor's mansion. Enroll the girls in Springfield public schools.  Paints the heated driveway "sunshine yellow."  Erect a statue of Nixon on the Statehouse lawn.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:19:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of  the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_0405/#comment-18201972</link><description>The day before inauguration: Pardons everyone who was put on Illinois' death row since George Ryan.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Erects statue of Elvis on Statehouse lawn.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:35:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;  Kelly formally pleads guilty  *** Ed Genson out as impeachment lawyer *** Team quits &amp;#8220;in protest&amp;#8221; *** Genson: Rules unfair *** Genson: Guv won&amp;#8217;t resign *** Ad...</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_just_in8230_kelly_formally_pleads_guilty_ed_genson_out_as_impeachment_lawyer_team_quits_8220in_/#comment-18202190</link><description>Anon - @ 4:27 pm:  I don't think that professional conduct rule applies since Genson, et al., haven't actually entered their appearance in the Senate proceedings.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:11:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quinn: No problem with being dissed</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/quinn_no_problem_with_being_dissed/#comment-18202674</link><description>Somewhat off topic: Mixed in with a &lt;a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2009/01/what_you_didnt_see_on_tv_inaug.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;NY Mag&lt;/a&gt; article about inaugural celebrity sightings:  "Roland Burris in a newsboy cap briefly joining said balcony addicts, though, endearingly, looking like a kid who just couldn't believe he got to be up there. When we shouted, "Wave to the camera, Senator Burris!" he seemed surprised and flattered, and obeyed."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:56:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quinn: No problem with being dissed</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/quinn_no_problem_with_being_dissed/#comment-18202675</link><description>So far, I can't find yesterday's picture of Burris in the newsboy cap.  I did find &lt;a href="http://blog.indecision2008.com/2009/01/21/inauguration-night-life-the-congresspeople-of-congress/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Comedy Central's picture of him in a tux&lt;/a&gt; last night.  Love the caption:  "The hottest name in Washington ... Roland Burris, the brand-new Senator from Illinois. Here he is caught off guard by a man wearing a wet cat on his head, whom he mistook for Governor Rod Blagojevich." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh look, a kitty? (Apologies if this was posted already today.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:25:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_362/#comment-18202842</link><description>Giddy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:32:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mrs. Blagojevich unemployed; Guv misses deadline; Feigenholtz video  *** UPDATED x1 ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/mrs_blagojevich_unemployed_guv_misses_deadline_feigenholtz_video_updated_x1/#comment-18202954</link><description>I bet Patti Blagojevich is &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; mad now.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:34:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mrs. Blagojevich unemployed; Guv misses deadline; Feigenholtz video  *** UPDATED x1 ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/mrs_blagojevich_unemployed_guv_misses_deadline_feigenholtz_video_updated_x1/#comment-18202968</link><description>Anon, he has mortgage payments on the house and the Washington, D.C., condo.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:54:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thompson to ask Obama for Ryan commutation</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/thompson_to_ask_obama_for_ryan_commutation/#comment-18203178</link><description>If George Ryan's imprisonment hasn't deterred other politicians from corrupt activities, and I agree it hasn't, isn't that all the more reason to keep Ryan in?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:25:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;  Sun-Times: Guv won&amp;#8217;t file suit</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_just_in8230_sun_times_guv_won8217t_file_suit/#comment-18203264</link><description>They're definitely conserving legal and financial resources, possibly for a lawsuit after the fact asking that an impeachment be overturned.  That would probably also include asking for a temporary restraining order allowing the gov to stay in office during the pendency of the lawsuit.  Hey, I'm not saying he'll prevail, just that he may try it.  In any event, I bet his lawyers have discussed it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:42:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;  Flip-flop on lawsuit? *** And back again? *** Serious dissension in the ranks *** Genson: &amp;#8220;I don&amp;#8217;t know about a lawsuit&amp;#8221; ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_just_in8230_flip_flop_on_lawsuit_and_back_again_serious_dissension_in_the_ranks_genson_8220i_do/#comment-18203401</link><description>In re Mr. Adam, not necessarily in this order:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;* He told us he's with the governor all the way;&lt;br&gt;* He sat in on impeachment hearings as if he was attorney for the governor;&lt;br&gt;* At one point he whispered that he and Mr. Genson should walk out of the impeachment hearings, whereupon Mr. Genson overruled him;&lt;br&gt;* At another point we were informed that he wasn't the governor's impeachment lawyer;&lt;br&gt;* He approached then General Burris to see if he wanted to go to the U.S. Senate;&lt;br&gt;* Despite having previously said he was with the governor all the way, he decided not to rep the Gov in the Senate hearing;&lt;br&gt;* Now he decides to sue on behalf of the gov thereby overruling Genson's decision not to sue.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My head is spinning a little, so I'm sure I've left something out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the meantime, who is paying him and how much?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:29:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;  Flip-flop on lawsuit? *** And back again? *** Serious dissension in the ranks *** Genson: &amp;#8220;I don&amp;#8217;t know about a lawsuit&amp;#8221; ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_just_in8230_flip_flop_on_lawsuit_and_back_again_serious_dissension_in_the_ranks_genson_8220i_do/#comment-18203405</link><description>Now that Blago has paid Jim Thompson's firm (in full?), I do wonder if he isn't going to try and employ them in some aspect of this.  Not that they would take the case, I don't think.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:09:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of  the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_3966/#comment-18203723</link><description>Governor, there was some confusion at the House impeachment hearings regarding Sam Adam's role as your attorney.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Who is paying his fee?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How much has he been paid so far?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:11:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of  the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_3966/#comment-18203725</link><description>Have you, or anyone on your behalf, been in contact with any state Senators to discuss the impeachment trial?  What has been discussed?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:13:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: But, wait, there&amp;#8217;s more!   *** Quinn responds *** Genson to resign *** Legislature gets tapes *** Guv on GMA, The View ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/but_wait_there8217s_more_quinn_responds_genson_to_resign_legislature_gets_tapes_guv_on_gma_the_view/#comment-18204081</link><description>I know a lot of people have tossed around ideas that the Gov may have a personality disorder.  But, listening to him this afternoon, I wonder if it isn't something more ominous.  Like a brain tumor.  I'm not trying to make a joke, as a friend of my family some years ago had one which no one knew about until after he passed away.  The Gov is starting to remind me of that friend.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:23:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;The View&amp;#8221; live blog   *** UPDATED x3 w/Video ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/8220the_view8221_live_blog_updated_x3_wvideo/#comment-18204304</link><description>It's like those people who go around saying "I'm so smart" or "I'm so pretty"  or "I'm so honest."  No.  The people will be able to figure those things out on their own without you telling them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And might I add, you can't blame the sensationalization of it all when you're the one doing the sensationalizing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:15:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;The View&amp;#8221; live blog   *** UPDATED x3 w/Video ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/8220the_view8221_live_blog_updated_x3_wvideo/#comment-18204306</link><description>Watching GMA now.  He has no desire to defend his wife's virtue, instead he quotes Rudy Kipling.  What a jerk.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:04:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This is why I hate cable news</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_is_why_i_hate_cable_news/#comment-18204809</link><description>The essence of Geraldo's schtick:  "I'm an attorney and I know stuff! Nyet nyet nyet."  Obviously Geraldo didn't want to hear one thing Fritchey said.  His mind is made up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As someone who hasn't seen Geraldo since his late night commentary during the OJ criminal trial days, I must say he appears as obnoxious now as he was then.  No substance.  No in-depth.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:11:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s not as simplistic as that</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/it8217s_not_as_simplistic_as_that/#comment-18205032</link><description>I heard he has 11 interviews today, including CNN at 7:00 p.m. (our time).  It's like he's frantically running around, bouncing off the walls, hoping someone will help him.  It's a sorry spectacle.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is hard to believe Sam Adam is sitting quietly by while his client goes on this media blitz.  Don't lawyers usually tell their criminally charged clients to keep their mouths shut?  Well, so much for that when Blagojevich's PR strategy overrides his legal strategy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And, in the realm of what he might do:  Maybe he'll hire himself as director of the Lincoln Library and Museum.  I hear they're looking, and the job pays real good.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:59:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Late afternoon video</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/late_afternoon_video/#comment-18205406</link><description>AC, I just saw that too.  My only thought was, if they're so hepped up about the security that "secrecy" provides, why are they blabbing it all over the internet.  I bet the State Police detail loved that one.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:53:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Late afternoon video</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/late_afternoon_video/#comment-18205408</link><description>Obviously, the PR strategy trumps not only a sound legal strategy, but a sound security strategy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:08:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Late afternoon video</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/late_afternoon_video/#comment-18205411</link><description>OneMan, good point.  Like extras in a movie, only more impromptu and less costly.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:14:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Late afternoon video</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/late_afternoon_video/#comment-18205417</link><description>Rod is a little nervous (genuine or faked?) takling to Rachel Maddow.  Weird and interesting.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:03:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Late afternoon video</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/late_afternoon_video/#comment-18205420</link><description>Same stuff.  Witnesses.  Electd twice.  Ten angels, Mother Theresa, anti-Nixon, tapes.  I didn't break any law.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maddow:  Public support.  Approval ratings lower than Cheney.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rod:  Once the economy plummeted... yadda yadda.  His low ratings had to do with economy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:06:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Late afternoon video</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/late_afternoon_video/#comment-18205421</link><description>Stu, thanks for the transcript.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:09:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Late afternoon video</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/late_afternoon_video/#comment-18205424</link><description>For someone who wants my trust and to believe he didn't do anything wrong, he's too scripted, too phony.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:29:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Late afternoon video</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/late_afternoon_video/#comment-18205434</link><description>I'll say one thing, the Maddow post-interview analysis (so far) is more thoughtful than the other media stuff I've seen this week, most of which was a joke.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:51:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fresh impeachment trial live-blog  *** Prosecutor to finish witness list today ***  CULLERTON: GUV WANTS TO SPEAK ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/fresh_impeachment_trial_live_blog_prosecutor_to_finish_witness_list_today_cullerton_guv_wants_to_spe/#comment-18205891</link><description>Is the gov going to do his own speaking, or will he bring his attorney to do the talking?  If the gov, will he be under oath?  Is an oath even necessary, since he took his official oath?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:07:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fresh impeachment trial live-blog  *** Prosecutor to finish witness list today ***  CULLERTON: GUV WANTS TO SPEAK ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/fresh_impeachment_trial_live_blog_prosecutor_to_finish_witness_list_today_cullerton_guv_wants_to_spe/#comment-18205893</link><description>Scratch my questions. Just saw the update.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:08:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fresh impeachment trial live-blog  *** Prosecutor to finish witness list today ***  CULLERTON: GUV WANTS TO SPEAK ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/fresh_impeachment_trial_live_blog_prosecutor_to_finish_witness_list_today_cullerton_guv_wants_to_spe/#comment-18205915</link><description>Gov at the microphone:  "You see, a long time ago there was a little teapot and...."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:24:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Late afternoon question   *** UPDATED x1 ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/late_afternoon_question_updated_x1/#comment-18206023</link><description>He will say that because certain witnesses couldn't be called to testify, the criminal complaint should not be considered in the vote.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He will say the tapes should not be considered because they were taken out of context.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He will heavily emphasize that some of the things for which he's being impeached were done before he was re-elected.  He will ask that those things not be considered in the vote.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Personally, I disagree with all this.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:49:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Late afternoon question   *** UPDATED x1 ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/late_afternoon_question_updated_x1/#comment-18206089</link><description>Surely his lawyer has told him publicity stunts won't do him any good at this point?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I see him systematically going down the items on the article of impeachment and one by one, refuting them.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 17:26:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Late afternoon question   *** UPDATED x1 ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/late_afternoon_question_updated_x1/#comment-18206132</link><description>But first he will hold a press conference announcing:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;* Dividing the state fair to make it more cost effective and profitable: Happy Hollow goes to the old Chicago Stockyards; Conservation World goes to Jo Davies County; the Sky Lift gets expanded and goes to Winnetka (year round)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;* Red suitcases for all high school seniors&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;* Appointing his wife as Executive Director of the Lincoln Library &amp;amp; Museum&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(Rich, thanks for the word "rebut."  I needed that.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:11:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rearview Mirror</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/rearview_mirror/#comment-18207148</link><description>Does anybody know what becomes of his campaign fund now?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:44:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of  the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_478/#comment-18207283</link><description>From Street Kid to Governor</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:41:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How can we miss you if you don&amp;#8217;t go away?</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/how_can_we_miss_you_if_you_don8217t_go_away/#comment-18207714</link><description>Sam Adam says Blago will answer questions at his criminal trial?  Uh, no.  Ten dollars says Blago does not even take the stand at the trial.  Of course, they don't have to say that now so they can go around pretending he will.  Just like so much other pretending Rod has done.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:44:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of  the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_646/#comment-18208543</link><description>State payroll.  Keep the workforce the same, but give them a one-day a week mandatory furlough.  Their salaries - whether hourly or salary - get cut accordingly.  In theory that would cut payroll by one-fifth.  See how much that would put back in the state coffers for a year.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(This is not an original idea as I believe it's what they're going to do in California.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:29:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of  the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_646/#comment-18208547</link><description>Reality, Don't most people work a five day work week?   Anyway, I didn't mean everybody would have the same day off, or that a department would close on the furlough day.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, for the furlough plan to work, I guess we'd have to cut some of the workforce off the top.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:45:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of  the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_646/#comment-18208548</link><description>tanstaafl, I said mandatory.  It wouldn't be voluntary.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:46:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of  the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_646/#comment-18208557</link><description>tanstaafl, Hey, I'm just trying to answer the question.  The fact that only 1 person has operational knowledge of a job is another problem that we never should have got ourselves into.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:09:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of  the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_646/#comment-18208567</link><description>tanstaafl, I don't work for the state.  To answer your question, I have had a job where I was forced to take a pay cut &lt;em&gt;without&lt;/em&gt; a reduction in hours.  I've also been unemployed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:49:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of  the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_079/#comment-18208838</link><description>Yesterday, I cut $1 billion from state payroll.  I did read most of those comments, and was left with the impression that the biggest push-back came in that area, presumably from state employees.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And, since I didn't see any rich doctors and hospitals coming on here throwing a fit over the prospect of their medicaid payments getting cut, I'm going to cut the next $2 billion from that category.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For my other billion, I'm going to split it evenly between K-12 education and pension funding.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For a total of $4 billion.  This is too easy.  Not.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:21:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cutting ain&amp;#8217;t easy, and almost impossible</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/cutting_ain8217t_easy_and_almost_impossible/#comment-18209264</link><description>Bill is right that sales tax should be applied to purchases made on the internet.  As it is, we as consumers are supposed to fill out our own tax forms and send them in with a check.  But who does that?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I heard one estimate a few years ago that Illinois' share would be about a billion dollars.  Not sure how that was arrived at, or if it's still the same.  Anyway, as yet, they haven't figured out how to tax out of state purchases at the point of sale.  This should be a major priority in these times.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:59:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of  the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_518/#comment-18209319</link><description>It looks like Larry Bomke (my own senator) did this to appease a supporter.  As already pointed out, the language is bad.  And while the bill doesn't specifically state it, it appears to be person specific legislation.  This bill should not even be called for a vote.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:47:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apparently, National Journal has no fact checkers</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/apparently_national_journal_has_no_fact_checkers/#comment-18209416</link><description>I wouldn't think a so-called respected publication like National Journal would base a story on points fed to it by a PR agency, but  that's what this sounds like.  Could it be?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 16:03:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of  the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_589/#comment-18210018</link><description>How about a 2% income tax increase, with 1% going to general revenue and the other 1% going to fix the disparity in school funding and property tax relief.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By the way, does anyone know how many dollars a 1% income tax increase would bring in?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:03:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of  the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_5654/#comment-18210586</link><description>I like this from PalosParkBob:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1)Changing election law so that there is a â€œlevel playing fieldâ€ for party and independent candidates. Make the signature requirements the same for party and independent candidates.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, make it so all voting in all elections in the state is done by mail (I hear they do this in Oregon and it works well).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:36:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230; Speaker Madigan refers Burris materials to state&amp;#8217;s attorney  *** Impeachment committee won&amp;#8217;t reconvene ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_just_in8230_speaker_madigan_refers_burris_materials_to_state8217s_attorney_impeachment_committe/#comment-18210740</link><description>I wonder if John Schmidt will convene a grand jury as an investigatory body.  Or will he mull the documents over himself?  Either way, I can't help but wonder if those documents contain all the information needed to make a decision.  Though what that decision could be, I don't know.  Sorry, I'm just thinking out loud.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:15:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230; Speaker Madigan refers Burris materials to state&amp;#8217;s attorney  *** Impeachment committee won&amp;#8217;t reconvene ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_just_in8230_speaker_madigan_refers_burris_materials_to_state8217s_attorney_impeachment_committe/#comment-18210745</link><description>I see that on the list of Burris and Lebed's former clients, some of them end with a year and "-current."  This obviously means they still represent those clients.  Did Roland quit the firm of of Burris and Lebed?  Or did he just quit being a lobbyist?  I'm confused.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:30:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230; Speaker Madigan refers Burris materials to state&amp;#8217;s attorney  *** Impeachment committee won&amp;#8217;t reconvene ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_just_in8230_speaker_madigan_refers_burris_materials_to_state8217s_attorney_impeachment_committe/#comment-18210776</link><description>I wonder if John Schmidt has already talked to Fitzgerald's office (or vice versa) to make sure his investigation doesn't encroach on the fed case.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:19:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_088/#comment-18211580</link><description>I'm on Myspace, but haven't checked in for so long, they sent me an email to log in or they'd delete my account.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm on Facebook and have connected with one person from high school, some people I met on the Internet, and most of my family, who I've found to be just as insufferable on FB, if not more.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm on LinkedIn and love the concept, but so far it hasn't helped me get work, which is why I joined.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for Twitter, I tweeted up a storm during the presidential debates.  These days I'm good for some inconsequential thought once or twice a day.  For the most part, I thrive on the tweets from other people.  Lots of good stuff there.  It is very useful.  Very entertaining.  And sometimes educational.  I love it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:40:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of  the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_331/#comment-18211883</link><description>Roland: Me? I'm scared of everything. I'm scared of what I saw, I'm scared of what I did, of who I am, and most of all I'm scared of walking out of this room and never feeling the rest of my whole life the way I feel when I'm with you.  (Mini monologue from Dirty Dancing.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:59:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of  the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_5963/#comment-18212301</link><description>Yes, it's the taxpayers' money.  We should know how it's spent.  The less secrets in government, the better for the people.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By the way, Missouri already does this (&lt;a href="http://http://mapyourtaxes.mo.gov/MAP/Portal/Default.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;Missouri Accountability Portal&lt;/a&gt;), and about 20 other states.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:19:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Burris adviser says he&amp;#8217;ll run, planning to play race card  *** UPDATED x1 ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/burris_adviser_says_he8217ll_run_planning_to_play_race_card_updated_x1/#comment-18212540</link><description>Roland Burris practices closing his mouth just in case he's approached by the press.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:07:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Burris revelations, more threats   *** UPDATED x1 ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/more_burris_revelations_more_threats_updated_x1/#comment-18212824</link><description>The timing of releasing of Burris' additional affidavit by the committee chairperson is not a big deal.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Would the Republicans have us think anything would have changed had it been released the day she got it?  What would have changed?  Nothing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think the Republicans should be mad at themselves for not doing a proper examination of Burris on the witness stand.  They are the ones who let him slide right into office.  Isn't that the bigger picture.  They should be publicly flogging themselves for their own ineptitude instead of focusing on the timing of the release of the affidavit.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:54:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of  the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_607/#comment-18212945</link><description>What reforms would you like to see happen in Illinois:&lt;br&gt;(a) By executive order; and/or&lt;br&gt;(b) Legislatively.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What should open government in Illinois look like (without using the words sunshine and disinfectant)?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:21:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of  the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_9085/#comment-18213576</link><description>No.  I don't see how any good can come of it while Roland Burris is a sitting senator.  If they want to pass such a law later, that would be okay, I guess.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If the legislature does pass a law and the governor signs it to go in effect while Roland is still senator, Roland and his cadre of lawyers will find some law to challenge it in court (which law, I don't know; but some).  Then, the fate of the law, and of course, Roland's seat in the senate will be will be in the hands of a court.  Either way (the law is upheld or struck down), is that what we really want?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:23:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230; AP uncovers Tribune consultant e-mails to Blagojevich chief</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_just_in8230_ap_uncovers_tribune_consultant_e_mails_to_blagojevich_chief/#comment-18215287</link><description>== If you or Rod need/want anything and want a direct pipeline to Spielberg just let me know.â€ [..] ==&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I realize that the line from Blagojevich to Spielberg is pretty thin (with Harris to Ganis to Ganis's cousin all in the middle), but wouldn't it be funny if Steven Spielberg, one of the most important people in Hollywood, got a call from Patrick Fitzgerald about his knowledge of any of this Blagojevich-Cubs- Tribune stuff?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But, perhaps &lt;em&gt;if&lt;/em&gt; Spielberg was being hounded by someone on behalf of Blagojevich, it could explain why less than a month after Blagojevich gets ousted, Spielberg's off-again on-again Lincoln movie is back in &lt;a href="http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2009/02/spielbergs_lincoln_survives_as.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;active development&lt;/a&gt;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 00:24:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Afternoon updates: Pensions; Daley; Feigenholtz; &amp;#8220;Reform&amp;#8221;  *** UPDATED x1 ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/afternoon_updates_pensions_daley_feigenholtz_8220reform8221_updated_x1/#comment-18215516</link><description>Assuming she gets the appointment, why would Sara Feigenholtz want to quit her state rep job to be a county commissioner?  That seems like a step down and a career ender.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:15:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Layers of the airport onion</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/layers_of_the_airport_onion/#comment-18216944</link><description>I never understood what was in it for Cong. Jackson.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:40:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Morning Shorts</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/morning_shorts_420/#comment-18219392</link><description>A long time ago I heard mines could take up to half the coal out of a vein.  Don't know where that figure came from or if it's even true.  Anyway, the mines took out more coal than they were allowed?  Or was half too much.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:36:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_8589/#comment-18221190</link><description>Dick Durbin is a distant cousin, and though we live in the same town, we've never met.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 14:42:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The end of an era</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/the_end_of_an_era/#comment-18221526</link><description>That is one fine ride, with or without the art.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great video by Devin.  Great music, too. Wow.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;More &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/search/?w=all&amp;amp;q=obamalac&amp;amp;m=text" rel="nofollow"&gt;Obamalac&lt;/a&gt;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 03:04:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will she or won&amp;#8217;t she?</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/will_she_or_won8217t_she/#comment-18221570</link><description>&lt;a href="http://TaxpayersforQuinn.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;TaxpayersforQuinn.com&lt;/a&gt; was bought this morning.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:55:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blagojevich roundup</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/blagojevich_roundup/#comment-18221881</link><description>I must admit the part of me that can't resist a spectacle hopes he gets to go to Costa Rica.  I'd tune in just to see him squatting in the jungle eating cockroaches out of a banana leaf bowl.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:01:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mark Kirk doesn&amp;#8217;t even know where the line is</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/mark_kirk_doesn8217t_even_know_where_the_line_is/#comment-18222140</link><description>I don't know what his usual M.O. is, but I just found out today he is one of a small handful of reps (both D and R) who decided to forgo asking for earmarks for FY2010.  I suppose he thinks that gives him the right to talk to the talk.  Or take the talk for a walk.  Or something.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:51:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wonkish &amp;#8211; Countdown to May 31: Tax plans emerge</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/wonkish_8211_countdown_to_may_31_tax_plans_emerge/#comment-18222949</link><description>Quinnâ€™s plan hits me for an additional $44; Houlihan's $102; and Cullerton $149.00.  As a single person with grown kids and low income, I pick Quinn.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:37:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of  the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_983/#comment-18223451</link><description>The professor's theory could simply be a plot backed by all the neighborhood bookies and their errand boys who were practically forced into retirement by off track betting, and moreso by the river boats.  Could be they have a new lobbyist.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What I'm trying to say is, I imagine getting rid of legalized gaming in Illinois would be a boon to organized crime.  New games, different venues, no taxes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We created this "monster," now we have to live with it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;MacBeth, Interesting stuff.  I had no idea. Wow.  But, while poker or games of skill may not be totally illegal, isn't wagering on them what makes them illegal?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:19:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of  the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_983/#comment-18223465</link><description>Hey, I'm no expert.  I'm just a person with some life experience and an opinion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's my belief that if we outlaw gambling as it is now in Illinois, someone's going to fill that market.  Some people here think Indiana, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Missouri will take up the slack.  Personally, I think organized crime would love to be in control without state regulation or taxes.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:55:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lost in the mail?</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/lost_in_the_mail/#comment-18223744</link><description>VanillaMan that may be your best yet.  Awesome!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Todd seems to be working way too hard to keep the press from finding out what really is going on here.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:12:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blagojevich back on TV  *** UPDATED WITH VIDEO &amp;amp; Press Release ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/blagojevich_back_on_tv_updated_with_video_amp_press_release/#comment-18223753</link><description>He said it (again?), "... I never intended to violate any law."  He said it twice.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:26:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blagojevich back on TV  *** UPDATED WITH VIDEO &amp;amp; Press Release ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/blagojevich_back_on_tv_updated_with_video_amp_press_release/#comment-18223791</link><description>I was going to suggest a "Get Me Outta Here" reality show in downtown Springfield, but OneMan's Starved Rock idea is really much better.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:23:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Caption contest!</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/caption_contest_47/#comment-18224405</link><description>If lovin' you is wrong, I don't wanna be right.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:19:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Caption contest!</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/caption_contest_47/#comment-18224417</link><description>They both look so happy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:48:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Swine flu stuff</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/swine_flu_stuff/#comment-18224633</link><description>I have a vague recollection of the '76 swine flu panic, but only because of some other health related stuff that was going on in my family at the time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What I do remember is, "Fears arose as to possible debilitating side effects of the vaccine (some claimed that it caused a neurological condition called Guillain-BarrÃ© syndrome), and the government proved unable to offer reassurance... (New Yorker)."  And that is what I think of every. single. time. when flu shots get offered since then.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:57:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_just_in8230_581/#comment-18224869</link><description>Isn't Cicero where a lot of corruption is?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:22:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bad news for Giannoulias</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/bad_news_for_giannoulias/#comment-18225136</link><description>Let me get this straight.  We pay an investment manager a fee to manage an investment account (Bright Start, or part of it).  Then the investment manager pays us back a fee.  Is that not the very definition of kick back?  Something is wrong with that picture.  Oh, and then we use that kick back money to buy a car.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 13:22:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Caption contest!</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/caption_contest_56/#comment-18225238</link><description>Game show contestants from the far away planet of Ravenswood prepare to land for the upcoming series, "I'm an alien, get me out of here!"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 15:17:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Morning Shorts</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/morning_shorts_699/#comment-18225523</link><description>From the sunshine department, Tennessee goes transparent and puts their stuff on line, including employee salaries:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://tn.gov/opengov/index.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://tn.gov/opengov/index.html&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 10:43:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Caption contest!</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/caption_contest_62/#comment-18226507</link><description>Quinn: And so there was this kitty...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cullerton (thinking):  Where's that Friday night video to play us out when you need it?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 14:45:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Madigan: &amp;#8220;Up in the air about the Senate&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/madigan_8220up_in_the_air_about_the_senate8221/#comment-18226850</link><description>When I first read that "Boland considering Illinois lieutenant governor bid," I thought it said Burris for a second there.  Strangely, I thought, that doesn't surprise me.  LOL.  Then I figured it out.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 12:21:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A hurtful fraud</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/a_hurtful_fraud/#comment-18226887</link><description>Did anyone ever try their hand at cutting the budget?  A couple weeks ago Rich posted a link at Wonkish that has a web ap for this very matter.  Anyway, I did it just to see if it could be done and it quickly becomes apparent that you CANNOT "further cut the budget without decimating services."  Here's my budget, which cut into half the deficit:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.wonkish.com/budget/share.php?ID=1237" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.wonkish.com/budget/share.php?ID=1237&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would never ever propose that budget in real life.  However, people who are saying cut this and cut that should do this exercise and report back.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 12:53:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A hurtful fraud</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/a_hurtful_fraud/#comment-18226892</link><description>George, Don't hate me, but thanks for noticing.  Like I said, it was just an exercise in trying to come up with some numbers, and I would never do that in real life (as if I could).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 13:43:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A couple of Hamlets</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/a_couple_of_hamlets/#comment-18227138</link><description>I hate to sound so Springfieldian, even though I am a Springfieldian.  If Lisa Madigan is shying away from the senate seat because of moving to Washington, has anyone asked her how she feels about living in Springfield if she becomes governor?  Dang, I hate asking that question, but it's going to come up.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 12:55:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of  the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_8288/#comment-18227528</link><description>No.  While a person can't have their fingerprints "planted" unknowingly at a crime scene, a person's DNA can be.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Too much opportunity for abuse by some bad people in charge.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 13:05:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;  *** DOOMSDAY PLAN ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_just_in8230_doomsday_plan/#comment-18227587</link><description>Trotter: "We can't tax our way out of this."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pot, your budget is absolutely gruesome!  And proof that we can't cut our way out of this budget situation.  People should look at Pot's budget to see what the budget will look like with cuts only and no tax increase.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's no mystery.  Seriously.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here's mine (which I also posted last week), which only cuts half the deficit:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.wonkish.com/budget/share.php?ID=1237" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.wonkish.com/budget/share.php?ID=1237&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 14:40:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Governor Quinn&amp;#8217;s full &amp;#8220;slash and burn&amp;#8221; explanation</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/governor_quinn8217s_full_8220slash_and_burn8221_explanation/#comment-18227643</link><description>Is it safe to say that some of these cuts on the state level will be overturned (I don't know the right word) by tax increases on the local level?  Like teachers being laid off.  If the local school board needs to keep the teachers on, then the local school board will increase its tax rate to property owners?  Just an example.  But if so, a budget cut instead of an income tax increase could equate to a property tax increase.  Just thinking out loud.  Is this right or wrong?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 16:01:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Morning shorts</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/morning_shorts_143/#comment-18227757</link><description>&lt;a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/specials/interactives/wdc/stimulus_counties/index.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Map of transportation infrastructure stimulus projects by county&lt;/a&gt;.  (Mouse over each county for dollar amounts; can also zoom in on states).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 17:22:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: *** UPDATED x2 &amp;#8211; Judge to release tape *** Roland Burris&amp;#8217; tenuous relationship with reality</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/updated_x2_8211_judge_to_release_tape_roland_burris8217_tenuous_relationship_with_reality/#comment-18228673</link><description>Is it safe to say the Sangamon County State's Attorney's investigation of Roland Burris has fizzled?  I don't recall ever seeing anything come out on this.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 13:41:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tax Calculator Updated</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/tax_calculator_updated/#comment-18229099</link><description>My taxes go up $179 under Quinn's new plan.  Under his old one, they only went up $44.  Hendon's increase is in the middle at $109.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;== Whoever votes for this tax increase needs to be voted out. ==&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;fed up, please do offer an alternative.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 14:34:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Afternoon video</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/afternoon_video_35/#comment-18229135</link><description>Thank you for bringing this very touching exhibit to our attention, Rich.  We'll be sure to see it in person before it leaves (on Sunday).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My daughter's husband is currently serving in Afghanistan.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 17:41:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Burris&amp;#8217; meltdown continues unabated</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/burris8217_meltdown_continues_unabated/#comment-18229224</link><description>I see Burris has a book agent and they're looking for a publisher.  Maybe he'll sign on with the PublicityAgency next.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 14:21:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_5152/#comment-18229346</link><description>"Oh, come on. I can twirl a pen better than that."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:28:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mid-evening update</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/mid_evening_update/#comment-18229699</link><description>Disrespectful?  Not even.  It was hilarious. Although, I noticed he conveniently left out Gov. Ogilvie.  ;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 22:32:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Morning shorts</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/morning_shorts_663/#comment-18231685</link><description>Why would the American Civil Liberties Union let go of police restrictions so easily?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 15:26:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bad connections</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/bad_connections/#comment-18233030</link><description>It is my opinion that Burris did a grave disservice for the undertakers when they came to him regarding the comptroller.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Burris took them on as a lobbyist client.  Instead, it is my belief, upon properly sizing up the situation, he should have advised them that they did not need a lobbyist to deal with the Comptroller; what they really needed was a lawyer who was experienced in state regulations and contract law.  He could have then referred them to such a person, or taken the case himself, in his capacity as a lawyer and not a lobbyist.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When he approached the comptroller's office as a lobbyist, Hynes said, "the comptroller doesn't deal with lobbyists" (or words to that effect).  And then, Roland did nothing.  But, the problem still existed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[Sorry for the "grave" reference.  Couldn't think of a better word.]</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:52:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Morning shorts</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/morning_shorts_286/#comment-18233492</link><description>T-Shirt:  &lt;a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseball/whitesox/chi-talk-ozzie-wrigley-shirtjun18,0,7985472.story" rel="nofollow"&gt;Ozzie mows Wrigley Field&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:03:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Murphy in, LMadigan still debating</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/murphy_in_lmadigan_still_debating/#comment-18234106</link><description>I couldn't help but notice when Sen. Murphy listed the "most important things weâ€™re going to be talking about for the next year and a half," he left out the budget and thereof balancing thereof.  Does he think that issue will take care of itself, or he does he not want to touch it?  I don't know.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:27:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_3780/#comment-18234290</link><description>If Quinn's concern is for the safety of the people of Illinois, he needn't be.  Marion is already known as &lt;a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-mcgowan/tales-from-inside-the-us_b_212632.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Little Gitmo&lt;/a&gt;, and for good reason.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If his concern is for the constitutionality of holding people as prisoners of the United States, without trial, well, now you're talking.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hope Quinn, as governor, is already well acquainted with what's going on down there.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:32:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: *** UPDATED x13 *** Today&amp;#8217;s rallies, protests, etc.   *** STATEHOUSE CLOSED *** Quinn open to lower corporate tax hike ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/updated_x13_today8217s_rallies_protests_etc_statehouse_closed_quinn_open_to_lower_corporate_tax_hike/#comment-18234630</link><description>Who is Michael Marshall?  Who does he work for and who is paying his salary?  That is truly pathetic.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:48:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: *** UPDATED x13 *** Today&amp;#8217;s rallies, protests, etc.   *** STATEHOUSE CLOSED *** Quinn open to lower corporate tax hike ***</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/updated_x13_today8217s_rallies_protests_etc_statehouse_closed_quinn_open_to_lower_corporate_tax_hike/#comment-18234712</link><description>Mom to 50, == There are parents who unjustly receive subsidy... ==&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;True and I don't disagree.  On the other hand, there are those (though undoubtedly not as many) who don't participate in the program simply because they don't know about it.  Case in point: Myself when I moved back to Illinois.  It wasn't until some time after I would not have qualified that I found out I could have qualified.  I really could have used that help to keep the other wolves away from the door.  Just showing another side to the coin.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:59:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Creepiest. Video. Ever.</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/creepiest_video_ever/#comment-18235027</link><description>The Rolling Stones - You Gotta Move (L.A. 1975)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96de2P0WIY8" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96de2P0WIY8&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 23:43:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Creepiest. Video. Ever.</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/creepiest_video_ever/#comment-18235028</link><description>Ooh!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We gotta get out of this place&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wP1w5Hl8D0E" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wP1w5Hl8D0E&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(Apparently, all my suggestions have "gotta" in them.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 23:59:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Creepiest. Video. Ever.</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/creepiest_video_ever/#comment-18235029</link><description>Last one. There's a message here for the Fran Eaton types.  Or maybe it's a message from.... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Me and My Uncle, by Joni (a real oldie, but better than the others.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zp3lJg07u4w" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zp3lJg07u4w&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:15:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wow</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/wow_44/#comment-18235218</link><description>Rich, congratulations!  The ranking is well deserved as no one delivers the Illinois message better than you.  You definitely know your stuff, and we are all the more informed because you.  Thank you for blogging and for letting us get our comments in.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And thank you, Mike, for working it at the Statehouse.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:50:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My life&amp;#8217;s preparation for covering the Statehouse</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/my_life8217s_preparation_for_covering_the_statehouse/#comment-18235404</link><description>Excellent article, Rich.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My dad had a few things he said all the time.  To us kids, "never loan anything unless you don't care about getting it back." My least favorite one, "do as I say, not as I do."  And, my favorite, "never get in a p*ssing contest with a snake."  All of which I used on my kids.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:43:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_2782/#comment-18235779</link><description>Look, a kitty!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:22:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_2782/#comment-18235781</link><description>Quinn to person in the crowd: "Nice pants!"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:40:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_2782/#comment-18235793</link><description>No, I am not the walrus, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:14:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230; Guv to address joint session at 3:30 &amp;#8211; Will speak to reporters at 4:30</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_just_in8230_guv_to_address_joint_session_at_330_8211_will_speak_to_reporters_at_430/#comment-18236101</link><description>Quinn walking to the podium without shaking hands is a sign that the time for pleasantries is over, and that there is no time for such things.  It was not a sign of disdain.  I don't think.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:14:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_5172/#comment-18236352</link><description>&lt;a href="http://www.thanksno.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.thanksno.com/&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:52:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Morning Shorts</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/morning_shorts_5226/#comment-18236690</link><description>&lt;a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/24441.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Washington Post cancels lobbyist event amid uproar&lt;/a&gt;:  "Washington Post publisher Katharine Weymouth said today she was cancelling plans for an exclusive "salon" at her home where for as much as $250,000, the Post offered lobbyists and association executives off-the-record access to "those powerful few" â€” Obama administration officials, members of Congress, and even the paperâ€™s own reporters and editors."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm sure our own esteemed newspapers wouldn't sell such face-time with reporters and editors. Would they?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:45:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Late afternoon news</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/late_afternoon_news/#comment-18237190</link><description>"The Ricketts family, which made its fortune through the Omaha-based online brokerage TD Ameritrade Holding Corp...."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Does that mean Sam Waterston will be the new voice of the Cubs?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:37:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Late afternoon news</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/late_afternoon_news/#comment-18237191</link><description>Instead of Cubs tickets, it'll be Ricketts tickets.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:42:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: L. Madigan to stay put</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/l_madigan_to_stay_put/#comment-18237800</link><description>To be honest, I think this is best for all of us.  As much as I like Lisa Madigan as Attorney General and public servant, and as much as I would support her in whatever she might do, I never could imagine what her governorship would look like with her father still heading up the House of Representatives.  And, I just couldn't see her devoting the time it would take away from her family to be in Washington, D.C.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:48:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: *** UPDATED x1 *** Dominoes begin to fall &amp;#8211; Kirk to run for Senate</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/updated_x1_dominoes_begin_to_fall_8211_kirk_to_run_for_senate/#comment-18237897</link><description>== ...I will be a force here for the next 16 months. ==&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Groan. LOL! Seriously...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;== ... I look for republicans in more conservative areas downstate.... ==&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He'll have to overcome the view that he's just another gun-grabbing politician - this time a Republican.  That's not promising as downstaters go.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:34:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gov. Pat Quinn weighs in</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/gov_pat_quinn_weighs_in/#comment-18238211</link><description>Hallelujah. Hallelujah. Hallelujah?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:17:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_5332/#comment-18238377</link><description>"They call me Dan-O."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:18:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: *** UPDATED x1 *** Step back and wait for more info before burning Hynes at the stake</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/updated_x1_step_back_and_wait_for_more_info_before_burning_hynes_at_the_stake/#comment-18238926</link><description>== to screw with them. ==&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;John, don't turn into another Anthony Martin.  Some of us may want to support you in some of your endeavors.  But if you become the litigant who must be avoided at all costs, that won't happen.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:36:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Last night&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;Chicago Tonight&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/last_night8217s_8220chicago_tonight8221/#comment-18239421</link><description>Really great job, Rich. We can only imagine what it's like to live in your brain.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:01:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This just in&amp;#8230;  More trouble ahead</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/this_just_in8230_more_trouble_ahead/#comment-18240424</link><description>Suggestion:  If possible, reallocate the $500 million in member initiatives to the unemployment fund.  Not that they would.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:49:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_767/#comment-18240617</link><description>Rudderless.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:55:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Evening video: Quinn&amp;#8217;s presser</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/evening_video_quinn8217s_presser/#comment-18240743</link><description>Great job, Rich.  I imagine many in corporate media are scratching their collective heads right about now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We'd all be pitifully less informed without you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On another note, I noticed the governor didn't appoint the comptroller to the cemetery task force.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:59:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hastert&amp;#8217;s poor showing, Proft on caddying lessons, plus lots more political stuff</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/hastert8217s_poor_showing_proft_on_caddying_lessons_plus_lots_more_political_stuff/#comment-18240857</link><description>Wow! I don't think I've ever seen a peppier campaign commercial than that Quinn one.  Very uplifting.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:26:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_2757/#comment-18240953</link><description>What did Pilgrim do with the money they got from the state?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There's a difference.  If the religious institution is doing a job that, if the state did it on its own would cost 10x as much (an example, but not out of the realm), then the religious organization becomes a contractor that just happens to also have a church or temple or whatever.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:33:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_2757/#comment-18240959</link><description>I neglected to say it before:  Rob Sherman is wrong.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The constitutional test should be how the organization uses the money.  If the money is being used to teach the bible and buy hymnals, then it is unconstitutional.  If state money is used to teach blind people how to walk with a cane, then it should be treated as any other non-religious organization that does the same job.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry if I sound like I'm repeating myself.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:44:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_2757/#comment-18240975</link><description>We pay state and federal dollars to hospitals that are backed by religious organizations in the form of Medicare and Medicaid.  I'm sure Sherman objects to that, too.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:38:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kicking the can down the road</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/kicking_the_can_down_the_road/#comment-18241113</link><description>Maybe the plagiarists were filling in for the regular writers, who are off for the summer.  I don't know.  Actually, there's nothing funny about it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But, on another note, "John Cullerton said ... push for a tax increase in January, when a simple majority again will be required to pass it."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm curious, what magic thing does he think is going to happen in January of 2010 that couldn't have happened in April or May of 2009?  Am I missing something?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:56:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unsolicited advice</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/unsolicited_advice_89/#comment-18241336</link><description>Dear Gov. Quinn: What up with not yet signing HB 35, the major transparency and accountability portal for Illinois?  It's been sitting on your desk for over a month.  Go for it. Sign it. You know you want to. Right?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:40:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day &amp;#8211; With a prize for the winner</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_8211_with_a_prize_for_the_winner/#comment-18241770</link><description>"Now look what you've done."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:02:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day &amp;#8211; With a prize for the winner</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_8211_with_a_prize_for_the_winner/#comment-18241772</link><description>Older Quinn to youthful Quinn:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"What were you thinking?"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:06:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_821/#comment-18242203</link><description>Secretary of State Jesse White, on a tour of the Howlett Building, discovers Jerry Garcia is alive and working in the far reaches of the basement.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 12:23:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Changes coming to reform bill?</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/changes_coming_to_reform_bill/#comment-18242435</link><description>Change IL is brought to you by the people at the Illinois Campaign for Political Reform.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ilcampaign.org/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.ilcampaign.org/&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:33:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_9392/#comment-18243194</link><description>Gov. Pat Quinn practices the air kazoo.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:44:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_9392/#comment-18243224</link><description>In an effort to deflect attention from the state's budget problems, Gov. Pat Quinn does a &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spit-take" rel="nofollow"&gt;spit take&lt;/a&gt; after each question by the press.  It took a while for the press to get tired of being showered by the governor's beverages, but they finally did and walked away.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:52:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_2200/#comment-18243936</link><description>Gov. Pat Quinn takes the opportunity to make incomprehensible hand gestures while no one is looking at him.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:53:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_2200/#comment-18243943</link><description>Governor Pat Quinn to Senator Dick Durbin:  "You brought him with you?"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:59:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_2200/#comment-18243953</link><description>Gov. Quinn shows Senator Durbin how he gets down and funky.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:08:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_2200/#comment-18243960</link><description>== â€¦In other words, Fritchey, youâ€™re gonna have to beg for it.==&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Preferably in public on this blog. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:21:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_2200/#comment-18243968</link><description>Pat Quinn recalls for Dick Durbin the time Rich Miller banned him for life from the Capitol Fax Blog.  Roland Burris looks for a kitty.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:36:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Polling secrets</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/polling_secrets/#comment-18244231</link><description>Someone should commission a poll that goes:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Do you support Plan A which consists of four grocery stores, three cafes, a tire store, a toy store, a pet shop, a furniture store, a year round farmer's market, a couple locally owned pharmacies, a multitude of little bakeries and tea and coffee shops, all of which sell at market prices, and all strategically located on the South Side?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Or, do you support Plan B which consists of one cold, heartless, hulking Wal-Mart?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Would you be more likely to support your city council if they supported Plan A or Plan B?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:41:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Polling secrets</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/polling_secrets/#comment-18244233</link><description>I wasn't seeking to deny anything to anyone, just trying to demonstrate the way a question is worded can have an impact on the answers.  Which is what I thought the topic was.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:17:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: *** UPDATED x1 *** Should campaign have posted while candidate was on duty?</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/updated_x1_should_campaign_have_posted_while_candidate_was_on_duty/#comment-18244633</link><description>Wumpus, no someone should not. Why would you even think that?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:44:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: *** UPDATED x1 *** Should campaign have posted while candidate was on duty?</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/updated_x1_should_campaign_have_posted_while_candidate_was_on_duty/#comment-18244637</link><description>Sorry. I was speed reading. Thought you said "should" take this and run.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:54:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: All sorts of weirdness</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/all_sorts_of_weirdness/#comment-18244872</link><description>You'd think someone who graduated from college at age 16 could have at least graduated from law school by age 17.  Maybe that's when she went to work on the floor of the NYSE or CBOT or wherever.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Seriously, I am sure Tamara is very smart and a very good lawyer.  I can't imagine how she let her name get on those property tax cases.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:20:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FYI: No Blog Posts Today</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/fyi_no_blog_posts_today/#comment-18246545</link><description>Not sure if it got reported here yet or not, but yesterday the governor signed into law House Bill 35, Illinois Transparency and Accountability&lt;br&gt;Portal (ITAP).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It goes into effect on January 1st.  However, if I'm reading it right, the web site doesn't have to go online until 12 months after that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:20:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Morning shorts</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/morning_shorts_3193/#comment-18246728</link><description>Regarding "there wonâ€™t be regular garbage-pickup service Monday...."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Isn't that a public health issue?  I would think garbage pick-up should NOT be skipped.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:31:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of  the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_668/#comment-18246864</link><description>No, it should not be fair game.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unless, of course, said "Monica Walker, an accomplished exec at Holland Capital Management" is advising and guiding Gov. Quinn regarding the state's financial and investment strategies.  And, especially if Holland is going to be getting the state's business.  If any of that's happening, then yes, we need to know everything.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:29:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_0230/#comment-18247438</link><description>I've been to Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Missouri's Statehouses.  But, only been inside Michigan's.  I remember my first impression being that it's atmosphere was very much like our own Capitol Building.  It felt good, and real, and old, and imposing.  Also, I thought it was kind of cool that the room I was in must have doubled for evening concerts since there was a large, old Grand piano in it.  I remember wondering if there were any Grand pianos in our Capitol Building.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Finally, I was so glad I got there early, because I kept driving around and around trying to figure out Lansing's one-way streets.  It seemed I could see the Capitol from everywhere, but couldn't actually drive up to it.  Ar.  I finally found a parking spot, got out and walked about four blocks.  I imagined out-of-towners to Springfield felt the same way about us.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:44:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_296/#comment-18247614</link><description>Stuck on a Ferris wheel.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:52:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Morning shorts</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/morning_shorts_078/#comment-18247897</link><description>Very creative, bluestatecowboys. Good work.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:29:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Question of the day</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/question_of_the_day_267/#comment-18248883</link><description>Fred Thompson for his looks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:25:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fritchey expected to run for county board, and other political news</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/fritchey_expected_to_run_for_county_board_and_other_political_news_74/#comment-18248945</link><description>They spelled pejorativre wrong.  It's pejorative.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But, great name for a band (rock-a-billy?):  Rich Miller's Pejoratives.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:22:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: *** UPDATED ***   Hang in there, Carlos!</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/updated_hang_in_there_carlos/#comment-18249048</link><description>Carlos, best wishes, good thoughts, and prayers (especially) for you from Springfield.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:54:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More details emerge on Kelly suicide</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/more_details_emerge_on_kelly_suicide/#comment-18251338</link><description>I'm disturbed by Rod Blagojevich using Chris Kelly's death to his own advantage in the court of public opinion.  It's one thing to use it in court documents and verbally before the judge.  But, to go around showing anything but remorse for what happened and sympathy for the family at this point is despicable.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:59:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More details emerge on Kelly suicide</title><link>http://capitolfaxcom.disqus.com/more_details_emerge_on_kelly_suicide/#comment-18251341</link><description>Unsolicited advice for the next media person to interview Blagojevich:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. Ask him when the last time was he talked to his good friend, Chris Kelly.  Was it on the phone, in person, where?  What did they talk about?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. Ask him when the last time he and his family got together with his good friend, Chris Kelly and his family, or anyone else?  Where was it and what did they do?  What did they talk about?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheswick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:31:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>