<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for bitch</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/8743cbf1f7c74d903d45e9eb6ab0a30b/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 10:46:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: When Good Albums Happen to Bad People: Glenn Danzig, &amp;#8220;Danzig II: Lucifuge&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://popdose.disqus.com/when_good_albums_happen_to_bad_people_glenn_danzig_8220danzig_ii_lucifuge8221_36/#comment-5458055</link><description>Erik sounds like the one who should be writing articles about Glenn Danzig.  Sounds like he knows much more about the subject (Danzig) than the clown who wrote the crap above.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh yeah, I'm with Tara on that being the worst cover I've ever heard.  It ranks somewhere between funny and really, really sad.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bitch</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:30:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Which video game console should you buy?</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/which_video_game_console_should_you_buy/#comment-15567046</link><description>ps3 is gangster</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bitch</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 10:46:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Farthest Galaxy Cluster Observed From Earth</title><link>http://astronomynotesnet.disqus.com/the_farthest_galaxy_cluster_observed_from_earth/#comment-4388250</link><description>i don't believe it one bit.  [-(</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bitch</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 22:33:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPod Touch 2G Jailbreak Coming</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/ipod_touch_2g_jailbreak_coming/#comment-6884423</link><description>steve guy is a dumbass&lt;br&gt;if you dont kno all the possiblities of a jailbroken ipod touch then just go ahead and get rid of ur ipod touch and kill yourself.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bitch</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:44:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon notes strong 3Q</title><link>http://bbcoolstaging.disqus.com/verizon_notes_strong_3q/#comment-13683841</link><description>Verizon and cdma SUCK!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bitch</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:03:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BlackBerryThemeCentral&amp;#8217;s Shayne McIntosh interviewed</title><link>http://bbcoolstaging.disqus.com/blackberrythemecentral8217s_shayne_mcintosh_interviewed/#comment-13684077</link><description>Why no 8100 Pearl themes yet?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bitch</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:33:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Treo 750 demo now in stores</title><link>http://bbcoolstaging.disqus.com/treo_750_demo_now_in_stores/#comment-13684246</link><description>windoz on a palm.... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;NO THANKS</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bitch</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 20:01:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Verizon gets by with BlackBerrys</title><link>http://bbcoolstaging.disqus.com/how_verizon_gets_by_with_blackberrys/#comment-13684372</link><description>Robb is wrong</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bitch</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 00:17:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Verizon gets by with BlackBerrys</title><link>http://bbcoolstaging.disqus.com/how_verizon_gets_by_with_blackberrys/#comment-13684373</link><description>another fluff article of verizon excuses and lies....  Some day the vealot sheep will wake up and see the true fat cat, anti-consumer company verizon is.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bitch</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 14:22:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Verizon gets by with BlackBerrys</title><link>http://bbcoolstaging.disqus.com/how_verizon_gets_by_with_blackberrys/#comment-13684374</link><description>EvilHomer is wise beyond his words...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bitch</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 19:59:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ThoughtPiece: Why RIM and Verizon Need to Get Closer</title><link>http://bbcoolstaging.disqus.com/thoughtpiece_why_rim_and_verizon_need_to_get_closer/#comment-13684553</link><description>HORRIBLE IDEA!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why should RIM waste its time on a limited proprietary technology like cdma?  Which has less than a 1/8 (and dropping) compared to industry leading, open, standard, GSM, the Global System for Mobile communication. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why should RIM waste its money on paying royalties to Patent holding company like qualcomm?  RIM was just forced to end Patent games with NTP.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why should RIM waste time, money, and consumer good will on a device for verizon which will only be locked down with buggy vzw firmware changes for removing features, functions, and applications.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Claiming to be a fan of RIM is one thing, but trying to convince RIM and others into thinking vzw and cdma is the way to go is the worst forward direction for RIM.  Thank goodness for RIM they are smarter than that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bitch</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 14:16:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon retakes lead from AT&amp;amp;T, hits the trifecta</title><link>http://bbcoolstaging.disqus.com/verizon_retakes_lead_from_atampt_hits_the_trifecta/#comment-13685607</link><description>relax your verizon cheerleading.  verizon has not taken the lead in anything other than perhaps crippled devices using a proprietary, closed technology to build it's network around.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;cdma providers are dropping cdma and moving on up to gsm, the Global System for Mobile Communication.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Seriously.. think about it for a second" Like Elise pointed out would RIM be smart making devices first for over 2.4 billion GSM customers or 4.25 million and dropping cdma customers.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bitch</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:18:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon shakes up voice/data pricing</title><link>http://bbcoolstaging.disqus.com/verizon_shakes_up_voicedata_pricing/#comment-13685600</link><description>and the verizon fat cats get fatter</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bitch</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:23:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verizon retakes lead from AT&amp;amp;T, hits the trifecta</title><link>http://bbcoolstaging.disqus.com/verizon_retakes_lead_from_atampt_hits_the_trifecta/#comment-13685610</link><description>"so please RIM and Verizon, tet me get at least one cool new BlackBerry first."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;verizon please make sure to "fix" the firmware too, make sure your in CONTROL of everything, and cripple what you aren't in control of, you know like you do with all vzerizon branded phones.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Better hurry though, consumers are waking up to verizon games.  Those "lower 48" are upgrading slowly to the freedom of GSM.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That RIM worldwide GSM market looks mighty good.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bitch</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 21:58:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ThoughtPiece: Verizon/AT&amp;amp;T &amp;#8212; The U.S. Market&amp;#8217;s Two Heavyweights</title><link>http://bbcoolstaging.disqus.com/thoughtpiece_verizonatampt_8212_the_us_market8217s_two_heavyweights/#comment-13685765</link><description>verizon's anti-consumer culture, and dead end cdma network WILL be verizon's downfall.  No top tier handset manufacture makes devices for cdma, and even if they did verizon would lock them down and cripple functions and applications.  att uses GSM, which is the Global System for Mobile Communication, it's a non-proprietary, open standard.  Every manufacture makes GSM phones.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;verizon - closed, proprietary, anti-consumer, network not available around the globe.  verizon like being anti-consumer is also anti-union.  qualcomm's holding verizon's leash.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;att - open, non-proprietary, pro-consumer, using technology and devices which works around the globe. att is Pro-UNION.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheerleading aside att's network is as good if not better than verizon's around the US.  Its sad that vealot's are stuck on believeing everything that comes out of verizon's hole. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A tale of two companies....&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cwa-union.org/verizon/video/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.cwa-union.org/verizon/video/&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bitch</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 09:11:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ThoughtPiece: Verizon/AT&amp;amp;T &amp;#8212; The U.S. Market&amp;#8217;s Two Heavyweights</title><link>http://bbcoolstaging.disqus.com/thoughtpiece_verizonatampt_8212_the_us_market8217s_two_heavyweights/#comment-13685766</link><description>BTW the "ThoughtPiece: Verizon/AT&amp;amp;T â€” The U.S. Marketâ€™s Two Heavyweights" is so full of bias and un-truth's it's shameful.  Too bad those at BlackberryCool time after time can't leave personal fantasy's of verizon alone in fantasy world, and keep whining for the day (that will never come) when RIM or any other manufacture takes verizon and cdma seriously.  Global wireless subscribers numbers tell the tale why.  GSM is growing, cdma is falling.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bitch</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 09:20:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Curve officially announced</title><link>http://bbcoolstaging.disqus.com/curve_officially_announced/#comment-13685783</link><description>Another great GSM device from RIM leaving cdma RIM devices 2 generations back.  It's very clear which technology is the real deal and which is the proprietary, non-global technology.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bitch</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 09:25:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Patent trolls take one in the teeth, world rejoices</title><link>http://bbcoolstaging.disqus.com/patent_trolls_take_one_in_the_teeth_world_rejoices/#comment-13685754</link><description>Vonage now has the power to slay the fat cat verizon....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bitch</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 09:30:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ThoughtPiece: Verizon/AT&amp;amp;T &amp;#8212; The U.S. Market&amp;#8217;s Two Heavyweights</title><link>http://bbcoolstaging.disqus.com/thoughtpiece_verizonatampt_8212_the_us_market8217s_two_heavyweights/#comment-13685768</link><description>Good to hear BBCool staff are IN THE KNOW, and don't let verizon, cdma and all it's issues hold y'all back.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bitch</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 11:01:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ThoughtPiece: Verizon/AT&amp;amp;T &amp;#8212; The U.S. Market&amp;#8217;s Two Heavyweights</title><link>http://bbcoolstaging.disqus.com/thoughtpiece_verizonatampt_8212_the_us_market8217s_two_heavyweights/#comment-13685770</link><description>Please enlighten us how 3G helps YOU with your blackberry?  Whats that? verizon doesn't have service where you work?   verizon's closed, proprietary, anti-consumer, network which is not available around the globe, OR at your place of work and you have to suffer with 2 generation old RIM devices?  More magic....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://haveopinionwiiltravel.blogspot.com/2006/03/verizon-can-you-hear-me-now-good.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://haveopinionwiiltravel.blogspot.com/2006/...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bitch</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 19:09:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hey America: How&amp;#8217;s your Curves? (Updated!)</title><link>http://bbcoolstaging.disqus.com/hey_america_how8217s_your_curves_updated/#comment-13686003</link><description>Ryan,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At&amp;amp;t's network (GSM) is just as good if not better than what your hopes and dreams tell you vzw has.  There are many good reasons why "manufacturers love GSM", and why manufacturers and consumers ignore cdma, and why service providers are taking old cdma networks and upgrading them to global standard GSM networks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bitch</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 18:53:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WCDMA falling flat</title><link>http://bbcoolstaging.disqus.com/wcdma_falling_flat/#comment-13685995</link><description>wcdma is falling flat due to qualcomm.  cdma networks are falling flat and being upgraded to GSM, why? because of qualcomm.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Service providers, manufactures and consumers in the know, know better than to chose proprietary, non-standard technologies from arrogant, greedy, lawsuit happy, patent-holding company named qualcomm.  Consumer based communication going forward needs to be like GSM is today; open, non-proprietary, and a global standard.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;cdma, wcdma anything qualcomm is not the right way forward in consumer communication networks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bitch</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 18:59:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BlackBerry 8830 shows up on Bell&amp;#8217;s website (with pricing)</title><link>http://bbcoolstaging.disqus.com/blackberry_8830_shows_up_on_bell8217s_website_with_pricing/#comment-13686196</link><description>Its the price cdma users MUST pay to use 2nd rate proprietary technology.  Better to upgrade to a GSM provider.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bitch</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:26:55 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>