<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Trike</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/85dbbe57d6c00a2bbb2f579c59d8ec78/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:48:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Church Without Presence?</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/church_without_presence/#comment-1219547</link><description>Q?  Does the whole idea of neighborhood really exist any longer in America?  Do we really have geographic (block by block) areas that we call 'ours'?  Doesn't the American fascination with the automobile and our tendancy to be around people who are 'like' us - whatever that means - trump any idea of 'living in such and such of a neighborhood?'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If this is possible, how in the world do we do incarnational living?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I bring absolutely nothing to the table, but just more questions!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Trike</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:44:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_05/#comment-5285180</link><description>Q?  Does the whole idea of neighborhood really exist any longer in America?  Do we really have geographic (block by block) areas that we call 'ours'?  Doesn't the American fascination with the automobile and our tendancy to be around people who are 'like' us - whatever that means - trump any idea of 'living in such and such of a neighborhood?'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If this is possible, how in the world do we do incarnational living?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I bring absolutely nothing to the table, but just more questions!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Trike</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:44:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_05/#comment-5285188</link><description>Q?  Does the whole idea of neighborhood really exist any longer in America?  Do we really have geographic (block by block) areas that we call 'ours'?  Doesn't the American fascination with the automobile and our tendancy to be around people who are 'like' us - whatever that means - trump any idea of 'living in such and such of a neighborhood?'&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If this is possible, how in the world do we do incarnational living?&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I bring absolutely nothing to the table, but just more questions!&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Trike&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:44:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Launch</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/launch/#comment-1219591</link><description>Whoa there, big dog!  I have quite a few thoughts I would like have you chew on:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1.  Having a total of 60 people at your first meeting is something to be JAZZED about!  As I shared the story of Misseo Dei having 60 people at their launch to our leadership team, they applauded!  It all is a matter of perspective.  THIS IS GREAT!!!  PEOPLE ARE COMING.  Remember, the ground you are in is very hard soil.  The fact that anyone came is so very, very cool.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2.  Do not be so quick as to strategize what the future will hold.  Our church was no more that 75 people after 1 year (if we counted all the cockroaches and mice in the building!).  I have always been full time.  It very well may be that you need to be bivocational...I have no idea, but see what God does.  Let me encourage you to keep it up, seeking God all the way to provide - how he does it is his business.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3.  Pour yourself into those 60 people!  Win, Disciple, Learn, Laugh, Hang out!  You will change the whole complexity of that neighborhood with 60 people who love on one another, love Jesus from their toes, and are eager to reach more and more people to the greatest message and person ever!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;4.  Enjoy it, even the hard times.  I've been at Hope now for 8+ years, and those early days, hard as they were, as poor as they were, were the good old days!  Our team worked very hard to celebrate the (very small, but significant) milestones.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm proud of you and your team.  Keep it up, do NOT give any discouragment a foothold in your life or your team's life.  If it sounds like I am preaching - I AM!!  Keep on running after him and for him!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2004 23:53:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_498/#comment-5285277</link><description>Whoa there, big dog!  I have quite a few thoughts I would like have you chew on:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1.  Having a total of 60 people at your first meeting is something to be JAZZED about!  As I shared the story of Misseo Dei having 60 people at their launch to our leadership team, they applauded!  It all is a matter of perspective.  THIS IS GREAT!!!  PEOPLE ARE COMING.  Remember, the ground you are in is very hard soil.  The fact that anyone came is so very, very cool.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2.  Do not be so quick as to strategize what the future will hold.  Our church was no more that 75 people after 1 year (if we counted all the cockroaches and mice in the building!).  I have always been full time.  It very well may be that you need to be bivocational...I have no idea, but see what God does.  Let me encourage you to keep it up, seeking God all the way to provide - how he does it is his business.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3.  Pour yourself into those 60 people!  Win, Disciple, Learn, Laugh, Hang out!  You will change the whole complexity of that neighborhood with 60 people who love on one another, love Jesus from their toes, and are eager to reach more and more people to the greatest message and person ever!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;4.  Enjoy it, even the hard times.  I've been at Hope now for 8+ years, and those early days, hard as they were, as poor as they were, were the good old days!  Our team worked very hard to celebrate the (very small, but significant) milestones.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm proud of you and your team.  Keep it up, do NOT give any discouragment a foothold in your life or your team's life.  If it sounds like I am preaching - I AM!!  Keep on running after him and for him!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2004 23:53:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_498/#comment-5285279</link><description>Whoa there, big dog!  I have quite a few thoughts I would like have you chew on:&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1.  Having a total of 60 people at your first meeting is something to be JAZZED about!  As I shared the story of Misseo Dei having 60 people at their launch to our leadership team, they applauded!  It all is a matter of perspective.  THIS IS GREAT!!!  PEOPLE ARE COMING.  Remember, the ground you are in is very hard soil.  The fact that anyone came is so very, very cool.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2.  Do not be so quick as to strategize what the future will hold.  Our church was no more that 75 people after 1 year (if we counted all the cockroaches and mice in the building!).  I have always been full time.  It very well may be that you need to be bivocational...I have no idea, but see what God does.  Let me encourage you to keep it up, seeking God all the way to provide - how he does it is his business.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3.  Pour yourself into those 60 people!  Win, Disciple, Learn, Laugh, Hang out!  You will change the whole complexity of that neighborhood with 60 people who love on one another, love Jesus from their toes, and are eager to reach more and more people to the greatest message and person ever!&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;4.  Enjoy it, even the hard times.  I've been at Hope now for 8+ years, and those early days, hard as they were, as poor as they were, were the good old days!  Our team worked very hard to celebrate the (very small, but significant) milestones.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm proud of you and your team.  Keep it up, do NOT give any discouragment a foothold in your life or your team's life.  If it sounds like I am preaching - I AM!!  Keep on running after him and for him!&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2004 23:53:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s not a Both/And, often it is an Either/Or</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/it8217s_not_a_bothand_often_it_is_an_eitheror/#comment-1219636</link><description>I got so exited here, I actually did a long blog on my own site.  Check it out&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.stevetreichler.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.stevetreichler.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2004 20:15:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_249/#comment-5285385</link><description>I got so exited here, I actually did a long blog on my own site.  Check it out&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.stevetreichler.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.stevetreichler.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2004 20:15:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_249/#comment-5285388</link><description>I got so exited here, I actually did a long blog on my own site.  Check it out&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.stevetreichler.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.stevetreichler.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2004 20:15:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_357/#comment-5285471</link><description>I did look at his site, as well as gander at some of his other writings.  I guess I would have to say, that although I would agree that we are missing part of the message of Jesus in our churches, we certainly do not need to DE-EMPHISIZE his soterological work of forensic atonement on the cross.  Steve Bush is a NT Wright guy, who is sympathetic to the whole annilationism concept (see &lt;a href="http://www.reconstruction.us/forums/viewthread.php?tid=20" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.reconstruction.us/forums/viewthread....&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, his starting point is so radically different from mine.  Yes, all that he says is true, but NOT to the exclusion of Jesus death and resurrection being for my INDIVIDUAL eternal salvation.  2 Corinthians 4 and 5 make no sense otherwise.  What do you all think?&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Steve&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2004 01:48:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Systematic Exclusion of Jesus from Christianity</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_systematic_exclusion_of_jesus_from_christianity/#comment-1219661</link><description>I did look at his site, as well as gander at some of his other writings.  I guess I would have to say, that although I would agree that we are missing part of the message of Jesus in our churches, we certainly do not need to DE-EMPHISIZE his soterological work of forensic atonement on the cross.  Steve Bush is a NT Wright guy, who is sympathetic to the whole annilationism concept (see &lt;a href="http://www.reconstruction.us/forums/viewthread.php?tid=20" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.reconstruction.us/forums/viewthread....&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, his starting point is so radically different from mine.  Yes, all that he says is true, but NOT to the exclusion of Jesus death and resurrection being for my INDIVIDUAL eternal salvation.  2 Corinthians 4 and 5 make no sense otherwise.  What do you all think?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Steve</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2004 02:48:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_357/#comment-5285468</link><description>I did look at his site, as well as gander at some of his other writings.  I guess I would have to say, that although I would agree that we are missing part of the message of Jesus in our churches, we certainly do not need to DE-EMPHISIZE his soterological work of forensic atonement on the cross.  Steve Bush is a NT Wright guy, who is sympathetic to the whole annilationism concept (see &lt;a href="http://www.reconstruction.us/forums/viewthread.php?tid=20" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.reconstruction.us/forums/viewthread....&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, his starting point is so radically different from mine.  Yes, all that he says is true, but NOT to the exclusion of Jesus death and resurrection being for my INDIVIDUAL eternal salvation.  2 Corinthians 4 and 5 make no sense otherwise.  What do you all think?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Steve</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2004 02:48:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_2415/#comment-5294406</link><description>Sounds kinda Barthian.  I've always found that very attractive in most ways, as long as the word is the word on it's own too.  Sounds like you've processed that well, my friend.  May the Spirit ROCK you and me and this city!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:52:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_67/#comment-5286510</link><description>I think my bible says "go make disciples" not "create really cool events that will WOW them into coming and giving and working to make more events for more people to make disciples."&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My question is this: how do we avoid this?  No matter how big or small our works may be, we always have a semblance of this going on?  At least all the ministries I have ever been a part of have.  Any ideas?&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:57:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Classic JM: Psalm 1, the Law, and the Missional Church</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/classic_jm_psalm_1_the_law_and_the_missional_church/#comment-1310343</link><description>Sounds kinda Barthian.  I've always found that very attractive in most ways, as long as the word is the word on it's own too.  Sounds like you've processed that well, my friend.  May the Spirit ROCK you and me and this city!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:52:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_2415/#comment-5294381</link><description>Sounds kinda Barthian.  I've always found that very attractive in most ways, as long as the word is the word on it's own too.  Sounds like you've processed that well, my friend.  May the Spirit ROCK you and me and this city!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:52:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stop Inviting People to Church</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/stop_inviting_people_to_church/#comment-1219837</link><description>I think my bible says "go make disciples" not "create really cool events that will WOW them into coming and giving and working to make more events for more people to make disciples."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My question is this: how do we avoid this?  No matter how big or small our works may be, we always have a semblance of this going on?  At least all the ministries I have ever been a part of have.  Any ideas?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:57:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_67/#comment-5286501</link><description>I think my bible says "go make disciples" not "create really cool events that will WOW them into coming and giving and working to make more events for more people to make disciples."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My question is this: how do we avoid this?  No matter how big or small our works may be, we always have a semblance of this going on?  At least all the ministries I have ever been a part of have.  Any ideas?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:57:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rethinking the Atonement</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/rethinking_the_atonement/#comment-1220001</link><description>Just like the new perspective of Paul, I would add that the atonement of Jesus is incredibly more than just his penal substitution, but certainly not less.  All of the recent work I am aware of on this issue is a great correction, as long as it doesn't try to "through the penal substitution out with the bathwater" IMHBYVOO (In My Humble But Yet Opinionated Opinion!).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2005 23:07:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_542/#comment-5286895</link><description>Just like the new perspective of Paul, I would add that the atonement of Jesus is incredibly more than just his penal substitution, but certainly not less.  All of the recent work I am aware of on this issue is a great correction, as long as it doesn't try to "through the penal substitution out with the bathwater" IMHBYVOO (In My Humble But Yet Opinionated Opinion!).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2005 23:07:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_542/#comment-5286906</link><description>Just like the new perspective of Paul, I would add that the atonement of Jesus is incredibly more than just his penal substitution, but certainly not less.  All of the recent work I am aware of on this issue is a great correction, as long as it doesn't try to "through the penal substitution out with the bathwater" IMHBYVOO (In My Humble But Yet Opinionated Opinion!).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2005 23:07:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: emerge, but for Pete&amp;#8217;s sake avoid the kitsch</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/emerge_but_for_pete8217s_sake_avoid_the_kitsch/#comment-1220023</link><description>Amen, and Amen, and Amen!  I felt like I could have written this post myself - so therefore, I guess you were pretty inspired in writing it, eh?  Or, did you do it after a few of Pat's homeaid beers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyway, I too feel like one of the dangers of the emergent movement is a sense of actually being more FORMULA motivated than the boomers - especially when it comes to art, litergy, icons, etc.  It seems like these things BECOME the reason the emergent is so "cool" - as opposed to being the MEANS to another end - being swept up into the glory of God.  All the Authentic, Emergent, Inclusive, Incarnational, Missiological, Dialogical, Contextual and Ancient-Futural (new word, eh?) in the world doesn't mean squat if it is an idol!  The MEANS have become the ENDS to make my point clearer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now, know this, I tend toward iconoclast as well - not because I am opposed to them, but because I can see how incredibly idolatrous our culture is with everything, especially religion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just one man's point of view.  Thanks for the rich post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Trike</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2005 17:45:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_787/#comment-5286962</link><description>Amen, and Amen, and Amen!  I felt like I could have written this post myself - so therefore, I guess you were pretty inspired in writing it, eh?  Or, did you do it after a few of Pat's homeaid beers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyway, I too feel like one of the dangers of the emergent movement is a sense of actually being more FORMULA motivated than the boomers - especially when it comes to art, litergy, icons, etc.  It seems like these things BECOME the reason the emergent is so "cool" - as opposed to being the MEANS to another end - being swept up into the glory of God.  All the Authentic, Emergent, Inclusive, Incarnational, Missiological, Dialogical, Contextual and Ancient-Futural (new word, eh?) in the world doesn't mean squat if it is an idol!  The MEANS have become the ENDS to make my point clearer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now, know this, I tend toward iconoclast as well - not because I am opposed to them, but because I can see how incredibly idolatrous our culture is with everything, especially religion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just one man's point of view.  Thanks for the rich post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Trike</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2005 17:45:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_787/#comment-5286970</link><description>Amen, and Amen, and Amen!  I felt like I could have written this post myself - so therefore, I guess you were pretty inspired in writing it, eh?  Or, did you do it after a few of Pat's homeaid beers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyway, I too feel like one of the dangers of the emergent movement is a sense of actually being more FORMULA motivated than the boomers - especially when it comes to art, litergy, icons, etc.  It seems like these things BECOME the reason the emergent is so "cool" - as opposed to being the MEANS to another end - being swept up into the glory of God.  All the Authentic, Emergent, Inclusive, Incarnational, Missiological, Dialogical, Contextual and Ancient-Futural (new word, eh?) in the world doesn't mean squat if it is an idol!  The MEANS have become the ENDS to make my point clearer.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now, know this, I tend toward iconoclast as well - not because I am opposed to them, but because I can see how incredibly idolatrous our culture is with everything, especially religion.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just one man's point of view.  Thanks for the rich post.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Trike&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2005 17:45:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: emerge, but for Pete&amp;#8217;s sake avoid the kitsch</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/emerge_but_for_pete8217s_sake_avoid_the_kitsch/#comment-1220024</link><description>BTW - nice word, shite.  Is that the Bethel way of spelling it?&lt;br&gt;ST</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2005 17:47:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_787/#comment-5286963</link><description>BTW - nice word, shite.  Is that the Bethel way of spelling it?&lt;br&gt;ST</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2005 17:47:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_787/#comment-5286971</link><description>BTW - nice word, shite.  Is that the Bethel way of spelling it?&lt;br&gt;ST&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2005 17:47:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Retribution of God</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_retribution_of_god/#comment-1300963</link><description>I , too, look forward to your comments on this issue, although I think we seriously disagree.  I think the cross and vicarious, penal, substitutionary atonement is the pinnacle of all of the faith, proclaimed loudly through the resurrection.  "I came preaching Christ, and him crucified."  I must confess, this is a biggie with me, and would love to enter the conversation to make sure I am hearing you correctly.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 01:08:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_706/#comment-5291298</link><description>I , too, look forward to your comments on this issue, although I think we seriously disagree.  I think the cross and vicarious, penal, substitutionary atonement is the pinnacle of all of the faith, proclaimed loudly through the resurrection.  "I came preaching Christ, and him crucified."  I must confess, this is a biggie with me, and would love to enter the conversation to make sure I am hearing you correctly.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 01:08:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_706/#comment-5291305</link><description>I , too, look forward to your comments on this issue, although I think we seriously disagree.  I think the cross and vicarious, penal, substitutionary atonement is the pinnacle of all of the faith, proclaimed loudly through the resurrection.  "I came preaching Christ, and him crucified."  I must confess, this is a biggie with me, and would love to enter the conversation to make sure I am hearing you correctly.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 01:08:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Embracing the Divine Impulse</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/embracing_the_divine_impulse/#comment-1304353</link><description>i like the picture...  glad I'm married!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyway, I don't disagree with your assessment, except for the fact that you seem to be speaking out of both sides of your mouth - in that in previous posts you rail against the traditional view of penal substitution and the wrath of God being satisfied, but here acknowledge it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My whole deal is that the gospel is a WHOLE LOT more than the penal substitution of the Father's wrath upon the Son for the reconcilliation of humans, but certainly never LESS.  I see a loss of this precious doctrine in much of the writing of today on the Atonement.  Perhaps this is a reaction to the single lens look at the cross many have had, but it is the baby and must not go down the drain with all the other baby poo of underemphasis of other beautiful aspects of our Lord's passion (you supply the mental imagry and smell associate with that on your own!).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My main idea is that you can never OVER emphasize penal substitution - you just must elevate all the other elements of the cross as well:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Christus Victor&lt;br&gt;Christus Exemplar&lt;br&gt;Revelation&lt;br&gt;Expiation&lt;br&gt;Justification&lt;br&gt;Imputation&lt;br&gt;etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thoughts?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Trike</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 16:57:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_2722/#comment-5291384</link><description>i like the picture...  glad I'm married!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyway, I don't disagree with your assessment, except for the fact that you seem to be speaking out of both sides of your mouth - in that in previous posts you rail against the traditional view of penal substitution and the wrath of God being satisfied, but here acknowledge it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My whole deal is that the gospel is a WHOLE LOT more than the penal substitution of the Father's wrath upon the Son for the reconcilliation of humans, but certainly never LESS.  I see a loss of this precious doctrine in much of the writing of today on the Atonement.  Perhaps this is a reaction to the single lens look at the cross many have had, but it is the baby and must not go down the drain with all the other baby poo of underemphasis of other beautiful aspects of our Lord's passion (you supply the mental imagry and smell associate with that on your own!).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My main idea is that you can never OVER emphasize penal substitution - you just must elevate all the other elements of the cross as well:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Christus Victor&lt;br&gt;Christus Exemplar&lt;br&gt;Revelation&lt;br&gt;Expiation&lt;br&gt;Justification&lt;br&gt;Imputation&lt;br&gt;etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thoughts?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Trike</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 16:57:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_2722/#comment-5291396</link><description>i like the picture...  glad I'm married!&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyway, I don't disagree with your assessment, except for the fact that you seem to be speaking out of both sides of your mouth - in that in previous posts you rail against the traditional view of penal substitution and the wrath of God being satisfied, but here acknowledge it.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My whole deal is that the gospel is a WHOLE LOT more than the penal substitution of the Father's wrath upon the Son for the reconcilliation of humans, but certainly never LESS.  I see a loss of this precious doctrine in much of the writing of today on the Atonement.  Perhaps this is a reaction to the single lens look at the cross many have had, but it is the baby and must not go down the drain with all the other baby poo of underemphasis of other beautiful aspects of our Lord's passion (you supply the mental imagry and smell associate with that on your own!).&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My main idea is that you can never OVER emphasize penal substitution - you just must elevate all the other elements of the cross as well:&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Christus Victor&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Christus Exemplar&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Revelation&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Expiation&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Justification&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Imputation&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;etc.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thoughts?&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Trike&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 16:57:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Embracing the Divine Impulse</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/embracing_the_divine_impulse/#comment-1304358</link><description>I find everything sexual...but I digress...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here's what I mean.  In his post on The Retribution of God about Chalke's book, Mark states the traditional evangelical view of propitiation as:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"If Jesus Christ died on the cross for my sins, and the reason my sins are such a big deal is that they warrent death and wrath. In the end, the Big Consequence for my sins is Hell–which is the eternal pouring out of God’s hot wrath. I need the Cross to save me from God’s hot wrath. Any attempt to diminish or deny this view is an assault on the very Gospel itself!"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then he goes on to describe his view as:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Want to know what I think? I think the penal substitutionary view of the Atonement as it currently is articulated by conservative evangelicals is a profound distortion of the Biblical telling. Basically, evangelicals tend to have a bad habit of reading things through bad lenses. When you read the Old Testament and the Gospels through Paul, who you read through the lense of Luther or Calvin, who you read through the lense of American Evangelicalism, who you read through the lense of individualism, you’re going to see things off kilter."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then in this post he states that the atonement is both propitiation and now about having victory over those things that kept us from loving God and neighbor, and that one must start with that view in order to be missional (which completely doesn't follow in my simple Iron Range, Public School trained mind - toss me a bone on why it is missional to hold Christus Victor?)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I couldn't agree more that the atonement is the cornerstone of the Christian worldview and faith.  However, I am one of those crazy, mystical guys who thinks that God can actually have multiple purposes and emotions at the same time (intense love and hot wrath, his desire to be glorified and our desire to be forgiven and fulfilled, him being just and merciful - etc.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The reason I get there is (WARNING - OVERSIMPLIFICATION COMING!!) from the Bible:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;God presented him as a sacrifice of atonement, through faith in his blood. He did this to demonstrate his justice, because in his forbearance he had left the sins committed beforehand unpunished... Romans 3:25&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For this reason he had to be made like his brothers in every way, in order that he might become a merciful and faithful high priest in service to God, and that he might make atonement for the sins of the people.   Hebrews 2:17&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;16 “For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. 18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because he has not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son. 19 This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but men loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. (John 3:16-19, NIV).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's enough for now...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thoughts?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Trike</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 23:02:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_2722/#comment-5291386</link><description>I find everything sexual...but I digress...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here's what I mean.  In his post on The Retribution of God about Chalke's book, Mark states the traditional evangelical view of propitiation as:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"If Jesus Christ died on the cross for my sins, and the reason my sins are such a big deal is that they warrent death and wrath. In the end, the Big Consequence for my sins is Hell–which is the eternal pouring out of God’s hot wrath. I need the Cross to save me from God’s hot wrath. Any attempt to diminish or deny this view is an assault on the very Gospel itself!"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then he goes on to describe his view as:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Want to know what I think? I think the penal substitutionary view of the Atonement as it currently is articulated by conservative evangelicals is a profound distortion of the Biblical telling. Basically, evangelicals tend to have a bad habit of reading things through bad lenses. When you read the Old Testament and the Gospels through Paul, who you read through the lense of Luther or Calvin, who you read through the lense of American Evangelicalism, who you read through the lense of individualism, you’re going to see things off kilter."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then in this post he states that the atonement is both propitiation and now about having victory over those things that kept us from loving God and neighbor, and that one must start with that view in order to be missional (which completely doesn't follow in my simple Iron Range, Public School trained mind - toss me a bone on why it is missional to hold Christus Victor?)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I couldn't agree more that the atonement is the cornerstone of the Christian worldview and faith.  However, I am one of those crazy, mystical guys who thinks that God can actually have multiple purposes and emotions at the same time (intense love and hot wrath, his desire to be glorified and our desire to be forgiven and fulfilled, him being just and merciful - etc.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The reason I get there is (WARNING - OVERSIMPLIFICATION COMING!!) from the Bible:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;God presented him as a sacrifice of atonement, through faith in his blood. He did this to demonstrate his justice, because in his forbearance he had left the sins committed beforehand unpunished... Romans 3:25&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For this reason he had to be made like his brothers in every way, in order that he might become a merciful and faithful high priest in service to God, and that he might make atonement for the sins of the people.   Hebrews 2:17&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;16 “For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. 18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because he has not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son. 19 This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but men loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. (John 3:16-19, NIV).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's enough for now...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thoughts?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Trike</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 23:02:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_2722/#comment-5291399</link><description>I find everything sexual...but I digress...&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here's what I mean.  In his post on The Retribution of God about Chalke's book, Mark states the traditional evangelical view of propitiation as:&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"If Jesus Christ died on the cross for my sins, and the reason my sins are such a big deal is that they warrent death and wrath. In the end, the Big Consequence for my sins is Hell–which is the eternal pouring out of God’s hot wrath. I need the Cross to save me from God’s hot wrath. Any attempt to diminish or deny this view is an assault on the very Gospel itself!"&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then he goes on to describe his view as:&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Want to know what I think? I think the penal substitutionary view of the Atonement as it currently is articulated by conservative evangelicals is a profound distortion of the Biblical telling. Basically, evangelicals tend to have a bad habit of reading things through bad lenses. When you read the Old Testament and the Gospels through Paul, who you read through the lense of Luther or Calvin, who you read through the lense of American Evangelicalism, who you read through the lense of individualism, you’re going to see things off kilter."&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then in this post he states that the atonement is both propitiation and now about having victory over those things that kept us from loving God and neighbor, and that one must start with that view in order to be missional (which completely doesn't follow in my simple Iron Range, Public School trained mind - toss me a bone on why it is missional to hold Christus Victor?)&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I couldn't agree more that the atonement is the cornerstone of the Christian worldview and faith.  However, I am one of those crazy, mystical guys who thinks that God can actually have multiple purposes and emotions at the same time (intense love and hot wrath, his desire to be glorified and our desire to be forgiven and fulfilled, him being just and merciful - etc.)&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The reason I get there is (WARNING - OVERSIMPLIFICATION COMING!!) from the Bible:&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;God presented him as a sacrifice of atonement, through faith in his blood. He did this to demonstrate his justice, because in his forbearance he had left the sins committed beforehand unpunished... Romans 3:25&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For this reason he had to be made like his brothers in every way, in order that he might become a merciful and faithful high priest in service to God, and that he might make atonement for the sins of the people.   Hebrews 2:17&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;16 “For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. 18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because he has not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son. 19 This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but men loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. (John 3:16-19, NIV).&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's enough for now...&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thoughts?&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Trike&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 23:02:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Atonement and the Embrace of God</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_atonement_and_the_embrace_of_god/#comment-1304338</link><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;God hates sin so much that he wants to send us to hell. Which is eternal torture at God’s hands. And so, he poured out all of his hatred, anger, venomous rage, and grumpiness on Jesus. His anger was so bad that it demanded blood. And Jesus was born for just that reason–to shed his blood to assuage God’s anger.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mark, man, that is a pretty easy 'straw man' to knock down about the reformed view of the atonement.  Pretty unfair, I would say...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Again, I think you are speaking out of both sides of your mouth - you bash the reformers view of penal substitution, yet you said it satisifies the sin and even the anger of God.  I am seriously confused.  Are you refusing to put yourself into categories to avoid argumentation, or are you trying to be more 'comprehensive' in your view of the atonement?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I too do not like the oversimplification of the gospel message to just the vicarious atonement - however, it is the MOST IMPORTANT PART!&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;3 For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received, that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, 4 and that He was buried, and that He was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, (1 Corinthians 15:3, 4, NAS95).&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;16 For if the dead are not raised, not even Christ has been raised; 17 and if Christ has not been raised, your faith is worthless; you are still in your sins. (1 Corinthians 15:16, 17, NAS95).&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;16 “For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life. 17 “For God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through Him. 18 “He who believes in Him is not judged; he who does not believe has been judged already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. (John 3:16-18, NAS95).&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not to be &lt;em&gt;that guy&lt;/em&gt;who puts proof texts into his commnets, but I really do see as primary importance the removal of our sins and the wrath of God (which is significant, powerful and aweful (see &lt;em&gt;hell&lt;/em&gt;).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is the gospel &lt;em&gt;more&lt;/em&gt; than justification and imputation?  Absolutely!!!  It is so much more!!!  And that is where many evangelicals err, and I agree with you - it is frustrating.  Our incredible union with Jesus is so much more now than just getting our sins taken care of - adoption into his family, care for the least of these, environmental issues, justice, love, righteous anger over injustice, etc.  However, the atonment is NEVER LESS than justification and imputation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It seems to me, by your posts that you are trying to elevate the other (correct) view of the atonemnt and (for some reason I don't fully understand) take the reformed view of justification and downplay it or even dismiss it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just one man's morning thoughts.  Thanks for the posts and I look forward to continued discussion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By the way, where did my previous post on this issue go?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 12:10:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_793/#comment-5291360</link><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;God hates sin so much that he wants to send us to hell. Which is eternal torture at God’s hands. And so, he poured out all of his hatred, anger, venomous rage, and grumpiness on Jesus. His anger was so bad that it demanded blood. And Jesus was born for just that reason–to shed his blood to assuage God’s anger.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mark, man, that is a pretty easy 'straw man' to knock down about the reformed view of the atonement.  Pretty unfair, I would say...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Again, I think you are speaking out of both sides of your mouth - you bash the reformers view of penal substitution, yet you said it satisifies the sin and even the anger of God.  I am seriously confused.  Are you refusing to put yourself into categories to avoid argumentation, or are you trying to be more 'comprehensive' in your view of the atonement?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I too do not like the oversimplification of the gospel message to just the vicarious atonement - however, it is the MOST IMPORTANT PART!&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;3 For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received, that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, 4 and that He was buried, and that He was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, (1 Corinthians 15:3, 4, NAS95).&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;16 For if the dead are not raised, not even Christ has been raised; 17 and if Christ has not been raised, your faith is worthless; you are still in your sins. (1 Corinthians 15:16, 17, NAS95).&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;16 “For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life. 17 “For God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through Him. 18 “He who believes in Him is not judged; he who does not believe has been judged already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. (John 3:16-18, NAS95).&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not to be &lt;em&gt;that guy&lt;/em&gt;who puts proof texts into his commnets, but I really do see as primary importance the removal of our sins and the wrath of God (which is significant, powerful and aweful (see &lt;em&gt;hell&lt;/em&gt;).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is the gospel &lt;em&gt;more&lt;/em&gt; than justification and imputation?  Absolutely!!!  It is so much more!!!  And that is where many evangelicals err, and I agree with you - it is frustrating.  Our incredible union with Jesus is so much more now than just getting our sins taken care of - adoption into his family, care for the least of these, environmental issues, justice, love, righteous anger over injustice, etc.  However, the atonment is NEVER LESS than justification and imputation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It seems to me, by your posts that you are trying to elevate the other (correct) view of the atonemnt and (for some reason I don't fully understand) take the reformed view of justification and downplay it or even dismiss it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just one man's morning thoughts.  Thanks for the posts and I look forward to continued discussion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By the way, where did my previous post on this issue go?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 12:10:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_793/#comment-5291370</link><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;God hates sin so much that he wants to send us to hell. Which is eternal torture at God’s hands. And so, he poured out all of his hatred, anger, venomous rage, and grumpiness on Jesus. His anger was so bad that it demanded blood. And Jesus was born for just that reason–to shed his blood to assuage God’s anger.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mark, man, that is a pretty easy 'straw man' to knock down about the reformed view of the atonement.  Pretty unfair, I would say...&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Again, I think you are speaking out of both sides of your mouth - you bash the reformers view of penal substitution, yet you said it satisifies the sin and even the anger of God.  I am seriously confused.  Are you refusing to put yourself into categories to avoid argumentation, or are you trying to be more 'comprehensive' in your view of the atonement?&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I too do not like the oversimplification of the gospel message to just the vicarious atonement - however, it is the MOST IMPORTANT PART!&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;3 For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received, that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, 4 and that He was buried, and that He was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, (1 Corinthians 15:3, 4, NAS95).&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;16 For if the dead are not raised, not even Christ has been raised; 17 and if Christ has not been raised, your faith is worthless; you are still in your sins. (1 Corinthians 15:16, 17, NAS95).&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;16 “For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life. 17 “For God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through Him. 18 “He who believes in Him is not judged; he who does not believe has been judged already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. (John 3:16-18, NAS95).&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not to be &lt;em&gt;that guy&lt;/em&gt;who puts proof texts into his commnets, but I really do see as primary importance the removal of our sins and the wrath of God (which is significant, powerful and aweful (see &lt;em&gt;hell&lt;/em&gt;).&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is the gospel &lt;em&gt;more&lt;/em&gt; than justification and imputation?  Absolutely!!!  It is so much more!!!  And that is where many evangelicals err, and I agree with you - it is frustrating.  Our incredible union with Jesus is so much more now than just getting our sins taken care of - adoption into his family, care for the least of these, environmental issues, justice, love, righteous anger over injustice, etc.  However, the atonment is NEVER LESS than justification and imputation.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It seems to me, by your posts that you are trying to elevate the other (correct) view of the atonemnt and (for some reason I don't fully understand) take the reformed view of justification and downplay it or even dismiss it.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just one man's morning thoughts.  Thanks for the posts and I look forward to continued discussion.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By the way, where did my previous post on this issue go?&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 12:10:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Atonement and the Embrace of God</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_atonement_and_the_embrace_of_god/#comment-1304340</link><description>Okay, I'm an airhead - I've already posted this last post on the other site - dude, I am so 42!  No need to reply, Mark - you already did on the other post:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/?p=691#comments" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 12:16:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_793/#comment-5291361</link><description>Okay, I'm an airhead - I've already posted this last post on the other site - dude, I am so 42!  No need to reply, Mark - you already did on the other post:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/?p=691#comments" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 12:16:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_793/#comment-5291371</link><description>Okay, I'm an airhead - I've already posted this last post on the other site - dude, I am so 42!  No need to reply, Mark - you already did on the other post:&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.jesusmanifesto.com/?p=691#comments" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 12:16:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: smoke smoke smoke that cigarette</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/smoke_smoke_smoke_that_cigarette/#comment-1305080</link><description>DUDE - I COULD NOT AGREE MORE!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Smoke em if you got em!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ya know, I don't smoke regularly - and I like the clean air and all.  And, simply - it AIN'T GOOD FOR YA!!But hey, this is frickin' REEDICKULOUS!!  Are we going to outlaw Big Macs, the sun, Rosie O'Donnell (causing heart attacks to conservatives), Rush Limbaugh (same to liberals), lawn darts and fireworks (guess we already did that).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Prohibition doesn't work.  And, to quote you, "it isn't a great moral evil."  It just smell and causes others  to dislike you (so does farting - but I do it regularly!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Trike</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 12:11:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_170/#comment-5291651</link><description>DUDE - I COULD NOT AGREE MORE!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Smoke em if you got em!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ya know, I don't smoke regularly - and I like the clean air and all.  And, simply - it AIN'T GOOD FOR YA!!But hey, this is frickin' REEDICKULOUS!!  Are we going to outlaw Big Macs, the sun, Rosie O'Donnell (causing heart attacks to conservatives), Rush Limbaugh (same to liberals), lawn darts and fireworks (guess we already did that).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Prohibition doesn't work.  And, to quote you, "it isn't a great moral evil."  It just smell and causes others  to dislike you (so does farting - but I do it regularly!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Trike</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 12:11:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_170/#comment-5291663</link><description>DUDE - I COULD NOT AGREE MORE!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Smoke em if you got em!&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ya know, I don't smoke regularly - and I like the clean air and all.  And, simply - it AIN'T GOOD FOR YA!!But hey, this is frickin' REEDICKULOUS!!  Are we going to outlaw Big Macs, the sun, Rosie O'Donnell (causing heart attacks to conservatives), Rush Limbaugh (same to liberals), lawn darts and fireworks (guess we already did that).&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Prohibition doesn't work.  And, to quote you, "it isn't a great moral evil."  It just smell and causes others  to dislike you (so does farting - but I do it regularly!&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Trike&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 12:11:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_2497/#comment-5295825</link><description>What a great post!  I simply loved it, and now, I will have a great reason to live here in this frozen tundra.  Blessings on you, my friend!&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Trike&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:57:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s cold as hell.</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/it8217s_cold_as_hell/#comment-1312094</link><description>What a great post!  I simply loved it, and now, I will have a great reason to live here in this frozen tundra.  Blessings on you, my friend!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Trike</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 01:57:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_2497/#comment-5295812</link><description>What a great post!  I simply loved it, and now, I will have a great reason to live here in this frozen tundra.  Blessings on you, my friend!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Trike</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 01:57:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_434/#comment-5296115</link><description>And to think...&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've been busting my hump to find out what Jesus wants us to do...&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How could I have gotten it so backward?&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 13:45:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_434/#comment-5296117</link><description>Dude,&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That was an amazing piece of satire.  I actually did a google on it to see if it was true before I noticed the "satire" comment.  However, I am REALLY scared that I actually thought that it could be true... That's it!  I could be true.  Too many of us pastors are drinking the red kool-aid and bowing at the "success" or die god and missing the kingdom message all together - and it scares the shit out of me as a pastor as well... God, please keep us from this!&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 13:48:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Easter Ad Campaign Reaches Unchurched at Record Numbers</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/easter_ad_campaign_reaches_unchurched_at_record_numbers/#comment-1312507</link><description>And to think...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've been busting my hump to find out what Jesus wants us to do...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How could I have gotten it so backward?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:45:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_434/#comment-5296110</link><description>And to think...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've been busting my hump to find out what Jesus wants us to do...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How could I have gotten it so backward?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:45:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Easter Ad Campaign Reaches Unchurched at Record Numbers</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/easter_ad_campaign_reaches_unchurched_at_record_numbers/#comment-1312508</link><description>Dude,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That was an amazing piece of satire.  I actually did a google on it to see if it was true before I noticed the "satire" comment.  However, I am REALLY scared that I actually thought that it could be true... That's it!  I could be true.  Too many of us pastors are drinking the red kool-aid and bowing at the "success" or die god and missing the kingdom message all together - and it scares the shit out of me as a pastor as well... God, please keep us from this!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:48:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: the Jesus Manifesto &amp;raquo; Maintenance Mode</title><link>http://jesusmanifesto.disqus.com/the_jesus_manifesto_raquo_maintenance_mode_434/#comment-5296112</link><description>Dude,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That was an amazing piece of satire.  I actually did a google on it to see if it was true before I noticed the "satire" comment.  However, I am REALLY scared that I actually thought that it could be true... That's it!  I could be true.  Too many of us pastors are drinking the red kool-aid and bowing at the "success" or die god and missing the kingdom message all together - and it scares the shit out of me as a pastor as well... God, please keep us from this!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trike</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:48:16 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>