Hello!
The comments on this profile are unclaimed and thus are unverified.
Do they belong to you? Claim these comments.
Unregistered
aliases
- Paula Mooney
- PAULA MOONEY
- PAULA MOONEY
- Paula Neal Mooney
- Paula Mooney
- Paula
- Paula Neal Mooney
- Paula Neal Mooney
Paula Mooney
Is this you? Claim Profile »
2 years ago
in Results: Top Wordpress Plugins (April 2007) on Andy Beard - Internet Business Systems Discussion
Yes, Andy, your DOFOLLOW tips helped my PR jump from 2 to 5 -- I love it!
But I can't vote on these plugins till I actually get serious on WP.
In the meantime, I don't think you made my list of blogger salaries. Do you post your income?
And I rarely do this, but would you all PLEASE do me a big favor and Digg this for me:
Paula's List of Blogger Salaries...Are you on the list?
Thanks!
Paula
But I can't vote on these plugins till I actually get serious on WP.
In the meantime, I don't think you made my list of blogger salaries. Do you post your income?
And I rarely do this, but would you all PLEASE do me a big favor and Digg this for me:
Paula's List of Blogger Salaries...Are you on the list?
Thanks!
Paula
1 reply
2 years ago
in Stop Writing for Search Engines on The Marketing Technology Blog
No offense taken; thanks for reading my post.
And yes, of course I wouldn't repeat and bold important SEO phrases if I didn't want people to find them.
Alas, such is the life of an SEO'er...
I do wonder how the whole SEO-Google game will change in the future.
It should be a fascinating ride...
And yes, of course I wouldn't repeat and bold important SEO phrases if I didn't want people to find them.
Alas, such is the life of an SEO'er...
I do wonder how the whole SEO-Google game will change in the future.
It should be a fascinating ride...
1 reply
Douglas Karr
Whew! Double-whew! Thanks Paula.
2 years ago
in Stop Writing for Search Engines on The Marketing Technology Blog
Hey Doug -
At the risk of sounding totally self-congratulatory, here's a piece I created that is getting good search-engine traffic and one that my regular readers also enjoyed:
No-Complaining Bracelet Rules: Are you sticking to them?
I have a few like that -- to God alone be the glory!
Though I admit I do know what you mean -- sometimes I skew more in favor of SEO than my regular readers, but I'm glad my regular readers still keep coming back because they like me.
It's like I am with Ilker Yoldas' TheThinkingBlog.com: I just keep reading it because I like him, so he could write SEO and I'd still be there as his regular reader!
Take care and thanks for responding,
Paula
At the risk of sounding totally self-congratulatory, here's a piece I created that is getting good search-engine traffic and one that my regular readers also enjoyed:
No-Complaining Bracelet Rules: Are you sticking to them?
I have a few like that -- to God alone be the glory!
Though I admit I do know what you mean -- sometimes I skew more in favor of SEO than my regular readers, but I'm glad my regular readers still keep coming back because they like me.
It's like I am with Ilker Yoldas' TheThinkingBlog.com: I just keep reading it because I like him, so he could write SEO and I'd still be there as his regular reader!
Take care and thanks for responding,
Paula
1 reply
Douglas Karr
Thanks, Paula. Hopefully, you take this the right way - but I think you helped to actually support my premise. Your mention of "no-complaining bracelet" several times in the first few passages just doesn't ring true - it reads like SEO was the priority rather than like you were talking to me.
The post is a great one, please don't take me the wrong way. But in 5 years when search engines can disseminate topical data without the need to write for them - would this be a natural means of writing a post?
Ironically, I went to this post on the Thinking Blog and the first paragraph has 21 gratuitous links in it for deep linking to his blog. Those links are purely for search engines, not for you and me.
With all due respect!
Doug
The post is a great one, please don't take me the wrong way. But in 5 years when search engines can disseminate topical data without the need to write for them - would this be a natural means of writing a post?
Ironically, I went to this post on the Thinking Blog and the first paragraph has 21 gratuitous links in it for deep linking to his blog. Those links are purely for search engines, not for you and me.
With all due respect!
Doug
2 years ago
in Stop Writing for Search Engines on The Marketing Technology Blog
Believe it or not, you can actually write for search engines AND your readers.
I like to think both/and instead of either/or.
I like to think both/and instead of either/or.
1 reply
Douglas Karr
Paula,
Any chance that I can challenge you to provide such a demonstration? I don't doubt that it isn't possible - I think there are probably ways of doing both. However, I can't identify any examples. (Perhaps that's because the author did such a good job of utilizing both techniques.)
I would love to see a random post that is written well and compare it to a post that is written well AND utilizes techniques for Search Engines.
Thanks!
Doug
Any chance that I can challenge you to provide such a demonstration? I don't doubt that it isn't possible - I think there are probably ways of doing both. However, I can't identify any examples. (Perhaps that's because the author did such a good job of utilizing both techniques.)
I would love to see a random post that is written well and compare it to a post that is written well AND utilizes techniques for Search Engines.
Thanks!
Doug
I don't publish full earnings, and it is hard to say what classes as blogging and what classes as earning from blogging.
I noticed some of the figures you published were from monthly checks, and lots of people publishing earnings don't publish costs. That is creative accounting for marketing purposes.