<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Bill</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/83051606d16792aaa2e9fee631696efe/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 10:06:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: .com Still Rules</title><link>http://robertdow.disqus.com/com_still_rules/#comment-21467560</link><description>Hi Robert,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've thought of updating my post a few times since I first posted it, and now I don't have to.  Thank you for doing so.  I know firsthand how much work it was.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There were a lot of questions raised in the comments to my post, and we can't be sure how close these numbers are to the actual number of pages upon these top level domains, but I still think it was an exercise worth doing, and I like your addition of "gainers." Does it signify a tremendous increase in the number of web pages on those tlds, or more pages being indexed by search engines that aren't on .com addresses, or some combination of both?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nice work, and thanks again.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 10:06:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In Depth: Google BlogSearch | Ranking Blog Documents Patent</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/in_depth_google_blogsearch_ranking_blog_documents_patent/#comment-10988578</link><description>Nice analysis, Andy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hadn't noticed that the filing date of the patent, and the launch date of Google blog search were the same day - great catch.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Google reader may have been one of the things that they had in mind when they were putting the patent together - they should have a much easier time gaining access to subscription numbers from that than from other services not under their control, but who knows for certain.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:46:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In Depth: Google BlogSearch | Ranking Blog Documents Patent</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/in_depth_google_blogsearch_ranking_blog_documents_patent/#comment-12523231</link><description>Nice analysis, Andy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hadn't noticed that the filing date of the patent, and the launch date of Google blog search were the same day - great catch.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Google reader may have been one of the things that they had in mind when they were putting the patent together - they should have a much easier time gaining access to subscription numbers from that than from other services not under their control, but who knows for certain.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:46:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 32 Forms of Linking Payola</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/top_32_forms_of_linking_payola_31/#comment-10989682</link><description>You liked something they wrote, and wanted to share it with your readers?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 22:25:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 32 Forms of Linking Payola</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/top_32_forms_of_linking_payola_31/#comment-12524246</link><description>You liked something they wrote, and wanted to share it with your readers?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 22:25:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 32 Forms of Linking Payola</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/top_32_forms_of_linking_payola_31/#comment-10989688</link><description>Maybe 14, Andy, but your introductory paragraph makes it sound a little like all links are payola of one type or another, and sometimes links are just references - not to demonstrate your own authority, but rather to share with your readers something that you've found.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Stephen's first point is a good one, too.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 10:09:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 32 Forms of Linking Payola</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/top_32_forms_of_linking_payola_31/#comment-12524252</link><description>Maybe 14, Andy, but your introductory paragraph makes it sound a little like all links are payola of one type or another, and sometimes links are just references - not to demonstrate your own authority, but rather to share with your readers something that you've found.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Stephen's first point is a good one, too.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 10:09:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Print is back?</title><link>http://loupaglia.disqus.com/print_is_back/#comment-4070073</link><description>Hi Lou,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm not sure which patent you are referring to with your statement about a patent filed in "1996".  Did I miss something, somewhere?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The one that you are writing about in this post was filed in 2006.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:34:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Print is back?</title><link>http://loupaglia.disqus.com/print_is_back/#comment-4070074</link><description>Hi Lou,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The timing is interesting.  I think that if you're going to explore something like print ads, it doesn't hurt to consider other options, too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The idea of using kiosks, like what is described in the patent application is also explored in another patent application from Google.  And we saw Google make an agreement recently to start putting kiosks in gas stations to provide local information and maps.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hard to tell if more pieces will fall into place, but it is interesting.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:46:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Hardest Part Of Marketing Art</title><link>http://evolvor.disqus.com/the_hardest_part_of_marketing_art/#comment-5853066</link><description>Great post, Eric.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Web is about sharing, and communicating with others.  Many artists ignore or misunderstand the framework in which they create their art - and a Web site can be a great framework.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 21:50:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Interview In Leading Search Engine Optimization Blog</title><link>http://evolvor.disqus.com/interview_in_leading_search_engine_optimization_blog/#comment-5853436</link><description>Hi Eric,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You're welcome.  Thank you in return.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It was a real pleasure having the chance to interview you, and learn more about how bands can become more visible to an audience that might be looking for someone like them.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 23:06:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First babies on Friendfeed. Now a 'social' engagement!</title><link>http://seoandtechdaily.disqus.com/first_babies_on_friendfeed_now_a_social_engagement/#comment-935703</link><description>Hi Charlie,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks.  It was great to hear from you today.  :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Kimberly is the love of my life.  I'm so glad that I found her.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:12:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Local Search Will Be Huge | BPWrap</title><link>http://bpwrap.disqus.com/local_search_will_be_huge_bpwrap/#comment-2007169</link><description>As frustrating as local search is, trying to find local search results in a normal web search can be even more frustrating.  The Microsoft patent application illustrates some of the difficulties of trying to understand a location intention in a user's query, but I'm not sure that the method described within the patent application is in place - a search through the &lt;a href="http://live.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;live.com&lt;/a&gt; SERPS leaves me no reason to believe so.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is a lot of potential for local search.  But I think that there's a lot of work on it that needs to be done before it will begin to reach its potential.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 18:54:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Happy Christmas Greetings To All Our Readers | BPWrap</title><link>http://bpwrap.disqus.com/happy_christmas_greetings_to_all_our_readers_bpwrap/#comment-2007225</link><description>Merry Christmas to you and your family, Barry.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hope that you are all having a wonderful holiday.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 09:53:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AnswerTips Comes To BPWrap, Courtesy of Answers.com</title><link>http://bpwrap.disqus.com/answertips_comes_to_bpwrap_courtesy_of_answerscom/#comment-2007344</link><description>Very neat gizmo.  I may have to try this out - it may come in really useful on patent related posts with technical language in them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for showing this off.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:11:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media Marketing (SMM) - the latest Buzz</title><link>http://bpwrap.disqus.com/social_media_marketing_smm_the_latest_buzz/#comment-2007403</link><description>I'm looking forward to participating in the new forum.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Knowing you, Barry, I sure that SMM (the Montreal one) has always been open and thoughtful about the possibilities of social networking.  I also suspect that industry support around SMM (the marketing one) is only just catching up. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 22:35:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media - Bad News Travels Faster | BPWrap</title><link>http://bpwrap.disqus.com/social_media_bad_news_travels_faster_bpwrap/#comment-2007458</link><description>I would venture to guess that Lee's post received more traffic because of the omission than it would have otherwise.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And he may have gained some new readers from Cre8asite, too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A little controversy isn't necessarily always a bad thing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 13:42:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google PageRank - Reputation and Relevance | BPWrap</title><link>http://bpwrap.disqus.com/google_pagerank_reputation_and_relevance_bpwrap/#comment-2007514</link><description>Pagerank might be the most well known algorithm, at least by name, in the world.  I think that it illustrates how even something like a mathmatical formula can provide a marketing benefit to a company.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's kind of fun to see &lt;a href="http://ask.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;ask.com&lt;/a&gt; try to do the same thing with their recent  string of television commercials about "the algorithm."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 23:47:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mobile Local Search, the most popular Internet application</title><link>http://staygolinks.disqus.com/mobile_local_search_the_most_popular_internet_application/#comment-2010617</link><description>Hi Barry,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great example with the Italian restaurant with the funny name.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regretfully, I had that experience a couple of weeks ago. The restaurant is only a couple of months old, has no web site, hasn't been reviewed by the local newspapers, and has no footprints on the web at all.  Fortunately for them, word of mouth has drawn customers to their doors.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A client and I have occasional business dinner meetings, and we both wanted to try the new restaurant, which we were both referring to as "the place where Lum's used to be."  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mobile local web search is a transformational technology.  Like the radio, the telephone, and television before it, mobile local provides a way to interact with the world in a manner that changes how we do so significantly. I agree completely that it will become the most popular internet application.  I think that what we've seen so far from it only scratches the surface of what we will gain from it, too.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 11:17:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Successful Ethical Marketing. Is It Possible?</title><link>http://learningseobasics.disqus.com/successful_ethical_marketing_is_it_possible/#comment-6479655</link><description>A great example of transparency, of  the value of giving, of the importance of ethics in talking to and reaching out to others.  I'll agree with Shari that we don't usually associate Jesus with marketing; applying his teachings to our lives and our livelihoods can transform what we do, and how we live and interact with others.  Very thoughtful and wonderful to read this morning.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 08:56:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Environmental SEO StumbleUpon Style</title><link>http://learningseobasics.disqus.com/environmental_seo_stumbleupon_style/#comment-6599195</link><description>Thanks, Kimberly.  The act of sharing ways to help make the world a better place through sites like SU can help enrich everyone's lives, spread ideas and information that people may not have otherwise seen, and inspire people to take action.  I'd like to see more follow your suggestions to use SEO to help make a positive difference as well.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:48:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Science for SEO</title><link>http://learningseobasics.disqus.com/science_for_seo/#comment-7235912</link><description>I really enjoyed reading your thoughts on science and art in SEO.  There's a poetry to your words.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One of the things that makes SEO so challenging, and so enjoyable to me is that it goes beyond how words rank in search engines, to how people read and understand and react to what words you choose as keywords, and what you write, and how you present what you create for your readers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is a science in trying to understand those kind of things while also writing something that will rank in search engines, and it is an art in  making what you create appealing and engaging.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:18:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: | 

Utah Search Engine Optimization | Utah SEO Consultant</title><link>http://utahseopro.disqus.com/utah_search_engine_optimization_utah_seo_consultant_14/#comment-7233284</link><description>Hi Jordan,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You took me completely by surprise with this post.  Thank you very much for your kind words.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There really are many people who make the search marketing community a great place.  It's an honor to be included with Sebastian X and Marious Alexandrou here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are a great number of folks who work tirelessly behind the scenes as forum owners and moderators, as insightful and articulate bloggers, as people who make industry conferences run smoothly, as those who act as the social glue for the industry.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are also the people who give search marketing a good name by showing everyday that SEO and internet marketing can have a positive influence on the livelihoods of site owners, and who don't get the recognition that they deserve. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Those folks are the unsung heros of search marketing, and I'd like to thank them.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 17:42:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bill Slawski and Kimberly Sitting in a Tree&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://utahseopro.disqus.com/bill_slawski_and_kimberly_sitting_in_a_tree8230/#comment-7233312</link><description>Thank you, Jordan.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Everytime I talk with Kimberly, when I don't think that it's possible, I fall more deeply for her.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She brings a smile to my heart, laughter to my lips, and poetry to my soul.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:01:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Come visit the HP Garage</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/come_visit_the_hp_garage/#comment-9688970</link><description>Thank you, Robert.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It was great having the opportunity to see and tour the garage where HP was built.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anne Mancini did a great job of humanizing and bringing HPs early history to life, and putting the historical importance of the garage into perspective.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 19:13:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Welcome Jeremy Luebke and Scott Woodard!</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/welcome_jeremy_luebke_and_scott_woodard/#comment-9410733</link><description>Hey,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Congratulations Scott, Jeremy, and Jordan.  Hopefully, Ben will rejoin you, too.   I had a chance to spend a little time with Scott and Ben at the last Pubcon, and they are both impressed me as bright, articulate, and very knowledgeable.  I'm very much looking forward to future posts at Marketing Pilgrim.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:42:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Gives Gov&amp;#8217;t Top Spot</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/google_gives_gov8217t_top_spot/#comment-9410924</link><description>Hi Jordan,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No conspiracy. :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That looks like a Google Q&amp;amp;A result to me, by both the placement and the way the link is referenced (the "according to").&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Same kind of result that you get for a search for something like:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Derek Jeter birthplace&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 00:31:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Defuses Googlebombs; Does this Change Link Building Practices?</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/google_defuses_googlebombs_does_this_change_link_building_practices/#comment-9411577</link><description>Hypertext analysis might treat anchor text as metadata that makes a page being pointed at to be seen as relevant for the anchor text phrase.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;An impact of this algorithmic change is that anchor text will no longer be considered as useful meta data if the phrase isn't on the page pointed at, but...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A number of the patent applications written by Google's Anna Patterson on her Phrase Based Indexing talk about using a method like this to eliminate Google bombing.  They add that if the phrase used in the anchor text is a "related" phrase that it may still have some impact:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;If the anchor phrase A does not appear in the body of URL1 (as in FIG. 8a), then a different step is taken to determine the inlink score. In this case, the indexing system 110 creates a related phrase bit vector for URL1 for phrase A (as if phrase A was present in URL1) and indicating which of the related phrases of phrase A appear in URL1. This related phrase bit vector is then used as the inlink score for the link from URL0 to URL1.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;See the section labeled "Document Annotation for Improved Ranking" in &lt;a href="http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&amp;amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;amp;d=PG01&amp;amp;p=1&amp;amp;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&amp;amp;r=1&amp;amp;f=G&amp;amp;l=50&amp;amp;s1=%2220060020607%22.PGNR.&amp;amp;OS=DN/20060020607&amp;amp;RS=DN/20060020607" rel="nofollow"&gt;Phrase-based indexing in an information retrieval system&lt;/a&gt;.  Matt Cutts stated that he can't confirm or deny the use of bit vectors like this, in a response to me at Search Engine Land, and it's possible that the method described by Anna Patterson isn't being used.  But, it's also possible that it is, and it is worth thinking about and discussing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:55:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SMX London Part 5 - Understanding the Needs of a Searcher</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/smx_london_part_5_understanding_the_needs_of_a_searcher/#comment-9421253</link><description>I think that Gord might have been referring to George Miller's research in &lt;a href="http://www.musanim.com/miller1956/" rel="nofollow"&gt;The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information&lt;/a&gt;.  That research has been misapplied by a lot of people over the past 51 years, and continues to be.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 22:34:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Gives SEO A Bad Name</title><link>http://publishing20.disqus.com/what_gives_seo_a_bad_name_87/#comment-13569927</link><description>Hi Scott,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are a lot of us in the SEO industry who would be happy to answer a quick question when you see something odd like the result you're pointing out.  I'm seeing more than a couple of SEOs who would, in the responses to this post, and showing up in your MyBlogLog widget right now.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:49:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BlogRush, You&amp;#8217;re Kidding Me</title><link>http://techipedia.disqus.com/blogrush_you8217re_kidding_me/#comment-14968546</link><description>I was emailed that my blog had passed their quality guidelines.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I never quite got to the point of installing the widget on my blog either.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:59:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Search and Why We Should Care: A Chris Sherman Webcast</title><link>http://10e20.disqus.com/social_search_and_why_we_should_care_a_chris_sherman_webcast/#comment-16679300</link><description>Another aspect of tagging that recent studies have discussed is that the tags used sometimes describe the relationship between what is being tagged, and the person doing the tagging, such as "toread."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 01:22:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do you know the way to San Jose?</title><link>http://10e20.disqus.com/do_you_know_the_way_to_san_jose/#comment-16682286</link><description>Hi Danielle,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It was a pleasure to meet you, also.  I'm happy to hear that you had such a good time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I really like San Jose a lot, too.  I found myself looking at the prices of apartments in the City last night.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hopefully I'll get to see you and Chris again at Pubcon.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:56:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reader Poll:  Best Forums for Search Marketing Tips</title><link>http://toprankblog.disqus.com/reader_poll_best_forums_for_search_marketing_tips/#comment-17127763</link><description>Ok, so I'm one of the administrators.  But I'm going to list it anyway :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow"&gt;Cre8asite Forums&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 09:05:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reader Poll:  Best Forums for Search Marketing Tips</title><link>http://toprankblog.disqus.com/reader_poll_best_forums_for_search_marketing_tips/#comment-17127774</link><description>No problems, Lee. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:13:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reader Poll:  Best Forums for Search Marketing Tips</title><link>http://toprankblog.disqus.com/reader_poll_best_forums_for_search_marketing_tips/#comment-17127782</link><description>Be nice to see seorefugee on this poll, too. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:21:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Google Can Do To Make The Web Less Of A &amp;#39;Cesspool&amp;#39;</title><link>http://paidcontent.disqus.com/what_google_can_do_to_make_the_web_less_of_a_39cesspool39/#comment-18897142</link><description>Someday the people at Forbes will figure out search.   Maybe.  In the meantime, their hubris (&amp;quot;our most prized journalistic institutions.&amp;quot;) is good for everyone else who has a clue.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 01:50:10 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>