Hello!
The comments on this profile are unclaimed and thus are unverified.
Do they belong to you? Claim these comments.
dscott
Is this you? Claim Profile »
6 months ago
in Insane Massachusetts Child Support Guidelines on OpenMarket.org
Well I have been and been divorced, I can attest to the accuracy of the article. Tom has every right to be concerned in fact he is spot on. The same draconian system exists in Maryland.
Something that Mr. Bader should touch upon a little more is the fact that he mentioned in passing the issue of domestic violence by women. The majority of child abuse in this country is perpetrated by women NOT men. In fact over half of all child abusers were hand picked by the very courts charged to act in the best interest of children. What do you call the judgment of the Courts when it fails children so badly? Is over 200,000 cases of child abuse per year a sign of the best interest of children? How would you describe such as result? Incompetent or Evil? It is a national scandal that child abuse is politically correct when the perp is a woman. This speaks to the immorality of the family law system, a system so bigoted in it's hatred of males that it willfully sacrifices children on the alter of it's political correctness.
Tom, you are a fortunate man that has not experienced the evil of the family law courts and I understand how as a rational person indoctrinated by the teachings of society that the courts are supposed to be the guardians of freedom and justice, so you can't possibly comprehend that they are mere euphemisms bandied about by politicians, judges and lawyers as an Orwellian cover up. Think of the "Ministry of Love" when the family law court is mentioned, then you will have an inkling of a clue as to what is going on in this country. If you want to see the face of Evil, just look at a family law judge, his minions the lawyers and the rest of the cadre liberal bigots masquerading as servants of the Law. Just as Satan is a convincing liar, so too are his servants, the family law judges. If you think my response is over the top, consider that I personally had to fight against a system that literally condoned the physical abuse of my children by the mother. I LOST.
Something that Mr. Bader should touch upon a little more is the fact that he mentioned in passing the issue of domestic violence by women. The majority of child abuse in this country is perpetrated by women NOT men. In fact over half of all child abusers were hand picked by the very courts charged to act in the best interest of children. What do you call the judgment of the Courts when it fails children so badly? Is over 200,000 cases of child abuse per year a sign of the best interest of children? How would you describe such as result? Incompetent or Evil? It is a national scandal that child abuse is politically correct when the perp is a woman. This speaks to the immorality of the family law system, a system so bigoted in it's hatred of males that it willfully sacrifices children on the alter of it's political correctness.
Tom, you are a fortunate man that has not experienced the evil of the family law courts and I understand how as a rational person indoctrinated by the teachings of society that the courts are supposed to be the guardians of freedom and justice, so you can't possibly comprehend that they are mere euphemisms bandied about by politicians, judges and lawyers as an Orwellian cover up. Think of the "Ministry of Love" when the family law court is mentioned, then you will have an inkling of a clue as to what is going on in this country. If you want to see the face of Evil, just look at a family law judge, his minions the lawyers and the rest of the cadre liberal bigots masquerading as servants of the Law. Just as Satan is a convincing liar, so too are his servants, the family law judges. If you think my response is over the top, consider that I personally had to fight against a system that literally condoned the physical abuse of my children by the mother. I LOST.
1 reply
ReACTIONary
I doesn't seem right that you have been put through this pain. It seems that you identify family law judges with "liberal," rather than, I suppose, "conservative" judges. What is the basis for this identification?
