<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for John C.</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/81e3a6dd219a30225cb01077671f9c34/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:15:48 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Home Reserve Guestbook</title><link>http://homereserve.disqus.com/home_reserve_guestbook/#comment-22758947</link><description>I usually don\'t bother to leave responses but Home Reserve deserves recognition for being one the the FEW companies that PROVES how much they care about their customers by doing everything possible to meet and EXCEED expectations.  I just have never had the experience where EVERYTHING was perfect...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Fabric - Nice!&lt;br&gt;The Instructions - Accurate.&lt;br&gt;The Parts - All there, nothing missing or broken.&lt;br&gt;The Quality - AMAZING for the price.  I have frequently paid 20-50% more for POS at the local places.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Try these people...You will be amazed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John C.</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:15:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Panic attacks.Help!?</title><link>http://bestpanicattackstreatment.disqus.com/panic_attackshelp/#comment-22749162</link><description>I have panic attacks. Ativan works well to relieve them. Maybe you should talk to a Dr.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John C.</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:48:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woman sues pastor, church over sexual relations - ExChristian.Net - News and Opinion</title><link>http://ex-christian.disqus.com/woman_sues_pastor_church_over_sexual_relations_exchristiannet_news_and_opinion/#comment-21518731</link><description>In response to "a realist", it is clear from the writing style, use of capitals, lack of proofreading, and knowledge of the senior pastor's salary that this is the writing of Sr Pastor Ben Brown himself.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Ben, why don't you just sign your name?&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;John C&lt;BR/&gt;Former College Minister of BBC&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John C.</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:47:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woman sues pastor, church over sexual relations - ExChristian.Net - News and Opinion</title><link>http://ex-christian.disqus.com/woman_sues_pastor_church_over_sexual_relations_exchristiannet_news_and_opinion/#comment-21518725</link><description>In response to "anonymous", why do you find it ironic that the people who are sticking by Roger are the one's who have known him the longest?  They're the ones who know him the best.  They're the ones in the best position to see through any lies and deception.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;As for the notion that Roger is the "best liar", "dean of deception", or "master of manipulation", I think you also have to consider that possibility that Ben fits those descriptions instead.  Is there any evidence from Ben's life outside of the Roger issue to corroborate such a conclusion?&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;John C&lt;BR/&gt;Ex BBC Pastoral Staff&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John C.</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:03:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woman sues pastor, church over sexual relations - ExChristian.Net - News and Opinion</title><link>http://ex-christian.disqus.com/woman_sues_pastor_church_over_sexual_relations_exchristiannet_news_and_opinion/#comment-21518710</link><description>Someone asked if crimes had been committed.  You decide for yourself.  I quote BBC board minutes.  Emphasis mine.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;I&gt;At the June 2001 board meeting, the budget committee presented to the board of deacons a plan to compensate Pastor Ben without directly affecting the current budget.  The deacon board voted to compensate Pastor Ben through the use of the Senior Pastor's Housing Loan.  Additional details would be necessary to process this decision.  At the January 10th, 2002 board meeting, the deacons reviewed a one-page hand out with the details of this proposal.  See board minutes for details.  This plan was to be effective July 1, 2001.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;B&gt;It is the decision of this board to grant Pastor Ben Brown salary compensation without directly affecting the current budget.  This will be done by reducing the principal on the Sr. Pastor's housing loan over a five year period.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;[Table omitted]&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;A necessary aspect of this agreement is to aggressively replace lost revenue from the interest into the budget for the purpose of student scholarships.  The revenue generated from this loan was equally divided between camp and student scholarships.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Sincerely,&lt;BR/&gt;signed Glen Vest, Chairman&lt;BR/&gt;signed Roger Stevens, Administrator&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;So Ben gets $70,000 of additional compensation without a church vote and outside of the budget.  The board commits a felony by raiding an irrevocable trust.  (Yes, trust according to documentation of original donor).  The Triad School and the Camp lose interest income and future pastors lose a resource intended to help with housing.  What leadership!  Though Ben was forced to give the money back, he still thinks it was rightfully his to keep, so I doubt he'll ever come clean on the issue.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;In other issues, let's not forget that BJ named the church as a defendant in her civil lawsuit.  Surely the church assumed she would properly tithe on her settlement, so it sure seems like we have a conflict of interest.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Throw in a few lies, other unethical acts, some general ungraciousness, and it's easy to see why we don't think very highly of these people.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;John&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John C.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 14:33:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woman sues pastor, church over sexual relations - ExChristian.Net - News and Opinion</title><link>http://ex-christian.disqus.com/woman_sues_pastor_church_over_sexual_relations_exchristiannet_news_and_opinion/#comment-21518705</link><description>| So Roger Stevens signed off on this&lt;BR/&gt;| transaction in 2001, as did at least&lt;BR/&gt;| 12 other men?&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Apparently so.  Pretty amazing huh?&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;| &lt;BR/&gt;| Is Ben Brown that powerfull? He can &lt;BR/&gt;| change the minds of grown businessmen&lt;BR/&gt;| into giving/loaning him $70,000?&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Yes, that powerful and manipulative.&lt;BR/&gt;Name one person in the last 20 years&lt;BR/&gt;that has confronted Ben on anything &lt;BR/&gt;substantial and not been threatened,&lt;BR/&gt;intimidated, or generally maligned.&lt;BR/&gt;Go ahead, name one.  I got bunches&lt;BR/&gt;who have.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;| &lt;BR/&gt;| Maybe Ben Brown made Roger cheat on&lt;BR/&gt;| his marital vows too.&lt;BR/&gt;| &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I can see you're not taking the evidence&lt;BR/&gt;of embezzlement seriously.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;| And if Ben Brown is so powerfull,&lt;BR/&gt;| then why didn't he get the DA's office&lt;BR/&gt;| in either of the counties that&lt;BR/&gt;| investigated Roger's alledged crimes&lt;BR/&gt;| to ring him up with charges?&lt;BR/&gt;| &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;He sure tried hard.  Acted like he&lt;BR/&gt;was best buddies with Ed.  Even claimed&lt;BR/&gt;to lead Ed to the Lord (another lie&lt;BR/&gt;but who's counting).  I guess the&lt;BR/&gt;only conclusion is that Ed saw the&lt;BR/&gt;truth in spite of Ben.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;| BRSC, that stands for (Before Roger's&lt;BR/&gt;| Sex Crimes) No one has a problem with&lt;BR/&gt;| Robin Schwartz being a music minister.&lt;BR/&gt;| You all high fived him, played&lt;BR/&gt;| volleyball with him and ate meals together. &lt;BR/&gt;| &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I've got no problem with Robin being a&lt;BR/&gt;music minister in a church and being&lt;BR/&gt;restored to full fellowship in the body.&lt;BR/&gt;I do have a problem with a registered&lt;BR/&gt;sex offender have free access to a high&lt;BR/&gt;school campus, especially when the previous&lt;BR/&gt;offense was with a high school girl.&lt;BR/&gt;Public schools don't allow RSO on their&lt;BR/&gt;campuses.  The reason no one had a problem&lt;BR/&gt;with it back then was because nobody knew&lt;BR/&gt;he was an RSO. I didn't, and I was on staff.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;| Same for this issue with the housing&lt;BR/&gt;| allowance. If Ben Brown somehow bent&lt;BR/&gt;| people's minds into giving him this&lt;BR/&gt;| money, why didn't anyone mention it&lt;BR/&gt;| until now, years later? And where are&lt;BR/&gt;| the criminal charges there? &lt;BR/&gt;| &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Because it generally wasn't known about&lt;BR/&gt;until about 2004 when Roger confessed&lt;BR/&gt;to Grant March (the original donor of &lt;BR/&gt;the money) that he failed to hold&lt;BR/&gt;Ben accountable to the intended use of&lt;BR/&gt;the funds.  Since then it's been Grant's&lt;BR/&gt;issue.  But make no mistake, Grant's &lt;BR/&gt;retired Federal Judge neighbor says he's&lt;BR/&gt;locked up people for less than what&lt;BR/&gt;happen here.  Grant has shown a great deal&lt;BR/&gt;of mercy and patience to Ben.  Since you&lt;BR/&gt;guys are so intent on being the sin police&lt;BR/&gt;maybe you should see if criminal charges&lt;BR/&gt;are appropriate.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;| If Ben Brown is this powerfull, then&lt;BR/&gt;| I want to elect him as Mayor of&lt;BR/&gt;| Klamath Falls. But why stop there,&lt;BR/&gt;| let's make him Governor.&lt;BR/&gt;| &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;If you like power, go for it.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;| And Bruner wrote bascially, Ben was&lt;BR/&gt;| the business end of the church, Roger&lt;BR/&gt;| was the People person. &lt;BR/&gt;| &lt;BR/&gt;| That is true, someone had to keep up&lt;BR/&gt;| with all the credit card fraud and&lt;BR/&gt;| church finance abuses. &lt;BR/&gt;| &lt;BR/&gt;| I would say it was a full time job&lt;BR/&gt;| just keeping up with Roger.&lt;BR/&gt;| &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;So you're all bent out of shape by &lt;BR/&gt;alleged credit card fraud by Roger&lt;BR/&gt;(for which you've provided no evidence)&lt;BR/&gt;yet when your guy makes off with 70k,&lt;BR/&gt;no big deal.  I see how it is.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;| And if 80 percent of the church left,&lt;BR/&gt;| why hasn't one single paid member of&lt;BR/&gt;| the staff left?&lt;BR/&gt;| &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Ummm... because they need a job?&lt;BR/&gt;Because they're a blood relative&lt;BR/&gt;to someone who runs the place?&lt;BR/&gt;Why would anyone stick around if&lt;BR/&gt;they didn't have to?&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;But wait, paid staff has left.&lt;BR/&gt;Me, Deanna, Cindi, Steve.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;| Yes, some volunteers have been poisoned&lt;BR/&gt;| into leaving, but the staff is intact.&lt;BR/&gt;| Has one single paid Triad teacher left?&lt;BR/&gt;| &lt;BR/&gt;| Didn't think so. &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Trumble? Jessica? Ryan Dean?&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;| The Coopers were married by Roger,&lt;BR/&gt;| he led them to the Lord. So it's natural&lt;BR/&gt;| for them to defend.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Just for the record, he didn't lead us&lt;BR/&gt;to the Lord.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;| John C. is amazing. He is a mind reader.&lt;BR/&gt;| &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;No - just ask my wife.  Ben's&lt;BR/&gt;attitude is just obvious from the&lt;BR/&gt;way he has responded in personal&lt;BR/&gt;emails and from the difficulty&lt;BR/&gt;Grant had in getting the money back.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Bottom line - nobody there is interested&lt;BR/&gt;in truth.  It's smear Roger's side&lt;BR/&gt;and hail BBC.  That's why nobody&lt;BR/&gt;from BBC signs their name.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;So, back to the 70k.  Ben, you want&lt;BR/&gt;to come clean?&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;John&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John C.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 19:01:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Woman sues pastor, church over sexual relations - ExChristian.Net - News and Opinion</title><link>http://ex-christian.disqus.com/woman_sues_pastor_church_over_sexual_relations_exchristiannet_news_and_opinion/#comment-21518698</link><description>| How did Ben 'make off' with 70,000?&lt;BR/&gt;| I believe there is documentation&lt;BR/&gt;| saying that Roger originally came&lt;BR/&gt;| up with the idea in the first place.&lt;BR/&gt;| &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I don't know how he did it.  I&lt;BR/&gt;wasn't here at the time.  Ask&lt;BR/&gt;the board members what happened.&lt;BR/&gt;In any event, it's documented&lt;BR/&gt;that a $70,000 church asset was&lt;BR/&gt;"granted" to Ben free and clear&lt;BR/&gt;by the board.  And apparently&lt;BR/&gt;nobody at BBC cares.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;| And really, calling Pastor Ben&lt;BR/&gt;| "Carpathia" is beyond pathetic.&lt;BR/&gt;| &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I've never called Ben "Carpathia".&lt;BR/&gt; I've signed my posts.  And my&lt;BR/&gt;wife has signed hers.  See, there&lt;BR/&gt;you people go again.  Jumping to&lt;BR/&gt;conclusions like it's truth.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I'm happy to hear that so many&lt;BR/&gt;people are so satisfied with&lt;BR/&gt;their current BBC experience.&lt;BR/&gt; I wasn't at the meetings where&lt;BR/&gt;Roger made these so-called&lt;BR/&gt;confessions, so I have to look&lt;BR/&gt;at the integrity all of the&lt;BR/&gt;parties from whom I hear&lt;BR/&gt;second-hand information.  When&lt;BR/&gt;BBC folk don't care that Ben&lt;BR/&gt;tried to embezzle 70k, that says&lt;BR/&gt;something.  When people don't&lt;BR/&gt;care that Ben is looking at&lt;BR/&gt;individuals' tithing data and has&lt;BR/&gt;staff members believing tithing&lt;BR/&gt;is a Biblical requirement for&lt;BR/&gt;deacon, that says something.&lt;BR/&gt; Why should I believe people that&lt;BR/&gt;jump up and down over alleged&lt;BR/&gt;lies from Roger, but aren't&lt;BR/&gt;concerned about Ben's lies?&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;What am I to think when when the&lt;BR/&gt;accuser says she spewed semen all&lt;BR/&gt;over the office couch and the&lt;BR/&gt;State Crime Lab can't find any&lt;BR/&gt;semen, yet people believe her&lt;BR/&gt;anyway? And when BBC people flip&lt;BR/&gt;Roger the bird, or do an about-face&lt;BR/&gt;at the sight of Gwen, or give the&lt;BR/&gt;cold shoulder to any Roger&lt;BR/&gt;supporter, does that lend to&lt;BR/&gt;their credibility?&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;As for Roger, his story to me&lt;BR/&gt;hasn't changed a bit from the day&lt;BR/&gt;I got back in town in late May 2004.&lt;BR/&gt;I've never caught him in a lie.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;So I take the data, draw a&lt;BR/&gt;conclusion, and if I find out in&lt;BR/&gt;The Day that I'm wrong about Roger,&lt;BR/&gt;then I've still shown love to him&lt;BR/&gt;and Ben will still have to explain&lt;BR/&gt;the 70k.  If I'm right, then Ben&lt;BR/&gt;will have to explain everything&lt;BR/&gt;including the 70k.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;So if everybody at BBC is all warm&lt;BR/&gt;and fuzzy, unified in the need to&lt;BR/&gt;smear Roger, then you can have it.&lt;BR/&gt;Roger will still be the same man&lt;BR/&gt;I've known for 14 years. &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;John&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;&lt;/BR&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John C.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 23:58:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I need a catchy name for my networking group of women who are part of direct sales/home businesses. Thanks!?</title><link>http://dsmarketingqueen.disqus.com/i_need_a_catchy_name_for_my_networking_group_of_women_who_are_part_of_direct_saleshome_businesses_th/#comment-4192653</link><description>Voici les femmes - Here are the women&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John C.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 03:46:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Early Feedback On Earl Stories</title><link>http://theeditorsblog.disqus.com/early_feedback_on_earl_stories/#comment-1922811</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I also want to commend the Telegraph for the exceptional articles on Superintendent Julia Earl's city paid expenses.  I found the article not only to be well researched and factual, but it was delivered in a very level manner with clear facts.  As a taxpayer, I thank the Telegraph for shedding light on this issue which will surely spur further investigation into how our tax dollars are spent.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thank You and Great Job.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John C.</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 02:59:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ana&amp;#8217;s Best Albums, Songs, and Movies of 2008</title><link>http://prettymuchamazing.disqus.com/ana8217s_best_albums_songs_and_movies_of_2008/#comment-16972379</link><description>Yeah, the Dark Knight is sort of a given, sure, but the other four are big "what the fuck?"-s.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have a huge list of movies for you to watch miss Half Note, if you're interested.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John C.</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 13:15:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ana&amp;#8217;s Best Albums, Songs, and Movies of 2008</title><link>http://prettymuchamazing.disqus.com/ana8217s_best_albums_songs_and_movies_of_2008/#comment-16972380</link><description>Yeah, the Dark Knight is sort of a given, sure, but the other four are big "what the fuck?"-s.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have a huge list of movies for you to watch miss Half Note, if you're interested.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John C.</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 13:15:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What is the best brand for golf club for beginner?</title><link>http://golf-accessories-tips-reviews.disqus.com/what_is_the_best_brand_for_golf_club_for_beginner/#comment-8352532</link><description>have the club pro fit you for a decent set of cavity backed irons that you wont play out of. Stay with Callaway, Ping Taylor Made Cleveland , Titelist. If he starts pushing some offbrand on you its because of a higher level of commision. I wouldnt go for woods until you find the ones you are going to use. For instance I drive w/ my 3 wood and use a 5 n 7 wood for fairway shots.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cobra is good but the proplem with them is the loft there clubs differently then the industry.Its a gimic thing .a Cobra 6 iron is like a regular 5 iron. Therefore theydont have the name recognition as the others</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John C.</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 09:18:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tee Hee</title><link>http://itisi2.disqus.com/tee_hee/#comment-9795604</link><description>MAN!  I have to set a time limit for my kids on theirs!  That was hilarious though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John C.</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 02:21:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boobs! Knockers! Lady Humps! Ha, that made you look, now please read this post.</title><link>http://itisi2.disqus.com/boobs_knockers_lady_humps_ha_that_made_you_look_now_please_read_this_post/#comment-9796094</link><description>I've had a pink ribbon campaign chicklet as well as Ilker's 'Topless Women' support chicklet in my sidebar for a while.  Good post, Kate!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John C.</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 23:50:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Boobs! Knockers! Lady Humps! Ha, that made you look, now please read this post.</title><link>http://itisi2.disqus.com/boobs_knockers_lady_humps_ha_that_made_you_look_now_please_read_this_post/#comment-9796098</link><description>Kate,&lt;br&gt;Her chicklet one of the three that are under my MyBlogLog widget on my blog.  :)&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John C.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:03:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>