<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for RT Cunningham</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/81737f6f0710b4cdd03004239cb98fa9/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 00:11:49 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Technorati Link Exchange</title><link>http://vinodlive.disqus.com/technorati_link_exchange/#comment-9474867</link><description>Hi, I have you linked as a favorite now.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:08:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I have a few Spock Invites to share</title><link>http://vinodlive.disqus.com/i_have_a_few_spock_invites_to_share/#comment-9475360</link><description>Thanks, Vinod! I could use an invite if for nothing more than to review the service. :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 03:27:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How I made over $2 million with this blog (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/how_i_made_over_2_million_with_this_blog_scripting_news/#comment-6237333</link><description>I agree with most of your post, Dave. There are two types of blog publishers: Social and Search. Some cross over from one type to the other and back again, but each have a specific, targeted audience. Mr. Lyons was trying to be a search blogger while having a social blog. The two don't mix very well. AdSense works for search conversions very well and very poorly anything else. Had Mr. Lyons done his research early enough in the game, he would have saved himself a lot of headaches and used his blog for social marketing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;His article just makes him look like the typical marketing newbie and that's really sad.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:46:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Could Just 1 Character Turn A 4 Day Old News Story Into A Front Page Digg?</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/could_just_1_character_turn_a_4_day_old_news_story_into_a_front_page_digg_32/#comment-10988389</link><description>Excellent post. I've similar things happen over and over again. All it takes is the right word, or punctuation mark, and they're all over it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 05:53:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Could Just 1 Character Turn A 4 Day Old News Story Into A Front Page Digg?</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/could_just_1_character_turn_a_4_day_old_news_story_into_a_front_page_digg_32/#comment-12523056</link><description>Excellent post. I've similar things happen over and over again. All it takes is the right word, or punctuation mark, and they're all over it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 05:53:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Multiple Reasons Why I Loathe Top Commenters Plugins</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/multiple_reasons_why_i_loathe_top_commenters_plugins_97/#comment-10988456</link><description>I agree with the sentiment of your loathing, but I can't completely agree. I use the plugin and have the top commenters wrapped in a scroll box. It does not reset every week, month, or year. I could not care less about what it does to my page rank, my traffic ranking, or whatever. In my own very humble opinion, anything I can do to boost others will eventually come back to me. Of course, I'm not into the SEO thing either.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:43:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Multiple Reasons Why I Loathe Top Commenters Plugins</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/multiple_reasons_why_i_loathe_top_commenters_plugins_97/#comment-12523116</link><description>I agree with the sentiment of your loathing, but I can't completely agree. I use the plugin and have the top commenters wrapped in a scroll box. It does not reset every week, month, or year. I could not care less about what it does to my page rank, my traffic ranking, or whatever. In my own very humble opinion, anything I can do to boost others will eventually come back to me. Of course, I'm not into the SEO thing either.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:43:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A List Bloggers in Crystal Palaces Shouldn&amp;#039;t Throw Stones</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/a_list_bloggers_in_crystal_palaces_shouldn039t_throw_stones_44/#comment-10988503</link><description>Great article, Andy. I love it when you call them out. I abhor the pompousness of some of the A-list bloggers.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 03:46:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A List Bloggers in Crystal Palaces Shouldn&amp;#039;t Throw Stones</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/a_list_bloggers_in_crystal_palaces_shouldn039t_throw_stones_44/#comment-12523162</link><description>Great article, Andy. I love it when you call them out. I abhor the pompousness of some of the A-list bloggers.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 03:46:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Akismet a Spam Magnet? Plus a little on Trackbacks</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/is_akismet_a_spam_magnet_plus_a_little_on_trackbacks_95/#comment-10988748</link><description>Ummm, Andy, check the date you started your blog. You don't own a Delorian, do you?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 16:13:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Akismet a Spam Magnet? Plus a little on Trackbacks</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/is_akismet_a_spam_magnet_plus_a_little_on_trackbacks_95/#comment-12523385</link><description>Ummm, Andy, check the date you started your blog. You don't own a Delorian, do you?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 16:13:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bloggers Choice Awards &amp;#8211; Blog Awards Go Social</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/bloggers_choice_awards_8211_blog_awards_go_social_78/#comment-10988887</link><description>I got nominated for 3 of these things, but I'm too lazy to hack the URL to each one. It's not like I think I have a snowball's chance in winning anything anyway. It's the thought that counts.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 05:29:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bloggers Choice Awards &amp;#8211; Blog Awards Go Social</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/bloggers_choice_awards_8211_blog_awards_go_social_78/#comment-12523510</link><description>I got nominated for 3 of these things, but I'm too lazy to hack the URL to each one. It's not like I think I have a snowball's chance in winning anything anyway. It's the thought that counts.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 05:29:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reciprocal Favoriting Gives Benefits &amp;#038; Adds Value</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/reciprocal_favoriting_gives_benefits_038_adds_value/#comment-10989255</link><description>I thought I was long-winded. That, Andy, was one of your longest posts. It took me a while, even in Google Reader!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But it was good! :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 14:04:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reciprocal Favoriting Gives Benefits &amp;#038; Adds Value</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/reciprocal_favoriting_gives_benefits_038_adds_value/#comment-12523846</link><description>I thought I was long-winded. That, Andy, was one of your longest posts. It took me a while, even in Google Reader!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But it was good! :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 14:04:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Speed Linking Slow Linking</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/speed_linking_slow_linking_49/#comment-10987683</link><description>I speed link all the time, but it's not speedy at all, and I don't call it that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 01:38:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Speed Linking Slow Linking</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/speed_linking_slow_linking_49/#comment-12522450</link><description>I speed link all the time, but it's not speedy at all, and I don't call it that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 01:38:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 32 Forms of Linking Payola</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/top_32_forms_of_linking_payola_31/#comment-10989685</link><description>I try to let people know why certain blogs are being linked to up front. I don't know if that qualifies as full disclosure or not, but it's usually the first thing on one of those types of pages.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Honestly, I don't know how you could link to someone and not fall into one of those categories, even by accident. I probably fall under number 14 a lot, but I don't think it has anything to do with demonstrating authority.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 01:48:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 32 Forms of Linking Payola</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/top_32_forms_of_linking_payola_31/#comment-12524249</link><description>I try to let people know why certain blogs are being linked to up front. I don't know if that qualifies as full disclosure or not, but it's usually the first thing on one of those types of pages.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Honestly, I don't know how you could link to someone and not fall into one of those categories, even by accident. I probably fall under number 14 a lot, but I don't think it has anything to do with demonstrating authority.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 01:48:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sam Casuncad &amp;#8211; Unprofessional SEO?</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/sam_casuncad_8211_unprofessional_seo_04/#comment-10989777</link><description>I received the same spam. Knowing it wasn't the usual, I went and took a look. I'm with you, Andy. Everything this guy did was of dubious intent. I've blocked him off since then. I wonder if this guy realizes how much damage he did to his own future endeavors?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 13:08:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sam Casuncad &amp;#8211; Unprofessional SEO?</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/sam_casuncad_8211_unprofessional_seo_04/#comment-12524333</link><description>I received the same spam. Knowing it wasn't the usual, I went and took a look. I'm with you, Andy. Everything this guy did was of dubious intent. I've blocked him off since then. I wonder if this guy realizes how much damage he did to his own future endeavors?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 13:08:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 29% Of Technorati Top 100 Never On Digg Home Page</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/29_of_technorati_top_100_never_on_digg_home_page_78/#comment-10990520</link><description>I've made it to the front page of Digg before, but I'm nowhere near that top 100 list. I'd be lucky to be in the top 10,000. :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 13:43:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 29% Of Technorati Top 100 Never On Digg Home Page</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/29_of_technorati_top_100_never_on_digg_home_page_78/#comment-12525050</link><description>I've made it to the front page of Digg before, but I'm nowhere near that top 100 list. I'd be lucky to be in the top 10,000. :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 13:43:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 29% Of Technorati Top 100 Never On Digg Home Page</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/29_of_technorati_top_100_never_on_digg_home_page_78/#comment-10990525</link><description>Do not feed the trolls.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:25:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 29% Of Technorati Top 100 Never On Digg Home Page</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/29_of_technorati_top_100_never_on_digg_home_page_78/#comment-12525056</link><description>Do not feed the trolls.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:25:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 29% Of Technorati Top 100 Never On Digg Home Page</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/29_of_technorati_top_100_never_on_digg_home_page_78/#comment-10990528</link><description>That's a smart move. "she that must be obeyed" can make your life miserable really quick. I know this from personal experience. :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:40:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 29% Of Technorati Top 100 Never On Digg Home Page</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/29_of_technorati_top_100_never_on_digg_home_page_78/#comment-12525059</link><description>That's a smart move. "she that must be obeyed" can make your life miserable really quick. I know this from personal experience. :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:40:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Blogs Suck</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/why_blogs_suck_96/#comment-10991477</link><description>The only people that make any real money from blogging, and it's still a really low conversion rate, are the so-called a-list bloggers like Shoemoney and Problogger.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm afraid if people are blogging solely to make money, they're going to be sadly disappointed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 14:06:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Blogs Suck</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/why_blogs_suck_96/#comment-12525941</link><description>The only people that make any real money from blogging, and it's still a really low conversion rate, are the so-called a-list bloggers like Shoemoney and Problogger.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm afraid if people are blogging solely to make money, they're going to be sadly disappointed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 14:06:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Blogs Suck</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/why_blogs_suck_96/#comment-10991483</link><description>I think a better lead acquisition system is a social networks like BlogCatalog. I have gained more contacts and subscribers through BC than StumbleUpon even though I get ten times the traffic from SU. Perhaps it's because they're all bloggers like me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:54:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Blogs Suck</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/why_blogs_suck_96/#comment-12525946</link><description>I think a better lead acquisition system is a social networks like BlogCatalog. I have gained more contacts and subscribers through BC than StumbleUpon even though I get ten times the traffic from SU. Perhaps it's because they're all bloggers like me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:54:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Blogs Suck</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/why_blogs_suck_96/#comment-10991517</link><description>I agree with everything you just wrote, Jack, and I couldn't have written it better if I tried. It's not the platform; it's the content. That and our ability to effectively communicate.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 13:19:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Blogs Suck</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/why_blogs_suck_96/#comment-12525980</link><description>I agree with everything you just wrote, Jack, and I couldn't have written it better if I tried. It's not the platform; it's the content. That and our ability to effectively communicate.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 13:19:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Digg Favorites Slapped By Google</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/digg_favorites_slapped_by_google_43/#comment-10991738</link><description>Google finally caught me. My blog slid from a 4 to a 3 today.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:19:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Digg Favorites Slapped By Google</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/digg_favorites_slapped_by_google_43/#comment-12526189</link><description>Google finally caught me. My blog slid from a 4 to a 3 today.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:19:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Supporting Your Most Valued Communities Without WIIFM</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/supporting_your_most_valued_communities_without_wiifm_05/#comment-10992651</link><description>Before my DSL service starting getting really lousy about 3 months ago, I was trying to be involved in several communities. Nowawdays, I only get about 6 hours of connectivity a day at the most. Hopefully, I'll have a new provider in January and be able to spend more time at them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Other than senseless discussions, I think all of them have points of value, so why not support them?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 04:07:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Supporting Your Most Valued Communities Without WIIFM</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/supporting_your_most_valued_communities_without_wiifm_05/#comment-12527112</link><description>Before my DSL service starting getting really lousy about 3 months ago, I was trying to be involved in several communities. Nowawdays, I only get about 6 hours of connectivity a day at the most. Hopefully, I'll have a new provider in January and be able to spend more time at them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Other than senseless discussions, I think all of them have points of value, so why not support them?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 04:07:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: IzeaRanks &amp;#038; RealRank &amp;#8211; How Many Lies Can You Tell Your Advertisers?</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/izearanks_038_realrank_8211_how_many_lies_can_you_tell_your_advertisers/#comment-10992914</link><description>"It is true that Google might currently look on javascript from Izea as an indication of writing paid posts, but hopefully with Social Spark that will be cleared up."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Andy, I just had my blog reconsidered and restored to a PR4 a couple of days ago with the IZEA code in place. All of the old PPP posts are still there, just nofollowed (all are over 30 days old). This is clear indication that the IZEA script in place does not necessarily mean I'm writing paid posts.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:34:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: IzeaRanks &amp;#038; RealRank &amp;#8211; How Many Lies Can You Tell Your Advertisers?</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/izearanks_038_realrank_8211_how_many_lies_can_you_tell_your_advertisers/#comment-12527349</link><description>"It is true that Google might currently look on javascript from Izea as an indication of writing paid posts, but hopefully with Social Spark that will be cleared up."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Andy, I just had my blog reconsidered and restored to a PR4 a couple of days ago with the IZEA code in place. All of the old PPP posts are still there, just nofollowed (all are over 30 days old). This is clear indication that the IZEA script in place does not necessarily mean I'm writing paid posts.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:34:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: IzeaRanks &amp;#038; RealRank &amp;#8211; How Many Lies Can You Tell Your Advertisers?</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/izearanks_038_realrank_8211_how_many_lies_can_you_tell_your_advertisers/#comment-10992919</link><description>Just the required ones for the advertiser, Andy. I didn't even look at the other links, if any.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:16:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: IzeaRanks &amp;#038; RealRank &amp;#8211; How Many Lies Can You Tell Your Advertisers?</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/izearanks_038_realrank_8211_how_many_lies_can_you_tell_your_advertisers/#comment-12527354</link><description>Just the required ones for the advertiser, Andy. I didn't even look at the other links, if any.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:16:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google PageRank Directory Clanger</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/google_pagerank_directory_clanger/#comment-10992949</link><description>The Google Directory, along with &lt;a href="http://dmoz.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;dmoz.org&lt;/a&gt;, lost relevancy a long time ago. Now, if the volunteer editors at &lt;a href="http://dmoz.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;dmoz.org&lt;/a&gt; were even moderately reliable at adding and removing entries, that wouldn't be the case.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It just confuses the heck out of me as to why Google uses the Open Directory Project in the first place. Anyway, a graph next to each entry, without displaying the actual number, is almost worthless. Is it a 4 or a 5, a 5 or a 6? Guessing by the appearance isn't nearly accurate enough.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:17:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google PageRank Directory Clanger</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/google_pagerank_directory_clanger/#comment-12527380</link><description>The Google Directory, along with &lt;a href="http://dmoz.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;dmoz.org&lt;/a&gt;, lost relevancy a long time ago. Now, if the volunteer editors at &lt;a href="http://dmoz.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;dmoz.org&lt;/a&gt; were even moderately reliable at adding and removing entries, that wouldn't be the case.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It just confuses the heck out of me as to why Google uses the Open Directory Project in the first place. Anyway, a graph next to each entry, without displaying the actual number, is almost worthless. Is it a 4 or a 5, a 5 or a 6? Guessing by the appearance isn't nearly accurate enough.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:17:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Alexa Rating Changes?</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/alexa_rating_changes_62/#comment-10993871</link><description>I think their efforts to combat gaming has had a negative impact on everyone. And here I thought only my site had taken a dive.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:58:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Alexa Rating Changes?</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/alexa_rating_changes_62/#comment-12528233</link><description>I think their efforts to combat gaming has had a negative impact on everyone. And here I thought only my site had taken a dive.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:58:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WordPress.com Subdomain Spam With Tags?</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/wordpresscom_subdomain_spam_with_tags_17/#comment-10994215</link><description>I've spent more than 40 man-hours tagging over 1100 posts on my blog. I didn't do it for SEO. I did for it relevancy. Each tag represents a sub-topic on a post. If a person clicks one of the tags, they'll find related posts. I believe if it's used for anything else, it's a waste of time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 00:02:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WordPress.com Subdomain Spam With Tags?</title><link>http://andybeard.disqus.com/wordpresscom_subdomain_spam_with_tags_17/#comment-12528556</link><description>I've spent more than 40 man-hours tagging over 1100 posts on my blog. I didn't do it for SEO. I did for it relevancy. Each tag represents a sub-topic on a post. If a person clicks one of the tags, they'll find related posts. I believe if it's used for anything else, it's a waste of time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 00:02:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How often do you hear the same &amp;#8216;blogging&amp;#8217; message?</title><link>http://imjustcreative.disqus.com/how_often_do_you_hear_the_same_8216blogging8217_message/#comment-9738666</link><description>Stopped by to scratchback as well as see what you have. Nice article. Accusations get hurled mainly by those without experience. Hot topics get written by so many people in a short span of time, there's bound to be overlaps, references, etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Imitation is flattery whereas pure plagiarism is not. People need to learn to distinguish between the two.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:32:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Signatures. Having the last word on your comments.</title><link>http://imjustcreative.disqus.com/signatures_having_the_last_word_on_your_comments/#comment-9738673</link><description>Graham, the signature thing doesn't bother me, although I rarely do it. Something you may want to consider when leaving multiple comments on the same thread, is that the "calling card" doesn't need to be dropped each time, especially if the comments are within close proximity to each other.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Because then, it just looks like signature spam. Once per thread is ideal as far as I'm concerned.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 02:12:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Heroes and Journeyman</title><link>http://popcritics.disqus.com/heroes_and_journeyman/#comment-1197172</link><description>If they'd quit bringing Katie J/Sackhoff in, the Bionic Woman might be better. Her character sucks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 03:07:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Battlestar Galactica prequel in the works?</title><link>http://popcritics.disqus.com/battlestar_galactica_prequel_in_the_works/#comment-1198702</link><description>I don't know about this. It had better be really good or it'll be the end of the BSG franchise.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Temple of Doom did well because no one knew (no one I knew knew or something like that) it was a prequel until after it came out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The SW prequels were crap in my book.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:30:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First photo of the &amp;#8216;USS Enterprise&amp;#8217; from the new Star Trek movie</title><link>http://popcritics.disqus.com/first_photo_of_the_8216uss_enterprise8217_from_the_new_star_trek_movie/#comment-1198677</link><description>I take it this will be the first constitution class Enterprise (the one in Enterprise series wasn't).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm hoping for a good movie. Somehow, though, I kind of doubt it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:04:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Technorati Is Ridiculous</title><link>http://popcritics.disqus.com/technorati_is_ridiculous/#comment-1198977</link><description>Yes, Technorati has some problems. One of them is that their database will only let you add 200 favorites -- I had over 500 before they put the limitation into effect.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I gained 50 links one day (and they were valid) and watched them disappear in two days, without reason. I don't know what Technorati's problems are, and I really don't care -- I only look once a day if that much. At once time, though, I actually used it to see what my favorite blogs were up to -- but that doesn't seem to be up-to-date most of the time either nowadays.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:07:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Post-strike TV series production news</title><link>http://popcritics.disqus.com/post_strike_tv_series_production_news/#comment-1315553</link><description>The one I'll miss, because I don't think it's coming back, is Journeyman. Ratings be damned!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 09:32:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shaq arrives in Phoenix, promises a ring</title><link>http://popcritics.disqus.com/shaq_arrives_in_phoenix_promises_a_ring/#comment-1315539</link><description>Yep, that's one big guy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 09:40:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FOX decides not to promote &amp;#8216;The Happening&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://popcritics.disqus.com/fox_decides_not_to_promote_8216the_happening8217/#comment-1315409</link><description>I really wanted to see the teaser. Anything would be better than some of the junk I've seen recently.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 09:46:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: M. Night&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;The Happening&amp;#8221; teaser</title><link>http://popcritics.disqus.com/m_night8217s_8220the_happening8221_teaser/#comment-1315351</link><description>I didn't see "Lady in the Water". I'll have to umm acquire it so that I can see if it's as bad as everyone says.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 09:49:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FOX decides not to promote &amp;#8216;The Happening&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://popcritics.disqus.com/fox_decides_not_to_promote_8216the_happening8217/#comment-1315410</link><description>Okay, I just saw the teaser. It was disturbing. Maybe I'll be better off NOT seeing the movie.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:05:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Most overrated science fiction show?</title><link>http://popcritics.disqus.com/most_overrated_science_fiction_show/#comment-1315302</link><description>Okay, I admit it, I can't even think of voting on a poll like this. BSG and Heroes are the only two of them that I've seen. Compared to what I have available to me (here in the Philippines), nothing I get a chance to see is overrated.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:48:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FOX decides not to promote &amp;#8216;The Happening&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://popcritics.disqus.com/fox_decides_not_to_promote_8216the_happening8217/#comment-1315414</link><description>&lt;a href="http://the-happening--trailer.blogspot.com/2008/02/happening-trailer.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://the-happening--trailer.blogspot.com/2008...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 12:40:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Most overrated science fiction show?</title><link>http://popcritics.disqus.com/most_overrated_science_fiction_show/#comment-1315309</link><description>Aw, Frank, I can do better than that. I! Finally! Figured! Out! How! To! Punctuate! Kirk! Speeches!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 15:23:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Josh Brolin - The New Terminator?</title><link>http://popcritics.disqus.com/josh_brolin_the_new_terminator/#comment-1315391</link><description>I see Josh Brolin as John Connor and Christian Bale as The Terminator, but it could easily be the other way around. The film isn't scheduled for completion until 2009, so a lot of things could change.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 02:14:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Roy Scheider 1932-2008</title><link>http://popcritics.disqus.com/roy_scheider_1932_2008/#comment-1316567</link><description>Wow, I didn't know he was that old. How could you forget about "Blue Thunder" which also starred Malcom McDowell? You know, "Follow my leader." The TV show Airwolf wouldn't have been made if it hadn't been for that movie.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:07:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Jaws&amp;#8217; star Roy Scheider dies at age 75</title><link>http://popcritics.disqus.com/8216jaws8217_star_roy_scheider_dies_at_age_75/#comment-1316504</link><description>And what about "Blue Thunder" dangit!?! He was awesome.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:17:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Roy Scheider 1932-2008</title><link>http://popcritics.disqus.com/roy_scheider_1932_2008/#comment-1316571</link><description>I didn't say I *liked* Airwolf (Jan Michael Vincent sucked to no end) and I can't believe it lasted as long as it did. But the theme was catchy and I have it on my PC somewhere (but with the wrong filename so I'll probably never find it again).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:13:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Technorati Favorites Exchange Program</title><link>http://gauravonomicsblog.disqus.com/my_technorati_favorites_exchange_program/#comment-3037363</link><description>I have you added and linked you up in the post on my site. Thanks for stopping by!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:58:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Plugin Ideas for WordPress</title><link>http://techiebuzz.disqus.com/new_plugin_ideas_for_wordpress/#comment-10911268</link><description>There's a category filter plugin that works, but is overkill for what I would want it for. I want to filter any articles from my feed within specific categories only. This is to prevent things like sponsored posts from making it to the feed. It could be based on category or on a trigger string within the content itself.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 03:42:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FoxTab Brings Aero Experience To Tab Switching In Firefox</title><link>http://techiebuzz.disqus.com/foxtab_brings_aero_experience_to_tab_switching_in_firefox/#comment-10914935</link><description>As much as I like the virtual windows thing (first seen in Linux), I think it's just so much eye candy. I much prefer using the standard alt-tab combination to quickly flip through tabs. I don't keep enough tabs open (with only 512KB on this PC) to even need tab switching in Firefox.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:11:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogger Unleashed: Honest, Straightforward Advocate</title><link>http://pajamaprofessional.disqus.com/blogger_unleashed_honest_straightforward_advocate/#comment-4808990</link><description>Hi, Victor is one of my many online friends. I also cut my teeth on the C64 (and then C128 later) before hopping onto the Internet before it was called the Internet. Unfortunately, I was in military at the time, so I didn't have the luxury of time to spend doing the things he did.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyway, I stopped by to check out your "do follow" status and to add your blog to my list. Thanks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;RT Cunningham's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://www.untwistedvortex.com/2008/04/25/make-retarded-search-engines-work-for-you/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Make Retarded Search Engines Work For You&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 05:19:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Root of Happiness</title><link>http://toddstips.disqus.com/the_root_of_happiness/#comment-11761181</link><description>My second stop. I've already been to Alohateam. I'll be back.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;RT Cunningham's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://www.untwistedvortex.com/2008/04/20/comment-kingqueen-award-for-the-week-ending-on-april-19-2008/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Comment King/Queen Award For The Week Ending On April 19, 2008&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 12:24:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: KeywordLuv and Do Follow</title><link>http://pingable.disqus.com/keywordluv_and_do_follow/#comment-12435317</link><description>Awesome, Simon! I've added this blog to my list. Sorry it took so long...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 06:34:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 20 + Sets of Free Royalty Free Icons</title><link>http://pingable.disqus.com/20_sets_of_free_royalty_free_icons/#comment-12435681</link><description>I am so going to steal, er... I mean use a lot of these icons for some upcoming posts. I spotted the Iron Man set right away... my favorite Marvel Comics superhero (after Spidey of course)...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:52:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Generic Comment Spam</title><link>http://pingable.disqus.com/generic_comment_spam/#comment-12436825</link><description>Sorry, Simon, I couldn't resist. Anyway, I found a good halfway point that takes more effort on the part of comment spammers to get worthwhile links. Consequently, the spam has been reduced by an incredible amount while those in the know can still get great backlinks. My latest "nofollow" post, which you already commented on, leaks it out if anyone takes the time to read the post.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 00:11:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Arizona Coffee - Site of the Week</title><link>http://tpreg.disqus.com/arizona_coffee_site_of_the_week/#comment-12480770</link><description>As much as I drink coffee, I stay away from the expense of the coffee shops. Besides, I make a mean cup of mocha (or cappuccino) right here at home. :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 12:16:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tigopedia 1.0</title><link>http://sizlopedia.disqus.com/tigopedia_10/#comment-13933513</link><description>Great theme and I've already customized a couple of things on mine. One thing. The theme (before customizing) does not validate as XHTML transitional.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 13:59:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Become Your Own Wireless Internet Service Provider</title><link>http://connectedinternet.disqus.com/how_to_become_your_own_wireless_internet_service_provider/#comment-15283675</link><description>I'm in the Philippines with a DSL connection that's pretty slow compared to the kind in America and the UK. I'm afraid that a mesh network, of any kind, would eat up what little bandwidth I get from the provider. Once they bring Internet cable into my neighborhood, now that would be a different story.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'll have to research to find out my initial cost, but I would be the only "ISP" in my barangay (subdivision/multiple neighborhoods).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:30:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ultimate Technorati Faves Exchange</title><link>http://garryconn.disqus.com/ultimate_technorati_faves_exchange/#comment-17873938</link><description>I have you added and linked you up in the post on my site. Thanks for stopping by, Garry!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:54:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Technorati Most Faved List</title><link>http://garryconn.disqus.com/technorati_most_faved_list/#comment-17874005</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="22" src="http://garryconn.com/images/windowslivewriterreportcheating-b05bwarning6.jpg" width="25" align="left" border="0"&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/faves/rtcunningham?show=blogs" rel="nofollow"&gt;Check To See If I Added You&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a title="Ask Garry To Remind Me" href="http://garryconn.com/contact/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Ask Garry To Remind Me&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 19:18:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Make Money Online With $100 Google Adsense Each Month</title><link>http://garryconn.disqus.com/make_money_online_with_100_google_adsense_each_month/#comment-17874285</link><description>That pingback was from a splog. Not a good example of what you're talking about.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:58:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Make Money Online Using MyBlogLog</title><link>http://garryconn.disqus.com/make_money_online_using_mybloglog/#comment-17874374</link><description>Hehe, Matt is crazy. My PR on both MyBlogLog pages are 4 and 3 (member/community). I don't think I'm in any position to make a bargain.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 14:29:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog Knowledge IQ Test</title><link>http://garryconn.disqus.com/blog_knowledge_iq_test/#comment-17874790</link><description>Good quiz! I know the answer to all of them, of course. Which one has people stumped? #6? The answer is blogger. Simple. :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 03:15:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Cooley aka Cyber Coder Is Jealous</title><link>http://garryconn.disqus.com/david_cooley_aka_cyber_coder_is_jealous/#comment-17878206</link><description>Well, at least you have a tag cloud. I'm still working my way through over a thousand posts and putting on tags and it's a long process. I won't put up a tag cloud until I'm through.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:34:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Cooley aka Cyber Coder Is Jealous</title><link>http://garryconn.disqus.com/david_cooley_aka_cyber_coder_is_jealous/#comment-17878208</link><description>Okay, I did it, but EGADS!  The default tag cloud widget looks horrible. I'll have to find something else.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:09:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Cooley aka Cyber Coder Is Jealous</title><link>http://garryconn.disqus.com/david_cooley_aka_cyber_coder_is_jealous/#comment-17878211</link><description>The html is okay, but I'll still check out the link. I say horrible because I spent a lot of time with the CSS and padding and so forth. The default widget doesn't follow the styling, so I'll be using the cloud within a custom widget. Thanks!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:26:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Cooley aka Cyber Coder Is Jealous</title><link>http://garryconn.disqus.com/david_cooley_aka_cyber_coder_is_jealous/#comment-17878214</link><description>Thanks. I'm using widgets because FTP'ing changes from here is difficult -- DSL connectivity being bad for hours per day. Besides, I figured them out and even wrote one of my own. Prior to that, it was all hard coded (still there in the sidebar.php file), but I kind of like being able to move things without having to deal with the FTP problems.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That is, of course, until I'm able to change providers (crossing my fingers for January).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:37:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: John Chow Is Getting Fat!</title><link>http://garryconn.disqus.com/john_chow_is_getting_fat/#comment-17879174</link><description>You can hide fat on other parts of the body with loose clothing, but a fat face never lies.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:45:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogosphere Donates Over $3000 To A Blogger In Need</title><link>http://garryconn.disqus.com/blogosphere_donates_over_3000_to_a_blogger_in_need/#comment-17879218</link><description>The response on this was, in one word, overwhelming.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 03:40:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogosphere Donates Over $3000 To A Blogger In Need</title><link>http://garryconn.disqus.com/blogosphere_donates_over_3000_to_a_blogger_in_need/#comment-17879232</link><description>Hi Garry,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There isn't any controversy at Blogger Unleashed, except maybe in the mind of Mike. Vic is brutal, untamed, and tells the truth to those that don't want to hear it. His words are laced with colorful metaphors, and that makes him unique. He doesn't care what people think of him as long as they listen to the message. I've been reading his blog since he started it, and sometimes it's difficult to read, but the advice he gives out is solid as a rock.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You've seen some of my blog reviews. Short, and to the point. Vic's blog, however, would take me days.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:42:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogosphere Donates Over $3000 To A Blogger In Need</title><link>http://garryconn.disqus.com/blogosphere_donates_over_3000_to_a_blogger_in_need/#comment-17879233</link><description>This story has been dugg (by me). Prepare for the wrath of the diggers.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:41:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogosphere Donates Over $3000 To A Blogger In Need</title><link>http://garryconn.disqus.com/blogosphere_donates_over_3000_to_a_blogger_in_need/#comment-17879237</link><description>Oops, a minor correction. January 22 instead of February 22. My brain is fried.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:54:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Do You Love and Love To Hate Google?</title><link>http://garryconn.disqus.com/why_do_you_love_and_love_to_hate_google/#comment-17879291</link><description>Garry: "I am confused, can someone throw me a bone and explain?" How about NO, Garry! (LMAO)  I was one of the ones who bitched (but not very loudly) because I knew it would draw traffic. How's that for a reason?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Collin: Shoemoney is a self-admitted liar. He throws those numbers out to confuse you. Those numbers may be true for a socially popular blog like his, but you have to look at the total volume of traffic he's using as the base figure. I can tell you right now, my main blog, which isn't monetized well at all, still gets 80% of the traffic from Google.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:04:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Do You Love and Love To Hate Google?</title><link>http://garryconn.disqus.com/why_do_you_love_and_love_to_hate_google/#comment-17879293</link><description>â€œI am confused, can someone throw me a bone and explain?â€ How about NO, Garry! (LMAO) I was one of the ones who bitched (but not very loudly) because I knew it would draw traffic. Howâ€™s that for a reason?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The first part was a reference to Dr. Evil, "throw me a bone". The second part was that I never got upset. I was curious and read the guidelines (that have long since been changed) AFTER I was penalized. Then I wrote scathing stuff because I knew people would come by and read it. They did. Yeah, I got dropped to a PR of 0, but I've since been reconsidered and put back up to a 4.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Part of the reason some people dropped by a point is because a lot of the links pointing to them dropped in value, and they didn't consider that part of the equation. I think it's the only reason a lot of my healthy pages are still sitting at 4 instead of being higher.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:08:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does Changing Your Domain Name IP Address Effect SEO?</title><link>http://garryconn.disqus.com/does_changing_your_domain_name_ip_address_effect_seo/#comment-17881072</link><description>Other than maintaining the web site at two locations pending the completion of DNS propagation, there is a factor to consider, which I'll get to in a moment. During the move, you have to keep the old location active but I would suggest turning off comments with a note in the comments section next to the form. Propagation can take up to a week, regardless of what you've been told. Propagation is fast in most places, but can take much longer in "third-world locations". 4-5 days is not unusual here in the Philippines.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Before you accept an IP address, check the many blocking lists. If your IP address, or range of IP addresses, is on any one of them it can definitely affect SEO and in the worst possible way, especially from the tech-savvy people. I found out, the hard way, that many of the IP address ranges here in the Philippines are on blocking lists. During a brief period where I used a web host here, my traffic dwindled to a trickle. Some of the other readers might laugh because you're dealing with the U.S., but there are a LOT of blocked IP addresses in the U.S.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 09:56:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Speed Up Your WordPress Blog</title><link>http://garryconn.disqus.com/how_to_speed_up_your_wordpress_blog/#comment-17881694</link><description>I took the time to go back and read your other post, the one with the pissing match. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I learned your lesson the hard way when I was changing hosts. Too many "ooh aah" plugins don't help anything at all in the long run. The majority of my widgets contain static links -- no database queries. It makes loading, even with out the super cache running, much faster than before. I have the super cache on standby when traffic goes crazy, but I don't use it otherwise.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I recently created 4 niche blogs and only 2 plugins each affect the front ends. They're lightning fast and without any caching.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 07:52:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are Backlinks Over-Rated?</title><link>http://garryconn.disqus.com/are_backlinks_over_rated/#comment-17882731</link><description>Excellent points, Garry. Prior to the beginning of this year, I didn't focus on anything at all really, other than general backlinks to my main blog. After spending quite a bit of time experimenting with different techniques since then, I'm convinced that there are two ways to go and you pointed them out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The biggest boost to my traffic started on July 14th when I started targeting the long tail keywords. I still go after the holy grail and main keyword, but it's a long building process because the competition is extremely tough. My traffic doubled and will continue to grow as I mine the long tail.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm also convinced that more than a few quality backlinks to a specific page are a complete waste of time. I would gestimate between 5 and 10 will do the trick, I generally go with 5 targeted backlinks and let evolution as well as the good feed scrapers take care of the rest.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The goal is really to rank on the first page of every search engine for multiple long tail keywords. I think it pays off better in the long run.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;abbr&amp;gt;&lt;em&gt;Check out RT Cunningham | Philippines's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://www.untwistedvortex.com/2008/08/02/one-bad-scraper-foiled-success-with-google/" rel="nofollow"&gt;One Bad Scraper Foiled - Success with Google&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;/abbr&amp;gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 11:13:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ultimate Technorati Faves Exchange</title><link>http://garryconncom.disqus.com/ultimate_technorati_faves_exchange/#comment-18586292</link><description>I have you added and linked you up in the post on my site. Thanks for stopping by, Garry!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:54:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Technorati Most Faved List</title><link>http://garryconncom.disqus.com/technorati_most_faved_list/#comment-18586358</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="22" src="http://garryconn.com/images/windowslivewriterreportcheating-b05bwarning6.jpg" width="25" align="left" border="0"&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/faves/rtcunningham?show=blogs" rel="nofollow"&gt;Check To See If I Added You&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a title="Ask Garry To Remind Me" href="http://garryconn.com/contact/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Ask Garry To Remind Me&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 19:18:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Make Money Online With $100 Google Adsense Each Month</title><link>http://garryconncom.disqus.com/make_money_online_with_100_google_adsense_each_month/#comment-18586637</link><description>That pingback was from a splog. Not a good example of what you're talking about.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:58:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Make Money Online Using MyBlogLog</title><link>http://garryconncom.disqus.com/make_money_online_using_mybloglog/#comment-18586703</link><description>Hehe, Matt is crazy. My PR on both MyBlogLog pages are 4 and 3 (member/community). I don't think I'm in any position to make a bargain.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 14:29:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blog Knowledge IQ Test</title><link>http://garryconncom.disqus.com/blog_knowledge_iq_test/#comment-18587104</link><description>Good quiz! I know the answer to all of them, of course. Which one has people stumped? #6? The answer is blogger. Simple. :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 03:15:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Cooley aka Cyber Coder Is Jealous</title><link>http://garryconncom.disqus.com/david_cooley_aka_cyber_coder_is_jealous/#comment-18590375</link><description>Well, at least you have a tag cloud. I'm still working my way through over a thousand posts and putting on tags and it's a long process. I won't put up a tag cloud until I'm through.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:34:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Cooley aka Cyber Coder Is Jealous</title><link>http://garryconncom.disqus.com/david_cooley_aka_cyber_coder_is_jealous/#comment-18590377</link><description>Okay, I did it, but EGADS!  The default tag cloud widget looks horrible. I'll have to find something else.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:09:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Cooley aka Cyber Coder Is Jealous</title><link>http://garryconncom.disqus.com/david_cooley_aka_cyber_coder_is_jealous/#comment-18590380</link><description>The html is okay, but I'll still check out the link. I say horrible because I spent a lot of time with the CSS and padding and so forth. The default widget doesn't follow the styling, so I'll be using the cloud within a custom widget. Thanks!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:26:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Cooley aka Cyber Coder Is Jealous</title><link>http://garryconncom.disqus.com/david_cooley_aka_cyber_coder_is_jealous/#comment-18590383</link><description>Thanks. I'm using widgets because FTP'ing changes from here is difficult -- DSL connectivity being bad for hours per day. Besides, I figured them out and even wrote one of my own. Prior to that, it was all hard coded (still there in the sidebar.php file), but I kind of like being able to move things without having to deal with the FTP problems.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That is, of course, until I'm able to change providers (crossing my fingers for January).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:37:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: John Chow Is Getting Fat!</title><link>http://garryconncom.disqus.com/john_chow_is_getting_fat/#comment-18591289</link><description>You can hide fat on other parts of the body with loose clothing, but a fat face never lies.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:45:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogosphere Donates Over $3000 To A Blogger In Need</title><link>http://garryconncom.disqus.com/blogosphere_donates_over_3000_to_a_blogger_in_need/#comment-18591331</link><description>The response on this was, in one word, overwhelming.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 03:40:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogosphere Donates Over $3000 To A Blogger In Need</title><link>http://garryconncom.disqus.com/blogosphere_donates_over_3000_to_a_blogger_in_need/#comment-18591345</link><description>Hi Garry,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There isn't any controversy at Blogger Unleashed, except maybe in the mind of Mike. Vic is brutal, untamed, and tells the truth to those that don't want to hear it. His words are laced with colorful metaphors, and that makes him unique. He doesn't care what people think of him as long as they listen to the message. I've been reading his blog since he started it, and sometimes it's difficult to read, but the advice he gives out is solid as a rock.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You've seen some of my blog reviews. Short, and to the point. Vic's blog, however, would take me days.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:42:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogosphere Donates Over $3000 To A Blogger In Need</title><link>http://garryconncom.disqus.com/blogosphere_donates_over_3000_to_a_blogger_in_need/#comment-18591346</link><description>This story has been dugg (by me). Prepare for the wrath of the diggers.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:41:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogosphere Donates Over $3000 To A Blogger In Need</title><link>http://garryconncom.disqus.com/blogosphere_donates_over_3000_to_a_blogger_in_need/#comment-18591350</link><description>Oops, a minor correction. January 22 instead of February 22. My brain is fried.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:54:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Do You Love and Love To Hate Google?</title><link>http://garryconncom.disqus.com/why_do_you_love_and_love_to_hate_google/#comment-18591402</link><description>Garry: "I am confused, can someone throw me a bone and explain?" How about NO, Garry! (LMAO)  I was one of the ones who bitched (but not very loudly) because I knew it would draw traffic. How's that for a reason?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Collin: Shoemoney is a self-admitted liar. He throws those numbers out to confuse you. Those numbers may be true for a socially popular blog like his, but you have to look at the total volume of traffic he's using as the base figure. I can tell you right now, my main blog, which isn't monetized well at all, still gets 80% of the traffic from Google.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:04:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Do You Love and Love To Hate Google?</title><link>http://garryconncom.disqus.com/why_do_you_love_and_love_to_hate_google/#comment-18591404</link><description>â€œI am confused, can someone throw me a bone and explain?â€ How about NO, Garry! (LMAO) I was one of the ones who bitched (but not very loudly) because I knew it would draw traffic. Howâ€™s that for a reason?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The first part was a reference to Dr. Evil, "throw me a bone". The second part was that I never got upset. I was curious and read the guidelines (that have long since been changed) AFTER I was penalized. Then I wrote scathing stuff because I knew people would come by and read it. They did. Yeah, I got dropped to a PR of 0, but I've since been reconsidered and put back up to a 4.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Part of the reason some people dropped by a point is because a lot of the links pointing to them dropped in value, and they didn't consider that part of the equation. I think it's the only reason a lot of my healthy pages are still sitting at 4 instead of being higher.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:08:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does Changing Your Domain Name IP Address Effect SEO?</title><link>http://garryconncom.disqus.com/does_changing_your_domain_name_ip_address_effect_seo/#comment-18593082</link><description>Other than maintaining the web site at two locations pending the completion of DNS propagation, there is a factor to consider, which I'll get to in a moment. During the move, you have to keep the old location active but I would suggest turning off comments with a note in the comments section next to the form. Propagation can take up to a week, regardless of what you've been told. Propagation is fast in most places, but can take much longer in "third-world locations". 4-5 days is not unusual here in the Philippines.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Before you accept an IP address, check the many blocking lists. If your IP address, or range of IP addresses, is on any one of them it can definitely affect SEO and in the worst possible way, especially from the tech-savvy people. I found out, the hard way, that many of the IP address ranges here in the Philippines are on blocking lists. During a brief period where I used a web host here, my traffic dwindled to a trickle. Some of the other readers might laugh because you're dealing with the U.S., but there are a LOT of blocked IP addresses in the U.S.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 09:56:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Speed Up Your WordPress Blog</title><link>http://garryconncom.disqus.com/how_to_speed_up_your_wordpress_blog/#comment-18593671</link><description>I took the time to go back and read your other post, the one with the pissing match. :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I learned your lesson the hard way when I was changing hosts. Too many "ooh aah" plugins don't help anything at all in the long run. The majority of my widgets contain static links -- no database queries. It makes loading, even with out the super cache running, much faster than before. I have the super cache on standby when traffic goes crazy, but I don't use it otherwise.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I recently created 4 niche blogs and only 2 plugins each affect the front ends. They're lightning fast and without any caching.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 07:52:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are Backlinks Over-Rated?</title><link>http://garryconncom.disqus.com/are_backlinks_over_rated/#comment-18594660</link><description>Excellent points, Garry. Prior to the beginning of this year, I didn't focus on anything at all really, other than general backlinks to my main blog. After spending quite a bit of time experimenting with different techniques since then, I'm convinced that there are two ways to go and you pointed them out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The biggest boost to my traffic started on July 14th when I started targeting the long tail keywords. I still go after the holy grail and main keyword, but it's a long building process because the competition is extremely tough. My traffic doubled and will continue to grow as I mine the long tail.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm also convinced that more than a few quality backlinks to a specific page are a complete waste of time. I would gestimate between 5 and 10 will do the trick, I generally go with 5 targeted backlinks and let evolution as well as the good feed scrapers take care of the rest.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The goal is really to rank on the first page of every search engine for multiple long tail keywords. I think it pays off better in the long run.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;abbr&amp;gt;&lt;em&gt;Check out RT Cunningham | Philippines's last blog post..&lt;a href="http://www.untwistedvortex.com/2008/08/02/one-bad-scraper-foiled-success-with-google/" rel="nofollow"&gt;One Bad Scraper Foiled - Success with Google&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&amp;lt;/abbr&amp;gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RT Cunningham</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 11:13:46 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>