I don't think that Tim Wu and you write about the same story. You focus here on governmental content regulation (why else the McCain exemple?) - which means a public censorship problem.
Tim Wu on the other hand doesn't support censorship at all (not a single word about this in his article), but is concerned about the dangers for free speech by high media concentration and the power of ISP to filter content for business purposes.
Thus, a fancy-sounding article about a non-subject.
I don't think that Tim Wu and you write about the same story. You focus here on governmental content regulation (why else the McCain exemple?) - which means a public censorship problem.
Tim Wu on the other hand doesn't support censorship at all (not a single word about this in his article), but is concerned about the dangers for free speech by high media concentration and the power of ISP to filter content for business purposes.
Thus, a fancy-sounding article about a non-subject.