<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Knowledge Worker</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/7fc62093daf243389f1316501cdead04/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:05:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: How can a ISP not be up to date on security ?</title><link>http://var-log-mind.disqus.com/how_can_a_isp_not_be_up_to_date_on_security/#comment-3260518</link><description>Hi&lt;br&gt;Interesting post!&lt;br&gt;I checked my router and the following Security options are available:&lt;br&gt;None, WEP, 802.1X, WPA-PSK, WPA&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am not a Security expert, however I understand that all of them would have vunerablities in them. &lt;br&gt;Whichever security protocol you might want to implement, it is just a matter of time before an exploit is found. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In India we have a saying "Locks are to stop a honest man from being a thief. A lock would not stop a thief. Thief would be able to crack the lock anyway"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I figure that ISP's would not be able to do much about the security aspect of wireless access points.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Knowledge Worker</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:02:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should Wifi routers be required to mandate strong authentication</title><link>http://var-log-mind.disqus.com/should_wifi_routers_be_required_to_mandate_strong_authentication/#comment-3260577</link><description>"Some security" or "No Security at all"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would root with "Some Security"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Knowledge Worker</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:05:27 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>