<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Mike Gorski</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/7ec96aadd672b8056173e4e8a5225d8b/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 12:30:31 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: A Question For You&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://bedeviant.disqus.com/a_question_for_you8230/#comment-3782161</link><description>Easy - "----ing A Bubba!"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Swearing still offers a powerful way to express oneself, when used sparingly.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike Gorski</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:53:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I Will Eventually Unfollow You.</title><link>http://bedeviant.disqus.com/why_i_will_eventually_unfollow_you/#comment-17773408</link><description>I generally follow those who follow me. But I also cull who I&amp;#039;m following regularly. So my ratio of following to followers peaks near 1:1 and then drops to 1:2 after a cull. I look through the list of people I&amp;#039;m following and check certain people&amp;#039;s tweet streams - if it seems uninteresting I unfollow them. &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;I find your objection to swearing funny. Mainly because I swear all the time. And having spent part of my career as a writer I know the thesaurus won&amp;#039;t help on that front. &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;I&amp;#039;m open to all viewpoints regardless of the person&amp;#039;s poor use of language. There are plenty of worse twitterers out there that don&amp;#039;t contain any swearing. Of course, if all you&amp;#039;re getting is potty language out of someone you are following - drop them. But I&amp;#039;d also drop a person who only tweets passages from The Bible all the time. &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Twitter is all about the whole being greater than the sum of its parts (tweets). I couldn&amp;#039;t judge anyone on a single tweet (or even 10 tweets). &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Thanks for making me think about this.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike Gorski</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 16:27:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.bedeviant.com/2009/05/04/in-the-ghetto/</title><link>http://bedeviant.disqus.com/thread_36/#comment-17773754</link><description>You&amp;#039;ve got some typos in your paragraph that starts &amp;quot;I cam across...&amp;quot;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike Gorski</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 10:25:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why a Four-Day Work Week Will Be the Norm</title><link>http://bedeviant.disqus.com/why_a_four_day_work_week_will_be_the_norm/#comment-17774786</link><description>My dentist already does 4-day weeks. And I love it. Because the range of appointment hours available on the working days is larger. I can get a 7am appointment with him. No need to wait for &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; office hours.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike Gorski</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 12:30:31 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>