<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Nils</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/7e2d7106115d6c73addbf258bc23c880/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 19:39:43 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Kicking Ass</title><link>http://windley.disqus.com/kicking_ass/#comment-205158</link><description>Thanks for the summary of Kathy's talk. It's great to have her back!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nils</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:38:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Concordia LEED Platinum Portland Home</title><link>http://jetsongreen.disqus.com/concordia_leed_platinum_portland_home/#comment-9075564</link><description>I think it needs to be staged, too. The empty kitchen just looks kind of sad.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nils</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 19:39:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DEMOfall 08: Plastic Logic creates a flexible and thin display</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/demofall_08_plastic_logic_creates_a_flexible_and_thin_display/#comment-2262492</link><description>I've been waiting for one of these since I first read about E-Ink the company back in the late 80's. I'm disappointed it's taking so long to get to market, but I've always thought electronic paper could make a significant change in how we interact with the world. This could definitely be combined with Swype for a killer laptop replacement, as well.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nils</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:47:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Accept_360.version++; clean_up_interface();</title><link>http://onticoren.disqus.com/accept_360version_clean_up_interface/#comment-2925986</link><description>Oren - thanks for the shout out! And yes, we're working on the last issue you brought up - integration with dev tools.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nils</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nils</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 21:15:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ontic Oren &amp;raquo; Living the ultimate online agile workflow</title><link>http://onticoren.disqus.com/ontic_oren_raquo_living_the_ultimate_online_agile_workflow/#comment-2925991</link><description>Oren - Great post! Your listing of the tools you're using, how you're using them, and why you're getting such benefit is really valuable! We're looking at Confluence ourselves, as well as Jira, and now I want Balsamiq!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nils</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nils</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 12:32:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If you love it, you don&amp;#039;t know much about typography</title><link>http://sierrag.disqus.com/if_you_love_it_you_don039t_know_much_about_typography/#comment-9069631</link><description>There was one great shot in the video of a coffee cup (I think - it was short) that had *both* Comic Sans and Algerian, which is another highly overused typeface. I personally kind of like Comic Sans, although I certainly don't think it should be used everywhere. I use it as my IM client typeface, for example, but wouldn't write a document with it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nils</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 16:46:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How tweet it is&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://newmedialisa.disqus.com/how_tweet_it_is8230/#comment-3665686</link><description>so far, mostly on Twitter as a listener. Don't have many RL friends here, so my tweets are pretty much general interest when I do them</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nils</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:57:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How tweet it is&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://newmedialisa.disqus.com/how_tweet_it_is8230/#comment-3665702</link><description>Also, I don't tweet about work-related things at all - haven't figured out how to balance "inside the kimono" activities with what my public should hear about.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nils</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:58:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tim Ferriss interview</title><link>http://sivers.disqus.com/tim_ferriss_interview/#comment-3741647</link><description>Incredibly inspiring interview. I'll be going out (to the local bookstore) to get the book today. Right now I'm starting a transition from a traditional job to (at least one) business of my own, as well as helping my wife with her home-based consulting business. So this is coming at a great time for me - where I need to fix my traditional job, as long as I still have it, and make sure my new venture produces value but leaves me with more of my life.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nils</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 10:51:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: everything in the sky - Incredible SprintCam v3 showreel, filmed at...</title><link>http://everythinginthesky.disqus.com/everything_in_the_sky_incredible_sprintcam_v3_showreel_filmed_at/#comment-8594865</link><description>Any idea was the music is? I love the accordian!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nils</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:19:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Awaiting the results of our LEED Certification.</title><link>http://complexions-spa-and-salon.disqus.com/awaiting_the_results_of_our_leed_certification/#comment-16205418</link><description>Congratulations on getting this far, and good luck with the energy savings sections. That's the most important thing, imho (as you can see if you take a look at my blog).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nils</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:32:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to build an energy efficient small business: Part 1</title><link>http://complexions-spa-and-salon.disqus.com/how_to_build_an_energy_efficient_small_business_part_1/#comment-16205237</link><description>I'm just seeing your blog for the first time (Zemanta hooked us up!) and I thought this was a particularly good entry. You guys are really putting the effort in to be sustainable - it's very impressive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also really liked your post about using Coach Wooden's pyramid for your team, even though it's not a sport team at all!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nils</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:38:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Energy Storage for the Backyard</title><link>http://energycircle.disqus.com/energy_storage_for_the_backyard/#comment-16996930</link><description>Peter - great post! Thanks for keeping an eye on this. Solving this distributed storage of renewable energy problem will be THE major way we can address climate change, imho. (That is, along with efficiency.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nils</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:26:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Energy Storage for the Backyard</title><link>http://energycircletest.disqus.com/energy_storage_for_the_backyard/#comment-17165597</link><description>Peter - great post! Thanks for keeping an eye on this. Solving this distributed storage of renewable energy problem will be THE major way we can address climate change, imho. (That is, along with efficiency.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nils</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:26:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Solar Power Wins Enthusiasts but Not Money</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/solar_power_wins_enthusiasts_but_not_money/#comment-17513672</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A few comments:&lt;br  /&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. The article claims in the text that solar supplied 0.01% of the electricity used in the US last year. However, the infographic puts the percentage at 0.1% - ten times as much. &lt;br  /&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. It's very likely that solar energy technology and research and development is hitting an inflection point right now. Many labs are announcing breakthroughs on a weekly basis (e.g., according to the MIT's Technology Review Emerging Technologies newsletter, for example). &lt;br  /&gt;&lt;br&gt;3. If so, solar energy could be in a mode right now of doubling its contribution every year or so. That's pretty significant - starting from 0.1% in year 0 (this year) and doubling every year leads to a contribution of - well not much in the next two or three years - but about 25% in eight years. The power of exponential growth is pretty amazing, as we've all experienced with our computers, cell phones, music players, etc.&lt;br  /&gt;&lt;br&gt;4. Even if solar power's contribution doubles only every two years, in ten years it will still have made a significant impact - five doublings is 3.2% - not huge but no longer trivial.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;For more on exponential growth like this, I recommend listening to one of Ray Kurzweil's talks about "the singularity" - they can be found in various places on the web.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of course, this is a bit simplistic, as the demand for energy is likely to grow as well, so solar's contribution may not grow quite as fast. On the other hand, solar has a lot of venture and business backers right now (Nanosolar, Kyocera, Google, Cypress Semiconductor) so R&amp;D breakthroughs could come a lot *faster* than a doubling rate - that sometimes happens when new technologies suddenly get traction - hit the tipping point - for whatever reason.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nils&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nils</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 00:03:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Passiv Haus in Urbana, Illinois</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/a_passiv_haus_in_urbana_illinois/#comment-17538200</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A recent article about Katrin's house on Fine Homebuilding's Green Building Advisor site addresses some of the questions above, in particular about the shading of the south-facing windows. Katrin found they did need some shading in the summer, and found a grape arbor to be effective.  (&lt;a href="http://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/homes/first-us-passive-house-shows-energy-efficiency-can-be-affordable" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/homes/first...&lt;/a&gt;) &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's definitely an interesting read.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nils</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 02:49:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Archdruid Nails It: Energy Conservation, Not Efficiency, Is Key</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/the_archdruid_nails_it_energy_conservation_not_efficiency_is_key/#comment-17579773</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Re: Jevon's Paradox. Amory Lovins of Rocky Mountain Institute says that if you carefully run the numbers, in most practical situations, Jevon's Paradox doesn't apply. For example, people don't drive more just because they have a hybrid car that gets a lot more mileage - we have real lives that require a certain amount of driving, so if we have a hybrid, we actually end up using less gas.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;[you, the individual, may end up using less gas; we, the society, end up using more gas, because everyone buys a hybrid.  Lovins is committed to maintaining a certain level of 'Happy Motoring' to maintain 'real lives'; this is fine, it just doesn't do anything for curtailing gas consumption mjo]&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nils</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:00:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nanotech Breakthrough Could Offer More Efficient Energy Storage</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/nanotech_breakthrough_could_offer_more_efficient_energy_storage/#comment-17582771</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, re: making graphene, Technology Review had an article in April on making larger sheets of graphene using essentially a paper-making process. So there is some hope of a scalable method. My personal hope is that someone creates a &lt;a href="http://barrier-busting.com/2008/09/graphene-nano-assembly-prediction/" rel="nofollow"&gt;nano-assembler to make graphene sheets&lt;/a&gt;. There's currently a lot of research on self-assembly and nano-assembly of carbon nanotubes, which are a lot like graphene, only rolled up.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also: Agree with Flubber that it's great to see carbon in a good light. I think it's such a waste to put CO2 into the ground to sequester it - much better to sequester carbon into useful things like carbon fiber, buckytubes, and graphene (and wood). It does take some energy to get the carbon out of CO2, but there's really quite a lot it could be used for.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nils</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:32:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Survey: The Volt- Would You Buy One?</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/survey_the_volt_would_you_buy_one/#comment-17582873</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My big problem is that it's GM - as I was just telling my brother-in-law on Sunday, I would never buy a GM car, just based on quality and the driving experience. But, I'm happy to give the Volt a chance - maybe GM can change its spots with this vehicle. I don't think the price tag is too high (would be fine with it lower, of course), as it will be a status symbol at least here in California for the first year or two.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nils</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:21:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 30-Fold Increase in Solar Power Possible by 2016, If Solar Industry and Utilities Collaborate to Make it Happen</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/30_fold_increase_in_solar_power_possible_by_2016_if_solar_industry_and_utilities_collaborate_to_make/#comment-17587248</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The “30-fold” number is interesting. If solar power doubles about every 18 months, then in eight years it will be about 32 times bigger. Where have I heard that “doubling every 18 months” idea before? Oh yeah, it’s Moore’s Law! It’s about time that a legit organization (as opposed to, say, my blog Barrier Busting) comes out with a prediction of a Moore’s Law-type growth rate for solar. And it means that in 15 years, if the doubling rate stays constant, solar will be about 120 times where it is now - and will be providing a very significant amount of our energy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nils</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:30:34 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>