Do they belong to you? Claim these comments.
karl
Is this you? Claim Profile »
7 months ago
in CNN’s Anderson Cooper and Soledad O’Brien Slant Black Superdelegate Coverage on Jack and Jill Politics
Mumia abu-jamals Due Process , CIVIL RIGHTS REMEDY
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
PENNSYLVANIA,S STATE SANCTION CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN CRIMINAL PROSECUTION
The State of Penn. and its agents have been and or are violating the civil rigths of indigent defendants sense Oct,121972 the U.S.Supreme Courts final judgment which outlined what due process minimally requires when taken ones freedom. Please be advised,the U.S.Supreme Court mandated counsel at first appearence hearings as well as preliminary hearings which Pa. doesnt provide inaddtion,the court ordered immediate release for non compliance and or if the hearing is not held in 3 days according toPa statute which interpreted correctly insist Pa.has the means to comply in less time than what the court mandated see pugh vs. rainwater 336 f. supp. 490 id at I.11. 19 and 20.Please be advised continue presecution after 3 days is an illegal act.Why you ask? see Ex parte young 209 us 123 id at page 8 the attemp of a state officer to enforce an unconst. statute is an proceding without authority an is an illegal act the officer is stripped of his offical charcter as a D.A. ect.The state of Pa.has not the authority to defy the U.S.Supreme Court to do so is the illegal act,inaddition to having state statutes, case lay and rule of ciminal procedures which as the court put it will apply to the extent that no court find its self inconsistent with its final judgment/opinion Oct 12 1972.Addittionally an 24hr. plus 7 day deprivation of librerty is unconst. see pugh vs. rainwater 335 f. supp. 1286 id at page 7.They tryed to argue this was a Fla. case ,wrong its an US.Supreme Court case it govern the hole country inaddtion to the equal protection law which if due process allows john doe to be free so shall i be set free see (Brief of Amicus Curiae National Legal Aid and Defender Association 1974 wl 186449 (u.s.) In closing 'put your own work in"dont trust a lawyer take my advise!your freedom depends on this.
Posted by karl at 1:02 PM 0 comments Links to this post
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom) Followers (1)
Follow this blog
Stop following
1 Follower View All Manage
Blog Archive
▼ 2008 (1)
▼ October (1)
PENNSYLVANIA,S STATE SANCTION CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATI...
About Me
karl
View my complete profile
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
PENNSYLVANIA,S STATE SANCTION CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN CRIMINAL PROSECUTION
The State of Penn. and its agents have been and or are violating the civil rigths of indigent defendants sense Oct,121972 the U.S.Supreme Courts final judgment which outlined what due process minimally requires when taken ones freedom. Please be advised,the U.S.Supreme Court mandated counsel at first appearence hearings as well as preliminary hearings which Pa. doesnt provide inaddtion,the court ordered immediate release for non compliance and or if the hearing is not held in 3 days according toPa statute which interpreted correctly insist Pa.has the means to comply in less time than what the court mandated see pugh vs. rainwater 336 f. supp. 490 id at I.11. 19 and 20.Please be advised continue presecution after 3 days is an illegal act.Why you ask? see Ex parte young 209 us 123 id at page 8 the attemp of a state officer to enforce an unconst. statute is an proceding without authority an is an illegal act the officer is stripped of his offical charcter as a D.A. ect.The state of Pa.has not the authority to defy the U.S.Supreme Court to do so is the illegal act,inaddition to having state statutes, case lay and rule of ciminal procedures which as the court put it will apply to the extent that no court find its self inconsistent with its final judgment/opinion Oct 12 1972.Addittionally an 24hr. plus 7 day deprivation of librerty is unconst. see pugh vs. rainwater 335 f. supp. 1286 id at page 7.They tryed to argue this was a Fla. case ,wrong its an US.Supreme Court case it govern the hole country inaddtion to the equal protection law which if due process allows john doe to be free so shall i be set free see (Brief of Amicus Curiae National Legal Aid and Defender Association 1974 wl 186449 (u.s.) In closing 'put your own work in"dont trust a lawyer take my advise!your freedom depends on this.
Posted by karl at 1:02 PM 0 comments Links to this post
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom) Followers (1)
Follow this blog
Stop following
1 Follower View All Manage
Blog Archive
▼ 2008 (1)
▼ October (1)
PENNSYLVANIA,S STATE SANCTION CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATI...
About Me
karl
View my complete profile