Do they belong to you? Claim these comments.
Unregistered
aliases
- Jenny Stockdale
- Jenny
- Jenny Stockdale
- Jenny Stockdale
Jenny Stockdale
Is this you? Claim Profile »
6 days ago
in MOBILE HOMELESS GRADUATE on The District Weekly
Thanks Well Rested.
I'll work on being the bane of my own existence, if you promise to work on your pretentious assumptions.
I'll work on being the bane of my own existence, if you promise to work on your pretentious assumptions.
1 week ago
in MOBILE HOMELESS GRADUATE on The District Weekly
I appreciate the comments, folks.
I actually bounced this story off a bunch of people before I ran it because I anticipated these responses: Tell that lazy bastard to get a job, suck it up, be a man, you can't always get what you want (though, join the army was not one I came up with--kudos dds).
But, I thought it went deeper than that. Knowing Derrick to be a witty, charming, completely capable guy, it was hard for me to understand how he got to where he is. But then he told me what I told you, and it wasn't so hard to fathom anymore.
A lot of people I asked told me that they didn't have any sympathy or empathy for this guy, because if they could navigate the hurtles and tar pits unscathed, why shouldn't he be able to. I think that's pretty fair of them to say, too--just as I completely understand your comments.
I thought this story was particularly relevant for probably selfish, close-to-home reasons, some of which I'll share with you in hopes that you'll understand the point in my point-of-view journalism you seem to not like so much.
I'm a CSULB journalism grad too (except I wrote a lot in college, busted my ass at the school newspaper and know I want to be a writer). But, even as a writing professional, I make absolute beans from these stories (as do most writers, not to mention that journalists are being laid off at an alarming rate, along with everyone else). I also work in a shitty seafood restaurant serving thankless tourists for unreliable income (which is steadily declining with the plummeting economy, also, though it pays more than writing for beans).
In short, it's discouraging. How do you work your way up through your career, when your field is evaporating, you're distracted by second and third jobs and you can't even afford a place to live, to sustain you throughout your climb? How do you concentrate on anything higher than survival, when you basic needs are in jeopardy?
You say, "Get a job!" as if it were an easy thing to do right now.
But it's obviously not.
Side note:Derrick had PR Internships--not jobs, that's just his quotation--making $8.00 an hour taking coffee orders for the business class, so he was essentially still a server, making less money. (I would probably hate that too, and understand why he may have been disenchanted by it).
When I heard Derrick's story, it scared the shit out of me--because it could easily be me in his situation. Unless you're sitting pretty in retirement or grandiose affluence, it could be you, too.
I don't know what phase of life you are all in, but as a 25-year-old female who should be on her way to a successful career, I'm extremely frustrated at my circumstances--being held back by health insurance bills, rental inflation, a near 10 percent state sales tax, school loan repayment, a hostile job market and a magazine that can't afford to pay me what I should be making. Does any of this sound familiar to you?
Couple all that with the insistent voice that has pushed me (and maybe some of you?) to believe that I really can do anything, be anything...it's enough to trigger a nervous breakdown or a complete loss of hope. Which is what I think may have happened in Derrick's case, if you'll allow me that psychoanalysis.
I don't expect you to feel sorry for Derrick.
I don't expect anything from you.
Expectations only lead to disappointment, right?
Thanks for reading.
show all 4 replies
I actually bounced this story off a bunch of people before I ran it because I anticipated these responses: Tell that lazy bastard to get a job, suck it up, be a man, you can't always get what you want (though, join the army was not one I came up with--kudos dds).
But, I thought it went deeper than that. Knowing Derrick to be a witty, charming, completely capable guy, it was hard for me to understand how he got to where he is. But then he told me what I told you, and it wasn't so hard to fathom anymore.
A lot of people I asked told me that they didn't have any sympathy or empathy for this guy, because if they could navigate the hurtles and tar pits unscathed, why shouldn't he be able to. I think that's pretty fair of them to say, too--just as I completely understand your comments.
I thought this story was particularly relevant for probably selfish, close-to-home reasons, some of which I'll share with you in hopes that you'll understand the point in my point-of-view journalism you seem to not like so much.
I'm a CSULB journalism grad too (except I wrote a lot in college, busted my ass at the school newspaper and know I want to be a writer). But, even as a writing professional, I make absolute beans from these stories (as do most writers, not to mention that journalists are being laid off at an alarming rate, along with everyone else). I also work in a shitty seafood restaurant serving thankless tourists for unreliable income (which is steadily declining with the plummeting economy, also, though it pays more than writing for beans).
In short, it's discouraging. How do you work your way up through your career, when your field is evaporating, you're distracted by second and third jobs and you can't even afford a place to live, to sustain you throughout your climb? How do you concentrate on anything higher than survival, when you basic needs are in jeopardy?
You say, "Get a job!" as if it were an easy thing to do right now.
But it's obviously not.
Side note:Derrick had PR Internships--not jobs, that's just his quotation--making $8.00 an hour taking coffee orders for the business class, so he was essentially still a server, making less money. (I would probably hate that too, and understand why he may have been disenchanted by it).
When I heard Derrick's story, it scared the shit out of me--because it could easily be me in his situation. Unless you're sitting pretty in retirement or grandiose affluence, it could be you, too.
I don't know what phase of life you are all in, but as a 25-year-old female who should be on her way to a successful career, I'm extremely frustrated at my circumstances--being held back by health insurance bills, rental inflation, a near 10 percent state sales tax, school loan repayment, a hostile job market and a magazine that can't afford to pay me what I should be making. Does any of this sound familiar to you?
Couple all that with the insistent voice that has pushed me (and maybe some of you?) to believe that I really can do anything, be anything...it's enough to trigger a nervous breakdown or a complete loss of hope. Which is what I think may have happened in Derrick's case, if you'll allow me that psychoanalysis.
I don't expect you to feel sorry for Derrick.
I don't expect anything from you.
Expectations only lead to disappointment, right?
Thanks for reading.
4 replies
The Toad
Jenny--Thank you for sharing your personal insights with us. My wife and I are better than 40 years older than you are and we are scared shitless also. We are retired, trying to live on a fixed income and we face most of the same challenges you do: increasing costs for supplemental health care insurance, food costs that seem to increase at about 10% per month, the sales tax you mention, increasing (again) cost of energy, huge increases in water rates, PLUS the knowledge that hyper-inflation is inevitable given the actions already taken by the new administration. You are not alone. I don't want to give you false hope, but when we were your age, things always seemed to work out.
Well Rested
the reason you work in a shitty restaurant is: YOU.
you get paid nothing in an industry where you know that most people don't get paid well... another reason: YOU.
sure it's discouraging, frustrating, frightening, etc.
did you ever think to look outside of california. the economy might be in the shitter but there are hundreds of thousands of greener pastures. it's a bold move, but if you can't afford property here or find work, you will just have to suck it up. NOT EVERYONE CAN AFFORD TO LIVE HERE, as it should be.
too bad schools teach people to look for jobs instead of creating their own.
you get paid nothing in an industry where you know that most people don't get paid well... another reason: YOU.
sure it's discouraging, frustrating, frightening, etc.
did you ever think to look outside of california. the economy might be in the shitter but there are hundreds of thousands of greener pastures. it's a bold move, but if you can't afford property here or find work, you will just have to suck it up. NOT EVERYONE CAN AFFORD TO LIVE HERE, as it should be.
too bad schools teach people to look for jobs instead of creating their own.
JUU
I don't feel sorry for many people (including Derrick).
I do feel for the journalism industry. Come on...we all read, many of us even enjoy it. But people don't get paid to write anymore. Look at the newspapers. We all want the material for free (online), but expect professionals to scribe it.
My friendly advice for the poor lost kid...pick something, anything and DO it. You're quoted as saying you basically scammed your way through college (or am I missing how a journalism major can graduate with little to no writing experience?). It's not the piece of paper that scores jobs. The skills you pick up along the way are supposed to render you capable for jobs. But if you didn't pick up skills...
I think we're all enamored with the "dream career". If you have it, props to you. Journalism, as the writer points out, is a passion for some. If it weren't, they wouldn't do it for the pitiful wage. But not having a passion is no excuse to stagnate. PICK A JOB!!! It may translate to a decrease in pay. But pick a field you want to move up in and just do it.
Unemployment is around 10% in California. Look at it the other way, 90% of those actively seeking employment ARE EMPLOYED.
Good luck, pick up extra shifts at those server jobs, and don't waste your time being down on life.
I do feel for the journalism industry. Come on...we all read, many of us even enjoy it. But people don't get paid to write anymore. Look at the newspapers. We all want the material for free (online), but expect professionals to scribe it.
My friendly advice for the poor lost kid...pick something, anything and DO it. You're quoted as saying you basically scammed your way through college (or am I missing how a journalism major can graduate with little to no writing experience?). It's not the piece of paper that scores jobs. The skills you pick up along the way are supposed to render you capable for jobs. But if you didn't pick up skills...
I think we're all enamored with the "dream career". If you have it, props to you. Journalism, as the writer points out, is a passion for some. If it weren't, they wouldn't do it for the pitiful wage. But not having a passion is no excuse to stagnate. PICK A JOB!!! It may translate to a decrease in pay. But pick a field you want to move up in and just do it.
Unemployment is around 10% in California. Look at it the other way, 90% of those actively seeking employment ARE EMPLOYED.
Good luck, pick up extra shifts at those server jobs, and don't waste your time being down on life.
1 month ago
in FLAT TIRED on The District Weekly
I"m collecting feedback on biking in Long Beach from cyclists and non-cyclists alike to post on the website.
Tell us your stories! Good, bad, ugly, whatever!
Send to: Jenny@thedistrictweekly.com
Tell us your stories! Good, bad, ugly, whatever!
Send to: Jenny@thedistrictweekly.com
1 month ago
in A FIXED YEAR on The District Weekly
I"m collecting feedback on biking in Long Beach from cyclists and non-cyclists alike to post on the website.
Tell us your stories! Good, bad, ugly, whatever!
Send to: Jenny@thedistrictweekly.com
Tell us your stories! Good, bad, ugly, whatever!
Send to: Jenny@thedistrictweekly.com
2 months ago
in FOCAL POINT on The District Weekly
Mr. Goodhue,
Thank you for your addition to the story. There were many players involved in this advocacy group's progress that I did not have room enough to include and describe. But, let it be known that everyone involved (who didn't just show up for a ribbon-cutting ceremony here and there) is doing a commendable job fighting to save this particular open space, in the face of so much adversity, corruption, indifference and the like.
Thank you for your addition to the story. There were many players involved in this advocacy group's progress that I did not have room enough to include and describe. But, let it be known that everyone involved (who didn't just show up for a ribbon-cutting ceremony here and there) is doing a commendable job fighting to save this particular open space, in the face of so much adversity, corruption, indifference and the like.
8 months ago
in WHAT PAIN LOOKS LIKE on The District Weekly
Rachel, this story had me from 'hello.' Thank you for writing this! It is its own work of art.
11 months ago
in TAKE ONE! IT’S FREE! | The District Weekly on The District Weekly
howardx, would you kindly be a bit more specific? Are you asking if a reconfigured breakwater would enable increased illegal immigration? I really can't link the two issues otherwise. Am I close?
11 months ago
in NO FEDERAL MONEY FOR BREAKWATER THIS YEAR | The District Weekly on The District Weekly
FYI, the city of Long Beach Marine Advisory Commission published a 28+ page document about this subject in 1998.
It was titled "Observations and Comments on Current City Beach Use" and proposed to create a "Mothers' Beach West" on the shore in front of the Villa Riviera. Wouldn't that have been interesting? Or not?
For years, this city has touted its "safe & non-threatening beach" to beach-goers with small children, omitting the section that is most vital: "unless your kids want to get in the water."
I have no idea who was on the this commission and/or who drafted this report, but the recommendations of this group are bizarre.
In the report, that section referenced in post #6 is called "The Empty Quarter"-- west of the Belmont Pier until the Villa Riviera.
Here is the full text of the report's executive summary:
"Of the 5 1/2 miles of beach front in Long Beach, it is noted that 4 miles of the ocean beach is [are] under utilized. Contrary to this observation is the Mother's Beach development in Alamitos Bay, which has proven to be very popular. The apparent reasons for this popularity include tranquil water for small children, ease of access and nearby parking, along with shaded grassy areas for picnicking which prove attractive to a wide range of ages. Another area experiencing popular use is in the downtown area where the water is tranquil in the protection of the near shore oil island. At this location, the width of beach sand from the waters edge to the back of the sand area is more than 400 feet, however, the utilized portion of the sand area is less than 100 feet. In comparing this pattern of the width of active beach usage, it is apparent that much of our beach, measuring up to 800 feed width, is unused. Several potential ideas to increase beach use are provided in concept. It is suggested that the City consider initiating efforts to pursue these or other ideas to enhance the utilization of these beach areas."
As far as I know, nothing has come of this report.
However, I think this commission is missing the point: People in Long Beach use mother's beach, not because of its tranquility and grass, but because they have no other choice but to swim in the mouth and at the ass of the most polluted river in America. Talk about oversight!
I completely agree with you that the city has failed to 'work with what they got.'
My theory is that city representatives foresee a slew of issues that would demand money and attention immediately after someone prettied-up the beach--parking, refuse, security, etc.... No one wants to touch the subject.
But if it's any consolation, I hear they're adding a separate pedestrian walking lane next to the bike path. Apparently, too many small children are crossing that 8-inch line that divides strolling humans and whizzing-by bikes. Couldn't have seen that one coming...
It was titled "Observations and Comments on Current City Beach Use" and proposed to create a "Mothers' Beach West" on the shore in front of the Villa Riviera. Wouldn't that have been interesting? Or not?
For years, this city has touted its "safe & non-threatening beach" to beach-goers with small children, omitting the section that is most vital: "unless your kids want to get in the water."
I have no idea who was on the this commission and/or who drafted this report, but the recommendations of this group are bizarre.
In the report, that section referenced in post #6 is called "The Empty Quarter"-- west of the Belmont Pier until the Villa Riviera.
Here is the full text of the report's executive summary:
"Of the 5 1/2 miles of beach front in Long Beach, it is noted that 4 miles of the ocean beach is [are] under utilized. Contrary to this observation is the Mother's Beach development in Alamitos Bay, which has proven to be very popular. The apparent reasons for this popularity include tranquil water for small children, ease of access and nearby parking, along with shaded grassy areas for picnicking which prove attractive to a wide range of ages. Another area experiencing popular use is in the downtown area where the water is tranquil in the protection of the near shore oil island. At this location, the width of beach sand from the waters edge to the back of the sand area is more than 400 feet, however, the utilized portion of the sand area is less than 100 feet. In comparing this pattern of the width of active beach usage, it is apparent that much of our beach, measuring up to 800 feed width, is unused. Several potential ideas to increase beach use are provided in concept. It is suggested that the City consider initiating efforts to pursue these or other ideas to enhance the utilization of these beach areas."
As far as I know, nothing has come of this report.
However, I think this commission is missing the point: People in Long Beach use mother's beach, not because of its tranquility and grass, but because they have no other choice but to swim in the mouth and at the ass of the most polluted river in America. Talk about oversight!
I completely agree with you that the city has failed to 'work with what they got.'
My theory is that city representatives foresee a slew of issues that would demand money and attention immediately after someone prettied-up the beach--parking, refuse, security, etc.... No one wants to touch the subject.
But if it's any consolation, I hear they're adding a separate pedestrian walking lane next to the bike path. Apparently, too many small children are crossing that 8-inch line that divides strolling humans and whizzing-by bikes. Couldn't have seen that one coming...
12 months ago
in RUSHIN’ TOWARD US | The District Weekly on The District Weekly
Thank you for reading this.
Lilia, you right about facts, and yes the people I met at Morningland were good people.
Honestly, though, Al Stone's commentary was included in this article for the sake of responsible journalism. Morningland is not without its controversy and to ignore that in the article would have been irresponsible.
If I left out Stone's input, I may have had the respect of the monastery, but I would have lost the respect of the crowd critical of Morningland. You might already know that print publications can't afford to lose their already-ADD readers, especially in the name of fairness.
And yes, Russ Roca is the best photographer I know. And, he bikes everywhere to photograph! Both the cover and inside photos for this story were taken at Morningland--the latter of which was taken in the courtyard with the brutal 2-o'clock sun beating down. Great shots. Totally ethereal, fitting and true to life.
Check Russ out online:
http://www.russroca.com/
http://www.russroca.com/about.html
http://lbcyclists.blogspot.com/
Lilia, you right about facts, and yes the people I met at Morningland were good people.
Honestly, though, Al Stone's commentary was included in this article for the sake of responsible journalism. Morningland is not without its controversy and to ignore that in the article would have been irresponsible.
If I left out Stone's input, I may have had the respect of the monastery, but I would have lost the respect of the crowd critical of Morningland. You might already know that print publications can't afford to lose their already-ADD readers, especially in the name of fairness.
And yes, Russ Roca is the best photographer I know. And, he bikes everywhere to photograph! Both the cover and inside photos for this story were taken at Morningland--the latter of which was taken in the courtyard with the brutal 2-o'clock sun beating down. Great shots. Totally ethereal, fitting and true to life.
Check Russ out online:
http://www.russroca.com/
http://www.russroca.com/about.html
http://lbcyclists.blogspot.com/
12 months ago
in LB CHAMBER APPROACHES JOSH LOWENTHAL ABOUT RUNNING FOR SCHOOL BOARD | The District Weekly on The District Weekly
Sachi also had a case against it a few years ago because someone had installed cameras above the toilets in the womans bathroom, to spy on and post online the inebriated young things doing the doo in there. Great place...very popular indeed. I would vote for anyone with ties to this palace.
12 months ago
in BREAKWATER BREAKDOWN | The District Weekly on The District Weekly
Joeseph, please contact me: jenny@thedistrictweekly.com
I would love to talk to you about this further. And don't worry, I work on the weekends all the time. Drop me a line.
I would love to talk to you about this further. And don't worry, I work on the weekends all the time. Drop me a line.
12 months ago
in RUSHIN’ TOWARD US | The District Weekly on The District Weekly
Mr. Hare, thank you for clarifying the story. When I showed up at the monastery unannounced, the members did the best they could to fill me in. But, I had a feeling I didn't quite get the details down when I retold that part of the story-- with all the metaphoric components colliding into the rest of it.
And Leila, great points.
And Leila, great points.
1 year ago
in MAIN LIBRARY LEAKS, QUEEN MARY COSTS AIRED IN BUDGET TALKS | The District Weekly on The District Weekly
My father always said, "you are what you stand on."
In the case of the Queen Mary, he'd probably say, "you are what you float on" --which is a dank, dark pool of human refuse blockaded by a circular breakwater. It speaks volumes really for how the place is run.
Dan Gross, the founder of Dive Corr Inc. and the man responsible for doing most of the Port of Long Beach's underwater structural inventory, has been brave enough to scuba dive under the Queen.
He told me in an interview last year that, even though the Queen isn't supposed to dump its human waste in the water, the moat that's surrounding her wide sides is "the most polluted water in Long Beach." And by polluted, he means 'full of shit!'
You are what you stand on...
In the case of the Queen Mary, he'd probably say, "you are what you float on" --which is a dank, dark pool of human refuse blockaded by a circular breakwater. It speaks volumes really for how the place is run.
Dan Gross, the founder of Dive Corr Inc. and the man responsible for doing most of the Port of Long Beach's underwater structural inventory, has been brave enough to scuba dive under the Queen.
He told me in an interview last year that, even though the Queen isn't supposed to dump its human waste in the water, the moat that's surrounding her wide sides is "the most polluted water in Long Beach." And by polluted, he means 'full of shit!'
You are what you stand on...
1 year ago
in ROBERT CLARK 1957-2008 | The District Weekly on The District Weekly
Thanks for posting this Chris.
1 year ago
in THE BIRD CAGE | The District Weekly on The District Weekly
Wow, I'll look into it Ryan, thanks. I'm no expert either...
1 year ago
in THE BIRD CAGE | The District Weekly on The District Weekly
Thanks folks. I did read those two stories about Bud Johnson's report (which I've read in its entirety and whom I've actually interviewed a few months ago). What a great guy!
His study is really interesting and his personal observations and recommendations are sound and intelligent. The only catch is, his study doesn't follow US Army Corps of Engineers' standards or methodology--things required to move the project forward. He's right when he says that more studies will always be required, even though they may not be necessary, but that's the downside to federal operations.
I'm sure Johnson's study will be used by Moffatt & Nichol in the coming months for its great information, but since the breakwater is federally owned and maintained, there is no short cut that can be taken by the city to circumvent the USACE's bureaucracy--which includes more studies, going through the process of receiving federal funding and approval for the recon, feasibility and pre-construction phases of its operations.
I really wish that political will existed, enough to drive Bud's initiatives into action, but I've never seen that kind of action taken until there's been a major disaster. For example, hurricane Katrina finally provoked the Corps to fix Louisianan levees. A few earthquakes and a major bridge collapse instigated better building codes, etc...
And, just for the record, the term "reconfiguration" refers to every kind of modification to that hard structure--be it a full leveling of the breakwater, an 1800-ft section removal just below sea level like Johnson's proposing, or anything in between. Moffatt & Nichol will likely look all combination of alternatives for the breakwater and test them with the mathematical model simulator they are famous for.
Both of those stories are great though, because they're getting the message out that this recon study will not result in absolute ignorant doom for the coast and coastal properties. And, they have people--who've been against the project from the beginning-- talking about it. The more smart discussion and communication lines open, the better. Great job guys!
His study is really interesting and his personal observations and recommendations are sound and intelligent. The only catch is, his study doesn't follow US Army Corps of Engineers' standards or methodology--things required to move the project forward. He's right when he says that more studies will always be required, even though they may not be necessary, but that's the downside to federal operations.
I'm sure Johnson's study will be used by Moffatt & Nichol in the coming months for its great information, but since the breakwater is federally owned and maintained, there is no short cut that can be taken by the city to circumvent the USACE's bureaucracy--which includes more studies, going through the process of receiving federal funding and approval for the recon, feasibility and pre-construction phases of its operations.
I really wish that political will existed, enough to drive Bud's initiatives into action, but I've never seen that kind of action taken until there's been a major disaster. For example, hurricane Katrina finally provoked the Corps to fix Louisianan levees. A few earthquakes and a major bridge collapse instigated better building codes, etc...
And, just for the record, the term "reconfiguration" refers to every kind of modification to that hard structure--be it a full leveling of the breakwater, an 1800-ft section removal just below sea level like Johnson's proposing, or anything in between. Moffatt & Nichol will likely look all combination of alternatives for the breakwater and test them with the mathematical model simulator they are famous for.
Both of those stories are great though, because they're getting the message out that this recon study will not result in absolute ignorant doom for the coast and coastal properties. And, they have people--who've been against the project from the beginning-- talking about it. The more smart discussion and communication lines open, the better. Great job guys!
1 year ago
in SLEUTH TO PSYCHO | The District Weekly on The District Weekly
Well, to start with, thank you for commenting on the story -- a story I didn't even want to write, and wasn't going to until my editors insisted upon it. Judging by your responses, though, I am both a wonderful person, a fool and a lunatic who has touched a nerve in the community, so maybe publishing it was the right decision. I also have to admit that I did not write (nor do I totally agree with) the headline of the story. I do not think Det. Peck is so much a lousy detective as a busy one who was juggling multiple, higher priority cases when mine landed on her desk. Nowhere in the body of the story does it state that I think she is "lousy." In fact, I tried remain as factual as possible and keep my soapbox out of it, mainly because (as many of you said) she was doing her job (maybe not as quickly as my self-interest would have dictated, but she did help me). The existing headline is not the one I would have written, but writers don't often get to choose their own headlines.
I will say though, that the Long Beach Police Department in general was not very receptive to my type of case, mainly because stolen wallets/identities are a dime a dozen and they simply don't have the manpower to correct the problem (parking citations are another matter, one that they can control because the criminal's car is parked in their plain view). I also understand that it is just a wallet (not an endangered life or a commercial burglary), but any crime committed against you is injurious, it chips away at your peace of mind, and is unnecessary. I also think that when the LBPD admits that wallet theft is low priority crime (which translates to: we probably won't get to this one) it enables people like my criminal to continue stealing things, because they can rest easy knowing the odds they might get caught are slim. I can't see how that's justifiable under any circumstances.
I also agree with comments stating that the woman who stole (or found-and-did-not-return, or robbed, or whatever) my wallet and triggered all this bad momentum is in the wrong, but I'm handing it over to Karma from here on out.
I think Sam Lowry's response is incredibly accurate, we all see things differently through the lens of our experiences. The lens on this story is my own. Maybe you share it because you've had a crime committed against you, maybe you disagree with it because you're on the other end of it, but it is what it is, and hey, IT HAPPENS.
Thanks for reading. And if you find a wallet, for Chrissakes, do the right thing.
I will say though, that the Long Beach Police Department in general was not very receptive to my type of case, mainly because stolen wallets/identities are a dime a dozen and they simply don't have the manpower to correct the problem (parking citations are another matter, one that they can control because the criminal's car is parked in their plain view). I also understand that it is just a wallet (not an endangered life or a commercial burglary), but any crime committed against you is injurious, it chips away at your peace of mind, and is unnecessary. I also think that when the LBPD admits that wallet theft is low priority crime (which translates to: we probably won't get to this one) it enables people like my criminal to continue stealing things, because they can rest easy knowing the odds they might get caught are slim. I can't see how that's justifiable under any circumstances.
I also agree with comments stating that the woman who stole (or found-and-did-not-return, or robbed, or whatever) my wallet and triggered all this bad momentum is in the wrong, but I'm handing it over to Karma from here on out.
I think Sam Lowry's response is incredibly accurate, we all see things differently through the lens of our experiences. The lens on this story is my own. Maybe you share it because you've had a crime committed against you, maybe you disagree with it because you're on the other end of it, but it is what it is, and hey, IT HAPPENS.
Thanks for reading. And if you find a wallet, for Chrissakes, do the right thing.
The reason people admire you and perhaps not Derrick is because even though he says he's ambitious, you clearly are. I think someone who graduated with a Journalism degree and yet never wrote a story is a professional slacker. Nobody wants to hire that kind of person no matter what his degree is, nor his upbringing. Rather, it's all about his character. And frankly it's gotten him to where he is now, and it's gotten you to where you are now. Guess which one of you I'd hire in the future? ;-)