<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for oleg</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/7a2b904e5dd3bd38ec33597af4d6788d/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:41:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google Trends for 3D CAD Companies: Whose Competing?</title><link>http://solidsmack.disqus.com/google_trends_for_3d_cad_companies_whose_competing/#comment-1310863</link><description>this is wrong comparison in my view. you cannot compare siemens search popularity (really not related to PLM at all, since nobody think about siemens as PLM vendor only), &lt;a href="http://ptc.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;ptc.com&lt;/a&gt; and autodesk. To have more fair comparison put autocad, solidworks, catia, pro-e (&lt;a href="http://www.google.com/trends?q=solidworks%252C+catia%252C+nx%252C+solidedge%252C+pro-engineer&amp;amp;ctab=0&amp;amp;geo=all&amp;amp;date=all&amp;amp;sort=0" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.google.com/trends?q=solidworks%2C+ca...&lt;/a&gt;) and you will see different picture.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">oleg</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:36:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blindness of closed source software company</title><link>http://yml-blog.disqus.com/blindness_of_closed_source_software_company/#comment-4275071</link><description>Yann, Excellent view. I liked it. Actually if you took GIS as potential path between Google map and PLM, I'd like to take one more step and see BIM. I think BIM made several successful steps in bridging GIS to product development (many be in context of AEC and not mechanical). &lt;br&gt;I will touch it my next posts for sure.&lt;br&gt;Regards&lt;br&gt;Oleg</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">oleg</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:34:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blindness of closed source software company</title><link>http://yml-blog.disqus.com/blindness_of_closed_source_software_company/#comment-4275220</link><description>MS started to compete - doesn't mean they did :)... and they are always coming second to the game. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Data is something will need to come to the next level of usage. Today is too closed and incompatible, but it will change fast in the future. PLM will not succeed to keep current licensing model for long run- in my view it will start explode from different sides- mostly from growing platform capabilities in Oracle and MOSS as well from  disruptive technologies that will come from 3D and gaming zone. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regards&lt;br&gt;Oleg</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">oleg</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:41:14 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>