<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Human Capital Guy</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/78f2b449a58d5a78a9450cadf3a4ca13/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 13:59:06 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Whoever Designed Ray Mozilo&amp;#8217;s Severance Package Should Be Ashamed</title><link>http://knowhr.disqus.com/whoever_designed_ray_mozilo8217s_severance_package_should_be_ashamed/#comment-1825269</link><description>Good comments all around. I also take issue that these severances are basically treated like bonuses, only are not tied to performance in any way. The "commenters" make a point that severance is often decided before a failure, but doesn't that mean the system of calculating severances are flawed?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Human Capital Guy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:50:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rethinking Umbrellas&amp;#8230;and HR</title><link>http://knowhr.disqus.com/rethinking_umbrellas8230and_hr/#comment-1825378</link><description>Does that woman come with the nubrella? Being from Seattle, I haven't used an umbrella since I was five years old - no hat or umbrella in pouring rain is the way to go!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Human Capital Guy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:35:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Smart People Question If Performance Evaluations Do More Harm Than Good</title><link>http://knowhr.disqus.com/smart_people_question_if_performance_evaluations_do_more_harm_than_good/#comment-1825377</link><description>As a manager, I have found "strict" performance reviews to not be very useful. Giving number rankings to different aspects of an employee's skill set never seemed to have a positive impact - either you give them a really good score, which really isn't all that useful, or you give them a slightly lesser score (say, 4/5 - "Why didn't I get a five?") and then they're pissed off.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I prefer less structured reviews where I can give feedback and ask for it, but not give specific scores. When scores are involved, the employee zeros in on those rather than taking to heard more open-ended criticisms and praise.s</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Human Capital Guy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:39:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lickable Employee Communication?</title><link>http://knowhr.disqus.com/lickable_employee_communication/#comment-1825374</link><description>It would just make me hungry.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Human Capital Guy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:43:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Business Slang: Top 10 Worst &amp;#8220;-ize&amp;#8221; Words</title><link>http://knowhr.disqus.com/business_slang_top_10_worst_8220_ize8221_words/#comment-6423650</link><description>I actually like the word templatize. As mentioned, it says what it means, and it's necessary to use at times. What would you recommend as an alternative?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't like redoing work that doesn't need to be done, so I prefer to templatize wherever possible.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Human Capital Guy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:45:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s Your GPA?</title><link>http://knowhr.disqus.com/what8217s_your_gpa/#comment-1825416</link><description>I don't disagree with the points made above; however, I do view GPA as an indicator (how good of an indicator, who knows) not as a measure of intelligence but as a measure of how capable someone is at doing things. For instance, if someone has a 2.3 GPA, I want to find out if that GPA is a result of not working hard enough, or if they were working three jobs to pay for school, or what. GPA may not be a measure of intelligence, but in general I don't think it's that hard to get a good GPA - if they don't have a good one, I at least want to find out the reasons.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Human Capital Guy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:50:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Doesn&amp;#8217;t HR Talk to the Press More Often?</title><link>http://knowhr.disqus.com/why_doesn8217t_hr_talk_to_the_press_more_often/#comment-1825522</link><description>I’m not PR, but as a marketing person I would be protective about anyone talking to the press who isn’t in PR. That being said, I think the issue is more that HR should request to be utilized by PR, and vice versa. I think you’re suggestion of HR talking to the press is good, but circumventing PR (i.e. not doing it with guidance from PR) is not a good move.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Human Capital Guy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:11:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Devolving decision making improves productivity - great for Enterprise2.0</title><link>http://theequitykicker.disqus.com/devolving_decision_making_improves_productivity_great_for_enterprise20/#comment-4455817</link><description>I have been involved in companies that worked from a very centralized matter, and and they have struggled to keep up to every-changing demands of the Internet age.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Human Capital Guy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 12:42:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: IT Human Capital as Competitive Advantage</title><link>http://ericbrown.disqus.com/it_human_capital_as_competitive_advantage/#comment-10677996</link><description>IT human capital is a huge asset. My ex company wouldn't even allow us in marketing to announce new hires as the demand is so competitive for quality talent.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Human Capital Guy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:53:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Email Dead?</title><link>http://writingwhitepapers.disqus.com/is_email_dead/#comment-12404902</link><description>I still like email. Much more organized than going to ten different places (Facebook, MySpace, twitter, etc.) to contact different people. If all of these avenues can be merged into one, that would be ideal (i.e. Outlook connects directly to Facebook and any other communication app).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Human Capital Guy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 13:59:06 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>