<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for sikozu</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/781b921f274c525b24f1763b634ebced/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 00:54:25 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Cell Phones in Cars: A Rare Case for Regulation</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/cell_phones_in_cars_a_rare_case_for_regulation/#comment-1444191</link><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Just as your right to wave your fist stops at my nose, your right to chat while driving stops at my bumper.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;That's all well and good except that what you are advocating for is a law that prevents me from talking on the phone in my car regardless of my proximity to your bumper. Perhaps a better solution (if there just &lt;i&gt;has&lt;/i&gt; to be one) would be to impose a penalty if it can be proved that cell phone use contributed to a collision.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There are any number of things that cause inattention to driving... why stop at cell phone use? Why not include talking with a passenger or eating food or listening to the radio? This sounds like a slippery slope.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sikozu</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 00:54:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>