<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Alex</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/7704a28b3a7a7853c056ccce36dd77a6/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 06:24:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Visual Communication And Video Publishing - Selected Tools And Web Services - Sharewood Picnic Feb24 08</title><link>http://robingood.disqus.com/visual_communication_and_video_publishing_selected_tools_and_web_services_sharewood_picnic_feb24_08/#comment-186576</link><description>You left out a good one - &lt;a href="http://WorldTV.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;WorldTV.com&lt;/a&gt;. Let's you take videos from different video sites and organize them into a channel. Great for organizing a collection of your favourite videos, no matter where they're hosted.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 06:09:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook&amp;#8217;s traffic</title><link>http://theequitykicker.disqus.com/facebook8217s_traffic/#comment-4456171</link><description>It's always such a shame these companies aren't publicly listed. It would have been nice to short Facebook stock from 2-3 months ago - this was very predictable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Most people I know are growing bored of Facebook and have grown irritated by the constant event announcements and dodgy friend requests. It really does lose its luster after the initial excitement of building your social graph fades.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unfortunately for social networks, they are by definition social. This means subject to the same social fashions and trends like bars or nightclubs. Highly exclusive social networks (online private members clubs) are probably next.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 05:22:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The role of technology in advertising</title><link>http://theequitykicker.disqus.com/the_role_of_technology_in_advertising/#comment-4456200</link><description>Insightful post... the point about 'breaking the link' is good and is already happening. Graphic design marketplaces are springing up online, where designers compete for projects in an open fashion, and we make use of them to develop the 'creative' behind our online ad campaigns. We then manage the buying of this inventory ourselves and use services that auto-optimize our Google advertising (for example), ultimately leading to a far more efficient, effective and economical campaign for our startup. When we need a TV ad, we'll go to the ad agencies... then again, maybe not. Ad agencies need to adapt and acquire, like all the other legacy businesses being affected by the Internet.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 06:28:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Communities are enabled, not created</title><link>http://theequitykicker.disqus.com/communities_are_enabled_not_created/#comment-4456258</link><description>Communities can happen in two ways - spontaneously or through the (typically) very hard work of an individual or small team. The single most enabling factor for an online community, beyond the obvious need to provide basic community tools... is the written word. Often this can come from a charismatic 'leader' or moderator and be achieved through community e-mails, blog posts or descriptive site text. It can be as simple as a well written guide for the posters in a discussion forum, or as involved as a full on integrated campaign of newsletters, individual personalized e-mails, blog posts, site text and general community stewardship. These are tricky and difficult to get right, and all the glossy design in the world won't come close to matching a single, effective, written communicator.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 06:49:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Traction or revenue</title><link>http://theequitykicker.disqus.com/traction_or_revenue/#comment-4456726</link><description>Nic, it's like you and I discussed not long ago. You have to "do what you have to do". &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We were executing a strategy of actively looking for VC funding until the current crisis rendered that a vastly less certain proposition. We scaled back expenses (including markteting), focused the 40-50% of our (my) time we were spending on 'fund raising' into monetization. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With the results from that (better monetization and lower costs), we're in a sustainable position now and can look again at raising funds to fuel growth as and when the 'sun comes up'. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the meantime we're comfortable to take slower or even static user number growth, and (following your valued suggestion) would look to kick that into higher gear again before we started the fund raising process again.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:46:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s a blog worth??</title><link>http://theequitykicker.disqus.com/what8217s_a_blog_worth_45/#comment-6175308</link><description>Funnily enough I've been doing some research into this myself the past week, specifically related to 'entertainment and celebrity' type blogs - Perez Hilton, DListed, TMZ etc. Trying to figure out how much money they make, what the CPM rates are.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The results were fairly shocking. Using publicly available data, I was able to ascertain that even DListed, the number 3 celebrity blog site, which is doing 35 million page impressions a month, is only making around $13,000 a month - or a page eCPM of $0.37. Actual ads cost as little as $0.13 CPM. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yet, as you indicate, there are exceptions. In that vertical, which has dozens and dozens of big sites, the number 1 is &lt;a href="http://PerezHIlton.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;PerezHIlton.com&lt;/a&gt; and that does 235 million page impressions a month with ad rates suggesting it's making $250,000+ a month.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The problem for that vertical is the subject matter and the intense competition which leads to very low CPM's. You need monster traffic to make a buck. Very few of these sites run Google Adsense (likely) because the subject matter is prone to violating Adsense T&amp;C's - swearing, booze, drugs, etc. And unfortunately the other advertising network options are dire. To this day Yahoo!'s Publisher Network is still not readily available to anyone outside the US and is still 'in beta'. It's been that way for three years! The other options are orders of magnitude smaller and don't have the scale needed to offer compelling CPM's.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm glad to say we do much better than these rates on our own network of sites, with the bonus that many are semi or fully automated. The thought of getting lower CPM's and having higher labour costs to run a professional blog site definitely give pause for thought.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:52:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Good to see that Microsoft&amp;#8217;s Adsense competitor is doing well in beta</title><link>http://theequitykicker.disqus.com/good_to_see_that_microsoft8217s_adsense_competitor_is_doing_well_in_beta/#comment-7338578</link><description>The problem has been a virtual monopoly on contextual advertising outside the US where Yahoo! Publisher Network is simply not available to people (been in beta for 3 years) and other networks just don’t have the scale to be viable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Simply put there is a gigantic number of publishers who will jump at the chance of a viable Microsoft option. The simple act of competition (non-existent previously) will spur huge rewards for web publishers worldwide. I only hope Microsoft moves quickly to offer this to those outside the US.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is good news.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 06:53:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Disenchantment with Google is growing</title><link>http://theequitykicker.disqus.com/disenchantment_with_google_is_growing/#comment-7886120</link><description>Very true and the recent bid for Twitter, if successful, will only hurt them further and may actually kill Twitter in the process. When I mentioned on Twitter recently that I'll be writing a story for Techcrunch about Microsoft's new 'Adsense' type product, it opened up a river of stories from web publishers about nightmare experiences in dealing with Google. The anticipation and interest in Microsoft's product is impressive. People are desperate for an alternative.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 15:21:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reminder &amp;ndash; success equals profits</title><link>http://theequitykicker.disqus.com/reminder_ndash_success_equals_profits/#comment-15869691</link><description>Great point Nic. A return for shareholders can come in different ways and is not necessarily predicated on profits as you say. Another source of return for shareholders could be a share buyback.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 06:24:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008/03/21/web-video-tv/</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/thread_37156/#comment-5998515</link><description>I agree with the first commenter. Watching TV is a very different experience to online video. You don't want interactivity when you're watching 'TV', the complete failure of interactive TV projects in the past demonstrates this.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sometimes we want to be the passenger, not the driver. TV is a way to relax, no need to think, just let it wash over you. Change the camera angle? NO THANKS! That's what technical director's are paid to do, and they do a great job.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mouse in hand is totally different - you're driving, you're in control, you want interactivity.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The 2 minute clips experience will not make the transition to TV, channel-centric services like &lt;a href="http://WorldTV.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;WorldTV.com&lt;/a&gt; and Joost can.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:49:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube Toolbox: 100+ Tools and Resources to Enhance Your Video Experience</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/youtube_toolbox_100_tools_and_resources_to_enhance_your_video_experience/#comment-6298806</link><description>Nice list but you missed WorldTV.com!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:45:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: YouTube Toolbox: 100+ Tools and Resources to Enhance Your Video Experience</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/youtube_toolbox_100_tools_and_resources_to_enhance_your_video_experience/#comment-6649448</link><description>Nice list but you missed WorldTV.com!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:45:58 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>