<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Anon</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/76e6852250415aea79abdccac9d03283/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:20:04 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Remix-A-Day: Lykke Li &amp;#8211; Little Bit (Villains Remix)</title><link>http://prettymuchamazing.disqus.com/remix_a_day_lykke_li_8211_little_bit_villains_remix/#comment-16976285</link><description>the blog might be growing but it's losing what used to make it so great. now it's too crowded and trying to do too many things for too many people. just my 2cents, but i liked it more when it was simpler.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:38:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2006/2007 New Man United Kit</title><link>http://epltalk.disqus.com/20062007_new_man_united_kit/#comment-2196194</link><description>this new kit is rubbish, looks so cheap</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:11:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 10 Most Visited Soccer Websites By U.S. Visitors | EPL Talk</title><link>http://epltalk.disqus.com/top_10_most_visited_soccer_websites_by_us_visitors_epl_talk/#comment-2211603</link><description>&lt;a href="http://manutd.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;manutd.com&lt;/a&gt; gets more visitors in the U.S. than &lt;a href="http://mlsnet.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;mlsnet.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's all you need to know...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 11:14:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My tips for Euro 2008 – The Group Stages</title><link>http://epltalk.disqus.com/my_tips_for_euro_2008_a_the_group_stages/#comment-2212236</link><description>Unlucky losers, doubting Holland!! they beat Italy 3-0, Shows how bad hollands defense is!!! Wayyyyyyy    SPAIN TO WIN! Ive got money on them xD</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:20:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Fan Segregation At Football Matches A Good Thing?</title><link>http://epltalk.disqus.com/is_fan_segregation_at_football_matches_a_good_thing/#comment-2213042</link><description>The "lager louts" have been priced out of football grounds at both international and English Premier League because of outrageous ticket prices.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tickets are still relatively cheap for the Bundesliga in Germany, but only for clubs that are out of contention.  The big city clubs, particularly Bayern Munich, have jacked up ticket prices.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For hooligan behavior week in and week out, you will have go to the developing world.  Argentina in particular is the biggest hooligan trouble spot in the football world.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 20:54:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Premiership Preview&amp;#8211;15. Wigan Athletic</title><link>http://epltalk.disqus.com/premiership_preview821115_wigan_athletic/#comment-2215046</link><description>Hold on now. Maybe I'm just reading the revised version, but even though I think 15 is a little low I can certainly appreciate some of the stuff being said here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First off, and most importantly: Lazy journalism is when papers make fun of Titus Bramble's play last year. It's the second or third thing most uninformed journos talk about and something that I did not see make an appearance here. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Second off, it looks to me like (and again, maybe this is the revised version) he got our assets in the right order. For example, I mean, Steve Bruce is the man, and the single biggest reason we stayed up this year. I wouldn't call Valencia or Palacios superstars either (yet - fact is, both scouted by Man U, but they're reserves right now, at least for a couple more years), but they do play in our midfield, which this year could be our biggest strength.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Third, no matter how lazy the journo, few make the effort or have the balls to actually discuss and debate his decisions with the people who leave comments. So honestly, take it easy guys... this may not be that favorable, might peg us a couple spots lower than we should be even (when you look at our record under Bruce last year and  combine that with the fact that we got rid of nobody important and picked up a number of good players, including a striker who can actually score, arguably our biggest need), but really this guy isn't actually that far off the mark.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 18:00:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GoFirstline.com: Evil, Deceptive Marketing to College Students</title><link>http://drumsnwhistles.disqus.com/gofirstlinecom_evil_deceptive_marketing_to_college_students/#comment-3779089</link><description>I worked for the company for 5 years.  Truth be told, it is very hard work and takes a very strong determination to be successful.  Almost 80% of the recruits that attempt to sell door-2-door don't have the backbone for rejection.  The other 20% end up making great money and continue to work in the industry through out college.  I am now graduated, own my own home as well as many rentals, own my cars and toys, and don't have any major debt.  This is all thanks to the opportunity that Firstline provided me.  They are a young company lead by young entreprnuers trying to manage the consistant 200-300% growth they experience each year.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I will agree that not all reps for Firstline are trained by the same manager and might be taught different techniques that are not completely ethical.  It is unfortunate that this happens within most sales organizations.  What we should really discuss and try to make a difference in is ethics and integrity.  It is up to the individual to decide what lines they will decide to cross or make gray.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:11:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pure Bull or Pure Evil?</title><link>http://drumsnwhistles.disqus.com/pure_bull_or_pure_evil/#comment-3779067</link><description>The Prodigy is a real concept designed to help an entreprenuer that has the skill set to be extremely successful at something that not many people would even attempt.  There is a million dollars of venture capital waiting for the winner of the program.  If the show will be aired, that is another question.  From what I understand, it is very difficult to get a tv show picked up.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't disagree that there was probably a financial motive for creating the show and bringing in more recruits.  But aren't all reality shows created to create an ROI?  That is what free capitalism is all about.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:44:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GoFirstline.com: Evil, Deceptive Marketing to College Students</title><link>http://drumsnwhistles.disqus.com/gofirstlinecom_evil_deceptive_marketing_to_college_students/#comment-3779096</link><description>Karoli-&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I want you to know that I agree with you on a lot of the points you bring up.  There are obviously some individual reps use to manipulate there way into making a sale.  Looking at the company from the inside out and now the outside in, I can tell you that the company does not teach manipulation and deceptive technique in obtaining its objectives.  Selling products door-to-door has been done for longer than I even know, and if a prospect is genuinly interested in a product that will protect thier family and home and they feel it is of value to them to have it, then they should let someone in thier home to help them see what will serve them best and give them the best protection.  It's the nature of the business, you can't properly protect someone's home unless you are allowed in the house to see what they need not what they have.  Granted, in almost ever industry in existence, there have been individuals that take an honest trade or technique and use it as a scam.  I have personally sold in areas where a short time after houses were being broke in to and they found that it was a group of individuals following us in white shirts saying they were an alarm company.  The only thing it did for us was boost our sales.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 13:27:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pure Bull or Pure Evil?</title><link>http://drumsnwhistles.disqus.com/pure_bull_or_pure_evil/#comment-3779075</link><description>Karoli-&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The show IS being done, filmed, produced.  Whether it hits the air or not is another question.  I don't even work there anymore, so I don't have the inside informaion.  But the goal still remains, 1 Million dollars to the winner.  This is not contingent upon the airing of the show.  There will be a Prodigy and whether this works as well next year, I don't know and don't much care.  Bottom line, the company and the opportunity opened up amazing opportunities for me and can do the same for any individual with the right skill-set and work ethics.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 13:34:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pure Bull or Pure Evil?</title><link>http://drumsnwhistles.disqus.com/pure_bull_or_pure_evil/#comment-3779073</link><description>I worked for Firstline for almost 5 years.  I joined on after the first summer the company was in business and left to manage my own marketing company a short time ago.  No, I was not hired on as part of The Prodigy promotion.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 23:54:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firstline Security Cost Comparison</title><link>http://drumsnwhistles.disqus.com/firstline_security_cost_comparison/#comment-3779270</link><description>Apples to Apples was not stating that they were being charged $24.99, they were using your example to add up the total cost.  Re-read and you will see what they meant.  And they make a good point, I would rather have an install done by an experienced technician as opposed to doing it myself.  My time is worth more than that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 23:44:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GoFirstline.com: Evil, Deceptive Marketing to College Students</title><link>http://drumsnwhistles.disqus.com/gofirstlinecom_evil_deceptive_marketing_to_college_students/#comment-3779131</link><description>Wow, It sounds like someone is a little bitter.  Just because your son had a bad experience doesn't mean that this is all a scam.  There are thousands of college students that go out for the summer and make a lot of money, do your research.  Don't be bitter, let it go, you are wasting your time trying to "debunk" all these security companies because the industry is a huge market.  Just accept the fact that your son had a bad experience, and don't try to make it the companies fault</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:59:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Kanye West &amp;#8211; Robocop (DJ Drops)</title><link>http://prettymuchamazing.disqus.com/new_kanye_west_8211_robocop_dj_drops/#comment-16969219</link><description>starts out like the smashing pumpkins end is the beginning vice versa beat</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:27:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VMAS 2009: Setlist?</title><link>http://prettymuchamazing.disqus.com/vmas_2009_setlist/#comment-16981131</link><description>this wasn't even photoshopped... it looks like someone made it in paint.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:20:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Work in Progress</title><link>http://whatay.disqus.com/work_in_progress/#comment-4450100</link><description>Brilliant man.ROTFL</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 22:56:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Interview Post #1 - Eventbrite and &amp;#8220;The Long Tail of Events&amp;#8221; | Charles Hudson's Weblog</title><link>http://charleshudson.disqus.com/interview_post_1_eventbrite_and_8220the_long_tail_of_events8221_charles_hudsons_weblog/#comment-3699128</link><description>You might be interested in reading the October 1 post on this blog:  &lt;a href="http://www.sandyofftopic.com/ " rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.sandyofftopic.com/ &lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 15:35:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Has Google tweaked its AdSense rev share?</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/has_google_tweaked_its_adsense_rev_share/#comment-14663570</link><description>The increase on my site was short-lived because after a week the revenue went back down</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 06:10:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ben.geek.nz &amp;raquo; Sliming?</title><link>http://ben.disqus.com/bengeeknz_raquo_sliming/#comment-1182423</link><description>I bought this tea from London three years ago and I use it to lose weight on and off. I found that when I first bought the tea I would use it as instructed on the box but after a while I foudn going to the toilet every five mintes a pain. So I was still drinking the tea but didn't realise my food intake had gone down at the same time. I had crocnic stomach cramps and came off the tea completely. Since then I've found out that if you continue to drink the tea twice a day for longer than a week, its starts damaging internal organs and can shut the kidneys down completely. Now I just use it every month or so when I feel bloated, once a day for a maximum of 3 days at once. Please be careful with any tea which is a laxative. It can help you lose weight and looking good is what everyone thinks life is about but you have to take care of yourself. Instead of using this tea as an everyday helper to eat the foods you want and lose weight, why not excersize for at least 30 mins a day instead? Change your diet, it doesn't have to be a big change, just minor things like instead of snacking on anything during the day, drink some water. Half the time people think their hungry is because their body is dehydrated. If you are eating because you are bored, go and do some gardening or take up a hobby!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please just be careful on what you depend on to get you through the day!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:08:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ben.geek.nz &amp;raquo; Sliming?</title><link>http://ben.disqus.com/bengeeknz_raquo_sliming/#comment-1182440</link><description>Sam, this is not a slimming device! It's a laxative. It means that you cannot use it on a long term basis as your kidneys and liver will become damaged because their job is being taken over by this remedy instead. Please only use this for constipation and not slimming!!!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 08:28:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why are China&amp;#8217;s web stats so bad?</title><link>http://thomascrampton.disqus.com/why_are_china8217s_web_stats_so_bad/#comment-5008386</link><description>I am in China trying to work but its absolutely imposible to surf some US and European site they are simply blocked.  For example to use wikipedia I have to use Annony Mouse.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 05:30:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Old Media&amp;#8217;s Effect on Reputation and Action</title><link>http://thomascrampton.disqus.com/old_media8217s_effect_on_reputation_and_action/#comment-5008634</link><description>A MUST video watch in my opinion, for every person who is trying to peek into the future and predict what will happen.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://epic.makingithappen.co.uk/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://epic.makingithappen.co.uk/&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 01:56:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dragons</title><link>http://undomondo.disqus.com/the_dragons/#comment-2982380</link><description>Perfect revision music, thank you!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 09:32:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Notebook - POIDH</title><link>http://ericajoy.disqus.com/google_notebook_poidh/#comment-2369595</link><description>The notebook a gadget for the desktop sidebar does not work.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 17:24:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Feeds Beyond Blogs</title><link>http://jgetc.disqus.com/feeds_beyond_blogs/#comment-7415563</link><description>GREAT! I can't wait! Once this innovation takes place I'll be able to sit on my toilet read Guns 'n' Ammo and masturbate to porn, while download Rush on my IPOD Shuffle :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 14:00:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Modify Firefox 1.5 to work with all extensions</title><link>http://scattered.disqus.com/modify_firefox_15_to_work_with_all_extensions/#comment-1264979</link><description>This is a VERY bad method and will break all extensions that require 1.5 to work.  Do it if you must, but using nightly tester tools to override and make your old extensions work is a much better method.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 17:50:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Herb Chambers complaint, commentary &amp;#038; update</title><link>http://cosmictap.disqus.com/herb_chambers_complaint_commentary_038_update/#comment-1212364</link><description>There is a Herb Chambers next to where I live, I would go there this weekend to check a few cars. Good that I googled their name and ended up here. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I read only a couple of comments but it was enough -- no way I am buying anything from them! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By the way, the comments from employees were very convincing.. It shows how incompetent they are...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:55:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ThinkCash Usury And You'll Like It Plan | The Cosmic Tap</title><link>http://cosmictap.disqus.com/thinkcash_usury_and_youll_like_it_plan_the_cosmic_tap/#comment-1340657</link><description>good point, Josh. very well said</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 03:26:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rich in Love</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/rich_in_love/#comment-3706740</link><description>This state of affairs has already been predicted by science fiction writers.  In the future women who refuse sex to any man will be considered antisocial.  The stigma of being so selfish as to want to own your own body will act to automatically even out the inequalities in sexual activity so that everyone can have that basic human right in quantities equal to their desire for such.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 08:45:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rich in Love</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/rich_in_love/#comment-3706750</link><description>I think the whole discussion is being put on an animalistic level.  Missing are the intellectual and emotional aspects of the connection between two people which are quite necessary for any kind of real happiness instead of just cheap thrills.  Come on, we know porn stars (at least most of them) can't be among the happiest people.  Men may be less sensitive than women in general, but most are not that callous.  Maybe the majority of people in the survey are happier because they have genuine relationships with other people that happen to result in having more sex and the less happy people who spend more time making money are so because they are simply more isolated.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 11:48:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rich in Love</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/rich_in_love/#comment-3706759</link><description>Bad joke but kind of relevant,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Q: Why do women watch pornos all the way to the end?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A:  They keep hoping there will be a wedding.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 18:15:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cuddle Party!</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/cuddle_party/#comment-3706782</link><description>Maybe its just me, but this thing doesn't sound like fun because on the one hand a bunch of guys are involved.  Who wants some strange dude groping his deltoids?  Its really disturbing on some level.  I won't even go into the other hand.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2004 08:55:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rich in Love</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/rich_in_love/#comment-3706776</link><description>yeah 973 times I agree.  After 267 times she just doesn't get that look in her eyes anymore like she wants it - so the magic is gone!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2004 20:16:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Don&amp;#8217;t Just Vote, Do Something!</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/don8217t_just_vote_do_something/#comment-3706830</link><description>A damned annoying one, too.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:46:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If God is Dead, Everything is Permitted . . .</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/if_god_is_dead_everything_is_permitted/#comment-3706851</link><description>I am a bad, bad, bad person for being so thoroughly amused by the phrase "baby-raping anarchy."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can't get the smirk off my face.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 05:40:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Don&amp;#8217;t Just Vote, Do Something!</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/don8217t_just_vote_do_something/#comment-3706831</link><description>Check out that guy's face in the foreground.  I didn't know they had nudist colonies on the Planet of the Apes!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:25:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If God is Dead, Everything is Permitted . . .</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/if_god_is_dead_everything_is_permitted/#comment-3706856</link><description>The more interesting question might be what things cause a society to become degenerate?  Clearly in history certain societies have become corrupt to the point of causing themselves serious harm, and I think in most cases we would find high levels of theism in those societies.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think maybe instead of a belief in a certain god or hell or whatever, the important thing is a general civic spirit combined with the following of certain rules like the 10 Commandments.  As far as churches and religious leaders serve to inculcate that spirit in the people, then they do help the society in general to be more prosperous.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:31:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If God is Dead, Everything is Permitted . . .</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/if_god_is_dead_everything_is_permitted/#comment-3706859</link><description>Maybe Will, just maybe, there are a shitload of people who really like playing make believe anyway.  So sad...have a look,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.muchosucko.com/video-fanimecon.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.muchosucko.com/video-fanimecon.html&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:24:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Political Libertarianism</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/more_political_libertarianism/#comment-3706885</link><description>This is precisely the problem.  Nobody has the balls to say they know whats right anymore so they try to accomodate every half assed theory that comes down the pipe.  What the classical liberals thought is quite the opposite and is a system that at least has some backbone to it.  People these days are just afraid.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:27:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If God is Dead, Everything is Permitted . . .</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/if_god_is_dead_everything_is_permitted/#comment-3706862</link><description>The whole point of positing a monotheistic god in the first place is the universality of that god's edicts.  They are axiomatic and so you end the chain of questioning.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:32:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: If God is Dead, Everything is Permitted . . .</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/if_god_is_dead_everything_is_permitted/#comment-3706875</link><description>J Kennedy,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'll agree with your latest post, but then how do we add a greater incentive?  If people stop beliving the story you can't just order them change their minds.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would argue that there is in fact something in human nature that causes most people to care about the common good.  If it were otherwise I don't think civilization would be possible at all.  Even people who give up Christianity tend to either go to some flaky new age stuff or else they are like Will and come up to some other solution.  The minority are called sociopaths or narcissists and become lawyers or middle managers.  They are commonly hated and reviled, but their evil is controlled to a degree by the majority.  In other words, I think it is human nature that makes people care.  In their desire to rationalize they may create god, but god is secondary.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2004 13:06:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Evaluative Worthlessness of Happiness</title><link>http://willwilkinson.disqus.com/the_evaluative_worthlessness_of_happiness/#comment-3707111</link><description>They overlook the possibility that wealth and technology could lead to the development of better happy pills, or some techniques that will be able to alter people's baseline level of happiness.  What about that, eh?  Personally it scares me.  A whole nation of sickening happiness and joy 24 hours/7 days a week.  I say nuts to that!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 18:14:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Circus, Circus</title><link>http://prettymuchamazing.disqus.com/circus_circus/#comment-16970890</link><description>i'm not even ashamed of my fascination with her. if anything, her breakdown added to the mystique. but i really wouldn't care much at all if i didn't actually like her music... well written article, although i'm not sure that i agree about people hoping for britney's downfall--i think it was too sad for others' ill-will to really play any significant role (but maybe that's just b/c i was never rooting against her)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:51:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NYC Closet</title><link>http://sellsius.disqus.com/nyc_closet/#comment-8839413</link><description>At those prices, I'd be better off renting a few closets and combining them.  Hey, this may be another real estate trend--- closet conversions.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 00:23:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BREAKING: Obama Foreign Policy Advisor Samantha Power Resigns. When Does Mark Penn Get Fired?</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/breaking_obama_foreign_policy_advisor_samantha_power_resigns_when_does_mark_penn_get_fired/#comment-1956780</link><description>Worry not people.  this was exercise in party discipline. in fact, i was impressed by the speed of her resignation. it means they mean business, no one is above the law, mess up, your out. this is what i like about the obama campaign, they want to remain on message and at the moment that message is 'we don't do ad hominum attacks', that's clinton's game. and they are spot on to keep that discipline up. clinton is playing miss ann to the hilt, true, but obama campaign knows something we forget...it works. you have to be very careful about how you fight the 'damsel in distress' pose. he'll find a way and don't be surprised if one of his senatorial surrogates comes up with some nasty bit of intel on the clintons--that is how he must play it. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;she'll be back though. powers is brilliant and come the swearing in her only blemish will be that she called clinton a monster--really!&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 14:54:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN Does Disservice To Black Bloggers And JJP Specifically (Updated!)</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/cnn_does_disservice_to_black_bloggers_and_jjp_specifically_updated/#comment-1959439</link><description>I don't use handles all the time because in my opinion all comments (and some blogs) are anonymous.  What's the difference in signing a post Suzy Q, Talisha X, Yonka Simmons or Anon.y.mous?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nothing because they are all on-line identities.  &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No one in their right mind would use their real names or their real email address because they wouldn't want to receive hate mail from Obama supporters calling them handkerchief heads. &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This has happened to me. &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;From now on, if I can post anonymously I will.&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 15:35:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McCain Jokes About Beating His Wife</title><link>http://jackandjillpolitics.disqus.com/mccain_jokes_about_beating_his_wife/#comment-1973298</link><description>Jill,&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm an Obama supporter, but I don't think McCain was joking about spousal abuse.  Where that remark comes from, rather, is an old saw about how to respond to a question that can only make you look bad.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For example, when the Michelle Obama/"Whitey" bs came up weeks ago, I believe it was the website for the Libertarian magazine "Reason" that said:&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Asking Barack Obama if he has ever heard his wife say 'Whitey' is like asking him when he stopped beating her."  (i.e. even if Michelle didn't say it and Senator Obama didn't hear it, both of which I believe are true, the question is still out there, creating suspicion.)&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So yeah, McCain may have stepped right up to the line on this, but I don't think he stepped over it.&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:26:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Vineland Festival in danger?</title><link>http://consequenceofsound.disqus.com/vineland_festival_in_danger/#comment-2869839</link><description>Man, Let's drum up support!  There aren't very many festivals on the east coast.  I went toLollapalooza last year and I am a changed person...Let's open up a festival on the east cooooast!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 10:01:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Album Review: This Gift</title><link>http://consequenceofsound.disqus.com/album_review_this_gift/#comment-2869909</link><description>Thank you for the review. I had only heard "Gilt Complex" previously and that's been a favorite for this this year so far!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 02:03:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The State of the Festival</title><link>http://consequenceofsound.disqus.com/the_state_of_the_festival/#comment-2870199</link><description>I agree with Kenny.  Bamboozle is an established festival for todays scene and emo bands.  You should talk about it a little.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:16:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You&amp;#8217;re Killing Me, Firefox</title><link>http://firsttube.disqus.com/you8217re_killing_me_firefox/#comment-1515509</link><description>Maybe it is time to give the Opera browser a try?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 04:42:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Darn it! Something Bigger May Be Wrong Here</title><link>http://firsttube.disqus.com/darn_it_something_bigger_may_be_wrong_here/#comment-1515566</link><description>Its Geckos fault.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No matter what Gui you are using.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One of the reasons why Nokia have choosen Webkit Over Gecko for their phones.&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 14:31:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OSNews 4 Beta Reactions</title><link>http://firsttube.disqus.com/osnews_4_beta_reactions/#comment-1515699</link><description>Hi.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The above quoted guy is right, it hurts the eyes (a lot more if you're in Windows).&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The news blocks are also too much compressed.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And putting ads in the middle of the  news it's not cool.&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 10:25:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Creative Uses for Wordpress</title><link>http://oszen.disqus.com/creative_uses_for_wordpress/#comment-1188187</link><description>A non technical point, but one which grates nonetheless. Your use of 'whala' as 'there you have it' is atrocious. The word is Voila and pronounced as it is because it's french (vwa'la with a soft 'v').&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/voil%25C3%25A0" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/voil%C3%A0&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please don't bastardise another language.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Apart from that a very interesting article and good use of wordpress. Bravo!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 09:43:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Make a Boot Disc in 2k/XP | Windows | Tech-Recipes</title><link>http://tech-recipes.disqus.com/make_a_boot_disc_in_2kxp_windows_tech_recipes/#comment-2766765</link><description>if oyu want free lindows, order lindows and add a cupon with the name LINDOWS and you get it free.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2004 14:47:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: XP: Make the Background of Your Icon Text Transparent on the Desktop | Windows | Tech-Recipes</title><link>http://tech-recipes.disqus.com/xp_make_the_background_of_your_icon_text_transparent_on_the_desktop_windows_tech_recipes/#comment-2768805</link><description>it still does not work for me... and I do not even use active desktop....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 05:15:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; OhGizmo Review: Tom Bihn Empire Builder With Brain Cell &amp;amp; Soft Cell</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/ohgizmo_raquo_archive_raquo_ohgizmo_review_tom_bihn_empire_builder_with_brain_cell_amp_soft_cell/#comment-1758586</link><description>I'd bet the screen protector cloth was made for a MacBook keyboard. Any company that puts that much thought into design and function would surely have Macs in mind when they were designing their bags and accessories. If you want to get a cloth that fits, I suggest picking up a large roll of Microfiber cloth and cutting it to your exact specs.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:09:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; Japanese Deep Fryer Has Aquarium Within</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/ohgizmo_raquo_archive_raquo_japanese_deep_fryer_has_aquarium_within/#comment-1761725</link><description>if you maintained the bottom surface of the water at a cool temperature you could have a steady state gradient of temperature through the water, so at least in a small region the fish could live.  This would waste a lot of energy though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 00:40:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; Art Lebedev&amp;#8217;s Matryoshkus Experiment With Design</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/ohgizmo_raquo_archive_raquo_art_lebedev8217s_matryoshkus_experiment_with_design/#comment-1763153</link><description>Interesting concept, too bad they look like Apple made them.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 17:33:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; Smart Image Resizing Cuts The Useless Out Of Your Pics</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/ohgizmo_raquo_archive_raquo_smart_image_resizing_cuts_the_useless_out_of_your_pics/#comment-1763285</link><description>amazing!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:40:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: World&amp;#8217;s Largest Man-Made Tornado Actually Built For Safety</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/world8217s_largest_man_made_tornado_actually_built_for_safety/#comment-1764317</link><description>Call me crazy, but this seems needlessly loud.   I wouldn't really want to be there despite being a cool attraction.  No museum I've ever been to is that loud.  Scratch that, the city museum in St. Louis is that loud, but it's screaming and running kids there.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 04:39:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Canned Air - Not Just For Spaceballs Anymore</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/canned_air_not_just_for_spaceballs_anymore/#comment-1764953</link><description>the english language does not contain a word that accurately describes how profoundly stupid this idea is.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:24:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; DVD Rewinder</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/ohgizmo_raquo_archive_raquo_dvd_rewinder/#comment-1759509</link><description>lololololololololololololol fail</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 16:09:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Technology Liberation Front  &amp;raquo; Archive   &amp;raquo; Are Young Libertarians Anti-IP?</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/the_technology_liberation_front_raquo_archive_raquo_are_young_libertarians_anti_ip/#comment-1445022</link><description>I am just passing and haven't read your article in depth.  However, the main problem with IP is that it conditions markets in such a way that monopolies are natural consequences - which is why IP should be treated with great care, certainly more care than it is today.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Brendan S</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 05:56:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trollzilla</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/trollzilla/#comment-1446498</link><description>&lt;p&gt;From Mr. Markham:&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;Yes -- currently everybody goes generic and the tests for obviousness and anticpation are poor. But these matters are corrected in the courts.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;In theory, yes. Practice however is a lot different. For example, Red Hat is being threatened at the moment over claims that I believe center around object db software (extracting from/sending to). I could be wrong, but I think that's the gist of it. As was mentioned earlier, this is kind of like patenting "A drug ingested into the body, through being absorbed into the blood stream, which, when brought into contact with carcinogens, impedes their ability to grow in population, thus killing off the cancer." Lame right? Because you haven't really invented anything, and monopolized the mere idea of invention that could be. This kind of stuff fails obviousness and prior art, so it should be struck down in court.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, getting back to RH, now they have to spend legal costs to fight this. And if the system keeps piling up, how many more companies will the same thing happen to? And that's even if the court is sane. I admit, I haven't really researched this, but isn't the East Texas District infamous for upholding just about anything related to IP holders? It would nice if we could reform software and business method patents, but is there any pragmatic system that would be effective, given the situation?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, I'd like to take this chance to comment on something I read on this blog. Can't remember who the author was, maybe Tim? He or she was saying that most classes of IP are protected by either copyright or patent. Art by copyright and invention by patent. Software is protected by both, however. Having software protected by copyright seems ok to me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tim, about your question about a good software patent, this is one I've thought about but never gotten around to really researching, and I'd like to get some others' perspective on it: the RSA patent. Can we be sure it wouldn't have been discovered without software patents? It seems like the nature of science and scientists to publish their findings. And isn't science what RSA really is? Not invention, not even the "art" of programming, but science. Should we really be patenting science?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 10:27:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The DMCA vs. Video Jukeboxes</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/the_dmca_vs_video_jukeboxes/#comment-1446537</link><description>here's a list of video juke boxes which you simply use your computer to do all the ripping:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=585212" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:32:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Straw Poll of the Straw Poll</title><link>http://iowaindependent.disqus.com/a_straw_poll_of_the_straw_poll/#comment-1661757</link><description>&lt;strong&gt;Please update this post!&lt;/strong&gt; Keep us updated on the unofficial poll results!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 11:21:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clinton Strikes Soundbite Gold While Edwards Makes Case as the Alternative</title><link>http://iowaindependent.disqus.com/clinton_strikes_soundbite_gold_while_edwards_makes_case_as_the_alternative/#comment-1662609</link><description>&lt;strong&gt;Congrats&lt;/strong&gt; This is press release quality spin.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 06:49:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama, Paul win Coffee Bean Caucus</title><link>http://iowaindependent.disqus.com/obama_paul_win_coffee_bean_caucus/#comment-1664267</link><description>&lt;strong&gt;No Chris Dodd?&lt;/strong&gt; Did Chris Dodd place or does he get to escape the indignity of tying Mike Gravel in something?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 09:25:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: UPDATED: Colorado Endorsement Watch</title><link>http://coloradoindependent.disqus.com/updated_colorado_endorsement_watch/#comment-1669894</link><description>&lt;strong&gt;Pueblo Chieftain endorses Ritter&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="http://chieftain.com/editorial/1162143804/1" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://chieftain.com/editorial/1162143804/1&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 06:43:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Safeway Shy On Contraception</title><link>http://coloradoindependent.disqus.com/safeway_shy_on_contraception/#comment-1670655</link><description>&lt;strong&gt;Shelf life&lt;/strong&gt; I heard shelf life is more like 4 years, from the pharmeceutical itself.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 06:41:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pregnancy Centers Put Up False Fronts</title><link>http://coloradoindependent.disqus.com/pregnancy_centers_put_up_false_fronts/#comment-1670682</link><description>&lt;strong&gt;They don't care about women&lt;/strong&gt; Funny how they pretend to care about women but then forget about her after the baby is born.&amp;nbsp; I wish I could remember where I read it, but I've heard that the reason they don't like abortion or contraception is they want to keep women under control, and the best way to do that is saddle her with a bunch of children.&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's family values for ya!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 07:13:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Some Pregnant Women More Equal Than Others</title><link>http://coloradoindependent.disqus.com/some_pregnant_women_more_equal_than_others/#comment-1670752</link><description>&lt;strong&gt;About high risk women&lt;/strong&gt; If a woman in a high risk pregnancy cannot afford the pregnancy, then maybe she shouldn't have the child at all. If you can't afford the pregnancy what makes you think you can afford a child at all? Make the taxpayers pay for it?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 06:52:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Elephants Eat Their Own</title><link>http://coloradoindependent.disqus.com/elephants_eat_their_own/#comment-1671091</link><description>&lt;strong&gt;Ha&lt;/strong&gt; Give it up Zap. The dream's over.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 18:40:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: St. Paddy&amp;#8217;s Parade Turns Ugly In Colorado Springs</title><link>http://coloradoindependent.disqus.com/st_paddy8217s_parade_turns_ugly_in_colorado_springs/#comment-1671451</link><description>&lt;strong&gt;too orwellian&lt;/strong&gt; When did PEACE become a dirty word?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 06:41:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oil and Gas Update: Cheap Natural Gas Hurting Colorado</title><link>http://coloradoindependent.disqus.com/oil_and_gas_update_cheap_natural_gas_hurting_colorado/#comment-1674664</link><description>&lt;strong&gt;Cheap Gas&lt;/strong&gt; I'd rather pay more taxes to cover the loss of severance taxes and keep the pipelines out of sensitive areas over the benes from the severance taxes.&amp;nbsp; Duhh.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:34:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Muslims Fear ‘Islamophobia’ Following Workplace Controversies</title><link>http://minnesotaindependent.disqus.com/muslims_fear_aislamophobiaa_following_workplace_controversies/#comment-1608175</link><description>&lt;strong&gt;Something to think about&lt;/strong&gt; One point worth thinking about. Where is the outcry from the Muslim leaders on the terrorists? I think that if there was more heard denouncing some of the bad things from radical islam there would be more support for the majority of Muslims that are just trying to make a normal life like everyone else.&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just a thought.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 05:56:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Breaking: Immigration Agents Arresting People in Willmar</title><link>http://minnesotaindependent.disqus.com/breaking_immigration_agents_arresting_people_in_willmar/#comment-1608242</link><description>&lt;strong&gt;Oh NO!&lt;/strong&gt; What are we going to do? You mean that they are out there arresting ILLEGAL Immigrants, some of which may have committed other crimes such as ID theft? How dare they! What is next? The police will go after murderers? What is this world coming to?!??</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:55:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Al Franken on Larry King&amp;#8211;Liveblog</title><link>http://minnesotaindependent.disqus.com/al_franken_on_larry_king8211liveblog/#comment-1608255</link><description>&lt;strong&gt;wow&lt;/strong&gt; Thanks for taking the time to do this. Now I am positive my decision not to watch this crap was the right one! It sounds to me like this interview with Franken was a whole lot of nothing! I am sure we can expect much more of that in the future from one of the world's most un-funny comdians!&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am glad it was your time wasted on this and not mine! &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;Way to go with that hard hitting journalism again MM!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 04:34:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Breaking: Immigration Agents Arresting People in Willmar</title><link>http://minnesotaindependent.disqus.com/breaking_immigration_agents_arresting_people_in_willmar/#comment-1608244</link><description>&lt;strong&gt;Yeah!&lt;/strong&gt; Thats right stop wasting money on enforcing the laws of this country! That money can be used for more important things like more grants to top notch organizations like ACORN right?&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 04:37:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In Minnesota We Don&amp;#8217;t Play With Ducks, We Hunt Them</title><link>http://minnesotaindependent.disqus.com/in_minnesota_we_don8217t_play_with_ducks_we_hunt_them/#comment-1608240</link><description>&lt;strong&gt;I See...&lt;/strong&gt; so now the fact that ice not being able to form in Southern California due to the climate of that region is me making it a global warming issue?&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;Because there used to be TONS of outdoor ice rinks in Southern California before Al Gore made his movie right?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;My bad I guess!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 05:29:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Al Franken on Larry King&amp;#8211;Liveblog</title><link>http://minnesotaindependent.disqus.com/al_franken_on_larry_king8211liveblog/#comment-1608256</link><description>&lt;strong&gt;re: wow&lt;/strong&gt; and thanks for wasting YOUR time on an insignificant comment, douchebag!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 06:40:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Al Franken on Larry King&amp;#8211;Liveblog</title><link>http://minnesotaindependent.disqus.com/al_franken_on_larry_king8211liveblog/#comment-1608257</link><description>&lt;strong&gt;Time to up your meds!&lt;/strong&gt; Wow....angry aren't we? Sorry mommy and daddy didn't hug you enough!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 06:45:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Breaking: Immigration Agents Arresting People in Willmar</title><link>http://minnesotaindependent.disqus.com/breaking_immigration_agents_arresting_people_in_willmar/#comment-1608246</link><description>&lt;strong&gt;It has nothing to do with research...&lt;/strong&gt; History has little to do with it. The laws are in place, and ICE was enforcing them. So what you are essentially saying is that because at one time we didn't have "illegal immigration" therefore we shouldn't now.&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here is another example using your logic:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;LSD wasn't always illegal so the police should not arrest anyone using it or possessing it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please don't assume my knowledge of history. This has nothing to do with history, it has to do with current laws and enforcing them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 07:16:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Al Franken on Larry King&amp;#8211;Liveblog</title><link>http://minnesotaindependent.disqus.com/al_franken_on_larry_king8211liveblog/#comment-1608258</link><description>&lt;strong&gt;A for effort!&lt;/strong&gt; though i'm not certain your opinion on funny vs. unfunny is credible.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 07:19:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Breaking: &amp;#8216;Big Question&amp;#8217; Blogger Eric Black to Take Star Tribune Buyout</title><link>http://minnesotaindependent.disqus.com/breaking_8216big_question8217_blogger_eric_black_to_take_star_tribune_buyout/#comment-1610908</link><description>&lt;strong&gt;Does he blog more, or go into politics?&lt;/strong&gt; A lot of people wish him well, whatever he does.&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Strib is in dire straits. I can understand how it would not be fun staying there at the deathbed - you in it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;Perhaps he will move to the Sixth District, and run against the witch. Bravo if he does.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 09:05:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MSU hate group has ties to white supremacy movement</title><link>http://michiganmessenger.disqus.com/msu_hate_group_has_ties_to_white_supremacy_movement/#comment-1658201</link><description>&lt;strong&gt;YAF&lt;/strong&gt; There is a difference between random connections on facebook and getting busted participating in a depraved orgy in the reststop on 127.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 07:43:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Muslims Fear ‘Islamophobia’ Following Workplace Controversies</title><link>http://theminnesotaindependent.disqus.com/muslims_fear_aislamophobiaa_following_workplace_controversies/#comment-1680762</link><description>&lt;strong&gt;Something to think about&lt;/strong&gt; One point worth thinking about. Where is the outcry from the Muslim leaders on the terrorists? I think that if there was more heard denouncing some of the bad things from radical islam there would be more support for the majority of Muslims that are just trying to make a normal life like everyone else.&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just a thought.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 05:56:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Breaking: Immigration Agents Arresting People in Willmar</title><link>http://theminnesotaindependent.disqus.com/breaking_immigration_agents_arresting_people_in_willmar/#comment-1680825</link><description>&lt;strong&gt;Oh NO!&lt;/strong&gt; What are we going to do? You mean that they are out there arresting ILLEGAL Immigrants, some of which may have committed other crimes such as ID theft? How dare they! What is next? The police will go after murderers? What is this world coming to?!??</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:55:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Al Franken on Larry King&amp;#8211;Liveblog</title><link>http://theminnesotaindependent.disqus.com/al_franken_on_larry_king8211liveblog/#comment-1680838</link><description>&lt;strong&gt;wow&lt;/strong&gt; Thanks for taking the time to do this. Now I am positive my decision not to watch this crap was the right one! It sounds to me like this interview with Franken was a whole lot of nothing! I am sure we can expect much more of that in the future from one of the world's most un-funny comdians!&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am glad it was your time wasted on this and not mine! &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;Way to go with that hard hitting journalism again MM!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 04:34:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Breaking: Immigration Agents Arresting People in Willmar</title><link>http://theminnesotaindependent.disqus.com/breaking_immigration_agents_arresting_people_in_willmar/#comment-1680827</link><description>&lt;strong&gt;Yeah!&lt;/strong&gt; Thats right stop wasting money on enforcing the laws of this country! That money can be used for more important things like more grants to top notch organizations like ACORN right?&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 04:37:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In Minnesota We Don&amp;#8217;t Play With Ducks, We Hunt Them</title><link>http://theminnesotaindependent.disqus.com/in_minnesota_we_don8217t_play_with_ducks_we_hunt_them/#comment-1680823</link><description>&lt;strong&gt;I See...&lt;/strong&gt; so now the fact that ice not being able to form in Southern California due to the climate of that region is me making it a global warming issue?&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;Because there used to be TONS of outdoor ice rinks in Southern California before Al Gore made his movie right?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;My bad I guess!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 05:29:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Al Franken on Larry King&amp;#8211;Liveblog</title><link>http://theminnesotaindependent.disqus.com/al_franken_on_larry_king8211liveblog/#comment-1680839</link><description>&lt;strong&gt;re: wow&lt;/strong&gt; and thanks for wasting YOUR time on an insignificant comment, douchebag!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 06:40:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Al Franken on Larry King&amp;#8211;Liveblog</title><link>http://theminnesotaindependent.disqus.com/al_franken_on_larry_king8211liveblog/#comment-1680840</link><description>&lt;strong&gt;Time to up your meds!&lt;/strong&gt; Wow....angry aren't we? Sorry mommy and daddy didn't hug you enough!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 06:45:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Breaking: Immigration Agents Arresting People in Willmar</title><link>http://theminnesotaindependent.disqus.com/breaking_immigration_agents_arresting_people_in_willmar/#comment-1680829</link><description>&lt;strong&gt;It has nothing to do with research...&lt;/strong&gt; History has little to do with it. The laws are in place, and ICE was enforcing them. So what you are essentially saying is that because at one time we didn't have "illegal immigration" therefore we shouldn't now.&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here is another example using your logic:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;LSD wasn't always illegal so the police should not arrest anyone using it or possessing it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please don't assume my knowledge of history. This has nothing to do with history, it has to do with current laws and enforcing them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 07:16:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Al Franken on Larry King&amp;#8211;Liveblog</title><link>http://theminnesotaindependent.disqus.com/al_franken_on_larry_king8211liveblog/#comment-1680841</link><description>&lt;strong&gt;A for effort!&lt;/strong&gt; though i'm not certain your opinion on funny vs. unfunny is credible.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 07:19:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Breaking: &amp;#8216;Big Question&amp;#8217; Blogger Eric Black to Take Star Tribune Buyout</title><link>http://theminnesotaindependent.disqus.com/breaking_8216big_question8217_blogger_eric_black_to_take_star_tribune_buyout/#comment-1681464</link><description>&lt;strong&gt;Does he blog more, or go into politics?&lt;/strong&gt; A lot of people wish him well, whatever he does.&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Strib is in dire straits. I can understand how it would not be fun staying there at the deathbed - you in it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;Perhaps he will move to the Sixth District, and run against the witch. Bravo if he does.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 09:05:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FOX Attacks Decency&amp;#8230; with Bill O&amp;#8217;Reilly Leading the Way</title><link>http://foxattacks.disqus.com/fox_attacks_decency8230_with_bill_o8217reilly_leading_the_way/#comment-2054993</link><description>thank you, i just fapped to that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 04:09:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Red Eye host jokes about having sex with a horse</title><link>http://foxattacks.disqus.com/red_eye_host_jokes_about_having_sex_with_a_horse/#comment-2050840</link><description>Don't call me sexist, because I'm female too, but that blond bimbo needs a diaper on her mouth to stop all that sick shit from pouring out.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:36:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kempes Leaving ESPN?</title><link>http://laligatalk.disqus.com/kempes_leaving_espn/#comment-1783215</link><description>ESPN Latin America is cutting production costs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Note the following:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Euro 2008 matches on ESPN Latin America and ESPN Deportes have English-language graphics.  The announcers are NOT identified by the graphics at all.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:17:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ESPN Fútbol Channel?</title><link>http://laligatalk.disqus.com/espn_faotbol_channel/#comment-1783202</link><description>Don't see that happening until ESPN gets a piece of the English Premier League in 2010.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, Time Warner, COX, and Comcast will raise hell with Congress and in the media if ESPN were to increase the amount of live events on ESPN Classic.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Comcast in particular needs to protect its sports channels:  Versus, Golf Channel, and Comcast SportsNet regional networks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:20:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Know What Jews Like</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/i_know_what_jews_like/#comment-1790663</link><description>hmm.  i'd like to be a fly on the wall at the local temple to find out how the really feel about their loyalty to israel.  let them that choose israel go there.  i don't really care.&lt;br&gt;they're a welfare/apartheid state, at least south africa used their own monies.  they claim to be an independent country, i'd like to see them survive without u.s. aid.  we should end all forms of foreign aid. we should take care of our citizens before anyone else...especially our veterans.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:15:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Brian McLaren: How Does Saddam&amp;#8217;s Execution Make You Feel?</title><link>http://godspolitics.disqus.com/brian_mclaren_how_does_saddam8217s_execution_make_you_feel/#comment-2065352</link><description>Dirty? &lt;br&gt; &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Good thing the world does not depend upon you. &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Too much weak kneed - left wing navel gazing. Saddam is dead. Good riddance.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Anything less is rubbish. Too bad he was not done in public - as is common in that part of the world.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Be glad you have the freedom to continue gazing.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt; That freedom came at the point of the weapon. And that freedom came from men not afraid to use the weapon.&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 06:08:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;sewer ISP&amp;#8221; joke almost appeared in Milford</title><link>http://granitegeek.disqus.com/google8217s_8220sewer_isp8221_joke_almost_appeared_in_milford/#comment-2109681</link><description>&lt;a href="http://www.focuss.net/news/ask4" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.focuss.net/news/ask4&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 01:13:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Scopes trial issues - still potent after all these years</title><link>http://granitegeek.disqus.com/the_scopes_trial_issues_still_potent_after_all_these_years/#comment-2109763</link><description>Do you see in the Republican debate last night that three of the candidates admitted that they don't believe in evolution?  They were Sen. Sam Brownback, Gov. Mike Huckabee, and Rep. Tom Tancredo.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We will be in big trouble if any of these brainiacs get elected...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 05:05:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Brooks has left the area</title><link>http://granitegeek.disqus.com/david_brooks_has_left_the_area/#comment-2109932</link><description>Earle, I look forward to reading your spin on science and technology.  Do you post somewhere else besides here, or is this your first go at blogging?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 04:10:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Outcome of Violence</title><link>http://onejerusalem.disqus.com/the_outcome_of_violence/#comment-2561014</link><description>In your first sentence, you make 2 mistakes: finely and avoidable.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 10:45:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Zidane - The Headbutt Heard Around the World</title><link>http://onejerusalem.disqus.com/zidane_the_headbutt_heard_around_the_world/#comment-2561142</link><description>This is sooo funny! (and true)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:01:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ugh</title><link>http://quaintly.disqus.com/ugh/#comment-2849707</link><description>People aren't empathic by nature. If everyone grew up being empathic, people would get along much better and the world would be a better place - in theory.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's hard to get someone else to feel strongly about something they don't understand, or haven't experienced yet. They don't know what you know or believe in what you believe in. They haven't seen or felt things as you have.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's easy for people who read or write a lot to expect others to be empathic. After reading so many books, and seeing from so many perspectives, it would be easier for us to be empathic - to put ourselves in someone else's shoes. But we simply cannot expect the same from others.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I guess the trick is to just know which battles to fight, and which ones to back off from. Concede defeat every now and then, but extract a promise or agreement from the other party as compromise. Blast the other person, then work your way towards a pleasant compromise :P People appreciate that, if only to escape from your clutches. They'd just want a hasty retreat at that point.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for the jealous girlfriends? It's not your fault. It's just that they don't trust their boyfriends. That's why their relationships might not last, while your friendships will. Cheer up! Don't take things too seriously! :D&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Okay that's all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ps: I'm bored. Can you tell?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 04:40:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: So Much That I Want</title><link>http://quaintly.disqus.com/so_much_that_i_want/#comment-2850703</link><description>And then they grow up to be beautiful young adults . . . then the world changes . . . greasy teenagers and twisted old men wave at your daughter and you're not smiling at them anymore, and your son consistently openly challenges you. After a short while you're left with an empty nest and then you realise you're a relic . . .</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 05:53:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Pretty Much Sums It Up</title><link>http://quaintly.disqus.com/this_pretty_much_sums_it_up/#comment-2855024</link><description>nice top! where'd you get it from?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:39:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Not Quite An Arms Race</title><link>http://quaintly.disqus.com/not_quite_an_arms_race/#comment-2855645</link><description>FOB=teen rock - didn't you realise earlier? =)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 07:35:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Palaver on Procrastination</title><link>http://quaintly.disqus.com/palaver_on_procrastination/#comment-2856137</link><description>pinkpau I have 3 kids now but all i can tell you is......if they had internet in my days at uni, i will be sweeping the longkangs of KL now.  so. a blessing in disguise!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:11:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Difference Between Ais Kosong And Evian</title><link>http://quaintly.disqus.com/the_difference_between_ais_kosong_and_evian/#comment-2856174</link><description>i know what you mean... i can tell when i'm being served water from the tap too... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;btw, do you still have your old blog's archives?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 12:21:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Doldrums</title><link>http://quaintly.disqus.com/doldrums/#comment-2856238</link><description>smartypants,  omg the palm analysis test thingy is so long and i took ages to finish it, only then it tells me what i know already.. 'you're a compassionate person with love and affection for your family and friends'. sheesh.. and for the rest of the analysis, i'd have to pay?!?!!? wtf.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:17:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mirror Exchanges</title><link>http://quaintly.disqus.com/mirror_exchanges/#comment-2856258</link><description>i guess i need to work harder to make my someone feel special.. =) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;you have a very good way of putting down feelings and thoughts on paper/blog.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 10:08:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Doldrums</title><link>http://quaintly.disqus.com/doldrums/#comment-2856247</link><description>wow.. i guess i must have missed that. oh well, i still remember some of the answers, so maybe i'll try it again some other time.. =)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 10:10:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Will And A Frog</title><link>http://quaintly.disqus.com/a_will_and_a_frog/#comment-2856485</link><description>omg... why are u dying? or are u just being overly dramatic like we all know you can be? =P &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;anyways, don't die! i'll miss reading your blog entries... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;btw, how and when did martian and you break up? O.O</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 10:03:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Just Perfect</title><link>http://quaintly.disqus.com/just_perfect/#comment-2856761</link><description>i thought you broke up with Martian a while back? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and why is he boycotting your blog?! i like to read your blog! your uncanny way of writing down things just as they are is awesome.. and you were wrong about writing being easy when one feels that way.. i don't find writing down my thoughts or feelings easy at all. guess i'm not a very expressive person. =(</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 08:39:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Survived Mt Kinabalu</title><link>http://quaintly.disqus.com/i_survived_mt_kinabalu/#comment-2856593</link><description>Highest MT in SOUTH EAST ASIA no less!  &lt;br&gt;And doesn't Nexus just rock?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;from&lt;br&gt;ex-Ipoh girl turned Sabahan, used to work at Nexus!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 19:23:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Mild Malaise</title><link>http://quaintly.disqus.com/a_mild_malaise/#comment-2856852</link><description>wow.. fly to hk just to study.. you are being spoiled by dad aren't you? did he pay for your air ticket?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 00:20:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Mild Malaise</title><link>http://quaintly.disqus.com/a_mild_malaise/#comment-2856858</link><description>oh.. did u pay for it yourself then? lol... that's nice of yourself then. =)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 02:41:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You&amp;#8217;re Yummy</title><link>http://quaintly.disqus.com/you8217re_yummy/#comment-2858128</link><description>Martian: How old are you?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 21:19:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Not So Happy Merdeka</title><link>http://quaintly.disqus.com/not_so_happy_merdeka/#comment-2858363</link><description>everything else u right is okay, but saying smart tunnel is dumb makes it a bit silly really</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:10:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Barisan National Cheats Their Way To Victory</title><link>http://quaintly.disqus.com/how_barisan_national_cheats_their_way_to_victory/#comment-2862044</link><description>i've complete and uttermost respect for you sue ann. ii hope to at least one day reach your level of maturity and capability of such deep insight and inspirational writing....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 01:16:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Barisan National Cheats Their Way To Victory</title><link>http://quaintly.disqus.com/how_barisan_national_cheats_their_way_to_victory/#comment-2862194</link><description>you know, you could do our country lots of good if you decide to go into politics. there are many who would hear you out. very good write-up. 100% truth about what's going on.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 04:22:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Barisan National Cheats Their Way To Victory</title><link>http://quaintly.disqus.com/how_barisan_national_cheats_their_way_to_victory/#comment-2862196</link><description>apparently there's a rumour going around that bn is panicking now. they are getting the military votes to help buck up the losing areas. anddd they are planning to cheat. what the hell!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 07:54:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Three Things To Talk About</title><link>http://quaintly.disqus.com/three_things_to_talk_about/#comment-2862652</link><description>i think.... my fav is ringo anddd hanis!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:34:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Early Morning Peanut Butter Cup-Induced Commentary</title><link>http://quaintly.disqus.com/early_morning_peanut_butter_cup_induced_commentary/#comment-2865383</link><description>excuse me. but Malaysia got explosions in the sky. so stop complaining, and please leave the music out of the politics, thank you very much.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 23:11:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Attitudes and Absences</title><link>http://quaintly.disqus.com/attitudes_and_absences/#comment-2865604</link><description>Respect. I was mostly a nerd at school and is doing well in life, but I will never want my kids to be like me. The years in school should be better memories other than study study study, stress, and study somemore.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 09:20:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rainforest World Music Festival 2008 and Other Things</title><link>http://quaintly.disqus.com/rainforest_world_music_festival_2008_and_other_things/#comment-2865907</link><description>now you are a famous blogger....you can't keep wearing the same stuff everytime...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 06:24:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Things I Learnt About College And NYC Part 1</title><link>http://quaintly.disqus.com/things_i_learnt_about_college_and_nyc_part_1/#comment-2867054</link><description>Going for this?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;President Lee C. Bollinger is pleased to announce that on Thursday, Sept. 11, at 7:00 p.m.,... remarks by Senators John McCain and Barack Obama. Moderated by TIME Magazine Editor Richard Stengel and PBS NewsHour Anchor Judy Woodruff, the forum will offer both candidates a national stage to discuss the role of service in America.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.columbia.edu/cu/news/newyorkstories/servicestudents.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.columbia.edu/cu/news/newyorkstories/...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 02:20:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pinkpau&amp;#8217;s Guide to US College Applications, Part 1</title><link>http://quaintly.disqus.com/pinkpau8217s_guide_to_us_college_applications_part_1/#comment-2867664</link><description>hey..does this means that i dont have to take ADP but just other pre-U program also can go to US?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 03:19:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pinkpau&amp;#8217;s Guide to US College Applications, Part 1</title><link>http://quaintly.disqus.com/pinkpau8217s_guide_to_us_college_applications_part_1/#comment-2867703</link><description>you're awesome =D</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 13:14:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gifted &amp;#8211; Come With Me</title><link>http://prettymuchamazing.disqus.com/gifted_8211_come_with_me/#comment-16973935</link><description>maybe it's me, but this "music" track sounds a lot like jay-z's "my first song"...personally, i enjoy a bit more originality to my music.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:22:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Presenting GCCalc: a horrible abuse of GCC</title><link>http://tlrobinson-blog.disqus.com/presenting_gccalc_a_horrible_abuse_of_gcc/#comment-3140277</link><description>&lt;p&gt;http://neugierig.org/software/c-repl/&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:14:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Boy Diaries Part 3</title><link>http://aronil.disqus.com/the_boy_diaries_part_3/#comment-3421893</link><description>oh man, i could really open up a can of worms on this one, but i&amp;#039;m too busy at the computer :p</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 04:13:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is reducing medical errors similar to improving transportation safety?</title><link>http://kevinmd.disqus.com/is_reducing_medical_errors_similar_to_improving_transportation_safety/#comment-15235923</link><description>Compare medicine to aviation and transportation when this is considered routine:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://micom.net/oops/AirMaint.jpg" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://micom.net/oops/AirMaint.jpg&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:07:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A doctor in Cuba becomes a nurse in the United States</title><link>http://kevinmd.disqus.com/a_doctor_in_cuba_becomes_a_nurse_in_the_united_states/#comment-15235968</link><description>Nurses with specialized skills and willing to work the tough shifts, nights, weekends, yeah, they can do quite well financially.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;More power to them. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would imagine anyone who made it through medical school anywhere, could be an excellent nurse with just a little orientation to whatever day-to-day idiosyncracies we have here, compared to where they came from.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also means, if that Cuban doc can do it, so could an American nurse.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Doctor D  -  I agree. Last time I checked, the biggest determinant of getting doctors to practice in rural areas is, training in the same rural areas, and most important, being from that area in the first place.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:45:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tiesto In Search of Sunrise Summer Tour: June 22 Hartford</title><link>http://boramag.disqus.com/tiesto_in_search_of_sunrise_summer_tour_june_22_hartford/#comment-3581963</link><description>Yeah i was one of the first people to get at the concert at like 330 cuz doors were to open at 430 ish.... got in at 7:37 and everyone was like this concert better ripe or else! It was all cuz there was like no power for lights and the scanner stuff or something in the plaza since the lights were only working for like 10 mins during Second Sun(which was amazing) but over all i still think it was worth it driving an hour and 45 mins to see tiesto (from mass) hopefully this wont happen next year!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:48:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tiesto In Search of Sunrise Summer Tour: June 22 Hartford</title><link>http://boramag.disqus.com/tiesto_in_search_of_sunrise_summer_tour_june_22_hartford/#comment-3581967</link><description>What a bloody disappointment!! Who was managing this show? You're FIRED! I spent good money to wait in lines? WTF. We were considering a cabana, thank god we decided against it. Tickets for drinks? Are you kidding? Bartenders don't know how to deal with cash? Tiesto rocks and we want him back in Hartford next year but you guys have a long way to go.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:35:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New (Old? Lame?) Justice &amp;#8211; Sure You Will</title><link>http://prettymuchamazing.disqus.com/new_old_lame_justice_8211_sure_you_will/#comment-16966605</link><description>It sounds like Breakbot to me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 21:46:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Choosing the Right Infrastructure for your Project</title><link>http://codingclues.disqus.com/choosing_the_right_infrastructure_for_your_project/#comment-3855777</link><description>Java is too big! No PHP!, why do ppl keeping saying this. i doubt your language experience</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:52:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: President Obama&amp;apos;s Guide to Going Green</title><link>http://treehuggerdev.disqus.com/president_obamaaposs_guide_to_going_green/#comment-17191007</link><description>&lt;p&gt;wheres the reduce? :( i only see recycle and reuse&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:25:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 4 Radical Solutions to Packaging Waste</title><link>http://treehuggerdev.disqus.com/4_radical_solutions_to_packaging_waste/#comment-17185665</link><description>&lt;p&gt; How about enacting a law that grocery stores need to sell a certain proportion of goods in bulk?  I go to a coop with reusable containers to fill up.  Good answer by the way, Anthony.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:35:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Its The Friggin Weekend v2</title><link>http://prettymuchamazing.disqus.com/its_the_friggin_weekend_v2/#comment-16964388</link><description>nope, not justice</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 14:03:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why are China&amp;#8217;s web stats so bad?</title><link>http://roytest.disqus.com/why_are_china8217s_web_stats_so_bad/#comment-4794478</link><description>I am in China trying to work but its absolutely imposible to surf some US and European site they are simply blocked.  For example to use wikipedia I have to use Annony Mouse.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 05:30:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Old Media&amp;#8217;s Effect on Reputation and Action</title><link>http://roytest.disqus.com/old_media8217s_effect_on_reputation_and_action/#comment-4794726</link><description>A MUST video watch in my opinion, for every person who is trying to peek into the future and predict what will happen.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://epic.makingithappen.co.uk/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://epic.makingithappen.co.uk/&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 01:56:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Randi&amp;#8217;s Best (and Worst) of 2008</title><link>http://prettymuchamazing.disqus.com/randi8217s_best_and_worst_of_2008/#comment-16972341</link><description>Nice lists, but i definitely disagree with a lot of your least favorites ("See You Again," "Womanizer," Katy Perry's singles).  Overplayed? Maybe. But they're so catchy--how could you not like them!?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 22:01:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hidebehind- one site to rule them all</title><link>http://theskykidcom.disqus.com/hidebehind_one_site_to_rule_them_all_77/#comment-8711963</link><description>awesome if its true dewez&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;thanks for the headsup skykid</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 01:29:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Libera</title><link>http://theskykidcom.disqus.com/libera/#comment-8712101</link><description>Why not join the Angelvoices Group on Yahoo?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:06:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Ring  : All PS3 Themes</title><link>http://allps3themes.disqus.com/the_ring_all_ps3_themes/#comment-6544061</link><description>lol, dat last comment really laid it out there, which one is cheaper! lol! ive had both consoles, 360 first, then ps3 several months later, sold my 360 shortly after getting my ps3 because the more i messed around with it, the more i realized how much better it is! how many times do you have to press the buttons just to listen to your music?? 5...6 times??? can't store my pictures in it either, ps3 can! 360 visuals(when playing music) fairly the same thing, see that typt all over! ps3 visuals (when playing music) are completely different, especially in the latest update, absolutely astonishing!&lt;br&gt;adam says the hd graphics aren't any different?? that's juss cus yer blind, i've played GoW in both 480i and 1080i (or was it 720p??), and i couldn't see any difference in visuals. BUT, i've played T.E.S. 4: Oblivian (ps3) first at 480i (standard t.v.) and thought the graphics were o.k.! then i connected it to my hdtv at 720p HUGE DIFFERENCE IN VISUALS! i couldn't believe at how vivid the picture was! &lt;br&gt;you think gt 5 is repetetive? obviously you haven't tried the demo! i gaurantee when it comes out, EVERY1 will be drifting in online races! which is a little hard to do on forza 1 or 2! i've tried! forza 2 is just forza 1 with better graphics! SAME DAMM GAME!&lt;br&gt;he likes to think R:FoM is cheap? play it co-op on superhuman! it's amazing at how much action the ps3 will dish out before the minor lag shows up! all the ps3 owners should know what i'm talking about there! it takes alot!&lt;br&gt;and now there's talk about ms releasing a Blu-Ray add-on! lol!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:10:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ICO versionD : All PS3 Themes</title><link>http://allps3themes.disqus.com/ico_versiond_all_ps3_themes/#comment-6545405</link><description>What did you do, basically just copy m0dus's Ico theme and put more backgrounds on it? You should have probably asked him permission before doing that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 12:57:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Heavenly Sword 06 : All PS3 Themes</title><link>http://allps3themes.disqus.com/heavenly_sword_06_all_ps3_themes/#comment-6546154</link><description>Oops! Didn't mean to use the makers name!  Can you post the template you used for the XMB lines?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:45:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sophie Howard_versionD : All PS3 Themes</title><link>http://allps3themes.disqus.com/sophie_howard_versiond_all_ps3_themes/#comment-6546539</link><description>i've seen better and sophie howard isnt that pretty anyway</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 10:48:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Final Fantasy VII : All PS3 Themes</title><link>http://allps3themes.disqus.com/final_fantasy_vii_all_ps3_themes_38/#comment-6546863</link><description>why the hell does he look like he has down syndrome?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:49:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Official Lair: Asylian Theme : All PS3 Themes</title><link>http://allps3themes.disqus.com/the_official_lair_asylian_theme_all_ps3_themes/#comment-6547021</link><description>Cool theme, but the sounds get irritating after awhile.  If someone could rip the sounds out, I'd use it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:30:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Realistique 2  : All PS3 Themes</title><link>http://allps3themes.disqus.com/realistique_2_all_ps3_themes/#comment-6543216</link><description>Excellent</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 02:57:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: APE Clan : All PS3 Themes</title><link>http://allps3themes.disqus.com/ape_clan_all_ps3_themes/#comment-6547491</link><description>the best clan theme ive seen ours isn't finished yet but i'm nt posting, don't want no n00bs downloading</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 06:30:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mirror&amp;#8217;s Edge [by Xié] : All PS3 Themes</title><link>http://allps3themes.disqus.com/mirror8217s_edge_by_xie_all_ps3_themes/#comment-6549309</link><description>Can't read the writing due to the white background. Otherwise, great theme!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 10:41:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shinra V2 : All PS3 Themes</title><link>http://allps3themes.disqus.com/shinra_v2_all_ps3_themes/#comment-6541425</link><description>this isnt a theme of shinra, this is a theme of crisis core, with only the backround and one icon having the shinra logo, FAIL</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 19:11:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BloodSpillXXT - Shaiya - Light : All PS3 Themes</title><link>http://allps3themes.disqus.com/bloodspillxxt_shaiya_light_all_ps3_themes/#comment-6549910</link><description>What game is this from?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 14:25:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Video Game Outsiders 01 (Unofficial) : All PS3 Themes</title><link>http://allps3themes.disqus.com/video_game_outsiders_01_unofficial_all_ps3_themes/#comment-6551016</link><description>Woo, a PS3 theme with an Xbox 360 controller as the main logo in it, just what every PS3 owner wants :D</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:41:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Summer Girl : All PS3 Themes</title><link>http://allps3themes.disqus.com/summer_girl_all_ps3_themes/#comment-6551111</link><description>wee wee</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:13:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Resistance: Fall of Man 2 : All PS3 Themes</title><link>http://allps3themes.disqus.com/resistance_fall_of_man_2_all_ps3_themes/#comment-6545316</link><description>The game's called Resistance 2, no subtitles dammit!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:05:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hotties On Ur PS3 : All PS3 Themes</title><link>http://allps3themes.disqus.com/hotties_on_ur_ps3_all_ps3_themes/#comment-6552247</link><description>do some nudes</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 17:27:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Beaches (HD Only) : All PS3 Themes</title><link>http://allps3themes.disqus.com/beaches_hd_only_all_ps3_themes/#comment-6552458</link><description>and this is one of the highest rated? jesus some people have terrible taste</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 20:46:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sticky Sackboy (LittleBigPlanet) : All PS3 Themes</title><link>http://allps3themes.disqus.com/sticky_sackboy_littlebigplanet_all_ps3_themes/#comment-6553549</link><description>i like the icons but not bckgroung 4 some reason!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:26:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wizzin&amp;#8217; on the 360 : All PS3 Themes</title><link>http://allps3themes.disqus.com/wizzin8217_on_the_360_all_ps3_themes/#comment-6545910</link><description>typical fanboy shite</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:30:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PS3 Must Have : All PS3 Themes</title><link>http://allps3themes.disqus.com/ps3_must_have_all_ps3_themes/#comment-6554182</link><description>Hey man, great theme! But maybe in a updated version you could not use watermarked images, that GameSpy logo is really annoying!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And remove Tomb Raider, Spiderman, Condemned 2 and Haze and add LittleBigPlanet, Dead Space, Uncharted and Killzone 2!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just a suggestion!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 17:09:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Celtic Football Club : All PS3 Themes</title><link>http://allps3themes.disqus.com/celtic_football_club_all_ps3_themes/#comment-6545630</link><description>Up Eh Hoops Fuk Eh Gers Hunz!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mon Eh Fenians Fuk Eh Orange B**tards!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;4 in a row here we go :D</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:07:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Celtic Football Club : All PS3 Themes</title><link>http://allps3themes.disqus.com/celtic_football_club_all_ps3_themes/#comment-6545631</link><description>Oh Arthur Boruc!! He Blessed Himself And The Hunz Went Off There Nuts.. Oh Holy Goalie.. Oh Holy Goalie!! ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Fuk Eh Orange B**tards.. RIP Neds</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:10:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Celtic FC : All PS3 Themes</title><link>http://allps3themes.disqus.com/celtic_fc_all_ps3_themes/#comment-6554627</link><description>Hail hail ftq&lt;br&gt;ft gers&lt;br&gt;ft hun&lt;br&gt;ft prods&lt;br&gt;ft orange order&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Long live celtic, ireland &amp;amp; scotland, catholics!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;fuk eh queen.. yeez are just her slaves yer hunz</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:14:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jaki Theme Celtic : All PS3 Themes</title><link>http://allps3themes.disqus.com/jaki_theme_celtic_all_ps3_themes/#comment-6553051</link><description>Mon eh celts.. mon my irish peeps fuck eh queen!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By bomb or by gun our deed will be done.. CIRA</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:17:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Scotland : All PS3 Themes</title><link>http://allps3themes.disqus.com/scotland_all_ps3_themes/#comment-6549545</link><description>OMG Nice skin.. Im having that lol</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:19:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Dark Knight Joker : All PS3 Themes</title><link>http://allps3themes.disqus.com/the_dark_knight_joker_all_ps3_themes/#comment-6550816</link><description>Nice theme :) Simple but yet keeps you guessing lol if you know what i mean lol</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:12:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Official Sony Manga Theme : All PS3 Themes</title><link>http://allps3themes.disqus.com/the_official_sony_manga_theme_all_ps3_themes/#comment-6543365</link><description>Does anyone know where could i get that wallpaper without those icons ofcourse. thanks!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:34:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should Knowledge Workers have E2.0 Ratings, Part 3</title><link>http://andrewmcafee.disqus.com/should_knowledge_workers_have_e20_ratings_part_3/#comment-5487992</link><description>Would you have incentives for writing good emails? Bonuses for effective telephone calls? Prizes for gathering at the water cooler to exchange information?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No, and neither should you have special assessments for use of E2.0 tools.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ask yourself how you would feel about your dean evaluating you this way. A waste of time for you?  The same is true for any knowledge worker. Big organizations have enough bureaucracy already!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 11:06:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Gameplay First - The Dungeon Siege 2 Example</title><link>http://polycat.disqus.com/gameplay_first_the_dungeon_siege_2_example/#comment-5680551</link><description>I love it when people proclaim how great a game is and then assume everyone else must love it too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In my opinion Dungeon Siege had repetitive game play, a boring and dull story at best and the interface mechanics were severely lacking. Now that I have had time to play through the second one for my job I can safely say I feel the sequel is even worse.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But who cares itâ€™s just my opinion and I guess thatâ€™s the point</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 14:01:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Best Kaiser Chiefs Song of, like, Ever</title><link>http://prettymuchamazing.disqus.com/the_best_kaiser_chiefs_song_of_like_ever/#comment-16964636</link><description>song is called "I Predict That You'd Look Good in a Riot"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 13:25:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nemew, Winchester</title><link>http://aimeeblog.disqus.com/nemew_winchester/#comment-5865240</link><description>aimee, your such a hero!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!&lt;br&gt;well done!!!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 08:05:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Madonna &amp;#8211; Celebrate (Oakenfold 12&amp;#8243; Dub)</title><link>http://prettymuchamazing.disqus.com/madonna_8211_celebrate_oakenfold_128243_dub/#comment-16979856</link><description>oakenfold remixes generally suck, so i have no way of knowing whether the actual song is any good. that said, this is one of his better sucky remixes.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 17:46:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.aeropause.com/2006/07/console-interfaces-its-simplicity-stupid/</title><link>http://aeropausegames.disqus.com/thread_0112/#comment-6341679</link><description>can you seriously not figure out how to work the 360 dashboard?  its even got big color bars for the mentally challenged like you.  this is such a joke.  you whine about finding the settings option in the 360 dash, its called the settings blade.  you're obviously just a sony fanboy trying to pass off your biased opinion as some sort of moderate outlook on how the ps3 interface is shaping up.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 03:50:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.aeropause.com/2006/08/lara-crofts-blinged-xbox-360/</title><link>http://aeropausegames.disqus.com/thread_293/#comment-6342504</link><description>Erm... that "PSP" is a DS... but yeah, at least the 360 isn't as ugly.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:30:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hoy te voy a meter un dedo en el ojo: Los paraolímpicos del amor.</title><link>http://greenshi.disqus.com/hoy_te_voy_a_meter_un_dedo_en_el_ojo_los_paraolimpicos_del_amor/#comment-14718908</link><description>En Internet he visto muchas cosas repulsivas, estas fotos, creo que son lo mas repulsivo que vi en mi vida... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;si esto es lo mas repulsivo, no has visto NADA en internet.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;como dudo de que el webmastah aya puesto estas fotos en plan, mirad que sexy, pajeaos sin control.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;si no mas bien por meter un dedo en el ojo como bien indica el post, deberiais todos meteros un dedo en el culo y gozarlo.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;ah, y mantengo mi opinion inicial&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS SHIT?&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 12:39:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Control your Desktop with Mouse Gestures | Tombuntu</title><link>http://tombuntu.disqus.com/control_your_desktop_with_mouse_gestures_tombuntu/#comment-7122184</link><description>iampriteshdesai - Easiet way would be to plug the Hard Drive into another PC with windows and use R-studio or some data recovery app. R-studio is the best I have found, it will find your data on lost partitions. You can possibly use an external/usb device so you can plug your HD into another working PC. I hope this helps, I hate to see people loose their data.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:56:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What’s Been Bugging you in Ubuntu 8.10? | Tombuntu</title><link>http://tombuntu.disqus.com/whats_been_bugging_you_in_ubuntu_810_tombuntu/#comment-7122960</link><description>Your problems are probably to do with pulseaudio.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you ever suspend your computer, when you resume it, pulseaudio currently gets stuck (fix on the way into intrepid-proposed) &lt;a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/202089" rel="nofollow"&gt;https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulse...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For now, instead of killing pulseaudio, run:&lt;br&gt;pasuspender /bin/true&lt;br&gt;whenever you have pulse problems, to jolt it back to life&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This should fix "pulseaudio issues" and "flash issues" as the problem with flash seems to be that it fills up some audio buffer and waits until that has actually been played out of the speakers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;i have also found that you cant use pulse as the input device on skype. but setting the alsa source does work. (as pulse much less rarely is hogging the input device than the output device)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:48:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s Wrong With People?</title><link>http://headon.disqus.com/what8217s_wrong_with_people/#comment-7260457</link><description>which brings to mind the fact that horrible war criminals in time of peace are just regular joe's who use the handicapped slots for fun.  What would this guy be like in a position of power over other people?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 10:00:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 100&amp;#8217;s Of Bad Words For You&amp;#8230; :O</title><link>http://jowki.disqus.com/1008217s_of_bad_words_for_you8230_o/#comment-12638152</link><description>When i made a wordpress blog i was looking around for something like this. Couldnt think of any swears lmfao.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 17:57:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Khajuraho: sex and the sacred</title><link>http://tutztutz.disqus.com/khajuraho_sex_and_the_sacred/#comment-7960308</link><description>christ, they were athletic back then.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 09:49:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Reading magazine</title><link>http://babydoll.disqus.com/reading_magazine/#comment-8185243</link><description>&lt;a href="http://trixinty.net" rel="nofollow"&gt;trixinty.net&lt;/a&gt; ...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 10:56:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Movie watching strategies and other rants on the death of network TV.</title><link>http://thelastminute.disqus.com/movie_watching_strategies_and_other_rants_on_the_death_of_network_tv/#comment-16833844</link><description>You are such a hypocrite.  BTW, video games are even worse than tv.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:26:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WP Wall Guestbook</title><link>http://theappleofdiscord.disqus.com/wp_wall_guestbook/#comment-9121931</link><description>You might want to check you ChipIn.  I donated yesterday, but you're still showing zero...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:40:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: UP&amp;#8217;s Bet to Ms. Cebu Did Not Win</title><link>http://bryankarldotnet.disqus.com/up8217s_bet_to_ms_cebu_did_not_win/#comment-9467515</link><description>Damn! *drools*&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I like Loise Tan. &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Damn! Damn! Damn!&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:46:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: This Sem&amp;#8217;s The Worst Sem Ever</title><link>http://bryankarldotnet.disqus.com/this_sem8217s_the_worst_sem_ever/#comment-9467528</link><description>I deeply understand your situation. I have a three-step method in relieving your stress:&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. Breath Deeply&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. Look at the others around you.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3. Kill that higher authority that really fucks you up&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Was your stress relieved? :D&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes, you have that very demanding literature which is a 3-unit subject. Dood, we have a 2-unit subject that eats all of our time, almost - Physical Education! Fcuk!&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:18:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Compliment for Kennedy</title><link>http://indianabarrister.disqus.com/another_compliment_for_kennedy/#comment-10849957</link><description>The city is already doing what Ike proposes. Have you read his proposal? Once again Ike is all about fluff and air time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 11:44:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Council Wars; Chapter 1.5 (The Rest of the Story)</title><link>http://indianabarrister.disqus.com/council_wars_chapter_15_the_rest_of_the_story/#comment-10850017</link><description>There you go again, drinking while you write your blog.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Are you seriously considering Sherron Franklin a credible source on what happens during a caucus meeting?  She is so anti-Peterson and anti-Democrat she will say anything to cause trouble.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let's see, you called the Republican-controlled DLGF and let them know that local Democrats were trashing local Republicans.  They stuck up for the Republicans.  Eeeeeeeeew, nice bit of investigative work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why don't you ask about the notice assessors are supposed to send out to taxpayers letting them now taxes are going up?  Now I know it hurts when you have to use your brain, but do you honestly think this is something Paul Rickets wants to send out right before an election?  Score!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, you officially endorse lying.  Did you actually try to listen to the tapes?  No, of course not, that would mean you would have to get off your butt and put away the bottle.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sober up and find the real story.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:17:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Behind the Deal</title><link>http://indianabarrister.disqus.com/behind_the_deal/#comment-10850139</link><description>Does someone's loved one have to disappear for anyone to care? Get him to resign!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 09:01:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Less You Forget</title><link>http://indianabarrister.disqus.com/less_you_forget/#comment-10850205</link><description>Oh no! What next? Pathologists with shady histories, ghost employment, secretaries driving free cars, bodies missing...stay tuned for "As the Morgue Turns..."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:54:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Peterson Asks for $85 Million Tax Increase</title><link>http://indianabarrister.disqus.com/peterson_asks_for_85_million_tax_increase/#comment-10851621</link><description>MMMM. Is it just me or wasn't consolidation supposed to save 36 million? oh wait.... 12 million..... oh this just in 4 million..... we now have to pay more? Bart is truly a tool and no one wants to call him on it in mainstream media.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 18:55:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TALES FROM THE TOWNSHIPS</title><link>http://indianabarrister.disqus.com/tales_from_the_townships/#comment-10853113</link><description>Perry is also the place where they have more constable badges than anyone. They work for several different businesses as well as what ever their duties include. I saw one in uniform that had I not noticed would have passed for a MCSD Deputy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 21:07:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TALES FROM THE TOWNSHIPS</title><link>http://indianabarrister.disqus.com/tales_from_the_townships/#comment-10853117</link><description>Actually no they are not special deputies. They are their own dept the deputy constables are apointed to when the Constable is elected. The Sheriff has no oversite on them. SOme may be specials to work part time</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 14:14:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GO SEE FOR YOURSELF</title><link>http://indianabarrister.disqus.com/go_see_for_yourself/#comment-10853585</link><description>I recommend birth control.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 18:24:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GO SEE FOR YOURSELF</title><link>http://indianabarrister.disqus.com/go_see_for_yourself/#comment-10853586</link><description>I recommend utilizing free public education.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 18:25:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SO MUCH FOR A GRACEFUL EXIT</title><link>http://indianabarrister.disqus.com/so_much_for_a_graceful_exit/#comment-10854284</link><description>We should all lobby the legislature to eliminate the Sheriffs perk of keeping the money from warrants and that should take care of the problem and make him go away. When Cottey and those before Sheriff Anderson has this perk I complained then too. That money should go back to the police budget.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 21:03:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: THE GAMES PEOPLE PLAY, BADLY</title><link>http://indianabarrister.disqus.com/the_games_people_play_badly/#comment-10854382</link><description>He's trying to be politically correct by using the word their?!? What have you been smoking Grammar Nazi? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe he was just typing quickly as he was hosting a radio show at 9:33 am? If you're going to "attack" someone like anon 9:29 did, then you should probably "man up" and use your name. That was the point I got. The politically correct spin is just funny.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 10:30:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting the Hang of the Twitter Culture</title><link>http://marketingpilgrim.disqus.com/getting_the_hang_of_the_twitter_culture/#comment-9436109</link><description>Hi Kenney. While it's rare to actually get kicked out of Twitter, your network will unfollow you for antisocial behavior. And it is SO hard to get that trust back once it is gone. The thing is that all the social networking sites are linked: members of Twitter also have Facebook, Plurk and FriendFeed accounts, for example. So if you mess up in one space you're likely to instantly get a bad reputation elsewhere too. It really is all about credibility and trust in the social media sphere.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 23:06:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Best Songs of the Decade (2000-2009)</title><link>http://prettymuchamazing.disqus.com/best_songs_of_the_decade_2000_2009/#comment-16980544</link><description>a nice mix altogether. i agree with a lot of the artists, but would probably have chosen other or additional songs for many of the selections ("paranoid android" by radiohead, britbrit's "gimme more", other arcade fire and killers songs, etc.). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also--why no santogold?!?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;there's a lot of good stuff here.  thanks for posting this.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:06:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Crystal Ball Roundtable: 2008 Big Ten Final Team Standings</title><link>http://nittanywhiteout.disqus.com/crystal_ball_roundtable_2008_big_ten_final_team_standings/#comment-9812130</link><description>this prediction seems... laughable.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 16:05:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CPA Exam Rants: April/May 2009 Window</title><link>http://cpaexam.disqus.com/cpa_exam_rants_aprilmay_2009_window/#comment-11587324</link><description>I passed REG and FAR last window. It was a miserable month working until 9 or 930 then studying until midnight. But it can be done. Just get in the mind set that if you will allow yourself to be miserable, seriously work, CPA studying, sleep (in that order of time commitment) for one month, you can pass both of them in one window. I'm not sure about 1 week, but its possible</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 00:35:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CPA Exam Rants: April/May 2009 Window</title><link>http://cpaexam.disqus.com/cpa_exam_rants_aprilmay_2009_window/#comment-11587579</link><description>i think TX meant material weakness and significant deficiency</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:34:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CPA Exam Score Release Predictions - April/May Window - Wave 1</title><link>http://cpaexam.disqus.com/cpa_exam_score_release_predictions_aprilmay_window_wave_1/#comment-11588966</link><description>any idea when REG scores for VA will be released?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 08:36:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CPA Exam Score Release Predictions - April/May Window - Wave 1</title><link>http://cpaexam.disqus.com/cpa_exam_score_release_predictions_aprilmay_window_wave_1/#comment-11588970</link><description>I just heard that wave 1 for AUD and BEC are out for VA. Any idea if REG will be posted later today 5/18?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 08:55:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CPA Exam Score Release Predictions - April/May Window - Wave 1</title><link>http://cpaexam.disqus.com/cpa_exam_score_release_predictions_aprilmay_window_wave_1/#comment-11588997</link><description>any news on REG for VA?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 11:22:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CPA Exam Score Release Predictions - April/May Window - Wave 1</title><link>http://cpaexam.disqus.com/cpa_exam_score_release_predictions_aprilmay_window_wave_1/#comment-11589060</link><description>any predictions on when REG may come out?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 14:19:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CPA Exam Score Release Predictions - April/May Window - Wave 1</title><link>http://cpaexam.disqus.com/cpa_exam_score_release_predictions_aprilmay_window_wave_1/#comment-11590116</link><description>i hear of people in CA getting their FAR scores back already, yet I have yet to receive mine :(&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;does anyone know if they tend to release the passing scores first and the borderline/failing scores later? or is it random?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 16:28:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CPA Exam Score Release Predictions - April/May Window - Wave 1</title><link>http://cpaexam.disqus.com/cpa_exam_score_release_predictions_aprilmay_window_wave_1/#comment-11591298</link><description>took FAR in CA on 4/23...still haven't received my score. Does that mean I'm in wave 2 forsure? when does wave 2 come out?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 03:02:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CPA Exam Score Release Predictions - April/May Window - Wave 1</title><link>http://cpaexam.disqus.com/cpa_exam_score_release_predictions_aprilmay_window_wave_1/#comment-11591415</link><description>I got my REG score from Delaware. PASSED. yessssssssssssssssss!!!!!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 22:16:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CPA Exam Score Release Predictions - April/May 2009 Window - Wave 2</title><link>http://cpaexam.disqus.com/cpa_exam_score_release_predictions_aprilmay_2009_window_wave_2/#comment-11593057</link><description>Hey Jeff,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Did you say that the wave 1 Audit scores that have not been posted yet were released by the AICPA to NASBA on Friday?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:58:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CPA Exam Score Release Predictions - April/May 2009 Window - Wave 2</title><link>http://cpaexam.disqus.com/cpa_exam_score_release_predictions_aprilmay_2009_window_wave_2/#comment-11593071</link><description>I'm waiting for Reg in CA. Does anyone know if CA ever releases scores in the evening/night? Thanks</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:52:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CPA Exam Score Release Predictions - April/May 2009 Window - Wave 2</title><link>http://cpaexam.disqus.com/cpa_exam_score_release_predictions_aprilmay_2009_window_wave_2/#comment-11593075</link><description>Thanks Wave 2 pass CA, good luck!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:00:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CPA Exam Score Release Predictions - April/May 2009 Window - Wave 2</title><link>http://cpaexam.disqus.com/cpa_exam_score_release_predictions_aprilmay_2009_window_wave_2/#comment-11593193</link><description>Jeff - do you still expect NASBA states to release REG between 8 and 12 tonight?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:08:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CPA Exam Score Release Predictions - April/May 2009 Window - Wave 2</title><link>http://cpaexam.disqus.com/cpa_exam_score_release_predictions_aprilmay_2009_window_wave_2/#comment-11594097</link><description>Nope CA scores show at the bottom of the "Status" page</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:47:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CPA Exam Score Release Predictions - April/May 2009 Window - Wave 2</title><link>http://cpaexam.disqus.com/cpa_exam_score_release_predictions_aprilmay_2009_window_wave_2/#comment-11594131</link><description>I think CA usually updates the next morning between 6 am and 7am</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:28:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10681993</link><description>Anonymous said...   let&amp;amp;#039;s all admit the truth. most of us live in mb or the westside because either (1) our lucrative careers are centered here and/or (2) we have family here. both the westside and mb have some serious flaws that when factored with the price we pay for real estate in either location is substantially overvalued even for california. for instance, i previously lived in the bay area--real estate in nice comparable communities such as palo alto or atherton are actually more affordable (more house &amp;amp;amp; land per sqft for the dollar) and have better public and private schools. however, most of us who live here have to do so for a reason and the decision between the westside and mb becomes a personal choice. those of us who cannot fathom spending $40k/yr to send our kids to school with spoiled industry</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 10:39:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10681995</link><description>My prediction:  20% price drops in Manhattan Beach on a house-by-house basis.  Don&amp;amp;#039;t know what it will look like in terms of median stats, but with continued problems getting loans, I expect a second year of record low sales and a second year of relatively meaningless median sales stats.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 12:08:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682053</link><description>You&amp;amp;#039;re kidding yourself. There are a lot of people in the entertainment industry both above the line and below the in MB. With Raleigh Studios MB and MB&amp;amp;#039;s close proximity to Columbia, it makes sense to live here.     On another note, I won&amp;amp;#039;t both defending the our industry as whole from a generalization like the one you stated, but if I may ask,  what industry are you in?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 12:32:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10681997</link><description>Hey Mark, the walkstreets are highly prized by people with...small children.  You should either start liking small kids, or consider something else.      Since you also like large houses, I would suggest the Hill section.  Although some say it is too far to walk to the beach, it is still pretty close.  And quite walkable if you are not fat or lazy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 12:51:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10681998</link><description>I am a local &amp;amp;quot;small investor &amp;amp;quot; in MB.  We own several properties, a few single fam&amp;amp;#039;s &amp;amp;amp; a few older duplexes.  We live in an older home in the north end.  I am noticing a trend in sales and purchases of property here in MB.  Properties are not staying on the market very long &amp;amp;amp; sales prices, compared to 2007 (&amp;amp;amp; now 2008), are going up.  I don&amp;amp;#039;t expect that we&amp;amp;#039;ll see the 15-20% per year run-up anytime soon, but what I am seeing now is a solid 5 to 9.9% increase in price.  I expect that 2009 will show price increases in the range of 7.5 to 11%.  I am now, and always have been, bullish on R.E.- even tho we, like many, many others took a &amp;amp;quot;whuppin&amp;amp;quot; in the mid-90&amp;amp;#039;s.  The fed&amp;amp;#039;s pumping of $$ in to the various markets (banks, auto&amp;amp;#039;s, ins, etc) will enable those folks who are astute enough to continue to make money in the future.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 13:02:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682002</link><description>Mark:  Laguna &amp;amp;amp; CDM are great residential areas; however, unless the place you find is near the village in laguna, you have to get in the car &amp;amp;amp; drive for a cup of coffee, breakfast, dinner, etc.  Many of the folks here in MB, especially empty-nesters, rarely use a car on week-ends.  If you&amp;amp;#039;re in the sand or closer trees, we walk everywhere (beach, Martyr&amp;amp;#039;s, Metlox, Von&amp;amp;#039;s, restaurants, coffee shops, Uncle Bill&amp;amp;#039;s...).     In my opinion, the walk st&amp;amp;#039;s north of downtown are best (disclaimer: I own a home there) because of all the above, plus Live Oak Park with tennis cts, baseball fields, bsktbl cts &amp;amp;amp; playgrounds with lot&amp;amp;#039;s of parking for your guests.  Hope this helps.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 15:12:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682004</link><description>Kind of funny.  I never get in my car for a cup of coffee.  I simply make it myself.  It is really not that hard.  Particuliarly if you are an empty nester, you shoud have time on your hands.  Heck, on the weekends I go all out and use my French Press.  Beats Starbucks three ways from tomorrow.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 15:34:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682061</link><description>It did not sound particuliarly positive in my opinion.....said one group of economomists predicted a modest recesssion.  And then it pretty much caveated away a lot of there credibility.    I talked to quite a few of my friends over the holiday&amp;amp;#039;s.  I was quite surprised by how many were taking mandatory shutdown&amp;amp;#039;s for the holidays...that is usually a pre-layoff tactic.  And these are in industries not related to the housing industry in any way.    I think the short recession guys are dead wrong.  We&amp;amp;#039;ve had a housing led recession for a year now.  The credit crunch has now caused a new phase of the recession, and it is now a &amp;amp;quot;general&amp;amp;quot; recession which has just started.  The housing recession is still with us, concensus is 20% nationwide drop this year in housing prices.    I don&amp;amp;#039;t think we are out of the woods yet.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 17:38:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682005</link><description>Hey this new comment system is great. It seems to filter out all Huggy posts.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 17:46:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682007</link><description>much easier  thanks MB watcher   love the site</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 18:01:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682010</link><description>The best area in the East Bay is Danville/Alamo, hands down.  It has a fantastic downtown with local shops and restaurants, great schools, and strong sense of community. Has a 4th of July parade if that gives you any indication.  I used to live in the Blackhawk area of Danville, which is a gated community with two golf courses.  If you golf, it is great and has one of the cheapest memberships in the Bay Area with the most to offer - two swimming pool complexes, two clubhouses, two golf courses, two tennis facilities.  30k is my guess for a membership.  If you don&amp;amp;#039;t live within the gates, both the east and westside of 680 in Danville/Alamo are very nice.  One of the most affordable areas as well.  Walnut Creek has a nice downtown, but sense of community isn&amp;amp;#039;t even close to Danville, Moraga, or Orinda/Laffayette.  You can get double the house in these areas vs. Palo Alto and you probably couldn&amp;amp;#039;t afford Atherton (not a dig at you since most people can&amp;amp;#039;t).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 18:26:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682011</link><description>I had to break this into two posts bc it wouldn&amp;amp;#039;t let me sumbit.  MBC, this could be a problem as it becomes a pain in the butt to post longer messages.    I went to Stanford and Palo Alto is nice, but not overly affordable compared to East Bay.  Commute to SF from Danville depends on what time you leave in morning and whether you&amp;amp;#039;re willing to take BART.  If you work downtown, BART is no brainer bc you drive to either Orinda or West Oakland Station and then take the train from there.  Public schools in the above East Bay cities are outstanding, with Walnut Creek as exception.  I grew up on Bay Area and lived there for close to 35 years so happy to give more color.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 18:28:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682013</link><description>It probably depends on where you work and whether you have kids (or plan to have kids).  MB probably has best access to freeways and schools.  However, if you don&amp;amp;#039;t need either of those, the other areas are cheaper, and can have a lot of charm.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 19:52:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682065</link><description>I would go East Bay, only because you get much more house for your money.  If working in Mt. View, East Bay out of question.  Would have to cross San Mateo or Dumbarton Bridge, which would bring you close to suicide.  Palo Alto or Menlo Park would be great for you.  Both have nice downtowns and warm sense of community.  PA schools much better than MP.  Neither are cheap, but MP cheaper.  I suppose Redwood City or Burlingame would be ok, but  would personally stick to PA or MP if thinking about living on Peninsula.  LG is also a tremendous place to live.  Another really nice downtown.  K-8 schools are good, LG high school full of drugs, much more than normal.  Wife went there and still has plenty of friends with kids there.  Bellarmine Prep best private school in San Jose, sister school to Loyola in LA.  I went there, obviously biased.  99% go to 4 year college, 10% to Ivy/Stanford, best overall sports in Bay Area.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 20:43:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682066</link><description>You could live in PA or MP and still work in SF too.  Can&amp;amp;#039;t do it from LG.  PA is large, so if too far from downtown it may defeat the purpose of you living there.  Regarding East Bay, Danville/Alamo commute not as bad as you think, if you take BART.  If working downtown, I would go that route.  Orinda/Moraga/Lafayette more reasonable, but don&amp;amp;#039;t have downtown/shops/restaurants you may be looking for.  GREAT schools though, all through HS with Miramonte, Campolindo, or Acalanes.  De La Salle nearby in Concord too.  Lafayette best downtown of the three.  Honestly, can&amp;amp;#039;t go wrong with either of them.  More pricey and less house for money vs. Danville/Alamo because you&amp;amp;#039;re taking off 10-20 minutes of commute, plain and simple.  To summarize, I&amp;amp;#039;d go East Bay if working in SF.  Would prefer Dan/Alamo but you literally won&amp;amp;#039;t go wrong with LaMorInda.  If SV is your choice, flip a coin with LG and PA unless working in SF, both very similar, but LG is only 25 minutes to Santa Cruz.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 20:53:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682073</link><description>I was thinking the same thing...  The hill section has fantastic views and the sands got the proximity to water.   What&amp;amp;#039;s the tree section offer?  trees?  There is an obvious dislike for EMB which I&amp;amp;#039;m not quite understanding.  I would certainly like to hear from others why tree section is better than EMB?  Perhaps EMB is neighboring RB?  The lots are much bigger than tree lots.... Please enlighten me.    Thanks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:28:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682055</link><description>I want what he&amp;amp;#039;s smoking...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 02:05:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682085</link><description>Did you graduate from Saratoga High?  What year?  I lived rigt off Seagull Way, right next to the 7 Eleven.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 12:36:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682069</link><description>Explorer.  I also dislike the fact that you have to scroll back to see if anybody has commented to your posts.  Also, there will be plenty of interesting comments missed if I have to do that on all posts.  For example, if there are a total of 50+ comments, some will continue off the third thread above.  I don&amp;amp;#039;t like that I literally have to start all over everytime and read posts to see if there is something new.   Like right now, you&amp;amp;#039;re going to have to go search for this answer and you may miss it since you&amp;amp;#039;re going to have to find your original post in this clutter, then read mine.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 13:42:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682020</link><description>To all the USC grads/fans.  Once again USC showed it has no class. From coach Carroll to the players, the demonstration on the sidelines at the end of the game was more then unsportsman like. But that is USC and always will be USC.  I can&amp;amp;#039;t even think of another coaching staff that would have allowed such activity. Even the letters to the LA times sports section showed the displeasure of many. One last thing, USC will not be in the BCS Bowl again next year.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:16:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682070</link><description>MBW, there is another bug.  The &amp;amp;quot;Jump To&amp;amp;quot; links in right margin will not work due to the pagination.  It will not jump to the thread that is not currently visible.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 16:25:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682102</link><description>plastic,     MB schools is only slightly better than HB.  Both are at the top of the class and API scores all over 900.  Do some homework on your own.  Google for California API websites.  It&amp;amp;#039;s all over the place.  HB kids goes to MB Mira Costa High.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:12:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682103</link><description>MBW found another bug for you.... check out my comment above.  I typed the word C L A S S and it replaced the last three letters with asterisks.   This is kind of lame.   They need to find a better way to filter out profanity.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:15:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682023</link><description>Pass class mass sass associate assignment</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:49:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682108</link><description>Watch your mouth anon.  MBW will have to wash out your mouth with soap.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:50:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682024</link><description>&lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/01/feds-yellen-recession-longer-and-deeper.html&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/01/feds-ye...&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/01/feds-ye...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;   Fed&amp;amp;#039;s Yellen: Recession &amp;amp;quot;longer and deeper&amp;amp;quot; than &amp;amp;quot;Garden-Variety&amp;amp;quot;    by CalculatedRisk on 1/04/2009 02:09:00 PM    From San Francisco Fed President Janet Yellen: Comments on &amp;amp;quot;The Revival of Fiscal Policy&amp;amp;quot;        I agree with [Martin Feldstein] that the current downturn is likely to be far longer and deeper than the &amp;amp;quot;garden-variety&amp;amp;quot; recession in which GDP bounces back quickly. As Marty points out, a defining characteristic of this downturn is its cause. Typically, recessions occur when monetary policy is tightened to subdue the inflationary pressures that emerge during a boom. This time, the cause was the eruption of a severe financial crisis. Cross-country evidence suggests that, following such an event, GDP remains subdued for an extended period.2 And consistent with this evidence, many forecasters expect this to be one of the longest and deepest recessions since the Great Depression. Indeed, the crisis is ongoing. Risk-aversion in financial markets remains exceptionally high; deleveraging is widespread; the markets for most private asset-backed securities are dysfunctional; financial institutions, both large and small, have failed; and the economic downturn is causing delinquencies to rise, threatening further financial distress; households and businesses face an ongoing credit crunch; and housing and financial wealth has plunged. Marty points out, and I agree, that the likely impact on consumer spending of the decline in wealth thus far&amp;amp;mdash;one of a number of factors weighing on this sector&amp;amp;mdash;is, on its own, quite substantial. And house prices are continuing to slide.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 18:04:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682091</link><description>You must be the same ole&amp;amp;#039; Penn State loser.  Once again, sorry about the loss, hope you didn&amp;amp;#039;t lay money down on the game.  Go run your mouth somewhere else, we don&amp;amp;#039;t care about it here.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 18:17:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682107</link><description>Professor,    If there is a better certified metric out there, other than your gut feeling than please enlighten us all....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 23:13:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682072</link><description>MBW,     assuming you are on the first of two pages, click on the &amp;amp;quot;jump to&amp;amp;quot; button for the following comment...currently the 5th one down.  It appears to only be a problem in firefox only.  IE works just fine...Thanks for trying.  Not a big deal.    -----------------------------------  anon    Professor,    If there is a better certified metric out there, other than your gut feeling than please...    Jump to &amp;amp;raquo; 1 hour ago</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:39:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682081</link><description>Shut-It-Lap-Dogs,    We are not complaining.  It&amp;amp;#039;s called feedback you moron.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:43:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682028</link><description>MBW:  Been an avid fan of MBC.  However the new lay-out seems to have created it&amp;amp;#039;s own &amp;amp;quot;Blog-site&amp;amp;quot; with folks e-ming each other.  I much prefer postings by time/sequence vs people responding to each other.  Just my own preference.  Thanks</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 12:28:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682029</link><description>I must admit, that over time I am beginning to warm up to it.  I do like the way it jumps to the most recent post.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 14:28:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682092</link><description>No that was not me dude, I went to CAL. But you are the typical USC grad I&amp;amp;#039;m talking about. Absolutly no class whatsoever.  Everyone knows it and if you want to be one one of them so be it.  Must be great bing perfect.  Now go ahead and run your mouth classless wonder.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 14:48:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682031</link><description>MBC, I agree with the other posters about the &amp;amp;quot;threading&amp;amp;quot; and def not a fan.  Love your site other than this new addition.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:18:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682032</link><description>MBW:  the &amp;amp;quot;jump to&amp;amp;quot; is pretty slick.  Perhaps you could publish instructions on this new posing system to help ease the typical fear of change.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:12:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MB Market Update for 12/31/08</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/mb_market_update_for_123108/#comment-10682128</link><description>Looks like January is off to an exciting start already.  Three new listings today and four price reductions.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:27:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682111</link><description>MBW:  I&amp;amp;#039;m the avid fan.  Txs for the reply</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:46:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MB Market Update for 12/31/08</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/mb_market_update_for_123108/#comment-10682133</link><description>I would think it would be even lower than the 1.5 you are guessing.  The auction started at 1.499 and had no takers.  Perhaps 1.35m?  That would make for a great deal and that&amp;amp;#039;s what it takes to sell these days.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:50:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682037</link><description>&lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/01/foreclosures-movin-on-up.html&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/01/foreclo...&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/01/foreclo...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;   Monday, January 05, 2009    Foreclosures: Movin&amp;amp;#039; on up    by CalculatedRisk on 1/05/2009 10:30:00 PM    A 90 second video from Jim the Realtor on a foreclosures in Carlsbad, California.     A couple of homes on this street sold for $1 million not long ago ...     &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWPtuLklH5E&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWPtuLklH5E&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWPtuLklH5E&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;   Manhattan Beach is less than a year from this scenario</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:37:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682038</link><description>Pending Home Sales Index Declines in November    &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/01/pending-home-sales-index-declines-in.html&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/01/pending...&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/01/pending...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;   by CalculatedRisk on 1/06/2009 10:01:00 AM    From the NAR: Economic Slump Weakens Pending Home Sales        The Pending Home Sales Index, a forward-looking indicator based on contracts signed in November, fell 4.0 percent to 82.3 from a downwardly revised reading of 85.7 in October, and is 5.3 percent below November 2007 when it was 86.9. The current index is the lowest since the series began in 2001.    I&amp;amp;#039;ll just repeat my comment from last month:        Existing home sales have been boosted by all the distress sales in low priced areas. Over time, as foreclosure activity shifts to middle and upper income areas, existing home sales will probably decline (the opposite of the NAR view - what a surprise!)    Existing home sales are reported at the close of escrow, pending home sales are reported when contracts are signed. The Pending Home Sales index leads existing home sales by about 45 days, so this suggests existing home sales will decline from December 2008 to January 2009.    For some graphs comparing existing home sales to pending home sales, see: Do Existing Home Sales track Pending Home Sales? The answer is yes - they do track pretty well.     &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2008/08/do-existing-home-sales-track-pending.html&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2008/08/do-exis...&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2008/08/do-exis...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:49:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Not So Delusional &amp;amp;ndash;&amp;amp;nbsp;Now</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/not_so_delusional_ampndashampnbspnow/#comment-10682149</link><description>Drake:  If Bev, or anyone else, has the answer we could all go on with our lives.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:14:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008 Median Price Wrapup</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/2008_median_price_wrapup/#comment-10682157</link><description>The data shows that we are starting to see a decline in prices of homes in MB. Note that most of the decline has occurred since August of this year. Also consider the data in the context of declining sales volume and mortgage rates and the makeup of the homes being sold (new versus old, tree section versus hill/sand).     I believe the key to predicting future declines is in the inventory numbers which are not shown here.  It would be nice to see numbers as well.     Thanks for the data and analysis.    PS, It would be nice to be able to preview ones post before actually submitting it--something this new system doesn&amp;amp;#039;t seem to offer.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:32:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008 Median Price Wrapup</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/2008_median_price_wrapup/#comment-10682160</link><description>the asks have come down in a massive way, especially at the entry level.  2509 palm started at 2.7, not flailing at 1.65mm.   hats 20%+, and even then they arent moving.  why listen to people who missed the recession, let alone every major piece of bad economic news for the last 18 months?  i mean seriously, real estate industry people giving you financial advice?  they are the most extreme kool aid drinkers of any industry (saying something), and for the most part just arent that savvy about overall economic issues.  buying real estate at any time over the last 25 years, in a rising credit environment, has been great for levered equity returns.  buying in the largest debt deflation / deleveraging in the history of the world, on a global basis....probably not so good.  guess what...all real estate is now global, not local.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:47:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682083</link><description>I would welcome the opportunity to tell you to your face moron. I&amp;amp;#039;m not the guy you&amp;amp;#039;ve be going back and forth with by the way.  You just come off as a real jerk.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:20:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682093</link><description>I agree 100% with your observation that USC and fans have little or no class for the most part.  I have a couple of friends that are USC grads and they agree as well. They say it has not always been that way. They graduated in 87 and 89.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:55:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682101</link><description>You mean like USC grads.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:59:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008 Median Price Wrapup</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/2008_median_price_wrapup/#comment-10682178</link><description>I agree.  Which is why we had sold last September.  Appraisers are already discounting at min 1% per month...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:32:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008 Median Price Wrapup</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/2008_median_price_wrapup/#comment-10682172</link><description>BTW where is Huggy?  Both he and RBD are unusually quite.  Maybe they are on a vacation together?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:44:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682126</link><description>I think MBW was hoping to lose some of the energy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:46:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oh Dear, John</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/oh_dear_john/#comment-10682204</link><description>hugz  - your postings have become much less frequent, and seem more tired.  economic reality got ya down?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 09:55:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682227</link><description>people on the strand should be strung up.  how dare they be so rich.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:36:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682259</link><description>strand walker,    If you buy one of these strand lots you can do pretty much whatever you like to the beach frontage.   That is one of the benefits of being able to afford a strand home in MB.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:02:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682299</link><description>I agree.  I do see some acceleration lower in the listing prices.  The couple of short sales that just showed up will put additional pressure on homeowners currently listed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:40:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682234</link><description>Mr. Bohica  You obviously don&amp;amp;#039;t get it, this is Manhattan Beach...the negative things regarding the economy don&amp;amp;#039;t ever reach us.    It&amp;amp;#039;s the mantra of the COTR.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 20:29:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682301</link><description>2900 Pacific is a VERY BUSY corner.  Location, Location Location.    Any really quality home, on a good street (meaning not high traffic) will fare much better.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:55:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oh Dear, John</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/oh_dear_john/#comment-10682223</link><description>And COTS is not working at all. A total loser for sure.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 22:56:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2008 Median Price Wrapup</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/2008_median_price_wrapup/#comment-10682165</link><description>Bravo MBW!  Nice graph of a brief snapshot of data.     As you mention, this is a 12 month moving average snapshot of MLS data for MB/West MB and we already see about a 10% drop -- affluent areas as we all know are on a lag due to the differential timing of the mortgage resets.  The current shallow drop is practically predictable given that the tether for the Alt-A and pay-options reset has yet to occur.  Keep an eye on this graph:    Graph: &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://tinyurl.com/4nzwb8&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://tinyurl.com/4nzwb8&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://tinyurl.com/4nzwb8&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;   In interpreting this data, it&amp;amp;#039;s worth remembering that moving averages blunt the actual drop by clipping the peak and falsely elevate the drop.  12 month moving averages provide information about what happened on average 6 months ago; in this rapidly changing market, this is old information which is not particularly helpful in projecting forward.     Recall, the median home price to median income ratios in MB at the peak and trough of the last cycle and the peak of this one:    Peak 1990: 7.5  Trough 1994: 4.5  Today: About 13, not a misprint: Thirteen -- and dropping!    Data:  &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://tinyurl.com/5yfd5t&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://tinyurl.com/5yfd5t&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://tinyurl.com/5yfd5t&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;   On another front, it took just over 12 years to recover median home values relative to the 1990 peak when adjusted for inflation and transaction costs (Realtor commissions, escrow and closing costs...).    What should give any contemplating home buyer pause is the corollary fact:  If you bought a median home close to the peak, you had to wait about 12 years before selling it to break even.  If you had to sell any sooner, you lost potentially a LOT of money, by as much as 40+% if you had to sell close to the  trough... adjusted for inflation and transaction costs.    Calcs: &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://tinyurl.com/43o44d&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://tinyurl.com/43o44d&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://tinyurl.com/43o44d&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;   Another data set to consider:  Of the 14,961 households in 90266, there have been 13433 real estate transactions (in the DQ dataset) over the last 20 years (01/88 to 12/07).  This translates to a sales rate of 671 transactions per year.  671 homes sold per year equates to an annual sales rate of 4.5% of all homes in MB.  In ten years, that equates to 45% of homes in MB exchanging hands.  In Manhattan Beach, in general, folks don&amp;amp;#039;t buy home and live in them for the life of their mortgage -- about half the homes sell in 10 years.  At random, the implications of this data is that there is a 45% (close to 50%) likelihood that any given home will sell in 10 years.    Life happens: deaths, divorces, job displacements, disease, upsizing, downsizing... and in our current times, the deflating and recessionary economy happens which is leading to global deleveraging and massive deflation of real estate, locally, regionally, nationally and globally.  These winds of change are just beginning to mature in affluent areas, which usually have more ballast to withstand the initial buffeting.    As the down-slope of this housing contraction matures, there are likely to be more and more homes which come to market that are underwater -- the implications for a seller is that the market is likely to get progressively more dire in the next few years.     Using the MB MLS data, this much is clear: Relative to the 12 month moving average, buyers who have been on the sideline last year (Feb peak to November trough) have saved themselves about 200K (if not more) in purchase price on a median home, just by waiting!  Interest rates continue to drop (for now)!    If the question is: &amp;amp;quot;To have waited or not to have waited?&amp;amp;quot;, the answer is quite simple: you saved a bundle by waiting; and ignoring the usual &amp;amp;quot;buy now&amp;amp;quot; and &amp;amp;quot;it&amp;amp;#039;s a great time to buy&amp;amp;quot; routine.    If the question is &amp;amp;quot;To wait or not to wait?&amp;amp;quot;, then imho, the trend line continues to point towards substantial lower home price in the next few years.  We&amp;amp;#039;ll likely see drops in the 30-40% range once Alt-As and pay-options start to reset; give it 2-3 more years.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 02:53:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682326</link><description>Mookie,    I just posted a longer post using Firefox 3.0.5 without difficulty:    &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://mbcon.blogspot.com/2009/01/2008-median-price-wrapup.html#IDComment13793530&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://mbcon.blogspot.com/2009/01/2008-median-pri...&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://mbcon.blogspot.com/2009/01/2008-median-pri...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 03:04:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682249</link><description>his name is in the Redfin Listing.  Anyone interested to see who the idiot is can easily look it up.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:21:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682298</link><description>lets all meet at the strand at 27th street and bring our putters so we can try out the putting green.  Afterall it is public property.  BTW the city manager confirmed that the home owners can&amp;amp;#039;t kick us off!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:24:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Year Open Forum (1/3-1/12)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/new_year_open_forum_13_112/#comment-10682048</link><description>Obama on the economy    &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTDln2f0GvQ&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTDln2f0GvQ&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTDln2f0GvQ&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;   its going from bad to worse</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:33:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oh Dear, John</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/oh_dear_john/#comment-10682222</link><description>I think you&amp;amp;#039;re in the bag dude.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:43:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682327</link><description>Without a doubt and it always has been. My parents moved to Manhattan Beach in 1941.  They bought a beach lot in the 500 block of 7th St for $350. They built a small 2 bedroom home for $3,000. I have nothing but great memories of growing up there.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:09:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682265</link><description>First, anyone who complained about the toys were &amp;amp;quot;bitter old people&amp;amp;quot;, now it&amp;amp;#039;s always the &amp;amp;quot;professional lady&amp;amp;quot; usually preceded by the title &amp;amp;quot;idiot&amp;amp;quot;. Obviously not everyone agrees with your decision to take over your walkstreet and your bullying to have your own way. You show your true colors every time you post. Oh and don&amp;amp;#039;t let me forget, this is all so you can raise your kids in a warm loving environment! God help your children.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:20:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682267</link><description>First, you accused anyone that didn&amp;amp;#039;t agree with you of being sexist, then when you realized you looked completely ridiculous, you accused them of being threatening and bullying and now thuggery. You show your true colors every time you post. You so clearly have a persecution complex. Oh, and now you&amp;amp;#039;re accusing us of taking over a walk street. Is anyone or anything beyond your accusations? The reality is (I know that is a word you&amp;amp;#039;re not familiar with), there are rules and laws in this city.  File a complaint and be done with it. One thing is for sure, you are not a neighbor. There have been disputes and they&amp;amp;#039;ve always been resolved peacefully and with kindness. As far as our children, you needn&amp;amp;#039;t worry about them. You really need focus on your own problems, which are clearly very serious. God help you, it must be terrible going through life thinking that people are always out to get you.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:00:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682251</link><description>Hey guys:  I just went over &amp;amp;amp; looked at the info.  Except for a few typo&amp;amp;#039;s, I don&amp;amp;#039;t think there is anything mis-leading about the ad.  It clearly states the green is on pub prop.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:30:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682269</link><description>What a joke you are. Yes, there are rules and laws in this city, like not leaving your personal belongings all over the publicly owned walkstreets and using them as playgrounds for your own personal use. I feel sorry for your kids. Your penchant for blaming everything on the phantom professional lady is just pathetic. I thought it was the &amp;amp;quot;angry entitled elders&amp;amp;quot; who were to blame?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:40:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682270</link><description>What a complete and utter coward you are. You&amp;amp;#039;re obviously very angry, but you don&amp;amp;#039;t have the courage to take any action whatsoever to resolve your complaints. Yes, there are rules and laws in this city, but despite your paranoid and unfounded accusations, you have no evidence that any rules or laws have been violated. I feel sorry for anyone that has to deal with you. Your penchant for wild and unfounded accusations is  just pathetic. I thought it was the &amp;amp;quot;sexist&amp;amp;quot; residents of the walk streets that were to blame?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:28:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682271</link><description>What a role model you are for your kids. I&amp;amp;#039;m sure by your language and attitude that all your disputes have been resolved peacefully and with kindness! So far i have a persecution complex, then i&amp;amp;#039;m sexist, a thug, paranoid and a coward. What a warm loving environment for your kids.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:03:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682272</link><description>What a nightmare you for your neighbors. I&amp;amp;#039;m sure by your language and non-stop accusations that all of your disputes end in lawsuits and restraining orders. So far I have taken over a walk street, then I leave personal belongings all over the publicly owned walkstreets and using them as playgrounds for my own personal use, then I&amp;amp;#039;m a joke, pathetic and a poor role model for my children. What warm loving environment for anyone around you.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:17:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682273</link><description>Why don&amp;amp;#039;t you spend some loving time with your children instead of obsessing over one person&amp;amp;#039;s opinion on this blog? Maybe you would gain some much needed perspective. Also i find it humorous that all of your comments parrot mine! Shows a distinct lack of imagination.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:57:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682274</link><description>Why don&amp;amp;rsquo;t you spend some loving time with anyone  instead of obsessing over toys on a walk street you don&amp;amp;rsquo;t   actually live on? Maybe you would gain some much-needed perspective. Also, I find it humorous that you&amp;amp;rsquo;re incapable of seeing the hypocrisy of your incessant accusations and derogatory comments. It shows a a distinct lack of intelligence.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:31:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682275</link><description>Again with the parroting. You bore me. I&amp;amp;#039;m off to dinner with family and friends so you can have the last word which i guess will make you the winner in your tiny, tiny world.    Oh wait, i&amp;amp;#039;ll save you the trouble of replying!     &amp;amp;quot;You only wish you had family and friends to dine with. If anyone&amp;amp;#039;s parroting and boring it&amp;amp;#039;s you! i guess that makes you the winner of your tiny, tiny world.&amp;amp;quot;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 22:00:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682276</link><description>Again with the derogatory statements. As far as boring you, all evidence to the contrary. Glad you&amp;amp;rsquo;re off to dinner with family and friends, but try not to be the controlling, intolerant person that you&amp;amp;rsquo;ve shown yourself to be on this blog. In respect to being the winner, I sincerely don&amp;amp;rsquo;t see it that way, but I do believe we&amp;amp;rsquo;ve made some progress -- as the only accusation you made in your last post is to accuse of me of being a parrot. There is hope for you yet, my dear.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:05:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682278</link><description>I think it is one moron posting both sides of the issue.   Surely there can&amp;amp;#039;t be two different people on this blog who are so idiotic that they care this much about this issue one way or the other.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:29:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/12-1/18)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_112_118/#comment-10682362</link><description>I think MBW was merely saying that USC is so talented they will almost always win the PAC-10, but will always choke at some point during the season against an unranked opponent and not qualify for the BCS final.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:25:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/12-1/18)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_112_118/#comment-10682363</link><description>USC = No Class whatsoever.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:39:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/12-1/18)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_112_118/#comment-10682364</link><description>Wow, that&amp;amp;#039;s a good one, and original at that.  At least come up with something better.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:41:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/12-1/18)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_112_118/#comment-10682365</link><description>If the truth be known, USC is the best college team money can buy. The NCAA just won&amp;amp;#039;t  go after them.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:43:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682280</link><description>Amazing, such hatred over a very simple issue.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:09:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682281</link><description>With that one you&amp;amp;#039;ve reached rock bottom and have started to dig.  What a scumbag.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:17:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682306</link><description>Actually there are ways to make the tree die on its own. Once completely dead there should no objection to having it removed.  Done properly, the tree could be dead within one year or less.  My fee to handle it would be fair.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:23:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682282</link><description>You are obviously new to this blog.  This blog is all hatred, all the time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:28:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682283</link><description>I hate it when soeone says that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:51:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/12-1/18)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_112_118/#comment-10682335</link><description>Talk about bitter.  Maybe MBW mentioned SC and the Rose Bowl together because they have played in the game 5 of the past 6 years.  Or maybe it is because they have won the Rose Bowl 24 times.  The next closest team is Michigan with 8.  The 2nd most wins by a PAC 10 team is Washington at 7.  To put in perspective, the most a team has won the Sugar Bowl is 8, tthe Fiesta Bowl is 6 and the Orange Bowl is 11.   So, when it comes to the strongest association any one team has with a particular bowl game - with the Rose Bowl, it is USC.  Period.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:14:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682284</link><description>That&amp;amp;#039;s the spirit!!  You&amp;amp;#039;ll be flaming people for spelling errors or perceived insults in no time.  Welcome to hell.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:25:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682286</link><description>Could you be any more dumb? I bet you&amp;amp;#039;ve never made a spelling error in your misearable life have you d--k head.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:37:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682287</link><description>Perfect!  You have demonstrated your full comprehension of MB Confidential blogging etiquette. By the way, &amp;amp;quot;misearable&amp;amp;quot; was an excellent touch.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:48:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/12-1/18)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_112_118/#comment-10682367</link><description>I was around and the 8 straight was from 1991-1998.....not the 80&amp;amp;#039;s.  And while there can be cycles between wins and losses between the two schools, there is no cycle in dynasties..   USC dominates in National Titles, PAC 10 Titles, Rose Bowl wins, etc.  Even during UCLA&amp;amp;#039;s &amp;amp;quot;dynasty&amp;amp;quot; period of 1991-1998, the won 6 more total games than SC over an 8 year period.  They both went to 5 bowl games:  UCLA&amp;amp;#039;s bowl record during that time 2-3.  SC&amp;amp;#039;s.....3-2.    Some UCLA dynasty</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:52:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682289</link><description>You were a little rough on the Beaver last Ward,</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:02:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682290</link><description>that  is last night</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:04:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682291</link><description>my aim is to please all the  d--k heads on this blog. You are clearly one.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:06:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682292</link><description>After a good nigt&amp;amp;#039;s sleep and much soul searching i have decided you are exactly right. Your hope for me has not been misplaced, my dear. Today i moved my patio furniture onto the walkstreet because the kids enjoy the view from there so much better. I also intstructed my teenager to park his car out there because it&amp;amp;#039;s so much more convenient that having to jockey around moving cars in the garage. Whew! i feel so much better having let go of my controlling, intolerant ways. Any problems that my neighbors might have with this will be resolved with loving kindness as long as they don&amp;amp;#039;t require me to change in any way. Thank you for pointing out that my only accusation against you was accusing you of being a parrot. I know you only accused me of being intolerant and controlling because you have my best interests at heart. Yes, together you and i have made tremendous progress in creating a wonderful world in live. There is hope for you yet, my dear.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:23:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/12-1/18)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_112_118/#comment-10682372</link><description>Come on is really any college all that hard.  Not really.  Once you are in, there is not a whole not of difference between schools.  That even goes for Harvard and Stanford.  It really depends on your degree.  Where did you go?  Let me guess El Camino.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:24:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Two Strand Lots Down $1m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/two_strand_lots_down_1m/#comment-10682293</link><description>MBW,    I think the blog feature that blanks out letters in almost-obscene words is acting up again.  See a couple of the above posts.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:20:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Was That Closed Price Again?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/what_was_that_closed_price_again/#comment-10682436</link><description>It is probably true in this market that it will continue to get worse, although it must steam a lot of people on this site that people can still make a lot of money by buying &amp;amp;amp; selling property.   It is folks like this that will probably clean up later on if prices continue down as they will have the foresight to pull the trigger while others quake in fear.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:37:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What Was That Closed Price Again?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/what_was_that_closed_price_again/#comment-10682438</link><description>Alma was in default on a couple of loans. Prop. Shark is showing the prop. going to a trustees sale in February. Was this scheduled before the sale in December?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:03:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hill Happenings</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hill_happenings/#comment-10682461</link><description>I&amp;amp;#039;ll give them 4M cash right now. I&amp;amp;#039;ll bet they wouldn&amp;amp;#039;t take it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:03:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/12-1/18)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_112_118/#comment-10682341</link><description>Wow, former chief economist of the National Association of Realtors is essentially unemployed.    Who would have guessed it?  Isn&amp;amp;#039;t it ironic?    Wasn&amp;amp;#039;t his first book about technology and came out before the tech bubble burst?    The really smart guys will buy his newsletter just to know what the next bubble is.  Because it looks like he goes from bubble-to- bubble.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:51:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hill Happenings</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hill_happenings/#comment-10682462</link><description>C-l-u-e-l-e-s-s</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:55:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hill Happenings</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hill_happenings/#comment-10682463</link><description>I agree.  I also commented to some agents I met that the prices they had listed at were too high....  And they always give me this really shocked expression like I must be nuts.  I don&amp;amp;#039;t know if the realtors are in denial or some are trying to BS me into over paying for the property.   Oh, and she said &amp;amp;quot;You are the only one who have said that all day, everyone else has said the price is very competitive.&amp;amp;quot;  Needless to say, the house is still on the market 2 months after.  Who&amp;amp;#039;s right huh?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:16:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hill Happenings</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hill_happenings/#comment-10682464</link><description>I hit a couple open houses just before closing, and I was the only name on the sign-in sheet.  I felt badly for the agents (a couple homes had two and even three working/sitting around).  I want to buy a home, but there is nothing in the news recently that even begins to make me want to buy now.  It just seems like a very bad idea.  Couple that with how expensive a million dollar plus loan is (super jumbo rates are no where near the conforming rates), and it&amp;amp;#039;s hard not to feel badly for these guys.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:52:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hill Happenings</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hill_happenings/#comment-10682474</link><description>Pufffffffff, cough cough cough.  Isn&amp;amp;#039;t this blog great?  I am so wasted man.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:34:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PPSF Peaked in Nov. &amp;amp;#039;06</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/ppsf_peaked_in_nov_amp03906/#comment-10682484</link><description>I think the median square feet simply shows that the &amp;amp;quot;median&amp;amp;quot; house is somewhere between the old stock (1,000-2000 sq ft) and the new stock of houses (3000-4000 sq ft).  I would guess that less than 25% of the houses in MB acrtually are the &amp;amp;quot;median&amp;amp;quot;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:56:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PPSF Peaked in Nov. &amp;amp;#039;06</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/ppsf_peaked_in_nov_amp03906/#comment-10682502</link><description>From Bloomburg (&lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://tinyurl.com/7zrldz):&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://tinyurl.com/7zrldz):&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://tinyurl.com/7zrldz):&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;   &amp;amp;quot;Jan. 14 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. home prices, already down 23 percent from their July 2006 peak, will continue to fall until the third quarter of next year, PMI Mortgage Insurance Co. said in a report.&amp;amp;quot;    It&amp;amp;#039;s expected to fall 15% by September 2010.    Note that we&amp;amp;#039;re off 17% from peak for PPSF as compared to 9.4% for median sales prices.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:13:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PPSF Peaked in Nov. &amp;amp;#039;06</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/ppsf_peaked_in_nov_amp03906/#comment-10682505</link><description>You are referring to the rent ratio, something you probably are familiar with, and is a common method of evaluating how much a home should be valued. . Historically it&amp;amp;#039;s averaged about 16 here in Los Angeles over the past 15 years or so. Apply that number one gets $1.2M (16*6K*12) for your rental versus an estimated value of about $1.7M by Zillow.  These are unique times (yes, look at historically low and possibly lower interest rates) and MB is not Los Angeles per say so I&amp;amp;#039;m not sure if 16 is the best number to use. I would think 20 is a better number around here which would value this home at $1.4M--assuming they can get $6K for the rent year round.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:03:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PPSF Peaked in Nov. &amp;amp;#039;06</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/ppsf_peaked_in_nov_amp03906/#comment-10682506</link><description>Some of the rentals are quite nice.  However, most people posting on this blog are not going to be in the higher-end rentals.  More likely is something crappy along MB Blvd by Target.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:21:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PPSF Peaked in Nov. &amp;amp;#039;06</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/ppsf_peaked_in_nov_amp03906/#comment-10682510</link><description>I think TJ employees are hard-working and helpful.  Certainly many renters in MB don&amp;amp;#039;t live in crappy rental units.      On the other hand, you seem to have a great deal of insight into the MB Blvd rentals and you are posting on this blog.  Are you happy about the new CVS going up on the corner of Sepulveda?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:42:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Big Tree Lots</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/big_tree_lots/#comment-10682573</link><description>I live 2 houses down from 2900 maple...renters in it say its a dump and in their opinion it allegedly has termites ..landlord (builder) wont fix anything...figures</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:01:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Big Tree Lots</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/big_tree_lots/#comment-10682575</link><description>&amp;amp;gt;The current list price for Walnut works out to about $760k for a standard lot, and about $390k for the bonus land.    One would think that a larger lot would command a premium. Maybe it&amp;amp;#039;s the Walnut location but I don&amp;amp;#039;t think it&amp;amp;#039;s all that bad compared to others that have sold.    With a relative glut of buildable lots now available, I&amp;amp;#039;m wondering if builders are just hesitant to build or rather, they want to build but cannot get financing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:59:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PPSF Peaked in Nov. &amp;amp;#039;06</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/ppsf_peaked_in_nov_amp03906/#comment-10682555</link><description>Looking at it from a different direction, are there any percent-for-sale statistics from distressed areas like Lancaster or Riverside so one could compare what a bad percentage is versus the 2% number here?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:56:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PPSF Peaked in Nov. &amp;amp;#039;06</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/ppsf_peaked_in_nov_amp03906/#comment-10682566</link><description>Spoken like the true leader of the COTR!    It&amp;amp;#039;s always a great time to buy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:36:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lowe-ring the Price</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/lowe_ring_the_price/#comment-10682582</link><description>I know the houses are much farther north in town, but is there really such a price difference from those two new construction homes that just sold on 35th and 33rd, as these comparable homes?  Seems like a million dollar plus difference is a lot, especially with both homes being brand new.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:05:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PPSF Peaked in Nov. &amp;amp;#039;06</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/ppsf_peaked_in_nov_amp03906/#comment-10682533</link><description>I think what he is saying is that it is not that easy to be a successful (money-making) builder.  Interestingly, the much-maligned Rich VR uses all cash (according to his ads) to minimize the loan interest and lower-tier finishes to get his margin up a little more.  I guess that is why he is still around.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:15:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lowe-ring the Price</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/lowe_ring_the_price/#comment-10682586</link><description>nrgtrader, homes in inland empire were selling for 750-K.  Houses in Compton were selling for 500-K.  I guess they weren&amp;amp;#039;t doing to bad there, where they?    The 6-M dollar sale has less impact on the median than a 800-sq ft condo in MB.    And the 2-M house is now 1.6 M.    Only a few folks paid 2-M for the 2-M house, since you could get&amp;amp;#039;em for 700-800 K a decade ago.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:50:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/12-1/18)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_112_118/#comment-10682376</link><description>This is why I have a hand gun with me at all times. I&amp;amp;#039;ve had a carry permit for 7 years now. Damn glad to have it and pray I never have to use it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:38:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/12-1/18)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_112_118/#comment-10682378</link><description>I know sarcasm when I read it dude. The more guns in a room the safer I feel is my belief. I sure hope nothing happens to you or your family. Do yourself a favor and call the MB police department and ask them if these street robberies are on the rise. I think you will find they have a concern and the answer is yes.  It is just a matter of time until someone gets shot.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:56:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/12-1/18)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_112_118/#comment-10682347</link><description>I say unto you, fear not for the Savior of the world takes over as President of the good old USA on Tuesday January 20th. All problems will be resolved within the first 100 days of his administration.  It will be the the land of milk and honey with the streets paved with gold.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:31:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hot Potato</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hot_potato/#comment-10682595</link><description>At least the last two owners have been realtors.   Is it a hazing thing where the new guy at Shorewood has to buy this house?    I like how the seller in 2007 described the sale as &amp;amp;quot;a multi-faceted deal, but roughly around $2 million&amp;amp;quot;.  I wonder if this was some sort of house trade.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:04:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hot Potato</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hot_potato/#comment-10682596</link><description>I&amp;amp;#039;m afraid there are quite a few realtors here in MB with homes bought at the peak!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:22:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/12-1/18)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_112_118/#comment-10682380</link><description>So Grandma is just like the chick in the movie Grind House?  I love it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:04:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hot Potato</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hot_potato/#comment-10682598</link><description>Talking about a hot potato, can anyone explain the sale of 706 N Dianthus (sale prices from blockshopper):    sold for $425,000 on April 12, 2007    sold for $1,900,000 on December 18, 2006</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:18:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PPSF Peaked in Nov. &amp;amp;#039;06</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/ppsf_peaked_in_nov_amp03906/#comment-10682534</link><description>What part of the equation don&amp;amp;#039;t you understand?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:08:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PPSF Peaked in Nov. &amp;amp;#039;06</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/ppsf_peaked_in_nov_amp03906/#comment-10682535</link><description>oops that was for Tim617   What part of the equation don&amp;amp;#039;t you understand &amp;amp;quot;Tim&amp;amp;quot;???</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:10:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hot Potato</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hot_potato/#comment-10682603</link><description>What gun nut? That must be a new one. I must have missed it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:47:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PPSF Peaked in Nov. &amp;amp;#039;06</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/ppsf_peaked_in_nov_amp03906/#comment-10682572</link><description>The sooner the better !!!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:52:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hot Potato</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hot_potato/#comment-10682604</link><description>The idiot professional lady, apparently she&amp;amp;#039;s packing heat and jonseing for Midol. God help us all.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 00:19:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hot Potato</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hot_potato/#comment-10682605</link><description>Madam, your obsession with the professional lady suggests you need therapy. Or maybe you should just get a job, sweetie.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 10:53:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hot Potato</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hot_potato/#comment-10682606</link><description>Coming to walk street near you armed and on her period, duck kiddies - it&amp;amp;#039;s the   idiot professional lady.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 13:02:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/12-1/18)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_112_118/#comment-10682350</link><description>I was quoted 7.4 for a 30 year fixed on 1.8M.  No thanks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 13:36:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hot Potato</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hot_potato/#comment-10682607</link><description>Wow! You are one sick puppy, my dear.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 13:41:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/12-1/18)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_112_118/#comment-10682385</link><description>7.4 to for a 1.8m loan sounds pretty cheap.  Would you lend someone that amount of money for 7.4%?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:09:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/12-1/18)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_112_118/#comment-10682381</link><description>I bet you do d--k head.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:04:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/12-1/18)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_112_118/#comment-10682382</link><description>I doubt he will save anything. He will remain an empty suit surrounded by the crooks and thieves he hung out with in Chicago politics. It&amp;amp;#039;s going to get real ugly over the next 4 years.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:08:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/12-1/18)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_112_118/#comment-10682388</link><description>There are always going to be people who are going to be ok financially no matter what, and you can&amp;amp;#039;t interpret a few high end sales as indicating these folks are sanguine about the market.  More than likely they don&amp;amp;#039;t even have to care about the market given their means.    In any case, the wealthy can be misguided (see Madoff).    And who says we are at the height of the financial crisis..news seems to be getting worse every day.  BofA and Citigroup on the rocks.  New &amp;amp;quot;bad bank&amp;amp;quot; concept being considered by govt.  That was Paulson&amp;amp;#039;s original idea BTW, which gives you a feeling that nothing govt has done so far is working.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:21:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/12-1/18)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_112_118/#comment-10682357</link><description>Tuesday can&amp;amp;#039;t come quick enough.      Good riddance Bush!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:23:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/12-1/18)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_112_118/#comment-10682390</link><description>People who only look for the negative will find it anywhere they look. Way to single out an anomoly as an indictmen on the whole town</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:30:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/12-1/18)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_112_118/#comment-10682423</link><description>The worst President in the history of our country.    Amen to good riddance.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 12:30:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/12-1/18)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_112_118/#comment-10682397</link><description>Huggy&amp;amp;#039;s Therapist you are spot on.    Insulting others so he can feel better.  He must really hate life.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 12:55:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/12-1/18)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_112_118/#comment-10682402</link><description>By the bit**y tone of this last post, Huggy must be a female.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 13:15:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/12-1/18)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_112_118/#comment-10682404</link><description>Huggy you are the one who exaggerated the magnitude.  Remember the Florence and Normandie reference?    You really, really must have a long day of butt kissing ahead.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 13:21:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/12-1/18)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_112_118/#comment-10682406</link><description>Wow!  I had no clue this was going on in MB.  Thanks for the credible post, but I wish I hadn&amp;amp;#039;t read it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 13:37:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/12-1/18)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_112_118/#comment-10682408</link><description>Sorry, point not taken.  The truth is shocking enough.  The incorrect details are irrelevant.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:00:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/12-1/18)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_112_118/#comment-10682409</link><description>Spoken by the guy who is probably unwilling to pay additional property taxes to help pay for more police.  Nothing comes free.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:08:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/12-1/18)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_112_118/#comment-10682424</link><description>You&amp;amp;quot;re a f&amp;amp;quot;ing idiot. The empty suit we are about to get is a joke. people like you were dumb enough to vote for this fraud.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:30:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/12-1/18)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_112_118/#comment-10682425</link><description>One can only assume you&amp;amp;#039;re the same moon that posted previously. You are clueless AH. Ever hear of Jimmy Carter? This is Carter revisited.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:34:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/12-1/18)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_112_118/#comment-10682358</link><description>Yes, I have heard of Jimmy Carter and Bush trumps him.  This man worked long and hard to achieve the title, please don&amp;amp;#039;t take it away from him.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 15:09:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/12-1/18)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_112_118/#comment-10682414</link><description>This realtor thinks Huggy is a loon.  As you may know I am very pro RE, pro community.  I share many of the same views as Huggy but he is crazy, and his posts on this blog prove it.      And yes the crime wave that has been discussed is very disturbing and I have every confidence that the MBPD are working tirelessly to protect us.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 15:15:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/12-1/18)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_112_118/#comment-10682420</link><description>Why on earth would anyone pretend to be a realtor?  Isn&amp;amp;#039;t the allegation insulting enough?  That makes as much sense as someone pretending to be a felon.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:15:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Three to See in the Trees</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/three_to_see_in_the_trees/#comment-10682631</link><description>Huggy -- If you hate the rantings on this site, why are you always on here?  I am genuinely curious.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 23:25:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Three to See in the Trees</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/three_to_see_in_the_trees/#comment-10682612</link><description>I went through 1800 Poinsettia today and thought is was great.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 23:32:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Three to See in the Trees</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/three_to_see_in_the_trees/#comment-10682613</link><description>I felt the same way. Nice house, I thought master bath could be better though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 23:35:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Three to See in the Trees</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/three_to_see_in_the_trees/#comment-10682635</link><description>Yeah, this blog definitely wouldn&amp;amp;#039;t be the same without Huggy.  There would be better dialogue and less juvenile name-calling.    Keep up the good fight, Huggs.  Your ability to turn discussions into hatefests should be bottled up and sold.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 01:07:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Three to See in the Trees</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/three_to_see_in_the_trees/#comment-10682616</link><description>MBCon a question for you, I was looking on Redfin this moring and notice 427 19th St and thought it was a very interesting listing.  How is this house listed for just under $1.8 with location, size, etc... just throwing it out there to see what other people thought as this looks like and interesting situation?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:38:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/12-1/18)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_112_118/#comment-10682426</link><description>Please assume room tempreture at your earliest convenience.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:37:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Three to See in the Trees</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/three_to_see_in_the_trees/#comment-10682654</link><description>go play tennis at Live Oak Park one Saturday morning and you&amp;amp;#039;ll see why it&amp;amp;#039;s priced the way it is. in my opinion it still has a way to go - that location is just bad, especially if you like sleeping in on the weekends</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:49:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Three to See in the Trees</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/three_to_see_in_the_trees/#comment-10682638</link><description>Huggy has gone on vacation a few times and at first this blog is filled with &amp;amp;quot;Where is Huggy hiding&amp;amp;quot; posts, followed by people turning on each other in search some way to vent frustration (the classic walk street toy discussion was one example of this).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:36:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Three to See in the Trees</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/three_to_see_in_the_trees/#comment-10682639</link><description>In regard to the toy discussion, after reading it, we went out and bought a bunch of toys and littered our walk street with them and we don&amp;amp;#039;t even have kids. It&amp;amp;#039;s fun to watch that nutty lady loose it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:17:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Three to See in the Trees</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/three_to_see_in_the_trees/#comment-10682640</link><description>OK, I thought that was just a joke.  Is there a woman who go crazy on the flat walkstreets?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:31:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hopin&amp;amp;#039; Forum (1/20/09-1/26)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hopinamp039_forum_12009_126/#comment-10682655</link><description>I think the top priorities should be to bring the troops home, stop the obnoxious spending in Iraq and focus on our economy.  By not achieving all three of these our economy will continue to decline.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:08:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Three to See in the Trees</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/three_to_see_in_the_trees/#comment-10682641</link><description>I don&amp;amp;#039;t believe there really is someone.  However, there is an alter-ego on this blog.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:59:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hopin&amp;amp;#039; Forum (1/20/09-1/26)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hopinamp039_forum_12009_126/#comment-10682659</link><description>All economic stimulus packages should have the proper controls implemted to ensure success.    As of now all the banks that received part of the 700B are hoarding the money and not lending it out.  This accomplishes nothing for our economy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:00:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Three to See in the Trees</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/three_to_see_in_the_trees/#comment-10682649</link><description>It will be interesting to see what 1813 Pacific sells for because it did go into escrow last year at full asking of $1.599M.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:22:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hopin&amp;amp;#039; Forum (1/20/09-1/26)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hopinamp039_forum_12009_126/#comment-10682663</link><description>MBC - Will you be doing a price chop story again in the near future? It seems to me that with the new year, and old listings returning after the holidays, we would see a lot of new prices.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:08:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Back to the Bank</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/back_to_the_bank/#comment-10682718</link><description>465 30th Street is for sale for 1.9m or rent for 3500/mo?  Is this old info?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:35:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Back to the Bank</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/back_to_the_bank/#comment-10682730</link><description>Yawn.   Another ranting loser claiming they can pay all cash for a house in MB.  How sad.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:56:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hopin&amp;amp;#039; Forum (1/20/09-1/26)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hopinamp039_forum_12009_126/#comment-10682688</link><description>So you&amp;amp;#039;re at the inaugural blogging from one of the fabulous balls?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:50:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Back to the Bank</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/back_to_the_bank/#comment-10682737</link><description>how are no nevada or arizona markets on this list?  its all cali with a dash of miami and wash???    and if you can rent a 1.9m home for 3500/mo, that can&amp;amp;#039;t be good for mb</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:51:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hopin&amp;amp;#039; Forum (1/20/09-1/26)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hopinamp039_forum_12009_126/#comment-10682681</link><description>Give it a rest, NimRod!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:31:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hopin&amp;amp;#039; Forum (1/20/09-1/26)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hopinamp039_forum_12009_126/#comment-10682690</link><description>You are about the biggest idiot ever.  You actually wish for failure for our country?  Incredible.    There are plenty of republican states in financial peril, as well as our country that was under republican leadership until today, so your argument has more holes that swiss cheese.       Ultra-left social democracy policies?  Since Obama is not a lame duck he will most likely get what he wants, but I doubt it will be anything ultra-left.  You are a bigger exaggerator than Huggy.  Loser.  So  keep preaching the hate, I am glad I am not your kid.    Regarding being a hostage to Islamic Facists.  As much as I hate to admit it, I think to some extent we already are.  Just look at what it takes to board a commercial flight now compared to pre-9/11.  Not to mention the new wiretapping laws.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:41:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Back to the Bank</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/back_to_the_bank/#comment-10682723</link><description>Huggy looked like a chump years ago.  He doesn&amp;amp;#039;t care.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:56:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Back to the Bank</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/back_to_the_bank/#comment-10682739</link><description>.........and yet they will continue to ask too much for their homes.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:53:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Back to the Bank</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/back_to_the_bank/#comment-10682745</link><description>1.5-1.6 is low but based on the inactivity at the auction, I thought this would sell for less.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:21:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Back to the Bank</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/back_to_the_bank/#comment-10682740</link><description>give it another months or so....  we started this year at twice the inventory as last year.  Competition is twice as high and sales are much much slower.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:29:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Back to the Bank</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/back_to_the_bank/#comment-10682742</link><description>Your comment reminds me of a realtor in Malibu who listed her house on PCH eight years ago and even though she has no takers, she keeps raising the price. Her house has literally been on the market for eight solid years. I always laugh when I see it on the MLS. It has to be some kind of record.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:55:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Back to the Bank</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/back_to_the_bank/#comment-10682746</link><description>Recent all cash offers accepted on the following homes:    1901 Walnut (multiple offers)  2509 Palm  2829 Valley    Hey, losers, what do you think these people &lt;b&gt;with money&lt;/b&gt; know that the COTC, which has no money, does not?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:56:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hopin&amp;amp;#039; Forum (1/20/09-1/26)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hopinamp039_forum_12009_126/#comment-10682666</link><description>Interesting perspective.    Subject: A British editorial view of Obama&amp;amp;#039;s Victory 1/20/09  A little different view of the &amp;amp;quot;Obamarama&amp;amp;quot; as seen through the  objective eyes of European been-there-done-that journalism.  I guess Wall Street was somewhat less enamored than the crowds in  Washington, today. Last time I looked, the Dow was down almost 200  points. Good speech, though.  From the cousins across the pond. So well put!!    An editorial from the London Daily Mail: Obama&amp;amp;#039;s Victory  A victory for the hysterical Oprah Winfrey, the mad racist preacher  Jeremiah Wright, the mainstream media who abandoned any sense of  objectivity long ago, Europeans who despise America largely because  they depend on her, comics who claim to be dangerous and fearless, but  would not dare attack genuinely powerful special interest groups.    more to follow</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:11:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hopin&amp;amp;#039; Forum (1/20/09-1/26)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hopinamp039_forum_12009_126/#comment-10682667</link><description>A victory for Obama-worshippers everywhere. A victory for the cult of  the cult. A man who has done little with his life but has written  about his achievements as if he had found the cure for cancer in  between winning a marathon and building a nuclear reactor with his  teeth. Victory for style over substance, hyperbole over history,  rabble-raising [sic] over reality.    A victory for Hollywood, the most dysfunctional community in the  world. Victory for Streisand, Spielberg, Soros and Sarandon.    Victory for those who prefer welfare to will and interference to  independence. For those who settle for group-think and herd mentality  rather than those who fight for individual initiative and the right to  be out of step with meager political fashion.    more to follow</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:17:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hopin&amp;amp;#039; Forum (1/20/09-1/26)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hopinamp039_forum_12009_126/#comment-10682668</link><description>Victory for a man who is no friend of freedom. He and his people have  already stated that media have to be controlled so as to be balanced,  without realizing the extraordinary irony within that statement. Like  most liberal zealots, the Obama worshippers constantly speak of Fox  and Limbaugh, when the vast bulk of television stations and newspapers  are extremely liberal and anti-conservative. Senior Democrat Chuck  Schumer said that just as pornography should be censored, so should  talk radio. In other words, one of the few free and open means of  popular expression may well be cornered and beaten by bullies who even  in triumph cannot tolerate any criticism and opposition.    A victory for those who believe the state is better qualified to raise  children than the family, for those who prefer teachers&amp;amp;#039; unions to  teaching and for those who are naively convinced that if the West is  sufficiently weak towards its enemies, war and terror will dissolve as  quickly as the tears on the face of a leftist celebrity.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:20:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hopin&amp;amp;#039; Forum (1/20/09-1/26)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hopinamp039_forum_12009_126/#comment-10682669</link><description>A victory for social democracy even after most of Europe has come to  the painful conclusion that social democracy leads to mediocrity,  failure, unemployment, inflation, higher taxes and economic  stagnation. A victory for intrusive lawyers, banal sentimentalists,  social extremists and urban snobs.    Congratulations, America!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:22:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hopin&amp;amp;#039; Forum (1/20/09-1/26)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hopinamp039_forum_12009_126/#comment-10682693</link><description>You hit the nail directly on the head. Sit back now and watch the fur fly.  With the media the way it is, this guy can do no wrong.  Hold on tight, it&amp;amp;#039;s going to be a rough ride for the next 4 years.  I don&amp;amp;#039;t need to wish for failure, it&amp;amp;#039;s guaranteed.  I love being on this side of the fence for awhile.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:36:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hopin&amp;amp;#039; Forum (1/20/09-1/26)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hopinamp039_forum_12009_126/#comment-10682680</link><description>Those are your top priorities? What a fool.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:10:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Glam Dirt</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/glam_dirt/#comment-10682762</link><description>Don&amp;amp;#039;t think the house matters one iota in either case as they both have an appointment with a bulldozer.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:11:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hopin&amp;amp;#039; Forum (1/20/09-1/26)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hopinamp039_forum_12009_126/#comment-10682694</link><description>Another fool speaks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:14:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hopin&amp;amp;#039; Forum (1/20/09-1/26)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hopinamp039_forum_12009_126/#comment-10682696</link><description>Spoken like a true brain dead democrat.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:45:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hopin&amp;amp;#039; Forum (1/20/09-1/26)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hopinamp039_forum_12009_126/#comment-10682698</link><description>Oh but he is. More right than you and your ilk would agree to.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:51:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hopin&amp;amp;#039; Forum (1/20/09-1/26)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hopinamp039_forum_12009_126/#comment-10682703</link><description>It was very obvious especially when Fox News sold Bush down the river.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:45:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Glam Dirt</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/glam_dirt/#comment-10682764</link><description>That ain&amp;amp;#039;t gonna help the market.  It will be interesting to see exactly where the bottom is.  As of today it is nowhere in sight.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:21:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Low End Heating Up</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/low_end_heating_up/#comment-10682766</link><description>I have not been back to MB in a while. I now live in SD.    I saw this house in the newspaper down here advertised online:  &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.502twentyfourth.com&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.502twentyfourth.com&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;www.502twentyfourth.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;   Looks like a decent design and the place has a nice interior. Is this a good location though? I can&amp;amp;#039;t picture where exactly this is? Walk street?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:23:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Low End Heating Up</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/low_end_heating_up/#comment-10682778</link><description>Agree.  EMB is not popular at all.  We hardly even discuss it here on the blog.  That alone tells you how desirable it is.  EMB is likely to get strong dose of $500k-$700k listings this year.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:18:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Low End Heating Up</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/low_end_heating_up/#comment-10682781</link><description>The house had 8 bids and we were one of them.  We went in at $25k over the ask and weren&amp;amp;#039;t considered.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:53:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Low End Heating Up</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/low_end_heating_up/#comment-10682794</link><description>HBD Joins COTC is quite obviously huggy, as anyone who has spent much time here can easily tell. Tone, syntax, spelling, salesman. Yes, it&amp;amp;#039;s huggy...an easy read. Question is, why is huggy hiding?    &lt;i&gt;shame&lt;/i&gt;    Oh, yes... &lt;i&gt;ahem&lt;/i&gt;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:44:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hopin&amp;amp;#039; Forum (1/20/09-1/26)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hopinamp039_forum_12009_126/#comment-10682707</link><description>You&amp;amp;#039;re a moron. There is not a chance in the world they will be tried. NONE!!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:46:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Low End Heating Up</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/low_end_heating_up/#comment-10682795</link><description>huggy is posting under many monikers these days. Wondering why?    &lt;i&gt;guilt&lt;/i&gt;    Oh, yes... &lt;i&gt;ahem&lt;/i&gt;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:48:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hopin&amp;amp;#039; Forum (1/20/09-1/26)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hopinamp039_forum_12009_126/#comment-10682674</link><description>I never thought it could happen, but the political open forum has me wishing for the good old days of non-stop posts about walk street toys.  MBW -- this political forum is a complete waste of bandwidth.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:45:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hopin&amp;amp;#039; Forum (1/20/09-1/26)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hopinamp039_forum_12009_126/#comment-10682710</link><description>How dare you trivialize the walk street toy dilemma and the horrible misogynists perpetrators.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:47:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Low End Heating Up</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/low_end_heating_up/#comment-10682803</link><description>Don&amp;amp;#039;t take it personally.  Someone has to be the &amp;amp;quot;next comp&amp;amp;quot; in the search for the bottom.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:01:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Low End Heating Up</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/low_end_heating_up/#comment-10682804</link><description>You are exactly correct.  Everyone in the last 2-3 years has guessed wrong and has lost equity/cash as a result.  Not smart to try and catch a falling knife.  And it&amp;amp;#039;s starting to look like the next 2-3 years will be awful as well.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:25:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Low End Heating Up</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/low_end_heating_up/#comment-10682802</link><description>Perhaps restating what you are saying, I think there has been a build up in the inventory of crap.  However, nice houses towards the mid to lower end are a tough to find.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:19:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Low End Heating Up</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/low_end_heating_up/#comment-10682798</link><description>Hey Dope, Marine and Rozcrans [sic] run parallel so not sure what you are talking about.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:26:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hopin&amp;amp;#039; Forum (1/20/09-1/26)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hopinamp039_forum_12009_126/#comment-10682713</link><description>My guess is you&amp;amp;#039;re a complete waste period.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:34:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Low End Heating Up</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/low_end_heating_up/#comment-10682808</link><description>I thought you were moving to the Bay Area... Any decision on where to live yet?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:16:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hopin&amp;amp;#039; Forum (1/20/09-1/26)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hopinamp039_forum_12009_126/#comment-10682675</link><description>What&amp;amp;#039;s coming to Manhattan Beach, soon:    &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/01/cof-strikingly-high-fico-customers.html&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/01/cof-str...&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/01/cof-str...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;   Thursday, January 22, 2009    COF: &amp;amp;quot;Strikingly high FICO customers&amp;amp;quot; Defaulting    by CalculatedRisk on 1/22/2009 08:27:00 PM    From the Capital One conference call, on Closed End Unsecured Loans (hat tip Brian):        Analyst: When you look at the closed in loans that are clearly under performing at this stage, what is it about either the underwriting or the characteristics of that group of loans which makes that different than say a normal revolving credit card or what would you suppose is maybe leading to the worse than expected performance at this point?        COF CEO: There are several factors involving the closed in loans. From a credit point of view, closed end loans tend to attract, just sort of by the nature of who the customer base that pursues an installment loan, tends to attract a customer base that is a little more credit intense if you will relative to the broad swath of our credit card base because a credit card of course is also a transactional product as well as a borrowing product. These closed in loans in fact were to pretty darn strikingly high FICO customers, basically super prime customers by profile, but they certainly have a degraded a lot more quickly than the overall super prime sort of equivalent super prime credit card customer. You know, they tend to be -- a couple of things about the boom and bust market that we have seen both they tend to perform -- they are performing worse in the boom and bust market we can see that than the credit cards, and they have a higher concentration in boom and bust markets as well. ...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:31:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where Inventory Grew in &amp;amp;#039;08</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/where_inventory_grew_in_amp03908/#comment-10682825</link><description>Thanks MBW.    This is very interesting indeed and makes a lot of sense I think?  Sands and Hills are the most prized properties thus the affordability is very very low.  With the financial crisis in full force, only the richest of the rich can afford these prices since multi-million dollar loans are all but gone.  This is likely to ripple down to the tree section in the near future as the tier or buyer will be under pressured as well.      The writing is on the wall.  It seems like everyone is buckling down as cash is still king right now.  Just look at the car markers.  Car sales have completely plummeted.  Even Toyota with it&amp;amp;#039;s Prius is struggling.  Today, Harley-Davidson announced they are cutting back as well...1100 to be laidoff.     When will MB listings reflect the new reality we all live in today?  Only time will tell....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:37:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where Inventory Grew in &amp;amp;#039;08</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/where_inventory_grew_in_amp03908/#comment-10682862</link><description>FYI, I&amp;amp;#039;ve gone to several open houses recently around the 4pm hour where the agent said no one else came.  Open Houses are depressing right now.  I feel badly for the agents who are spending their afternoons wasting away with them.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:15:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where Inventory Grew in &amp;amp;#039;08</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/where_inventory_grew_in_amp03908/#comment-10682848</link><description>At least he is not a complete wuss like you WBW.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:42:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where Inventory Grew in &amp;amp;#039;08</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/where_inventory_grew_in_amp03908/#comment-10682849</link><description>oops....that&amp;amp;#039;s MBW</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:45:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where Inventory Grew in &amp;amp;#039;08</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/where_inventory_grew_in_amp03908/#comment-10682833</link><description>The &amp;amp;quot;train&amp;amp;quot; isn&amp;amp;#039;t going to be leaving the station for AT LEAST another 2-3 years and here is why (a repost from &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://mbcon.blogspot.com/2009/01/2008-median-price-wrapup.html):&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://mbcon.blogspot.com/2009/01/2008-median-pri...&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://mbcon.blogspot.com/2009/01/2008-median-pri...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;   Recall, the median home price to median income ratios in MB at the peak and trough of the last cycle and the peak of this one:    Peak 1990: 7.5  Trough 1994: 4.5  Today: About 13, not a misprint: Thirteen -- and dropping!    Data: &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://tinyurl.com/5yfd5t&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://tinyurl.com/5yfd5t&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://tinyurl.com/5yfd5t&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;   On another front, it took just over 12 years to recover median home values relative to the 1990 peak when adjusted for inflation and transaction costs (Realtor commissions, escrow and closing costs...).    What should give any contemplating home buyer pause is the corollary fact: If you bought a median home close to the peak, you had to wait about 12 years before selling it to break even. If you had to sell any sooner, you lost potentially a LOT of money, by as much as 40+% if you had to sell close to the trough... adjusted for inflation and transaction costs.    Calcs: &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://tinyurl.com/43o44d&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://tinyurl.com/43o44d&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://tinyurl.com/43o44d&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;   Another data set to consider: Of the 14,961 households in 90266, there have been 13433 real estate transactions (in the DQ dataset) over the last 20 years (01/88 to 12/07). This translates to a sales rate of 671 transactions per year. 671 homes sold per year equates to an annual sales rate of 4.5% of all homes in MB. In ten years, that equates to 45% of homes in MB exchanging hands. In Manhattan Beach, in general, folks don&amp;amp;#039;t buy home and live in them for the life of their mortgage -- about half the homes sell in 10 years. At random, the implications of this data is that there is a 45% (close to 50%) likelihood that any given home will sell in 10 years.    Life happens: deaths, divorces, job displacements, disease, upsizing, downsizing... and in our current times, the deflating and recessionary economy happens which is leading to global deleveraging and massive deflation of real estate, locally, regionally, nationally and globally. These winds of change are just beginning to mature in affluent areas, which usually have more ballast to withstand the initial buffeting.    As the down-slope of this housing contraction matures, there are likely to be more and more homes which come to market that are underwater -- the implications for a seller is that the market is likely to get progressively more dire in the next few years.    Using the MB MLS data, this much is clear: Relative to the 12 month moving average, buyers who have been on the sideline last year (Feb peak to November trough) have saved themselves about 200K (if not more) in purchase price on a median home, just by waiting! Interest rates continue to drop (for now)!    If the question is: &amp;amp;quot;To have waited or not to have waited?&amp;amp;quot;, the answer is quite simple: you saved a bundle by waiting; and ignoring the usual &amp;amp;quot;buy now&amp;amp;quot; and &amp;amp;quot;it&amp;amp;#039;s a great time to buy&amp;amp;quot; routine.    If the question is &amp;amp;quot;To wait or not to wait?&amp;amp;quot;, then imho, the trend line continues to point towards substantial lower home price in the next few years. We&amp;amp;#039;ll likely see drops in the 30-40% range once Alt-As and pay-options start to reset.    This particular housing bubble train is slowly decelerating into the station and will not be leaving the station for at least 2-3 more years.  If you hear otherwise, it&amp;amp;#039;s likely got more to do with getting a commissions than it has to do with representing reality for what it is.    It&amp;amp;#039;s always a &amp;amp;quot;great time&amp;amp;quot; to buy, isn&amp;amp;#039;t it?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 02:14:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where Inventory Grew in &amp;amp;#039;08</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/where_inventory_grew_in_amp03908/#comment-10682892</link><description>Bob, you came to the wrong website if you want objective real estate information.  This site is composed mostly of crazies who pray for the fall of US society so that they can somehow afford MB mixed in with a few realtor types who continuously insult the above-mentioned crazies.  Note that this site has no correlation with all of the nice normal people in MB.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 13:23:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where Inventory Grew in &amp;amp;#039;08</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/where_inventory_grew_in_amp03908/#comment-10682902</link><description>I need to clarify what I mentioned earlier.  I also enjoy MBW&amp;amp;#039;s articles.  The comment section is the home of the end of the world crazies and the realtor crazies.  Again, neither crazy group is representative of life here.   I personally rent in HB and work at a local high-tech firm and would love to buy in the area once prices moderate.  I have lived in the area for quite a while and enjoy living here very much due to the mixture of the beach and the nice people I have met over the years in HB, MB, and RB.      There are not really any other MB sites I can recommend.   The only other MB site I am aware of for now is &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://mbre.tumblr.com/&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://mbre.tumblr.com/&lt;/a&gt;in&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://mbre.tumblr.com/&lt;/a&gt;in&lt;/a&gt; which the site owner is pleased to see local businesses close, implies that people should go after a Prop 8 supporter, and was amused by an accident on Rosecrans that involved decapitation.  The owner of that site clearly falls into the first crazy group I mentioned.      For an out of area site, I have always enjoyed Bubble Markets Inventory Tracking which can be reached by one of MBWs links.  The discussion there about the SD area is usually pretty interesting.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 16:07:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where Inventory Grew in &amp;amp;#039;08</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/where_inventory_grew_in_amp03908/#comment-10682839</link><description>I think the bigger question is why would anyone sell in this market?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:58:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where Inventory Grew in &amp;amp;#039;08</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/where_inventory_grew_in_amp03908/#comment-10682907</link><description>you would fit right in it is obvious.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 23:01:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Where Inventory Grew in &amp;amp;#039;08</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/where_inventory_grew_in_amp03908/#comment-10682910</link><description>It&amp;amp;#039;s not Bobby. You sound more like a Lawndale kind of guy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 23:03:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hills Are Alive with Opens (1/25)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hills_are_alive_with_opens_125/#comment-10682920</link><description>I visited 406 Anderson. Agree the layout is nice and good flow but I&amp;amp;#039;m disappointed at the finishes. You certainly have to like white.  The wood detail seemed a bit too simple as well--MDF simply cut (no real detail) and painted (white of course). Wouldn&amp;amp;#039;t mind living there though as it seems to be a nice quiet location.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:52:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hills Are Alive with Opens (1/25)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hills_are_alive_with_opens_125/#comment-10682925</link><description>Drip, drip, drip.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:12:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Drip, Drip</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/drip_drip/#comment-10682947</link><description>Drip, drip, drip</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:16:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hills Are Alive with Opens (1/25)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hills_are_alive_with_opens_125/#comment-10682938</link><description>that red haunted tuscan mansion?  unbelievable, worst house i have ever seen, period.  talk about proof that $ cant buy style.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:06:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Drip, Drip</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/drip_drip/#comment-10682952</link><description>FWIW:  &lt;a href="http://DQNews.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;DQNews.com&lt;/a&gt; just posted the numbers for Dec, 2008.  MB was the highest priced city in LA County at $1.467 M.(and probably in the state) and 14% higher than Dec, 2007.  For those not familiar with this site, go to DQN then click on Calif City Chart on the left hand column.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:40:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hills Are Alive with Opens (1/25)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hills_are_alive_with_opens_125/#comment-10682943</link><description>I was in this house over the weekend, and yes it reminded me of my neighbor&amp;amp;#039;s when I was growing up.  I like this house and it would be a shame to have it bulldozed, but this lot is just too good for anything other than a mcmansion.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:07:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Drip, Drip</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/drip_drip/#comment-10682973</link><description>Seems like EMB is having a very difficult time selling.  If this closing price is accurate, that would mean $1,350,000 / 3604sf = $376/sf.  I don&amp;amp;#039;t keep records but this certainly seems awfully low.  If not, one of the lowest for new construction in recent memory.  So what does this mean for all the previously owned home in EMB on market?  Should they be priced closer to $325-$350/sf?      The last sale I can find in EMB is 1801 23rd dating back to 11/5/2008.  That&amp;amp;#039;s an amazing 82 days between sales.  Granted it was the holiday season but 82 days is still 82 days.  And it took a new construction to break the streak if the above author is correct.  But the used home streak is still alive and well.  When will the next used house in EMB close?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:29:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Drip, Drip</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/drip_drip/#comment-10682957</link><description>dear not huggysupporter:  I posted the DQNews info earlier.  I am new to this site.  I did not realize that doing so would subject me to any name-calling.  I have followed DQNews publishings for some years &amp;amp;amp; pretty much take their info with a grain of salt.  Numbers for Cal- &amp;amp;amp; MB- vary monthly.  Sorry if I upset anyone with my post.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 02:02:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Drip, Drip</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/drip_drip/#comment-10682959</link><description>Dear Nothuggysupporter et al:  OK.  Thanks.  (signed) DQ poster, above</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:40:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Drip, Drip</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/drip_drip/#comment-10683008</link><description>Don&amp;amp;#039;t worry about it.  As long as you can afford your house, it does not matter.    Two demographics on my block will most likely be impacted.  There are at least three realtors, and another three (some spouses) in other parts of real estate/ development/ loans.  Those folks have probably reduced sales or salaries.    The second segment are small business owners, again of which I have met ~5 on my block.  A few of them have told me that sales have ground down to almost zero.  They are hurting.    There is also a hedge fund guy on my block, but he is the only financial guy that I&amp;amp;#039;ve met on the block.    You do the math.  It is a tough year.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:32:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Drip, Drip</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/drip_drip/#comment-10683027</link><description>the name calling is the best part imo</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:39:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Best Deals of 2008 &amp;amp;ndash; Hill Section</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/best_deals_of_2008_ampndash_hill_section/#comment-10683046</link><description>Now I know what Mrs. MBW saw in him.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:08:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Best Deals of 2008 &amp;amp;ndash; Hill Section</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/best_deals_of_2008_ampndash_hill_section/#comment-10683042</link><description>MBW: I am simply shopping for a home for my family.  It is extremely difficult to read this article during these hard economic times.  I&amp;amp;#039;m not sure homes for the super elite class is an appropriate subject to be discussing at this time.... just a thought.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:27:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Drip, Drip</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/drip_drip/#comment-10682996</link><description>Who is Fulham?  I don&amp;amp;#039;t get it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:23:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Local Assets</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/local_assets/#comment-10683055</link><description>In Charleston, SC where I moved from 2 years ago, there was a law saying if you lived in a &amp;amp;quot;historic landmark district&amp;amp;quot; you couldn&amp;amp;#039;t make significant changes to the exterior of your home without a committee signing off on it. The problem was the &amp;amp;quot;citizens committee&amp;amp;quot; was a cartel composed of the towns leading developers. They wouldn&amp;amp;#039;t sign off unless you used them to make the additions.    Ah southern politics........</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:03:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Surprising Development on MBB</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/a_surprising_development_on_mbb/#comment-10683060</link><description>I think the disaster in El Porto will suffer the same fate.  Timing is everything.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 17:04:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Surprising Development on MBB</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/a_surprising_development_on_mbb/#comment-10683063</link><description>One bad decision after another.  Why would the owner even list this high and risk riding the market down the entire year with one mark down after another?  You would think he/she would price it to sell and get out as soon as possible given this horrible location.  Do they live under a rock?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 17:48:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Surprising Development on MBB</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/a_surprising_development_on_mbb/#comment-10683069</link><description>Just as a point of clarification, this is a mixed use development. There is 1 commercial and 3 residential units The front lower level looks to be commercial. The top front and rear appear to be residential.     Agree that prices are a bit high and I cannot fathom why there is $1600/month total HOA unless it&amp;amp;#039;s for the insurance on the green roofs!  I like the idea mixed use buildings if the residential units can be made quiet.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:21:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Surprising Development on MBB</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/a_surprising_development_on_mbb/#comment-10683098</link><description>genworth financial just released new mortgage insurance guidelines - no homes in CA over 500k.  period.  tightening continues at the high end.  only thing that can break the logjam is govt upping the limits to over 1mm.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:06:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Surprising Development on MBB</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/a_surprising_development_on_mbb/#comment-10683072</link><description>450K verified for the last 7 years for a 1.3M loan?  That seems a bit excessive.  I guess the credit market really did tighten up.  That is crazy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:14:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Surprising Development on MBB</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/a_surprising_development_on_mbb/#comment-10683103</link><description>You cannot qualify for these rates without 55-60% CLTV, or a 40 - 45% down payment.  On a refi, good luck with the appraisal!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:23:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Surprising Development on MBB</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/a_surprising_development_on_mbb/#comment-10683104</link><description>I spoke to two different brokers in the last couple of weeks and both said it could be at least a year before we could get a jumbo loan (30 year fixed) with 20% down (banks just aren&amp;amp;#039;t offering them). There are not many people who can currently afford to put down 40-50% down to get a jumbo. Since most people need a jumbo loan to get into Manhattan Beach, it should be interesting to see what this does to prices.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:41:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/29-2/2)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_129_22/#comment-10683149</link><description>I was thinking that many of the people in this blog could stand to loosen up and wake up with a stranger.   Sexual frustration is likely one of their key issues.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:41:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/29-2/2)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_129_22/#comment-10683154</link><description>I saw this report on TV and was equally in shock.  This can easily drag LA down another 30% this year or perhaps even more....  frightening scenario indeed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:55:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/29-2/2)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_129_22/#comment-10683174</link><description>Just clean-up your toys and trying to be a loving parent.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:02:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Surprising Development on MBB</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/a_surprising_development_on_mbb/#comment-10683116</link><description>The QB analogy  just described Mookie to a T.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:20:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/29-2/2)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_129_22/#comment-10683176</link><description>Agreed.   At this rate, we should see listing count at 250 pretty soon and perhaps 300 by summer time.  What will prices do when listings get that high?  Should be a very interesting year....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:30:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Surprising Development on MBB</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/a_surprising_development_on_mbb/#comment-10683113</link><description>Is it a 30 year fixed? What is your rate?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:41:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/29-2/2)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_129_22/#comment-10683128</link><description>&lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB123310421416822271-lMyQjAxMDI5MzIzODEyMDg0Wj.html?ref=patrick.net&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB12331042141...&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB12331042141...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;    This article says all you need to know about the future of Manhattan Beach real estate.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:43:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/29-2/2)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_129_22/#comment-10683175</link><description>Yeah, it is amazing that you can see the big red balloon from out there.  It must be huge up close.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:10:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/29-2/2)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_129_22/#comment-10683162</link><description>I don&amp;amp;#039;t call any community &amp;amp;quot;upscale&amp;amp;quot; that allows their streets to be taken over by entitled bullies.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:25:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/29-2/2)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_129_22/#comment-10683134</link><description>I&amp;amp;#039;m editing you. I&amp;amp;#039;m so powerful. I&amp;amp;#039;m a renter. I can edit you and I make $34, 000 a year. Wee.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:09:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/29-2/2)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_129_22/#comment-10683186</link><description>You are such a jerk.  One post did have the facts incorrect but truth was very shocking.  I am not certain where your &amp;amp;quot;sour grapes&amp;amp;quot; thing is going but you should be thankful no one was hurt in any of these terrible events.    I guess it&amp;amp;#039;s all about you.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:36:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/29-2/2)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_129_22/#comment-10683196</link><description>Sounds pretty suspicious that all of the crime is centered around your house.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:01:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/29-2/2)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_129_22/#comment-10683198</link><description>I could care less about those incidents just as long as no one touches the toys littering our walk street.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:16:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/29-2/2)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_129_22/#comment-10683146</link><description>MBW: Any idea how many realtors MB had at the peak vs how there are now?  That should be a very interesting data if available...no?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:22:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/29-2/2)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_129_22/#comment-10683228</link><description>MBW: Any idea how many worlds can fit on the head of a pin? When I&amp;amp;#039;m really high, which is always, I wonder such relevant things.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:39:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Best Deals of 2008 &amp;amp;ndash; Sand Section</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/best_deals_of_2008_ampndash_sand_section/#comment-10683260</link><description>Now that every contractor is &amp;amp;quot;hungry&amp;amp;quot; it&amp;amp;#039;s amazing just how cheap the cost of construction is.  If you got the money now is the time to remodel or for an addition.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:38:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Best Deals of 2008 &amp;amp;ndash; Sand Section</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/best_deals_of_2008_ampndash_sand_section/#comment-10683282</link><description>Let&amp;amp;#039;s see:    5*$1.25M = $6.25M  4*$1.5M = $6M    You actually would more money on commission in the first example.  I guess that makes you both a liar and &amp;amp;quot;not so good at Math&amp;amp;quot;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:56:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (1/29-2/2)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_129_22/#comment-10683231</link><description>Edith-Anne, just clean-up your children&amp;amp;#039;s and spare us the homilies.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 19:04:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Super Saturday for Opens (1/31)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/super_saturday_for_opens_131/#comment-10683295</link><description>852 8th, strange to have master bedroom open to the front of 6th on the ground level</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 09:16:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Westside Crashing?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/westside_crashing/#comment-10683336</link><description>savemefromwork,    The writing is on the wall.  But that doesn&amp;amp;#039;t mean you should not buy either.  Everyone&amp;amp;#039;s timeline is different.  If you have to buy now then you should ask for 15-20% discount I think.  Otherwise, time is on your side.  You will eventually see 15-20% discount by year end or perhaps even more.  That&amp;amp;#039;s just my guess of course.  I nor anybody else can predict the future but it certainly doesn&amp;amp;#039;t look pretty.  If you have $2mil to blow then you should be able to land yourself a really nice new build at least at this time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:43:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Westside Crashing?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/westside_crashing/#comment-10683349</link><description>Great to hear from a doc!.  As much as 400k is, I think you guys deserve a whole lot more.  I rather pay you guys millions then those morons in this financial meltdown...auto industry included.  Not to say all are bad...you know what I mean.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:16:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Westside Crashing?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/westside_crashing/#comment-10683320</link><description>MBW&amp;amp;#039;s last count was 115 active listings west of Sepulveda I believe.  Let&amp;amp;#039;s see what February does....If this trend continues then prices might gap down pretty fast.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:03:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Westside Crashing?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/westside_crashing/#comment-10683328</link><description>You need to move behind the gates in Bel Air.  Otherwise you will be stuck with the transient lowlifes.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 12:21:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Westside Crashing?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/westside_crashing/#comment-10683369</link><description>Any weekend at the pier in the summer things can look pretty sketchy.      If you go to the beach one block north or south of the pier, things look OK    I&amp;amp;#039;ve never personally seen any trouble at the pier, however.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 12:31:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Westside Crashing?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/westside_crashing/#comment-10683345</link><description>You can go to 75% ltv on a super jumbo (although most lenders are at 70% on loans greater than $1.5mm).  On loans over $2mm, they are looking for 60% ltv these days.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:18:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Westside Crashing?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/westside_crashing/#comment-10683368</link><description>Hey, don&amp;amp;#039;t say that about  get-a-clue&amp;amp;#039;s fine home.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:25:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bubble Blog Forum (2/3-2/9)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/bubble_blog_forum_23_29/#comment-10683390</link><description>Sales of million-dollar homes in California down 43% in 2008:    &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/laland/2009/02/million-dollar.html&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/laland/2009/02/mi...&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/laland/2009/02/mi...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:05:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bubble Blog Forum (2/3-2/9)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/bubble_blog_forum_23_29/#comment-10683391</link><description>&lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/laland/2009/02/westside-prices.html&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/laland/2009/02/we...&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/laland/2009/02/we...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;   Westside median home sale prices were down sharply in the fourth quarter of 2008, we reported today in The Times.  Reader Bob Flick of Pacific Palisades asked for prices per square foot, in case smaller-sized houses were dominating sales and thus skewing the median price picture. I happened to have those numbers for the fourth quarter of 2008, here they are, from MDA DataQuick for certain Westside areas:    Beverly Hills: $732/sf, down 18% from the peak.    Brentwood: $745/sf, down 14% from the peak.    Culver City: $439/sf, down 31% from the peak.    Malibu: $685/sf, down 51% from the peak.    Pacific Palisades: $731/sf, down 35% from the peak.    Santa Monica: $901/sf, down 9% from the peak.    Venice: $1,005/sf, which is the area&amp;amp;#039;s peak.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:07:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Westside Crashing?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/westside_crashing/#comment-10683386</link><description>You should be in politics. What a load of crap you laid out there.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:18:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bubble Blog Forum (2/3-2/9)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/bubble_blog_forum_23_29/#comment-10683404</link><description>He is a crook just like the rest of them. No such thing as honest politition period. With election of Obama on the national level it is nothing but downhill from here on out. We are done as a nation.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:28:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Westside Crashing?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/westside_crashing/#comment-10683346</link><description>They also think Obama is God.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:36:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: $1.5m Off the Top</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/15m_off_the_top/#comment-10683416</link><description>None of these houses are really great - they all need a little something or are location challenged. There are buyers for Hill Section homes at this price point but most of them have bought tear downs and are building their own.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:04:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Westside Crashing?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/westside_crashing/#comment-10683379</link><description>I lived in Pallisades a few years.  Can get to the beach down Temescal Canyon.  The town itself really is a small town and is pretty authentic.  The farmers market is on the weekend, and is absolutely fantastic.  Much better than anything in south bay.  They have will roger&amp;amp;#039;s park, and access to santa monica hiking trails.  Larger yards.  Feels very isolated.  Much cleaner air, if you look at a smog map, even the coastal areas of S. Bay get pollution.  They come from the freighters.  PVE and S. Redondo have the cleanest air in S. Bay if you care about that.    I think Palisades is considerably nicer than MB in my opinion.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:14:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Westside Crashing?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/westside_crashing/#comment-10683362</link><description>Only fools would be buying this year.... Anyone else like a shot at the falling knife?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:43:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bubble Blog Forum (2/3-2/9)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/bubble_blog_forum_23_29/#comment-10683393</link><description>Caveat emptor!    IHere is what Huggy&amp;amp;#039;s recent posts: &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://tinyurl.com/cy2fnf&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://tinyurl.com/cy2fnf&lt;/a&gt;:&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://tinyurl.com/cy2fnf&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/a&gt;    &amp;amp;quot;But let&amp;amp;#039;s for once just call EB out for his BIG LIE - that median home prices are 13 times median income in Manhattan Beach. Only someone completely blind (get it?) to the facts would believe that. If the current SFR median is around $1,700,000, that implies a median income of $131,000. BALONEY!  I have clients that make who much in a month (or less). Recent all cash purchases of homes locally gives further evidence to EB&amp;amp;#039;s big lie...&amp;amp;quot;    Here are the facts:    Median household incomes in Manhattan Beach circa 2007 is estimated at $127,185; and that is the highest available published number I can find:    Data comes from: &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.city-data.com/zips/90266.html&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.city-data.com/zips/90266.html&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.city-data.com/zips/90266.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;   Other available sources of data: &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manhattan_Beach,_California&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manhattan_Beach,_Cal...&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manhattan_Beach,_Cal...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;   and: &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.localcensus.com/city/Manhattan_Beach/California&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.localcensus.com/city/Manhattan_Beach/C...&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.localcensus.com/city/Manhattan_Beach/C...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;   2000 US Census data reports median household income at $100,750:    Data: &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06/0645400.html&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06/064540...&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06/064540...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;   Huggy&amp;amp;#039;s source: &amp;amp;quot;clients&amp;amp;quot;.  That needs repeating: think &amp;amp;quot;a client&amp;amp;quot;. ;-)))  Think about that as a jewel of all anecdotal examples: &amp;amp;quot;a client&amp;amp;quot;!  ;-)    &amp;amp;quot;Clients&amp;amp;quot; for robust information about Manhattan Beach median household income or the US Census; you choose?  This guy cracks me up for the sheer audacity of his ill-informed reach!  Ahh, and of course the &amp;amp;quot;all cash&amp;amp;quot; sales clinch this dubious illogic.    BALONEY it is; you are the one writing it Huggy!    For those that have been following any of these comments section, this is a common ploy used by Huggy -- shoot his wad of blather and suggest irrelevant things, try to connect plausible and disparate facts and pretend that he knows something, where in truth, like the median household income in MB, he is tin can hallow and certifiably clueless; for everyone to see in this case.    There are other examples:    Huggy fabricated for months in early 2008 that &amp;amp;quot;median home prices dropped 15-20% MAX&amp;amp;quot; during the last cyclical downturn in the 1990s.    The truth as we all discovered was 27.7% for the trailing 12 month moving average data; adjusted for inflation, this drop was 34.6% -- allow me to restate that fact.  Median home prices in Manhattan Beach dropped 34.6% during the last downturn adjusted for inflation, from peak to trough when using 12 month moving averages:    Data and graph: &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://mbcon.blogspot.com/2008/05/90s-what-drag.html&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://mbcon.blogspot.com/2008/05/90s-what-drag.h...&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://mbcon.blogspot.com/2008/05/90s-what-drag.h...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;   If one looked at the actual raw range of the drop, median home prices in MB peaked at 570K in January 1990 and reached a trough at 336K January 1994.  This range was a 40% drop in raw data monthly data and a 50% drop when adjusted for inflation, for the raw, well supported peak and trough monthly data.    All this occurred from a median home price to median income ratios in MB from a peak of 7.5 in 1990 to a trough in this ratio of 4.5 in 1994.  We are currently at a ratio of 13.    The facts stand as stated above.  The median home price to median income ratios in MB at the peak and trough of the last cycle and the peak of this one:    Peak 1990: 7.5  Trough 1994: 4.5  Today: About 13, not a misprint: Thirteen -- and dropping!    The question remains: Huggy&amp;amp;#039;s &amp;amp;quot;client&amp;amp;quot; or real data.      You be the judge!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:54:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: $1.5m Off the Top</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/15m_off_the_top/#comment-10683423</link><description>Why would the global elite have any interest in living in MB?  MB is more expensive because the working LA rich live here...e.g. athletes, hedge fund managers, entertainment, i.e. people who want to live in a real beach community but have a reasonable commute to the Westside.  However, let&amp;amp;#039;s not get carried away, MB is not Malibu, Newport Coast, Laguna Beach, Del Mar, La Jolla and DEFINITELY NOT the Mediterranean, Carribean, etc.  Another faux Tuscan McMansion stuffed into a postage stamp sized lot (e.g. we think an 8k lot in the Hills is something to aspire to...) on a hill with decent ocean views (i.e. not &amp;amp;quot;white water&amp;amp;quot;...is that a concept that people in MB even understand?) is not somewhere a global super rich person wants to have a 3rd home.  Again, I will say it again...the only reason a really rich person buys a $7m home in MB is because work/career brings them to the LA area.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 12:11:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: East MB Bucket (7)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/east_mb_bucket_7/#comment-10683478</link><description>I&amp;amp;#039;d have to give it to you.  You win on that one.  There must be $3mil worth of pot on the property to be asking that much.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:58:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: East MB Bucket (7)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/east_mb_bucket_7/#comment-10683480</link><description>Try telling that to every active listing in EMB today.  Every single one is over priced!  As a result, they are simply hurting themselves and riding this market down.  Wishful thinking can be very expensive.  Just wait til spring inventory kicks in....there will be some huge price cuts coming.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:30:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: East MB Bucket (7)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/east_mb_bucket_7/#comment-10683464</link><description>Dialing 911 calls CHP.    Call 310-545-4566 to report suspicious activity in MB.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:21:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: East MB Bucket (7)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/east_mb_bucket_7/#comment-10683487</link><description>Thanks for the update, Kaye. Good luck to ya!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:43:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bubble Blog Forum (2/3-2/9)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/bubble_blog_forum_23_29/#comment-10683396</link><description>All you Obama supporters must loving the change. I want them to pass the biggest stimulus package they can come up with. The sooner they do the sooner Obama will fall on his arrogant butt and fail. I&amp;amp;#039;m going to love watching this country go further in the toilet over the next 4 years. Don&amp;amp;#039;t blame me, I didn&amp;amp;#039;t vote for this idiot.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:48:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bubble Blog Forum (2/3-2/9)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/bubble_blog_forum_23_29/#comment-10683410</link><description>Amen brother, Amen.  The guy should go to jail.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:49:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Slow to Move on Poinsettia</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/slow_to_move_on_poinsettia/#comment-10683509</link><description>Thanks for the update, Kaye. Don&amp;amp;#039;t you have your own blog?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:51:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bubble Blog Forum (2/3-2/9)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/bubble_blog_forum_23_29/#comment-10683412</link><description>Get back to your bong dude, everything will be all right.  Oh, as Teddy Kennedy said, It&amp;amp;#039;s water under the bridge now.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:02:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Slow to Move on Poinsettia</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/slow_to_move_on_poinsettia/#comment-10683503</link><description>SIX new listings today according to redfin.  Time to get aggressive if you really want to sell....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 22:47:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MB Market Update for 1/31/09 - Inventory</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/mb_market_update_for_13109_inventory/#comment-10683527</link><description>Compound that with January sales results....    Per MBW,  221 34th ($3.315m)  772 Rosecrans ($744k)  1900 Laurel ($1.250m)     If I had to guess, inventory should break the 190 he is forecasting since sales pace is far less than last spring.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:30:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MB Market Update for 1/31/09 - Inventory</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/mb_market_update_for_13109_inventory/#comment-10683549</link><description>No sales = No commission = Huggy can&amp;amp;#039;t pay his power bill.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:53:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MB Market Update for 1/31/09 - Inventory</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/mb_market_update_for_13109_inventory/#comment-10683556</link><description>Your apples-to-apples comment makes no sense.  3113 was the &amp;amp;quot;green&amp;amp;quot; house and 2829 was not.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 14:59:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Big Lot or Big House?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/big_lot_or_big_house/#comment-10683593</link><description>Thanks for posting the link.  That is the best I have read regarding our economic situation.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:03:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Big Lot or Big House?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/big_lot_or_big_house/#comment-10683594</link><description>it will be looooooooong.  and houses will be hit the hardest.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 20:08:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Big Lot or Big House?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/big_lot_or_big_house/#comment-10683586</link><description>Has it occurred to MBC that part of the reason for the price drop may be your post stating that the house is overpriced, and that by pegging it as worth closer to $4M you are herding the price in that direction?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 21:58:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MB Market Update for 1/31/09 - Inventory</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/mb_market_update_for_13109_inventory/#comment-10683565</link><description>Right on target &amp;amp;quot;The Real MB Question&amp;amp;quot;!  Certainly the question to ask in following the micro and short-term trend.    What will ultimately driver the downturn in the real estate market is the slow and steady grind of the lack of credit in an environ where the median home price to median income ratio is 13, where there is widespread economic distress, including increasing unemployment..., now effecting essentially every sector of the economy and the tsunami of Alt-A and pay-option resets yet to come.  It takes a few years for these trends to mature and evolve.  Over time, the individual seller&amp;amp;#039;s and buyer&amp;amp;#039;s psychology will fall in line with this reality.    In the long run, buyer/seller psychology is unlikely to effect the multi-year trend substantially.    Judging from the last downturn, folks will have to wait AT LEAST a decade for prices to return to current levels and for those folks, if they have cash-flow positive real estate investments, it may well make sense to rent them out;  although, as you know, in this economy, rents too are falling, as such, even this equilibrium is difficult to ascertain.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 11:00:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sunday Opens (2/8)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/sunday_opens_28/#comment-10683598</link><description>I drove by 18th a few weeks ago and thought it was so hideous and tasteless that it could not possibly be a spec house by a developer.  the confusing mishmash of styles, those hideous palm leaf iron patterns and everything else made the concept that this would somehow match a buyer completely absurd.      that seems to be the problem with MB real estate right now...who on earth would want to drop 6m on this thing and have to see their friends smirking reactions when they see the actual house.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 17:41:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sunday Opens (2/8)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/sunday_opens_28/#comment-10683612</link><description>Who is the builder?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 19:58:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bubble Blog Forum (2/3-2/9)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/bubble_blog_forum_23_29/#comment-10683414</link><description>the last guy did not screw it up d--k head. The item you mentioned is bogus aand has been proven so. There were no fnds wasted in Iraq. It has been worth every penny. The new giy is beyond an idiot and obviouslynso are you.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 20:38:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sunday Opens (2/8)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/sunday_opens_28/#comment-10683610</link><description>Over $900/sf?  You&amp;amp;#039;re kidding right?  You must be the owner...  Developers can&amp;amp;#039;t make money right now with new construction so this one has much more cutting to do.  I don&amp;amp;#039;t agree by your analysis of (-$455k/-30%).  So what?  It doesn&amp;amp;#039;t really matter how much the reductions have been if it was grossly over priced to begin with.  The NEW reality is you psf needs to come down to $700-$800 range.  Even then you will be challenged...    Good luck to you.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 20:54:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sunday Opens (2/8)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/sunday_opens_28/#comment-10683619</link><description>Sand may be hit worse than the trees.  Those folks will see a more significant percentage decline in income.  We&amp;amp;#039;ll see how much they are levered up.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 22:05:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sunday Opens (2/8)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/sunday_opens_28/#comment-10683621</link><description>Not many. ....soon enough everyone will know it!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:54:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bubble Blog Forum (2/3-2/9)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/bubble_blog_forum_23_29/#comment-10683400</link><description>This is what is starting to happen to Alt-A and pay options in OC:    &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.ocregister.com/articles/loans-emc-bear-2301306-percent-jensen&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.ocregister.com/articles/loans-emc-bear...&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.ocregister.com/articles/loans-emc-bear...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;    &amp;amp;quot;In Orange County, Bear&amp;amp;rsquo;s borrowers generally had credit scores, known as FICO, above 700 &amp;amp;ndash; considered strong during the housing boom.    But by the middle of last year, 12.9 percent of Bear&amp;amp;rsquo;s loans were in foreclosure. By comparison, subprime loans, which have lower credit scores, had an industry-wide foreclosure rate of 11.8 percent at the time. And for all loans nationwide the rate was 2.8 percent.    LaCour-Little concludes Bear&amp;amp;rsquo;s higher foreclosure rate is likely a result of the bank piling on risk factors. Many of the loans allowed borrowers to provide little or no proof of income, while at the same time delaying payment of interest and sometimes principal too.    Such factors enabled borrowers to buy more expensive homes or to &amp;amp;ldquo;cash-out&amp;amp;rdquo; their equity by refinancing. Seventy-two percent of the loans were for refinancing.    The professor also found 90 percent of the loans are adjustable, and 88 percent contain prepayment penalties.&amp;amp;quot;    -------------------    This is a good time to reread Tanta&amp;amp;#039;s post:     Reflections on Alt-A    &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2008/08/reflections-on-alt.html&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2008/08/reflect...&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2008/08/reflect...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;    Here is a brief excerpt:        Residential mortgage lending never, of course, limited itself to considering creditworthiness; we always had &amp;amp;quot;Three C&amp;amp;#039;s&amp;amp;quot;: creditworthiness, capacity, and collateral. &amp;amp;quot;Capacity&amp;amp;quot; meant establishing that the borrower had sufficient current income or other assets to carry the debt payments. &amp;amp;quot;Collateral&amp;amp;quot; meant establishing that the house was worth at least the loan amount--that it fully secured the debt. It was universally considered that these three things, the C&amp;amp;#039;s, were analytically and practically separable.        That, I think, is very hard for people today to understand. The major accomplishment of last five to eight years, mortgage-lendingwise, has been to entirely erase the C distinctions and in fact to mostly conflate them.      ...      A lot of folks see the failure of Alt-A as a failure of FICO scores. I don&amp;amp;#039;t see it that way. FICO scoring is just an automated and much more consistent way of measuring past credit history than sitting around with a ten-page credit report counting up late payments and calculating balance-to-limit ratios and subtracting for collection accounts and all that tedious stuff underwriters used to do with a pencil and legal pad. I have seen no compelling evidence that FICO scoring is any less reliable than the old-fashioned way of &amp;amp;quot;scoring&amp;amp;quot; credit history.        To me, the failure of Alt-A is the failure to represent reality of the view that people who have a track record of successfully managing modest amounts of debt will therefore do fine with very high amounts of debt. Obviously the whole thing was ultimately built on the assumption that house prices would rise forever and there would always be another refi.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 01:32:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bubble Blog Forum (2/3-2/9)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/bubble_blog_forum_23_29/#comment-10683401</link><description>More Tanta:    &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2008/08/reflections-on-alt.html&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2008/08/reflect...&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2008/08/reflect...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;    Alt-A, we are regularly told, is a kind of loan for people with good credit but weak capacity or collateral. It overwhelmingly involved the kind of &amp;amp;quot;affordability product&amp;amp;quot; like ARMs and interest only and negative amortization and 40-year or 50-year terms that &amp;amp;quot;ramps&amp;amp;quot; payment streams. But it doesn&amp;amp;#039;t do this in order to help anyone &amp;amp;quot;catch up&amp;amp;quot; on arrearages; people with good credit don&amp;amp;#039;t have any arrearages. Alt-A was and has always been about maximizing consumption, whether of housing or of all the other consumer goods you can spend &amp;amp;quot;MEW&amp;amp;quot; on. If subprime was supposed to be about taking a bad-credit borrower and working him back into a good-credit borrower, Alt-A was about taking a good-credit borrower and loading him up with enough debt to make him eventually subprime.    The utter fraudulence of the whole idea of Alt-A involves the suggestion that people who have managed debt in the past that was offered to them in the past on conservative &amp;amp;quot;prime&amp;amp;quot; terms must therefore be capable of managing debt in the future that is offered to them on lax terms. FICOs or traditional credit analyses are good predictors of future credit performance, but only if the usual terms of credit-granting are similar in the past and in the future. Think of it this way: subprime borrowers had proven that they couldn&amp;amp;#039;t carry 50 pounds, so the subprime lenders found a way to restructure their debts so that they were only carrying 40. Alt-A lenders took a lot of people who had proven they could carry 50 pounds and used that fact to justify adding another 50 pounds to the burden.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 01:36:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sunday Opens (2/8)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/sunday_opens_28/#comment-10683623</link><description>Clearly the builder ended up using all the left over materials he had or could find to finish off this monstrosity. Someone will like it!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 09:42:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MB Market Update for 1/31/09 - Inventory</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/mb_market_update_for_13109_inventory/#comment-10683544</link><description>Not sure if this has been mentioned but DQNews has MB with the highest number of $1M sales in the state (&lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://tinyurl.com/btao37):&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://tinyurl.com/btao37):&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://tinyurl.com/btao37):&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;    Million Dollar Home Sales, ranked by 2008 sales #s  2007 2008 2008&amp;amp;#039;s Most  Zip Community Sales# Sales# Expensive             90266 Manhattan Beach 403 296 $6.90 mill.  94010 Hillsborough 384 274 $8.26 mill.  95014 Cupertino 396 263 $5.65 mill.  95070 Saratoga 383 260 $5.20 mill.  94025 Menlo Park 323 258 $5.45 mill.  92130 Del Mar 387 247 $5.20 mill.  92037 La Jolla 404 246 $14.39 mill.  90049 Brentwood 332 219 $18.00 mill.  90272 Pacific Palisades 303 214 $16.00 mill.  94506 Danville 424 213 $3.01 mill.  92253 La Quinta 308 208 $5.85 mill.  94024 Los Altos 239 204 $4.58 mill.  90210 Beverly Hills 275 192 $18.00 mill.  90275 Rancho Palos Verde 254 181 $7.50 mill.  94941 Mill Valley 301 178 $5.40 mill.  93108 Santa Barbara 203 175 $26.61 mill.  92651 Laguna Beach 267 173 $7.50 mill.  94114 San Francisco 209 167 $5.63 mill.  94062 Woodside 193 166 $9.50 mill.  94070 San Carlos 236 160 $2.68 mill.  94539 Fremont 292 160 $3.50 mill.  92648 Huntington Beach 221 159 $3.00 mill.  92660 Newport Beach 257 158 $8.16 mill.  94022 Los Altos 208 157 $12.00 mill.  95120 San Jose 279 157 $2.55 mill.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 11:18:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bubble Blog Forum (2/3-2/9)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/bubble_blog_forum_23_29/#comment-10683402</link><description>Many of us predicted that Mr. Obama would be a disaster for the country and he has proven us right in so little time.  His campaign message was to have a change from the same old faces and same old Washington politics. Just go down the list of his picks for the various positions within his administration. Same old faces same old politics. The guy is a fraud and will end up taking this country down. What a shame. It&amp;amp;#039;s over people, over.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 11:58:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sunday Opens (2/8)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/sunday_opens_28/#comment-10683629</link><description>Who cares?    Is that your ex-husband or ex-lover and you want to track his income? What does this have to do with the Sunday opens?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:29:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sunday Opens (2/8)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/sunday_opens_28/#comment-10683609</link><description>We saw 2613 Oak yesterday. It is a cute house but the location is not great and it has the smallest master bath I have ever seen. MBC you were saying that there isn&amp;amp;#039;t anything comparable in the trees right now. Since new construction is now in the $500 psf range, wouldn&amp;amp;#039;t this be a clue for the owner that this house is very overpriced. I think around $1m would be much more realistic. Did anyone else see this house?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:46:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (2/9-2/15)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_29_215/#comment-10683653</link><description>If they are priced in that price range then they are clueless.  Will not likely sell....But a sucker is born every minute so I&amp;amp;#039;ll refrain from saying it will never sell at that price.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:54:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (2/9-2/15)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_29_215/#comment-10683650</link><description>That was pretty cool reading the responses off one.  They made sense in a weird sort of way.    As an &amp;amp;quot;out of the closet&amp;amp;quot; atheist, I am obviously against religious school.    But whatever floats your boat.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 22:22:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Strand Living Gets Cheaper</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/strand_living_gets_cheaper/#comment-10683669</link><description>And why is that case?  As long as you&amp;amp;#039;re not in el porto section I don&amp;amp;#039;t understand the lower price.  How is that being justified?  Is it simply the proximity to the refinery?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:12:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Long, Strange Listing</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/a_long_strange_listing/#comment-10683687</link><description>Man, redfin is showing lots of new listing and price chops.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:48:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Strand Living Gets Cheaper</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/strand_living_gets_cheaper/#comment-10683682</link><description>I think commenter just means that if you buy a house that a builder already put on the lot it will be more than if you buy the lot and build it yourself (even with the same builder).  The builder is boosting the price to offset his risk.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:17:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recent Action</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/recent_action/#comment-10683754</link><description>It seems that houses that are more reasonably priced to the actual market are seeing some action and will move.  In my opinion there seems to be some huge discrepancies between where certain houses have sold, and other listings that continue to sit on the market and follow prices down.  Great article MBCon, thanks for the info.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:11:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recent Action</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/recent_action/#comment-10683782</link><description>Cash.....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:35:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Recent Action</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/recent_action/#comment-10683783</link><description>Cash</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:36:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Hill Newbie to Go Short</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/first_hill_newbie_to_go_short/#comment-10683797</link><description>Has anyone else noticed the lack of quality finishing on many of these new construction homes that have hit the market in the last 6 months?  It makes me wonder about the overall quality of these houses if the builders are cutting every corner possible to save money, it seems these new house priced 1.7 and higher should be finished to a higher standard.  MBCon, the modern newbie on Poinsettia dropped off Redfin, did they get some action after that big cut, or did they just pull the listing?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:14:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: First Hill Newbie to Go Short</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/first_hill_newbie_to_go_short/#comment-10683817</link><description>Builders have gotten fat and lazy during the boom years when all they cared about were features and not quality. They pretty much turn everything over to the contractors.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:12:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (2/9-2/15)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_29_215/#comment-10683651</link><description>Forget the boat, you&amp;amp;#039;re going to need an asbestos suit.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 22:47:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (2/9-2/15)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_29_215/#comment-10683652</link><description>Somehow I doubt it.    At least I can enjoy my sundays a lot more.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 23:55:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: That Was Quick</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/that_was_quick/#comment-10683851</link><description>Heck, I think the median home price will be 1.3-M for this month.  Who knows what the rest of the year brings!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:01:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sunday Opens (2/15)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/sunday_opens_215/#comment-10683946</link><description>aah the power of positive thinking. Ain&amp;amp;#039;t it great !!!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 12:54:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sunday Opens (2/15)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/sunday_opens_215/#comment-10683925</link><description>And your name is?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:32:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (2/16-2/22)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_216_222/#comment-10683990</link><description>What was up with the handwritten yellow &amp;amp;quot;Foreclosure&amp;amp;quot; signs all over?  Led to a place on Ruhland.  Anybody know the story?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:04:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (2/16-2/22)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_216_222/#comment-10684031</link><description>But we are! There should be no question.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:30:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (2/16-2/22)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_216_222/#comment-10684035</link><description>I saw them and would also like to know the answer.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:36:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (2/16-2/22)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_216_222/#comment-10684036</link><description>Just curious , are there a lot of foreclosures in MB? I know of a few default notices, but that is not a foreclosure from what I understand.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:34:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (2/16-2/22)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_216_222/#comment-10684018</link><description>&amp;amp;quot;fhuggly&amp;amp;quot;, that&amp;amp;#039;s a good one</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:56:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (2/16-2/22)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_216_222/#comment-10684032</link><description>Hey dude, selling houses is not like selling burger like you do everyday. I&amp;amp;#039;m sure Huggy is doing just fine.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:15:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (2/16-2/22)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_216_222/#comment-10684033</link><description>I do dude. Huggy is the only thing good about this blog.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:18:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (2/16-2/22)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_216_222/#comment-10684020</link><description>Hmm, who is on the rag?  Seems like the comments above hit home.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:48:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Not Worth Their &amp;amp;#039;05 Prices?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/not_worth_their_amp03905_prices/#comment-10684064</link><description>So it seems like we are right around 2005 prices now, with the poor locations selling below &amp;amp;#039;05 due to the sparsity of buyers and oversupply of houses, while the prime locations are at or slightly above 2005?  Is this a fair characterization?  Would be good to get examples of homes that recently sold above their 2005 prices.  I also believe there are a couple other homes currently on the market, not mentioned here, that last traded in 2005.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:02:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Not Worth Their &amp;amp;#039;05 Prices?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/not_worth_their_amp03905_prices/#comment-10684103</link><description>Why is the truth humiliating? If the house you are selling isn&amp;amp;#039;t worth what it use to be, is that MBC&amp;amp;#039;s fault? The answer is &amp;amp;quot;no&amp;amp;quot;! Grow up.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 23:03:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Not Worth Their &amp;amp;#039;05 Prices?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/not_worth_their_amp03905_prices/#comment-10684075</link><description>So the guy that runs this thing potentially goes to dinner parties at friend&amp;amp;#039;s houses and then anonymously slams their homes? Nice guy. wow.  Seems more like LA than MB.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 23:26:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Not Worth Their &amp;amp;#039;05 Prices?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/not_worth_their_amp03905_prices/#comment-10684138</link><description>Prettty much none.      It does reinforce the view of a lot of people that were sidelined by the bubble that the MB real estate establishement  (ie, all the fat middle aged MB realtors) are a bunch of lying arrogant idiots.    And it scares the crap out of the realtors to hear people doub their nonsense.  And call them out on their bullshit idiocy that they&amp;amp;#039;ve managed to get away with for a decade because of the funny money economy.  It&amp;amp;#039;ll be tough for the realtors having to remember how to work for a living again.  Have to work off the wine gut, and all that.      As huggy likes to put it, this blog is &amp;amp;quot;therapy&amp;amp;quot;.  Ironically, he says it with no irony.  Since this blog is a bunch of bitter realtors main outlet to vent.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:40:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Not Worth Their &amp;amp;#039;05 Prices?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/not_worth_their_amp03905_prices/#comment-10684077</link><description>Agree that this blog likely has little impact on market prices.  That being said, there probably are few people out there, other than those who don&amp;amp;#039;t already live in the South Bay, who are in the market for a house WOS that do not at least use the information and links contained in this blog as a resource.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 01:47:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Not Worth Their &amp;amp;#039;05 Prices?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/not_worth_their_amp03905_prices/#comment-10684120</link><description>Sounds like MBW&amp;amp;#039;s outing will be a result of the lawsuit.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:29:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Not Worth Their &amp;amp;#039;05 Prices?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/not_worth_their_amp03905_prices/#comment-10684142</link><description>I would say zero.  Infact my house was mentioned in one of the articles.  I didn&amp;amp;#039;t like what I read, but ultimately it was true.  Despite the advise from my realtor I priced my house out of the market, so I had to take it off the market.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:14:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Low on the Hill</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/low_on_the_hill/#comment-10684213</link><description>While I&amp;amp;#039;m not sure things will get that bad on the S&amp;amp;amp;P, I do agree about the prices of homes.  Those sellers that make the aggressive moves will get deals done, and the rest of inventory will slowly follow the mkt down and continue sit unsold.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:37:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Not Worth Their &amp;amp;#039;05 Prices?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/not_worth_their_amp03905_prices/#comment-10684172</link><description>So you are predicting MB will another 75%  to a median of about $375k?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:49:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Low on the Hill</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/low_on_the_hill/#comment-10684219</link><description>Southern California home prices fall to 2002 levels    &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/la-fi-homesales20-2009feb20,0,1225465.story?track=rss&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/la-fi-homesales20-200...&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.latimes.com/news/la-fi-homesales20-200...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:10:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Not Worth Their &amp;amp;#039;05 Prices?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/not_worth_their_amp03905_prices/#comment-10684174</link><description>I agree with your general statement about early 90&amp;amp;#039;s pricing, but I think it is off by about a factor of 2 in that I think prices will fall to inflation adjusted levels.  That would mean you would need to double you numbers.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:55:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Not Worth Their &amp;amp;#039;05 Prices?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/not_worth_their_amp03905_prices/#comment-10684175</link><description>Inflation is about 50% per decade.  It only doubles according to realtors.    Salary is the other factor.  Salaries are down the last decade when adjusted for inflation, so housing may underperform as well.  In that other expenses have gone up, housing should do a bit worse.    I&amp;amp;#039;m in for 90&amp;amp;#039;s bottom + 50%.    If shit gets worse, I&amp;amp;#039;ll take 1978 pricing plus inflation.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:20:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Not Worth Their &amp;amp;#039;05 Prices?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/not_worth_their_amp03905_prices/#comment-10684176</link><description>I agree with your amount per decade, but it has been closer to two decades since the early/mid 90&amp;amp;#039;s.  Also, I happen to have some anecdotal evidence in that I know that starting salaries in a few different companies in my industry have approximately doubled since the early to mid 1990&amp;amp;#039;s.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:34:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Not Worth Their &amp;amp;#039;05 Prices?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/not_worth_their_amp03905_prices/#comment-10684177</link><description>I think MB bottomed 95-96.  SInce this is very beginning of &amp;amp;#039;09, that is closer to one decade than two.  It&amp;amp;#039;l be another 1-2 years until it bottoms, so call it ~15 years.  Maybe previous bottom + 70%.  However, since we are having a multi-year recession, with negative inflation, that is most likely on the high side.    I also think the next two years will show massive drops in MB income.  Looks like financials, realtors, brokers, lawyers, and executives are all going to take a major dump.    It may well be that S. Bay in 2015 looks kind of like it did in 1985.  Pretty much nothing left but aeospace engineers.  Those cheap bastards will enjoy getting all the stainless steel appliances and granite countertops for next to nothing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:28:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Not Worth Their &amp;amp;#039;05 Prices?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/not_worth_their_amp03905_prices/#comment-10684179</link><description>vous &amp;amp;ecirc;tes le perdant</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:09:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Low on the Hill</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/low_on_the_hill/#comment-10684223</link><description>Something must be wrong with this house -- who knows where the market is today, but $1.4mm in 2002 seems low.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:56:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sunday Opens (2/22)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/sunday_opens_222/#comment-10684304</link><description>MBC you may want to check the lot aquisition price of 229 24th Street. I believe the $3.6m was for a double lot, split by the developer who is also building the two new townhomes just to the east.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:11:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sunday Opens (2/22)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/sunday_opens_222/#comment-10684305</link><description>2509 Palm was being marketed yesterday on the Open House signs as a short sale.   Seems a little misleading if that was actually the case.  But then again, thats what agents do best.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:51:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sunday Opens (2/22)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/sunday_opens_222/#comment-10684333</link><description>Wow, MBC it&amp;amp;#039;s a good thing you liked some of the stuff this builder has done because I&amp;amp;#039;d hate to see what you write if you didn&amp;amp;#039;t. Don&amp;amp;#039;t you look up things like that before you write them?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:47:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sunday Opens (2/22)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/sunday_opens_222/#comment-10684334</link><description>That&amp;amp;#039;s simply not true. You do need good credit, but you can get it done with 25% to 35% down depending on lender.  Jumbo rates are in the mid to high 6&amp;amp;#039;s for good credit (high 5&amp;amp;#039;s if you&amp;amp;#039;re willing to take a  5yr arm).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:52:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sunday Opens (2/22)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/sunday_opens_222/#comment-10684312</link><description>Did anyone go see the townhomes on John?  There is A LOT more value in buying a home like 1813 Pacific for 1.5 than spending 1.3 - 1.7 for one of these townhomes.  Also, the finishes on these were nothing of note; quite simple.  Not sure if this &amp;amp;quot;European concept&amp;amp;quot;, as it was described to me by the realtor, is going to fly in MB.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:10:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sunday Opens (2/22)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/sunday_opens_222/#comment-10684353</link><description>I hear the same thing and find it insulting.  Do agents think all homebuyers are complete idiots?  You don&amp;amp;#039;t have to live under a rock to know this financial crisis is beyond huge.  I immediately walk out the door when I hear those responses.  Don&amp;amp;#039;t even try to play me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:38:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MBB THs Dropping</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/mbb_ths_dropping/#comment-10684435</link><description>Man, these things are a rip off.  Pretty easy to compare them to apartments since they are condos.  Each of these would probably rent for between 3000-4000.    Mortgage would be anywhere from 10,000-14,000.  Depending on mortgage rate and downpayment.    And then you&amp;amp;#039;ve got to put 500-600 HOA on top of it.    It&amp;amp;#039;s probably tougher to get a loan on a condo now than a house to boot.  What a joke.    Cut them to 450-K and be done with it.  Whoops, they have to much money in them.....I think these will be the next set of bank owned in MB.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:12:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sunday Opens (2/22)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/sunday_opens_222/#comment-10684345</link><description>offer them a million then, they may take it</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:15:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MBB THs Dropping</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/mbb_ths_dropping/#comment-10684464</link><description>What do you think the monthly rent is?  Take that and subtract out the HOA, which is pretty hefty.  Take the result and multiply it by 100 if you are a cheap bastard type of landlord, or 200 if you like to give your money away.  That gives you are range of what each of those places are worth.  Multiply by 150 if you want a happy median value.    Lets take the smallest one and assume it rents for 3000.  You can find older 2 bedrooms for half of that.   Minus 500 for HOA leaves 2500.  Times 150 gives you 375,000.  And keep in mind that I am assuming that your are renting ofr a premium because it is &amp;amp;quot;new&amp;amp;quot;.  The newness tends to wear off and your premium disappears.    How much overpriced is the list price?  67%    Only a fool would get near these things at these prices.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:48:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Newbie Way Down</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/another_newbie_way_down/#comment-10684289</link><description>I wonder if all the knuckleheads who have their homes priced at over $1,000. per square foot are finally getting a clue. Drop your price by close to 1/2 and you might just sell your home.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:01:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (2/24-3/2)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_224_32/#comment-10684421</link><description>Great story Clueless Realtor.  Thanks for the chuckles.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:12:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MBB THs Dropping</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/mbb_ths_dropping/#comment-10684479</link><description>You guys don&amp;amp;#039;t get it.  Their &amp;amp;quot;talent&amp;amp;quot; has nothing to do with customer service.  It has everything to do with being able to monopolize the local markets, and keep the marketplace from functioning properly.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:35:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MBB THs Dropping</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/mbb_ths_dropping/#comment-10684483</link><description>Contract lawyer costs a few hundred dollars an hour.  Shouldn&amp;amp;#039;t take more than 8 hours to prepare the contract and do the follow up paper work.  That is a few thousand dollars.    Total realtors commission on a million dollar house is 60,000 dollars.    Which sounds cheaper?    In the UK, realtors don&amp;amp;#039;t work on a percentage basis.  They get a flat fee of a few thousand dollars.  Given what they do, doesn&amp;amp;#039;t that sound a bit more reasonable than 10&amp;amp;#039;s of thousands of dollars?  If that were the case, you&amp;amp;#039;d see all the housewives leave, and you would have a significantly lower level of hardcore professionals left.  They&amp;amp;#039;d probably make decent income.  Just all the housewives would have to go back to tupperware and avon.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:39:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MBB THs Dropping</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/mbb_ths_dropping/#comment-10684485</link><description>No much advantage in an exteme sellers market.  It is all the advantage in an extreme buyers market.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:41:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (2/24-3/2)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_224_32/#comment-10684406</link><description>There&amp;amp;#039;s a horrible smoky chemical smell this morning on the bike path. I&amp;amp;#039;m still smelling on my clothes and in my nostrils. Anyone have an idea what this might be?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:41:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2 Years and $1.3m Later...</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/2_years_and_13m_later/#comment-10684570</link><description>Dude, provide a link.  That&amp;amp;#039;ll be a fun read.    On another not, I believe the the RIC (real estate industrial complex) that post on this blog have now passed denial, and are now strongly in the &amp;amp;quot;anger&amp;amp;quot; stage.    Next stage is acceptance.  It&amp;amp;#039;s a bitch until you give up.    bwa hahahahaha</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:34:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (2/24-3/2)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_224_32/#comment-10684409</link><description>Laugh as you may, but libel is libel whether it appears in the LA Times, The Beach Reporter, KTLA-TV or on the internet on MBC.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:50:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: February to Date</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/february_to_date/#comment-10684590</link><description>Anybody see Obama&amp;amp;#039;s new tax plan?  Itemized deductions get fazed out for the &amp;amp;quot;big earners&amp;amp;quot;.  Which is probably everyone in MB, including the renters.    Doh.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:52:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: February to Date</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/february_to_date/#comment-10684617</link><description>Most eastern states have property taxes and income taxes.  Only the N.Eastern ones have income tax and 3% property tax.  For instance, VA has ~1% property tax rate and lower income tax rate than CA.  And there budget is in better shape than CA by far.    CA is one of the few to have the truly bizarre prop 13, which caps the property tax increase to well below the inflation rate.    I guess it just depends on whether you want your state to slowly go bankrupt or not.  The people have spoken, apparently.  &amp;amp;quot;Yes, we do&amp;amp;quot;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:39:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: February to Date</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/february_to_date/#comment-10684604</link><description>Huggy, for once you are correct.  I have stated several times that an overpriced house fails all, unfortunately in this market the appropriate price is a bit shocking.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:22:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tax Time</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/tax_time/#comment-10684632</link><description>How many of the higher end purchases (&amp;amp;gt;$3mm) have been all cash deals?  These people clearly don&amp;amp;#039;t care about the mortgage interest deduction, and if they fix AMT, then at least their property taxes will be deductible.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:33:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (2/24-3/2)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_224_32/#comment-10684399</link><description>As Manhattan Beach goes, so does Manhattan.    &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/26/realestate/26condo.html&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/26/realestate/26co...&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/26/realestate/26co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;    February 26, 2009    And Do I Hear $2 Million? No? $1 Million? Sold!    By TERI KARUSH ROGERS    As housing prices around the country began to tumble about three years ago, the New York market kept rising, and only in the last year did it begin to show some weakness.    But now sales in the city have slowed so significantly that worried developers are planning to auction off some luxury condos in the spring for around half of what they were asking just a year ago.    Developers who are awash in unsold inventory see auctions as a tactic to jolt a paralyzed public to life.    A two-bedroom on the Upper East Side, for example, could be marked down to $1.1 million from $2.2 million.    ...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:42:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2 Years and $1.3m Later...</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/2_years_and_13m_later/#comment-10684585</link><description>Especially if you&amp;amp;#039;ve seen inside this house...it needs a lot of work.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:11:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Losing Our Bounce</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/losing_our_bounce/#comment-10684651</link><description>I believe the two recent town house listings on Marine in the Sand Section are also below there recent acquisition prices.  We&amp;amp;#039;re headed considerably lower, just look at the stock market, who wants to jump into a house purchase with all assets going lower and taxes going higher, not the best combo.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:25:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Losing Our Bounce</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/losing_our_bounce/#comment-10684683</link><description>Huggy, you are a complete moron.  You just wasted your breath painting a picture of ensuing bidding wars for multiple homes, in an article about 4 homes that are underwater.  Your data may be correct, but the picture you paint is all smoke and mirrors.  The near future is grim.  Open your eyes, LOSER.  Pull your head out of the sand.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:02:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (2/28-3/1)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_opens_228_31/#comment-10684752</link><description>Who is Marshall Applewhite?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 19:12:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (2/28-3/1)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_opens_228_31/#comment-10684753</link><description>Then why are you on this blog?  What an idiot you are.... so a person does not agree with you that makes them your enemy.  hahahahaa...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 21:24:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (2/28-3/1)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_opens_228_31/#comment-10684736</link><description>Wow, the owners of 2407 Manhattan Ave. are really delusional. Good luck with that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 11:56:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (2/28-3/1)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_opens_228_31/#comment-10684779</link><description>EMB Realtor,    Finally....we have an agent I would actually want to work with.   While I know you all need to sell homes any way you can, you sound like a honest person.  kudos.  This is the kind of feedback I appreciate from a listing agent as well. Last thing in the world a home buyer wants is to get surprised after moving in.  It is a life changing event to have a new home and to live there and not be happy would be very painful.....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 15:14:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (2/24-3/2)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_224_32/#comment-10684407</link><description>Blakes actually got an interesting post on his blog.      &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.blakeanddiana.com/2009/02/a-short-sale-story.html&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.blakeanddiana.com/2009/02/a-short-sale...&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.blakeanddiana.com/2009/02/a-short-sale...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 17:03:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (2/28-3/1)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_opens_228_31/#comment-10684740</link><description>Hey Mookie:  What do you think is happening in the markets now?   Are the financial types fearful, or do they think they will pull through?  I think the markets look poised for another dump.  gonna be a bad year.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 20:59:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (2/28-3/1)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_opens_228_31/#comment-10684785</link><description>I just noticed that the short sale lowered it&amp;amp;#039;s price another 100k, I think these two houses are going to set a low price per sq foot.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 21:38:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (2/24-3/2)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_224_32/#comment-10684408</link><description>So serious! Get a clue. You must be a very delusional/angry seller.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 01:55:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Couple Good Changes</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/a_couple_good_changes/#comment-10684809</link><description>Don&amp;amp;#039;t hate.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:03:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (2/28-3/1)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_opens_228_31/#comment-10684791</link><description>Pra4surf... you must be the real estate agents.  I know they are monitoring this site as I overhead them discussing MBW during one of their opens this weekend.  They are not a fan.  Go figure.  Most Realtors aren&amp;amp;#039;t.  Except Huggly.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:13:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Couple Good Changes</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/a_couple_good_changes/#comment-10684808</link><description>Essentially, you are accusing the previous realtor and the current realtor of fraud and conspiracy. If your facts, are correct, I say to you excellent reporting and thank you. If they are not, you&amp;amp;#039;re guilty of libel.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 23:43:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (3/3-3/9)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_33_39/#comment-10684877</link><description>It&amp;amp;#039;s that change we can believe in. It is only going to get worse until Americans wake up. I personally believe it&amp;amp;#039;s to late. Maybe in  four years people will become smarter and elect someone who can tell the truth. Doubtful, but possible.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:33:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (3/3-3/9)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_33_39/#comment-10684866</link><description>You said it. Should be interesting.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:17:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (3/3-3/9)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_33_39/#comment-10684893</link><description>You make some excellent points-I&amp;amp;#039;ve always thought tree section was way over-valued!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 20:08:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (3/3-3/9)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_33_39/#comment-10684871</link><description>Please don&amp;amp;#039;t pretend that it has only been the past 8 years that got us into the trouble.  I&amp;amp;#039;d challenge you to go to  the real source of the problem, the repeal of G/S under Clinton in the mid 90s and the effort of Clinton and other Dems to put every American (especially minorities) into a house.  That being said, most people are to blame, regardless of political party.  Easy money in all areas of the economy was the real devil.  Obama has it made... It&amp;amp;#039;s no different than Clinton getting all the credit of turning the economy around after the original bush admin cut rates aggresively to turn the tide in the early 90s.  You&amp;amp;#039;ll see the same from Obama.   He has absolutely nothing to lose and everything to gain.  His strategy was to talk the economy down his first two months to  make sure all know who is to blame.  Now he&amp;amp;#039;s turning positive, to make sure all know who is the savior once the economy turns.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 20:35:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (3/3-3/9)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_33_39/#comment-10684884</link><description>I am right.  I hope you didn&amp;amp;#039;t HELOC the heck out of it, &amp;amp;#039;cause it would suck to be underwater on a house you bought 25 years ago.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 21:56:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (3/3-3/9)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_33_39/#comment-10684899</link><description>Maybe-but certainly not worth the 1.5-2.5 million.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 22:05:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (3/3-3/9)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_33_39/#comment-10684878</link><description>Spot on my friend. Obama is a disaster for America.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 12:35:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Flat Walkstreet Chops</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/flat_walkstreet_chops/#comment-10684927</link><description>I think it&amp;amp;#039;s time for the agent to have a come to jesus talk with these sellers.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:48:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Flat Walkstreet Chops</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/flat_walkstreet_chops/#comment-10684934</link><description>Yep Its A Conspiracy = Bitter Broker or Agent.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:33:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Flat Walkstreet Chops</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/flat_walkstreet_chops/#comment-10684950</link><description>They won&amp;amp;#039;t. It classic human nature.......ride that market down!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 01:22:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MB Market Update for 2/28/09</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/mb_market_update_for_22809/#comment-10684969</link><description>Any officially announced Northrop layoffs yet?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 10:30:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Strand for a Mil, or 10</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/the_strand_for_a_mil_or_10/#comment-10684986</link><description>Is that For Rent sign for 4305 Strand? I wonder how much they want.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 10:51:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: King &amp;amp;amp; Queen Open Up</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/king_ampamp_queen_open_up/#comment-10685001</link><description>I&amp;amp;#039;ve been in the queen. Lots of stairs and walkways. Don&amp;amp;#039;t care for this.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 10:15:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: King &amp;amp;amp; Queen Open Up</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/king_ampamp_queen_open_up/#comment-10685003</link><description>I agree, I don&amp;amp;#039;t see how that brand new construction on 35th St , west of Highland, in the Sand goes for under $4 mil and these are starting for the same price, IMO I don&amp;amp;#039;t think these are going to move at current levels.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:09:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (3/7-3/8)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_opens_37_38/#comment-10685040</link><description>Hard to say about 2003-2005.    I would say that yes, leveraging up between 2006-2008 was a major mistake.  The depths of the mistake will be clear in a couple of years.    Did you see the report that came out the other week that showed how little money baby boomers have saved up?  The reported predicted that at the bottom of the housing bubble, boomers would be effectively on the level of 1st time buyers since they have no savings and no equity.    Let&amp;amp;#039;s think about how bad the coming decades can be.  The majority of boomers have little or no retirement savings.  So they&amp;amp;#039;ll be on social security, which last time I checked is not enough to live the high life.  As a nation, that means massively reduced consumption, and massively reduced demand for assetts.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 12:33:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (3/7-3/8)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_opens_37_38/#comment-10685060</link><description>Naw, that&amp;amp;#039;s just a bitter realtor that thinks the facts should be spun her way.  They hate it when the real data is out there.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 12:35:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (3/7-3/8)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_opens_37_38/#comment-10685015</link><description>I think the real jerks are the New York Times.  How dare they write such articles as &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/08/business/08shift.html?partner=rss&amp;amp;amp;emc=rss&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/08/business/08shif...&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/08/business/08shif...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt; .  Why are they airing the woes of the Hill Section&amp;amp;#039;s residents?  What next NYT,  are you going to tell me that Facebook is not the business juggernaut we all think it is?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 19:01:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (3/7-3/8)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_opens_37_38/#comment-10685017</link><description>They&amp;amp;#039;re creepy and they&amp;amp;#039;re kooky  They all just rent like Mookie  Whose bathroom smells of dookie  The M-B-W    Their rental&amp;amp;#039;s a museum  Open houses they go see-em  and when they sell they scream  The M-B-W</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 19:53:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (3/7-3/8)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_opens_37_38/#comment-10685048</link><description>At least they have a degree.  And a set hourly fee.  How many hours do realtors actually work for their commission?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 20:55:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (3/7-3/8)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_opens_37_38/#comment-10685020</link><description>If I recall, that Larsson house was sporting both &amp;amp;quot;for sale&amp;amp;quot; and &amp;amp;quot;for rent&amp;amp;quot; signs last year when I walked by it last summer.  Looks like they are dipping their toes into the market again.    Probably would have got 20% more last summer.  This summer.....not as much.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 22:59:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (3/7-3/8)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_opens_37_38/#comment-10685054</link><description>Huggy sighting!    Whast the matter?  You don&amp;amp;#039;t like it when I suggest that realtor&amp;amp;#039;s should get an hourly wage?  I&amp;amp;#039;m not sure how you&amp;amp;#039;d keep track.      But c&amp;amp;#039;mon.  Lawyers, doctor&amp;amp;#039;s, engineers (all professionals) charge by the hour.    But realtor&amp;amp;#039;s are supposed to get a percentage cut of the entire house value?  come on.    Flat fee is OK.  I vote for 2-K, which is what they get in the UK.  Seems reasonable for someone in the service industry.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 23:04:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (3/7-3/8)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_opens_37_38/#comment-10685022</link><description>more importantly, for a six figure fee, why cant these people figure out how to work a digital camera?  its embarrassing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 10:44:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (3/7-3/8)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_opens_37_38/#comment-10685063</link><description>I think tax reutrns should be public information.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 12:35:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (3/7-3/8)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_opens_37_38/#comment-10685061</link><description>No, that is not included.  But the playhouse on the walkstreet is.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 12:46:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (3/7-3/8)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_opens_37_38/#comment-10685058</link><description>The other irony here is that it is clear that Huggy views the seller as the client, and makes no reference to the buyer&amp;amp;#039;s agent fiduciary duty.  Although theoretically, he reps the buyer.  I guess Huggy figures since the payout comes from the seller, the seller is the customer.  The irony is that the money, of course comes from the buyer.    Definately a screwed up system.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:00:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (3/7-3/8)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_opens_37_38/#comment-10685033</link><description>Saw 201 Larsson over the weekend. Quite a bachelor pad. Newer that the 80/90 updates suggested by the post. Great views. Not so great for families. Would be very surprised if it sold for $2.265M--more like high $2M or even $3M IMO.    Also saw 2404 Palm. Those 80&amp;amp;#039;s were a trip weren&amp;amp;#039;t they?!!     Finally, saw 2103 Elm. Home seemed a bit compressed. One bathroom door opened out. My guess it will sell for $1.8MM but only because there aren&amp;amp;#039;t too many new homes on the market now.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 15:57:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (3/7-3/8)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_opens_37_38/#comment-10685077</link><description>I didn&amp;amp;#039;t see the cancer comment, although I looked.    His point seems pretty commonplace, and not very controversial.....I&amp;amp;#039;ve seen many times worse posted by realtor&amp;amp;#039;s on this site.  Of course they are taking jabs at purpported &amp;amp;quot;bitter renters&amp;amp;quot;.  In my book,  these massive equity withdrawals are pretty shocking, and a telling indicator for what is causing the market to fail.    Try growing a bit thicker skin.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:11:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (3/9-3-15)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_39_3_15/#comment-10685105</link><description>You wish.  I reckon the median MB homeowner is now losing ~100-K/month in virtual equity.    At the end of the day, I think you spell &amp;amp;quot;loser&amp;amp;quot; as &amp;amp;quot;MB McMansion Owner&amp;amp;quot;.    Some of us are sheep.  Some of us are wolves.  You are &amp;amp;quot;baahing&amp;amp;quot; the same old bullshit that got us into this mess, so you are just meat.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:37:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (3/9-3-15)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_39_3_15/#comment-10685108</link><description>oh thank you</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 00:22:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (3/7-3/8)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_opens_37_38/#comment-10685035</link><description>429 31st doesn&amp;amp;#039;t surprise me at all. Those sellers were def making a move and the $/sq foot was very cheap for the Sand.  I would def think that this house is going to set some new comps for the whole area to the downside.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:51:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can&amp;amp;#039;t Fight the Future No More</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/canamp039t_fight_the_future_no_more/#comment-10685180</link><description>thanks tyler durden.  thats just the way the development deal is played...the industry operates at 99% leverage and gets wiped out every time there is a downturn.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:07:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can&amp;amp;#039;t Fight the Future No More</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/canamp039t_fight_the_future_no_more/#comment-10685174</link><description>the destruction of the spec developer market is going to have a major impact on old homes and scrapers.  there is nobody now willing to pay 1.2 for a north Pacific scraper lot.  As that drops, so will the prices on all of these homes.  500 - 750 is where we are headed for dirt.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:08:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spring Rally Casualty</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/spring_rally_casualty/#comment-10685166</link><description>amen to that</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:02:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2 Classy Hillies Down $2m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/2_classy_hillies_down_2m/#comment-10685189</link><description>It also seems like there is a ton of new construction due to come on the market in the near future.  Not the best sign for all the new construction on the hill.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:56:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (3/9-3-15)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_39_3_15/#comment-10685098</link><description>&amp;amp;quot;... Rising unemployment also is making it harder for homeowners to keep up with payments. The U.S. jobless rate rose to 8.1 percent in February, the highest in more than 25 years, according to the Labor Department.    Wait and See    Some of the top U.S. lenders own as many as 700,000 foreclosed homes they have yet to offer for sale, said Rick Sharga, executive vice president for marketing for RealtyTrac.    The banks may be waiting to see how U.S. government plans develop before selling the properties, Sharga said. The lenders and government-owned Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two biggest U.S. mortgage financing companies, have already extended temporary foreclosure moratoriums....&amp;amp;quot;    &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;amp;amp;sid=aOd4ZFCxraDI&amp;amp;amp;refer=news&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;amp;a...&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;amp;a...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;    We have not yet even seen the worst part of this housing crisis.  scary but true.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:32:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2 Classy Hillies Down $2m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/2_classy_hillies_down_2m/#comment-10685216</link><description>I agree 100%, esp with 429 31St.  That was a really nice home in a great part of town for a price/sq ft in the $550 range, so it doesn&amp;amp;#039;t surprise me that this house got a deal done.  The question is going to be who else in the Sand is willing to bring their offers down to a similar price range to get a deal done.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:44:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2 Classy Hillies Down $2m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/2_classy_hillies_down_2m/#comment-10685226</link><description>why dont i want recovery?  because i want the overleveraged to be punished.  i saved, you didnt.  worked for a long time, now it doesnt.  i hope you all get slaughtered.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:17:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2 Classy Hillies Down $2m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/2_classy_hillies_down_2m/#comment-10685227</link><description>hilarious.  huggy is grasping at straws, and he will continue to due so.  the value of all leveraged assets is dropping.  carry on.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:18:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2 Classy Hillies Down $2m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/2_classy_hillies_down_2m/#comment-10685230</link><description>Don&amp;amp;#039;t believe everything you hear in the news.  The citi report that they had profits was an &amp;amp;quot;internally leaked memo&amp;amp;quot; which did not state any assumption about the return to profibility.....like what &amp;amp;quot;onetime&amp;amp;quot; losses they have excluded.  So it is not a real statement.____Why would such a report be &amp;amp;quot;leaked&amp;amp;quot;?  Simply to try and sway public away from putting them into receivership.  There were reports that morning about new steps the federal government was taking towards that effect.____In short, it is a scam by the banks to extend their existence.____The real report comes out on the fifteenth, I believe.  See what happens that day.____</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:06:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2 Classy Hillies Down $2m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/2_classy_hillies_down_2m/#comment-10685231</link><description>you are a pitiful un-american waste of oxygen</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:13:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2 Classy Hillies Down $2m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/2_classy_hillies_down_2m/#comment-10685198</link><description>Why oh why did you delete the posts that outed huggy? (and, the fact that they were deleted is pretty much all I needed to know.) I have read past posts where you let him name names (esp. about I think rb dude, but not sure, he has even called him by name here).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:18:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Back Again on 35th</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/back_again_on_35th/#comment-10685258</link><description>I remember that poll and I am pretty sure I voted for won&amp;amp;#039;t sell. Homeowners have a big disinclination to take a loss (don&amp;amp;#039;t we all!). I figured they would not drop to market because it would cut into their d/p presumably. Now I would think it does sell near 2.2, just my opinion.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:15:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2 Classy Hillies Down $2m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/2_classy_hillies_down_2m/#comment-10685242</link><description>Spot on Huggy. Excellent response as usual.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:18:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (3/9-3-15)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_39_3_15/#comment-10685121</link><description>Where are all these unemployed people? I&amp;amp;quot;ve been around a long time and know a lot of people. I don&amp;amp;#039;t know a single person that has lost their job, not one.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:24:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Back Again on 35th</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/back_again_on_35th/#comment-10685289</link><description>Slim margins, high volume, (excellent customer service) sounds like a decent business plan. I have run a business of that model, and can think of  more like any grocery store, Walmart, Target, Zappos, etc.     I have heard from the entitled and entrenched South Bay agents that Catalist is going under for years, going on decades now, from the day they opened their doors. It must be a chant at the Thursday morning sales meetings, it really sounds the same. Now eveyone with me... &amp;amp;quot;Catalist going under, Catalist going under...&amp;amp;quot;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 12:53:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Back Again on 35th</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/back_again_on_35th/#comment-10685304</link><description>is this an all-cash venture, and frankly, why wouldn&amp;amp;#039;t anyone want their cash tied up in a deflationary environment for 12 months or longer?   &amp;amp;#039;cause good luck getting financing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 12:57:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Back Again on 35th</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/back_again_on_35th/#comment-10685291</link><description>Let&amp;amp;#039;s talk redfin&amp;amp;#039;s total volume. Unlike you losers, their universe does not revolve around 267 houses in Manhattan Beach...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 13:02:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Back Again on 35th</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/back_again_on_35th/#comment-10685293</link><description>I never said I had realtor friends. I was their potential Client. And as I am not in the industry I don&amp;amp;#039;t know or care how long Catalist has been around. I just know what I&amp;amp;#039;ve heard from you ad nauseum for years.    You know you&amp;amp;#039;ve hit a nerve when the personal insults start flying.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 13:11:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (3/9-3-15)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_39_3_15/#comment-10685122</link><description>But I do.  The people I know in these industries are still employed. I know two people that had to take salary cuts.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 13:23:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2 Classy Hillies Down $2m</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/2_classy_hillies_down_2m/#comment-10685253</link><description>Exactly !!!!!!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 13:30:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (3/9-3-15)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_39_3_15/#comment-10685100</link><description>I was talking to some friends at a party last night about our new President.  5 voted for Obama (including myself) 2 voted for McCain. Those of us that voted for Obama with the hope for real change in our government are very disappointed and feel we were lied to. One still had confidence that Obama would be able to turn things around within the next 6 to 8 months. As for me, I&amp;amp;#039;m feeling like I made a big mistake. My wife on the other hand disagrees with me. Now we just have to hope for the best.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 13:44:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Back Again on 35th</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/back_again_on_35th/#comment-10685297</link><description>The 3 stages of Huggy&amp;amp;#039;s desperation:     1. Pompously rolling out the numbers in a dubious attempt at &amp;amp;#039;insider industry knowledge&amp;amp;#039;     2. Moving on the personal insults     3. Discrediting: Now, they&amp;amp;#039;re just lying!     Next time I invite you to my kitchen table for your dog and pony show, you can tell me all about Catalist. K?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 14:13:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Back Again on 35th</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/back_again_on_35th/#comment-10685265</link><description>Just too stupid to respond to. Now Right On knows what off-the-MLS sales and transfers  are happening in every attorney&amp;amp;#039;s office and escrow company in the entire world!  Stick to pushing your 277 MLS-listed MB homes, please.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 16:10:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (3/9-3-15)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_39_3_15/#comment-10685127</link><description>I think we thought there should have been more of what we heard in the campaign. He claimed there would be noticable change in his administration. All he did was to seek out never were&amp;amp;#039;s and has beens from the Clinton administration. One or two errors in his selections would have been possibly understandable. I&amp;amp;#039;ve lost count on how many have had to step aside. Obama sid the American people would have the opportunity to read the bills to be considered before he signed them. The congress didn&amp;amp;#039;t even read the bill before they passed it. So much for his transparency idea.  There is so much more. I&amp;amp;#039;m willing to give him a chance but I fear America has made a mistake in it&amp;amp;#039;s selection of a leader.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 12:41:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Back Again on 35th</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/back_again_on_35th/#comment-10685312</link><description>RB, just so we understand you clearly.  Are you saying that you are in &amp;amp;quot;Fantasy Austin.&amp;amp;quot; As in you &amp;amp;quot;own a house in MB,&amp;amp;quot; or actual Austin as in, you own nothing, but bombard this blog with posts?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:23:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (3/9-3-15)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_39_3_15/#comment-10685128</link><description>Yes I&amp;amp;#039;m serious! The notion that the previous administration left a mess is simply not the truth. I fell into the hype of this guy and  I now feel it was a mistake. Your statement about taxes and Palin and McCain I&amp;amp;#039;m totally unaware of. I don&amp;amp;quot;t recall anything about them relating to not paying taxes.  Yes, it&amp;amp;#039;s his fault that congress didn&amp;amp;quot;t read the bill before they signed it. He pushed and pushed them with fear of a disater. He simply lied when he said bills such as this would be published on the web site for all to see and read for a minimum of 5 days before signing. This financial mess can be laid at the feet of democrats like Barney Frank, Maxine Waters Chris Dodd and others for the the failure of the housing industry. Some of these people will end up in jail if there is any real justice left in this country.The country has made a big mistake in the election of a socialist leader.  I hope we wake up and are able to do something about it before it&amp;amp;#039;s to late. More and more moderate democrats are seeing this and will hopefully bring us back to an even keel. If not, we are in big trouble as a nation.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:29:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Close the Books on 220 35th</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/close_the_books_on_220_35th/#comment-10685317</link><description>If you want photos &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.mydigitalpublication.com/publication/?i=8042&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.mydigitalpublication.com/publication/?...&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.mydigitalpublication.com/publication/?...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt; Luxury Life and Style Magazine.  Pg 96-97</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:35:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Close the Books on 220 35th</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/close_the_books_on_220_35th/#comment-10685321</link><description>Not that I could dream of buying a house like this, but other Sand Section homes that are listed $5 mil and higher how do they possibly compare or believe there is that much more of a premium, even with the slightly challenged locations of 34th and 35th St these homes seem to set the price for that mkt.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:26:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Close the Books on 220 35th</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/close_the_books_on_220_35th/#comment-10685326</link><description>That house has already started to fall apart and will be garbage in 2 years.  Good luck with that one.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:53:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (3/16-3/22)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_316_322/#comment-10685356</link><description>Keep up the great work.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:35:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sunday Opens (3/15)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/sunday_opens_315/#comment-10685316</link><description>At the risk of having folks on this board accuse me of being Huggy or just someone trying to pump up the market in MB, it appeared to me there were a lot of people looking at the open houses over the weekend, I don&amp;amp;quot;t know if they were serious buyers or not. Does anyone know if offers were made on any of these homes over the weekend?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:14:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A 2nd Try at 2nd</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/a_2nd_try_at_2nd/#comment-10685388</link><description>The sales history chart for this home is proof of how insane this market had become. The current owners really think they deserve a million  profit in just 4 years? Good luck with that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:09:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quick Picks</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/quick_picks/#comment-10685418</link><description>People who are buying sand section properties are looking to hold them for a long time which is why the activity is better there even in this market. if someone finds a house &amp;amp;amp; location they like and can afford, the market condition becomes secondary. When you get down to it there aren&amp;amp;#039;t that many really nice houses in really good locations in a given pricepoint. The ones that are sell. It doesn&amp;amp;#039;t matter if its $1.2 or $10.2 the same applies.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:23:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quick Picks</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/quick_picks/#comment-10685419</link><description>MBC - I keep hearing that so many homes are falling out of escrow. Can you do a follow up to this story showing how many actually closed?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:58:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (3/16-3/22)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_316_322/#comment-10685382</link><description>Personally, I would prefer more Huggy and less of you.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:31:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quick Picks</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/quick_picks/#comment-10685427</link><description>Why does anyone bother to even comment about what Huggy says anymore? We all see the   writing on the wall, including Huggy, he just will never admit it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:53:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quick Picks</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/quick_picks/#comment-10685444</link><description>Lots of baboons screeching tonight.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:07:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MB Market Update for 3/15/09, Hills</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/mb_market_update_for_31509_hills/#comment-10685469</link><description>I have been aware that the hill section was flooding but thanks for the numbers</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:59:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MB Market Update for 3/15/09, Hills</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/mb_market_update_for_31509_hills/#comment-10685471</link><description>denial or in no rush to sell. Its gotta suck sitting in the sidelines in your rental apt wishing that the so called greedy fools lower their prices so you can one day afford to live in manhattan beach.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:54:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quick Picks</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/quick_picks/#comment-10685466</link><description>Very well put and spot on. Great response to the post !</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:05:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MB Market Update for 3/15/09, Hills</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/mb_market_update_for_31509_hills/#comment-10685496</link><description>Exactly !!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:21:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A 2nd Try at 2nd</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/a_2nd_try_at_2nd/#comment-10685408</link><description>Pure capitalism is the only thing that does work dude. If you doubt that, you&amp;amp;#039;re a Moron.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:26:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quick Picks</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/quick_picks/#comment-10685454</link><description>You see the writing on the wall because  you live in Lawndale.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:30:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MB Market Update for 3/15/09, Hills</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/mb_market_update_for_31509_hills/#comment-10685536</link><description>1901 Walnut closed at $2,150,000.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:31:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Still Slow on Poinsettia</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/still_slow_on_poinsettia/#comment-10685552</link><description>Note to architects/general contractors/homeowners that are remodelling - let&amp;amp;#039;s just say we ban the turret-like structure - K?   And I totally agree with Nostra&amp;amp;#039;s price prediction on this one.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:50:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Open (3/21-3/22)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_open_321_322/#comment-10685588</link><description>I don&amp;amp;#039;t see any anti-homeowner sentiment huggy, I see anti-realtor sentiment. And he&amp;amp;#039;s not the only one. As the representative on this blog of your chosen vocation, and please note that I deliberately did not use the word profession, you make realtors look like terrible, cheating, conniving, lying, snakes.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:02:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Open (3/21-3/22)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_open_321_322/#comment-10685597</link><description>comment heard at open house today.  couple leaving a nice entry level new build &amp;amp;quot;i love it, if you drop the price about 400k we are interested!&amp;amp;quot;.  sign o the times.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:36:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Open (3/21-3/22)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_open_321_322/#comment-10685605</link><description>Would you not live on the Strand because of a &amp;amp;quot;shabby&amp;amp;quot; house next door?  Welcome to the beach!  This is not a master planned community in Orange County.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:14:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Craigslist Craziness</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/craigslist_craziness/#comment-10685690</link><description>Wow. That was hard to follow. First thing I checked was the name of the Listing Agent, bc although all of the above may not be illegal, I find it slightly unethical. Then there is the title passing through different LLCs.   Mostly though, it is ugly, from the pictures posted on Redfin.   Good post (and detective work) on this one, MBC.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:28:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MB Market Update for 3/15/09, Sand</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/mb_market_update_for_31509_sand/#comment-10685686</link><description>MBCon, love the site, but I think in the Sand Section there is a huge % of inventory that are town homes and condos, do you know what the inventory looks like with these homes included, as these homes definitely help set price in this part of town?  I know this isn&amp;amp;#039;t your cup of tea exactly, but thanks for the help.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:52:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Open (3/21-3/22)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_open_321_322/#comment-10685594</link><description>The link above isn&amp;amp;#039;t working!    The cartoon is @:     &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wFWqWIH-WFU/ScHRy9OzB7I/AAAAAAAAJYY/CD-cwT-7gkY/s1600-h/CalvinHobbs.jpg&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wFWqWIH-WFU/ScHRy9OzB7I...&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wFWqWIH-WFU/ScHRy9OzB7I...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;    The tinyurl link is corrupted on some browsers    Still, try &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://tinyurl.com/cnx4cj&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://tinyurl.com/cnx4cj&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://tinyurl.com/cnx4cj&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:59:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MB Market Update for 3/15/09, Trees</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/mb_market_update_for_31509_trees/#comment-10685718</link><description>People who are &amp;amp;quot;waiting for prices to go back up&amp;amp;quot; are just not very bright. As nice houses said when prices fall in Manhattan Beach to a reasonable level sales will rise. However, you can be certain there are people reading this right now who are thinking &amp;amp;quot;not in Manhattan Beach&amp;amp;quot;!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:29:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MB Market Update for 3/15/09, Trees</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/mb_market_update_for_31509_trees/#comment-10685723</link><description>I know several people who would buy if they only had a brain.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:53:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (3/16-3/22)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_316_322/#comment-10685376</link><description>MBW, I&amp;amp;#039;ve been away for nearly 3 months now. i really like the new format but what appears your strict rules for posting make the site boring. I liked the lively debates in the past. Sometimes insults and or offensive language are appropriate in my humble opinion. Oh well your the boss man. I plan to continue to check out the site from time to time but not like before. Like I said before, it has gotten a bit stuffy and boring.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:03:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Craigslist Craziness</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/craigslist_craziness/#comment-10685706</link><description>anyone who would predict such nonsense simply doesn&amp;amp;#039;t understand MB real estate.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:06:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Craigslist Craziness</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/craigslist_craziness/#comment-10685707</link><description>my wife and I own 3 condos in MB. We bought the first one in 1997 and it has been rented to the same person since. The next one we purchased in 2001 and are now on the second tenent occupant. The last one was puchased in 2004 is also rented to our initial tenant. The rents are reasonable and we have a positive cash flow. The values obviously go up and down. we have no plans to sell so it doesn&amp;amp;#039;t matter.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:34:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Flipping for Rosecrans?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/flipping_for_rosecrans/#comment-10685750</link><description>I&amp;amp;#039;ve got to get some of whatever you&amp;amp;#039;re smoking dude. Maybe it&amp;amp;#039;s just your age. You&amp;amp;#039;ve only been right about 20% of the time over the centuries.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:30:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Flipping for Rosecrans?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/flipping_for_rosecrans/#comment-10685754</link><description>I&amp;amp;#039;ll put money on before then, No, I&amp;amp;#039;m not kidding,</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:11:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Flipping for Rosecrans?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/flipping_for_rosecrans/#comment-10685756</link><description>Interesting - revised square footage on 620 9th - now only 3600 vs 4500</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 20:15:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hill Bits</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hill_bits/#comment-10685765</link><description>Whoa, that&amp;amp;#039;s a substantial reduction in square footage for 620 9th Street!  How in the world did that happen?  I heard there may be some mold issues there - does anyone know the story?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:51:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hill Bits</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hill_bits/#comment-10685792</link><description>Sounds like somebody is desperate to sell and even willing to lie to move this place.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:08:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Craigslist Craziness</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/craigslist_craziness/#comment-10685708</link><description>That is crazy!  I call myself comfortable, not wealthy. Our single family home is also in MB and is paid for.  I see no reason that we will not be able to maintain reliable tenants. The tenants we have I&amp;amp;#039;ve talked to and they seem very comfortable in their employment. One owns is own business and he is doing fine. We owe very little on the condo units so we are not concerned.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:34:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Open (3/21-3/22)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_open_321_322/#comment-10685622</link><description>I believe Huggy nearly all the time dude.Maybe you should start.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:37:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Flipping for Rosecrans?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/flipping_for_rosecrans/#comment-10685762</link><description>The sound of drums and gun fire every now and then would be my guess.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:41:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Flipping for Rosecrans?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/flipping_for_rosecrans/#comment-10685755</link><description>Good post. Thanks Red, oh excuse me, I mean  Clem.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:57:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hill Bits</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hill_bits/#comment-10685768</link><description>I am curious as to how one takes care of a second story patio with grass, you know,   like how do you cut the lawn, take out the clippings and such?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 23:04:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hill Bits</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hill_bits/#comment-10685771</link><description>&amp;amp;quot;Ignore the headlines and TV &amp;amp;quot;news&amp;amp;quot; meant to entertain versus inform. Do your own research and you will find housing continues to unravel, now at the high end.&amp;amp;quot;     Anyone who went through the 90s knows this. As a potential buyer, time is on your side, years and years and years of time... especially this time around.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 01:03:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hill Bits</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hill_bits/#comment-10685806</link><description>But Jose, I don&amp;amp;#039;t want you to tromp through my house to get to the &amp;amp;#039;yard&amp;amp;#039;. Is there an outside staricase?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:24:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hill Bits</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hill_bits/#comment-10685810</link><description>I can&amp;amp;#039;t to see what Nostradamus says it will go for and when.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:51:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hill Bits</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hill_bits/#comment-10685812</link><description>A new way of spelling fool......Fauxtalian Palass</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:55:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hill Bits</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hill_bits/#comment-10685815</link><description>Woo hoo! Ticked off the old home team by telling it like it is. $, your title says it all.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 18:54:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MB Market Update for 3/15/09, Trees</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/mb_market_update_for_31509_trees/#comment-10685717</link><description>COTC....I understand you&amp;amp;#039;re a real estate agent and need to make some $ off some more suckers out there.  I suggest working part time as a used car salesmen...maybe you can get some more suckers to believe your hype.  Haha...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:17:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hill Bits</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hill_bits/#comment-10685785</link><description>It is pointless to debate the tons of desperate real estate agents trying to talk up the housing market on this site.  I can&amp;amp;#039;t blame them...they need to find more suckers to buy Manhattan Beach homes now at inflated prices in order to pay their bills.  Deep down, they are simply used car salesmen...sad individuals.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:01:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hill Bits</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hill_bits/#comment-10685830</link><description>Anti-realtor, yes. Anti-homeowner - only if they&amp;amp;#039;re delusional, then the overpriced POS they&amp;amp;#039;re trying to unload gets slammed on this site. Hence, their feelings get  hurt. Poor babies...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:16:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hill Bits</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hill_bits/#comment-10685786</link><description>I love it!   Trotting out the entire SW sales team to rail against MBC and the meanies on this blog by calling them all &amp;amp;#039;clueless&amp;amp;#039; and &amp;amp;#039;poor.&amp;amp;#039;   I guess they really don&amp;amp;#039;t have much else to do these days.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:39:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hill Bits</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/hill_bits/#comment-10685843</link><description>As opposed to the knuckle draggers that post on here all day long?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:52:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deals or No Deals?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/deals_or_no_deals/#comment-10685910</link><description>A year from now we&amp;amp;#039;ll look back on this poll and laugh at the fact that any of these homes were considered a deal.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:55:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deals or No Deals?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/deals_or_no_deals/#comment-10685927</link><description>....guess a realtor can dream.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:58:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deals or No Deals?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/deals_or_no_deals/#comment-10685914</link><description>According to hugtard, all of these are screaming buys.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:42:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deals or No Deals?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/deals_or_no_deals/#comment-10685915</link><description>seems like 2600 poinsettia that i saw at under $500 a foot looks like the buy compared to these</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:29:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deals or No Deals?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/deals_or_no_deals/#comment-10685919</link><description>I agree with the other posts.  While each has merits, for the Pacific and Poinsettia houses to be a &amp;amp;quot;deal&amp;amp;quot; or worth considering, these would need to be around $500/sq foot, as some of the new and newer homes have recently sold for in the trees.  I haven&amp;amp;#039;t seen Ardmore, but it seems like more of a deal based on the age of the home and the price; although, the location is not ideal.  The Oak location is not desirable either, and in my opinion, will need to come down quite a bit.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:03:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deals or No Deals?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/deals_or_no_deals/#comment-10685932</link><description>If things keep going like this, you are right.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:46:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sunday Opens in the Trees (3/29)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/sunday_opens_in_the_trees_329/#comment-10685902</link><description>Relax. Horrible no, annoying yes. The MB City Council has better things to do. Don&amp;amp;#039;t you think?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:23:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sunday Opens in the Trees (3/29)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/sunday_opens_in_the_trees_329/#comment-10685903</link><description>You must be a great neighbor.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:23:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deals or No Deals?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/deals_or_no_deals/#comment-10685923</link><description>Really not sure what your point is.  Every one knows that homes in Manhattan Beach are still selling and will continue to sell each month.  The difference between you and others is that you still feel the local realestate market is strong, while others see prices go down each month.   Whatever sells today will have a value 20 to 30 percent lower 1 year from now.  Take that to the bank.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:12:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: East MB Bucket (8)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/east_mb_bucket_8/#comment-10685973</link><description>I think they should put a wall through the middle of Ed K&amp;amp;#039;s house, and sell it as two 4,000 sq ft condo&amp;amp;#039;s for 3.25-M each.    Maybe that&amp;amp;#039;s still too steep for E.MB.  Maybe turn it into 4 2,000 sq ft apartments for 1.6-M each.  That still sounds kind of steep.    Maybe 8 1,000 sq ft apartments for 800-K each?  That still sounds steep compared to the condos a few blocks away on MB Blvd.    Here&amp;amp;#039;s an idea.  Maybe cut it to 3.25 M starting price.  He paid peak bubble prices for lot and construction......probably worth a few million less than what he paid already.    I hear one of the features they left off the redfin listing is that the faucets actually run kool-aid instead of water.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:34:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: President to Regulate Real Estate, Set Prices</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/president_to_regulate_real_estate_set_prices/#comment-10686009</link><description>Good one!!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 14:17:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: President to Regulate Real Estate, Set Prices</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/president_to_regulate_real_estate_set_prices/#comment-10686013</link><description>The biggest April Fools of them all are Obama and his adminisration. They will end up sending us all into bankruptsy. I still can&amp;amp;#039;t believe Americans voted this guy into office. One good thing is he will be a one term president.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:44:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: East MB Bucket (8)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/east_mb_bucket_8/#comment-10685978</link><description>Between this home on 9th, Candy Spelling&amp;amp;#039;s new listing, and more, my mind is becoming boggled over the thought of the property tax bill alone.     The photos of home theaters and wine rooms are blending into each other.      Manhattan Beach seems overbuilt today. I think we may have been better off when there were lots of little original beach bungalows with varying crappy sq. ft. additions. Just my opinion.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 22:21:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When We Say Walkstreet...</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/when_we_say_walkstreet/#comment-10686025</link><description>Sorry, but this little shack with no access (and for just under a mil(!)) is and would be one of the worst investments I have ever seen. No. Never. Not ever.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:18:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: President to Regulate Real Estate, Set Prices</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/president_to_regulate_real_estate_set_prices/#comment-10686017</link><description>Yep.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:21:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When We Say Walkstreet...</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/when_we_say_walkstreet/#comment-10686026</link><description>They&amp;amp;#039;ll be lucky if they get what they paid for it, I just don&amp;amp;#039;t see buyers in today&amp;amp;#039;s market will to reward a flipper esp with over 20% appreciation.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:25:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When We Say Walkstreet...</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/when_we_say_walkstreet/#comment-10686039</link><description>the neighbors apparently had no interest in Jan 08</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:48:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When We Say Walkstreet...</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/when_we_say_walkstreet/#comment-10686027</link><description>I bet this flipper is going to take it in the shorts! Never gonna sell at this price or anywhere near it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:51:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: President to Regulate Real Estate, Set Prices</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/president_to_regulate_real_estate_set_prices/#comment-10686019</link><description>beyond screwd unfortunately.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:44:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: President to Regulate Real Estate, Set Prices</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/president_to_regulate_real_estate_set_prices/#comment-10686015</link><description>Best April fools joke I&amp;amp;#039;ve ever read.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:46:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deals or No Deals?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/deals_or_no_deals/#comment-10685969</link><description>Amen to that !</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:48:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: East MB Bucket (8)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/east_mb_bucket_8/#comment-10685994</link><description>uh huh</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:17:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When We Say Walkstreet...</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/when_we_say_walkstreet/#comment-10686050</link><description>sclause     My link to this article isn&amp;amp;#039;t working. Can you send it again?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 00:26:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll Results: Deals or No Deals?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/poll_results_deals_or_no_deals/#comment-10686068</link><description>Good Idea.  In fact, how does Rock N Fish get away with charging $14.00 for a burger? I predict they&amp;amp;#039;ll be lucky to get $8.00 this time next year. Now that everybodies equity lines have dried up, I think only the places like Jack in the Box will survive!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 08:29:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll Results: Deals or No Deals?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/poll_results_deals_or_no_deals/#comment-10686088</link><description>No Commish -- bullseye.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 11:37:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When We Say Walkstreet...</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/when_we_say_walkstreet/#comment-10686055</link><description>sclause    Since we can&amp;amp;#039;t read the full article, did it say when this wave was coming?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:35:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When We Say Walkstreet...</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/when_we_say_walkstreet/#comment-10686062</link><description>He didn&amp;amp;#039;t name himself that as I understand it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:34:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When We Say Walkstreet...</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/when_we_say_walkstreet/#comment-10686063</link><description>that would be you, don&amp;amp;#039;t you know?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 13:36:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Poll Results: Deals or No Deals?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/poll_results_deals_or_no_deals/#comment-10686082</link><description>sounds like a stopping problem to me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 13:41:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When We Say Walkstreet...</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/when_we_say_walkstreet/#comment-10686064</link><description>MB Watcher, please advise this pant load how Huggy got his handle.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 13:45:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When We Say Walkstreet...</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/when_we_say_walkstreet/#comment-10686037</link><description>mb watcher, if you insist on censoring posts, at least be consistant and fair. Is that asking to much?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 13:50:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Reading (4/4-4/5)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_reading_44_45/#comment-10686106</link><description>Anon 7: What is your point?     Do you hate Leo in particular? Real Estate vultures in general? Opportunists? Or is it business people that &amp;amp;#039;prey&amp;amp;#039; on the affluent? I don&amp;amp;#039;t know and can&amp;amp;#039;t understand from your post.     I do agree that with your prediction of 2012, and well beyond, where we may see any kind of stabilization (not a recovery of 2005 prices.) Of course, as a famous blogger on this site says, &amp;amp;quot;All bets are off&amp;amp;quot; pending more government interference with market principles.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 15:05:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Reading (4/4-4/5)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_reading_44_45/#comment-10686098</link><description>So here&amp;amp;#039;s an excerpt from a WSJ article I found:    &amp;amp;quot;I looked at Case-Shiller&amp;amp;#039;s index back to 1987 and compared it to federal data on average earnings. The result, rebased to 100 in January 1987, can be seen here. And it&amp;amp;#039;s alarming. By this (admittedly very simple) measure, today&amp;amp;#039;s home prices are actually more expensive, in relation to average earnings, than at the peak of the 1989 property bubble.    Equally noteworthy is that when the last property bubble burst, it took about eight years before the market showed really strong signs of revival. This bubble was far, far bigger.&amp;amp;quot;    Check out the rest of the article here....    &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123853857749575441.html&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB12385385774957544...&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB12385385774957544...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;    CNN also published a recent RE forecast:    &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://money.cnn.com/magazines/moneymag/moneymag_realestate/2009/snapshots/11.html&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://money.cnn.com/magazines/moneymag/moneymag_...&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://money.cnn.com/magazines/moneymag/moneymag_...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;    Forecast   Price change :  (from peak to bottom) -57.4% When they&amp;amp;#039;ll hit bottom: 2010:Q3 At bottom, prices will drop to levels last seen in: 2001:Q4</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 18:51:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Reading (4/4-4/5)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_reading_44_45/#comment-10686114</link><description>You have piqued my curiosity about 717 Poinsettia, as they don&amp;amp;#039;t have any interior photos on Redfin, the exterior looks quite stunning.     Your story reminds me of a Hill Section home my husband and I were looking at many years ago (I&amp;amp;#039;m thinking 1994 or so) that was vacant, but within minutes we had to run out into the street to brush the fleas off of our legs. We were literally standing in the middle of the street doing that odd dance you do when trying to get bugs off.     Not saying this one is anything like that, but it is perplexing to not straighten up for an open. Oh well.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 20:13:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Reading (4/4-4/5)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_reading_44_45/#comment-10686115</link><description>Many of us have experienced how, caught in a So Cal real estate down cycle, it can difficult at best to have a home on the market for a protracted period of time. Especially with young children and pets. I wish them a quick(er) sale, but of course, the market may be telling them to lower the asking price.  It looks like a wonderful, peaceful-looking home for a family, although I have not seen the inside.     Redfin shows a 1986 build, but MBC says a &amp;amp;#039;very classy newer home..&amp;amp;#039; Is the Redfin date wrong?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 21:13:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Reading (4/4-4/5)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_reading_44_45/#comment-10686107</link><description>&amp;amp;quot;&amp;amp;quot;The foreclosure business goes in waves...&amp;amp;quot;     I personally love that quote from a local, mellow surfer dude that has built a successful business.     I wish I had it, or could bottle and sell that surfer outlook on life.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 21:20:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When We Say Walkstreet...</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/when_we_say_walkstreet/#comment-10686065</link><description>I try to at least leave one every day</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 21:45:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Reading (4/4-4/5)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_reading_44_45/#comment-10686121</link><description>It&amp;amp;#039;s kinda addicting too</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 13:02:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Reading (4/4-4/5)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_reading_44_45/#comment-10686123</link><description>Mookie, why do you have to report factual data.   Of course, my house hasn&amp;amp;#039;t gone down that much in value, it could only be my next door neighbor that has suffered.    Now we know why Huggy refused to post, it does not help his always good time to buy scenario.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 23:51:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MB Market Update for 3/31/09, Overview</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/mb_market_update_for_33109_overview/#comment-10686127</link><description>Actually, 5 condos and 1 apartment building were in the 41</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 10:29:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MB Market Update for 3/31/09, Overview</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/mb_market_update_for_33109_overview/#comment-10686145</link><description>Waiting to Buy a Burger - Get a life</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 10:41:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MB Market Update for 3/31/09, Overview</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/mb_market_update_for_33109_overview/#comment-10686146</link><description>&lt;a href="http://redfin.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;redfin.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:16:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MB Market Update for 3/31/09, Overview</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/mb_market_update_for_33109_overview/#comment-10686135</link><description>Huggy    I can see why you never posted the sales numbers that others had asked you to. Perhaps it was because you were too busy selling homes. Or not.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 14:56:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MB Market Update for 3/31/09, Overview</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/mb_market_update_for_33109_overview/#comment-10686137</link><description>517 21st did sell, supposedly for under $2.2.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:39:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MB Market Update for 3/31/09, Overview</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/mb_market_update_for_33109_overview/#comment-10686156</link><description>Quick Answer.  The price on this house is too high for the market; if this house was priced 20% lower, it&amp;amp;#039;d see some action (like most of the current listings in MB).   It&amp;amp;#039;s simple.  A house will sell if it&amp;amp;#039;s priced correctly.  Since most buyers now realize that the market will likely fall another 20%, 25% or 30% this year, they are reluctant to buy something that will be worth hundreds of thousands less in a few months.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:45:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MB Market Update for 3/31/09, Overview</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/mb_market_update_for_33109_overview/#comment-10686138</link><description>&lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/06/us/06convene.html&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/06/us/06convene.ht...&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/06/us/06convene.ht...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;    April 6, 2009    Homeowners&amp;amp;rsquo; Hard Times Are Good for the Foreclosure Business    By ERIC LIPTON    PALM DESERT, Calif. &amp;amp;mdash; The celebration started early Saturday, with poolside music and drinks, as partygoers passed around business cards and compared notes on successful techniques for evicting residents who try to stay in bank-owned property, a process they call &amp;amp;ldquo;cash for keys.&amp;amp;rdquo;    One woman in a T-shirt walked around with a hand-written sign that read &amp;amp;ldquo;Bank Property&amp;amp;rdquo; affixed prominently to her chest.    Welcome to the spring 2009 Reomac conference, which has attracted nearly 3,000 real estate agents and property managers to this lush desert resort. The crowd brimmed with a gusto that is hard to find in this recessionary era. The hotel bar did more business on Saturday night than it did on New Year&amp;amp;rsquo;s Eve. Small wonder: These are the people cashing in on the boom in foreclosed properties.    R.E.O. is industry lingo for &amp;amp;ldquo;Real Estate Owned,&amp;amp;rdquo; the term that bankers assign to homes they have taken in a foreclosure. Reomac is the industry group that serves the mortgage default trade, specializing in selling the busted-up American dream.    &amp;amp;ldquo;Things are going tremendously,&amp;amp;rdquo; said Darren Johnson, an R.E.O. agent from the Detroit area, who has handled about 180 bank property sales in the last year. &amp;amp;ldquo;It has never been this good.&amp;amp;rdquo;    The conference this year is centered on the &amp;amp;ldquo;R.E.O. tsunami,&amp;amp;rdquo; referring not to any natural disaster but to the one caused by the flood of as many as 700,000 bank properties now on the market nationwide. There were just 100,000 in 2006.    The tsunami has leveled off a bit in recent months, because of foreclosure moratoriums imposed by major banks and the Obama administration. But the real estate agents here were told not to worry &amp;amp;mdash; the flood will continue for several more years, and probably has not peaked yet.    In February, nearly 45 percent of the home sales nationwide were R.E.O. or so-called short sales, in which homeowners, under duress, sell a property for less than their mortgage, according to the National Association of Realtors. The sales have intensified a nationwide decline in home values. R.E.O. homes typically sell at a 20 percent discount.    The convention at the Desert Springs J. W. Marriott formally began on Sunday, with a golf tournament, featuring a &amp;amp;ldquo;19th hole&amp;amp;rdquo; bash cosponsored by Coldwell Banker, the giant real estate firm. Other convention-goers were at the resort spa, getting top-priced treatments, like the protein-rich caviar scrub for $185.    &amp;amp;ldquo;What we have seen so far is just a hint of what is coming down the pike in the next three years,&amp;amp;rdquo; Marty Higgins, a San Francisco real estate broker who specializes in apartment buildings, said as he stepped off his golf cart, smoking a cigar.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 01:05:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/7-4/13)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_47_413/#comment-10686167</link><description>Here&amp;amp;#039;s a topic. How about the 2nd attempted kidnapping that happened in hermosa beach the other day - the first was in redondo beach in january. And before that the rash of robberies that happened in manhattan beach. Does anyone else feel as if crime in the south bay has suddenly increased. all of a sudden people don&amp;amp;#039;t feel safe in their own neighborhoods.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 11:48:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/7-4/13)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_47_413/#comment-10686199</link><description>You think it&amp;amp;#039;s bad now, just wait to see what happens as Obama ,Pelosi and  others continue to socialize our country. Yes, this really change we can believe in.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 12:26:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/7-4/13)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_47_413/#comment-10686186</link><description>MBC, you forgot this relevant info, former Mira Costa High running back Mookie, who scored one touchdown in 1977 is renting and his toilet is still broken.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 12:26:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/7-4/13)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_47_413/#comment-10686195</link><description>I can&amp;amp;#039;t speak for folks like you living in more marginal neighborhoods, but MB is still very safe.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:42:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/7-4/13)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_47_413/#comment-10686207</link><description>If you have direct contact with the Pope or Cardinal or can donate a substantial amount of money to the church you may have a shot.  it is easier to get into Harvard than AM. It is an ok school. It is not the school it once was however. What do you mean by rents? Do you mean tuition? it is expensive I can assure you of that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:04:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/7-4/13)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_47_413/#comment-10686202</link><description>Pretty much like getting admitted to any private school worth their salt. You do have to work for it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:30:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/7-4/13)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_47_413/#comment-10686212</link><description>You mean  like you&amp;amp;#039;ve lived your life so far?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 11:55:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/7-4/13)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_47_413/#comment-10686208</link><description>Acceptance goes to the highest bidders. End of story.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 11:58:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/7-4/13)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_47_413/#comment-10686213</link><description>If your name is Ozzie or Harriet, you&amp;amp;#039;re in.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 12:03:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/7-4/13)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_47_413/#comment-10686215</link><description>Amen to that brother/sister</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 12:10:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/7-4/13)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_47_413/#comment-10686197</link><description>In a city of this size, it is impossible to take crime down to zero.  There are a few incidents every year in MB, but it is still one of the safest areas in the Los Angeles area.     if you lived here, you might realize that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:17:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/7-4/13)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_47_413/#comment-10686174</link><description>MBW,    I propose a new poll of how many people are cowering under their beds due to the &amp;amp;quot;crime wave&amp;amp;quot; we are experiencing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:19:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More MBB Surprises</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/more_mbb_surprises/#comment-10686232</link><description>There are plenty of two or three on a lot townhomes in the area (perhaps more in HB and RB) and they are typically priced approximately in this range.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:43:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More MBB Surprises</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/more_mbb_surprises/#comment-10686236</link><description>These are just plain stupid.  They will never sell for anywhere near this price.  I bet they go for close to dirt value.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:18:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/7-4/13)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_47_413/#comment-10686219</link><description>Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 21:12:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More MBB Surprises</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/more_mbb_surprises/#comment-10686237</link><description>For a comparable to these places on John, does anyone know if any of the new townhomes on Artesia have sold?  I think they are priced at ~900k (around $420/sq ft) and are arguably an even worse location.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 21:44:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More MBB Surprises</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/more_mbb_surprises/#comment-10686239</link><description>If only more sellers would concede that they are way off on their asking prices, things might actually start to sell again.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:36:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/7-4/13)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_47_413/#comment-10686200</link><description>When paranoid white people like Fight On see a person of color they immediately hallucinate that a crime is being committed. Fight On is obviously some white power lunatic looking to stir up animosity.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 11:31:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Some Recent Closings</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/some_recent_closings/#comment-10686243</link><description>Wow 480 psf in the hills. The comps just took a big hit!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:04:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/7-4/13)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_47_413/#comment-10686176</link><description>MBW,    Have you read Mark&amp;amp;#039;s Blog?  He&amp;amp;#039;s got some great stats there.    &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/2009/04/07/4-7-ca-foreclosures-about-to-soar/&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/2009/04/07/4-7-ca-...&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/2009/04/07/4-7-ca-...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:32:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/7-4/13)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_47_413/#comment-10686177</link><description>As goes Manhattan, so does MB.    &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/09/realestate/manhattan/09real.html&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/09/realestate/manh...&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/09/realestate/manh...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;    April 9, 2009    As Some U.S. Markets Level Off, Housing Slump Hits Manhattan    By JOSH BARBANEL    While sales have picked up a bit in some suffering housing markets in the West, creating a glimmer of hope that home prices nationwide may be approaching a bottom, the Manhattan real estate market has just begun a steep slide. It parallels the decline in New York&amp;amp;rsquo;s financial services industry, and housing analysts say it may continue long after other markets heal.    Apartment prices have once more become the talk of the town in Manhattan, but this time the talk is of uncertainty and falling numbers. While brokers say they are seeing more activity lately, especially from first-time buyers taking advantage of lower interest rates, housing analysts are predicting a prolonged slump in prices and sales that could last as long as four or five years.    In this year&amp;amp;rsquo;s first quarter, sales of co-ops and condominiums in Manhattan plunged nearly 60 percent from the first quarter of 2008. Average co-op prices fell as much as 24 percent in the same period, according to various market reports released last week.    Condo prices have held up so far, but only because buyers who went into contract long before the downturn were closing on newly completed condominium buildings. But now few new contracts are being signed on unfinished condominiums, and some buyers have been renegotiating contracts or are trying to back out of them. Co-ops and condos make up 98 percent of the residential properties for sale in Manhattan.    The stress is most severe at the high end of the market. There are 350 apartments and town houses for sale in Manhattan with asking prices of more than $10 million, and inventory has been growing. It would take about six years at the current sales rate to absorb all those listings.    &amp;amp;ldquo;For the last three years, it was the bigger the better,&amp;amp;rdquo; said Dolly Lenz, a broker at Prudential Douglas Elliman. &amp;amp;ldquo;Now the key words are smaller, livable and affordable. Before no one asked what the maintenance was. Now everyone wants to know.&amp;amp;rdquo;    Manhattan was spared some of the housing problems the rest of the country faced during this downturn. The mortgage foreclosure rate in Manhattan remains low even today. While thousands of condos were built here, most were bought by homeowners, not speculators, as was common in Miami and other oversaturated markets.    But Manhattan housing prices were driven higher by record earnings and bonuses on Wall Street, and they fell hard when the music stopped last fall.    The quick fall in prices is shown in the experience of Abigail Disney, a philanthropist and documentary filmmaker, who a year ago put her sprawling 17-room co-op on West End Avenue on the market for $13.5 million.    With trophy homes commanding ever higher prices from the titans of finance, Ms. Disney priced the apartment at 20 percent more than she had paid for it only a few months earlier. Harry Belafonte, the singer and actor, had created the huge space many years earlier by breaking through the walls of two smaller apartments.    After a series of price cuts, Ms. Disney has finally found buyers for the property, for just under $7.5 million, a 46 percent discount from her initial asking price. But to make a deal she agreed to restore the walls and convert it back into two apartments and sell it to two buyers.    Despite government efforts to ease credit around the country, the market in New York is being starved by a limited availability of credit, especially for jumbo mortgages, which are loans of more than $729,750. More than half of all apartment sales in Manhattan are above even the expanded limits of conventional mortgages, which carry lower interest rates.    Jonathan J. Miller, an appraiser who prepares quarterly reports on Manhattan, said the market could continue to fall through this year and next, especially if credit remained tight for most buyers. After that, he said, it could take several more years to work through the excess inventory.    The housing recovery will also depend on the state of the economy, which many forecasters say will take a disproportionate toll on New York City before the recession ends. In New York, the financial industry accounts for more than 30 percent of all wages, and at least some of the wages of half of all very high income households, according to the New York City comptroller&amp;amp;rsquo;s office.    While employment fell nationwide last year, the number of jobs actually grew in New York City until September. Since then, the city lost nearly 85,000 jobs through January, and the comptroller&amp;amp;rsquo;s office has forecast a loss of 121,000 jobs in 2009 and another 83,000 in 2010.    Condominiums under construction have been hit particularly hard, especially because new mortgage rules have made it difficult for buyers to get conventional loans unless 70 percent of the apartments in a building are in contract.    This has left many developers scrambling to convert condominium projects to rentals or provide alternative financing...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 16:27:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Some Recent Closings</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/some_recent_closings/#comment-10686256</link><description>NotTheNext dude, 300 per doesn&amp;amp;#039;t seem that far fetched to me, but I&amp;amp;#039;ll give (or take) 100 pps as an added measure.  As MBC noted in a previous post, there are 38 sfrs currently on the market in the Hill Section -- even as a layman (that means not a realtor for your lexicon) that&amp;amp;#039;s a lot of multi-million dollar buyers to compete with all other affluent zips in LA county. Good luck with that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 22:24:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Some Recent Closings</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/some_recent_closings/#comment-10686259</link><description>Someone is a little bitter. Could it be you own, are trying to sell or will soon need to sell in the hill section? What ever the case, relax  being a jerk won&amp;amp;#039;t change reality.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 23:53:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lovely Vistas</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/lovely_vistas/#comment-10686267</link><description>Very funny post regarding the Vista listing, MBC.     It&amp;amp;#039;s a lovely looking home according to the interior pics on Redfin. Not sure about the location though.     I am curious as to all the listing and price change dates, has this place ever sold since being newly built in 2007 (build date according to Redfin)?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 05:04:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Some Recent Closings</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/some_recent_closings/#comment-10686251</link><description>As sure as the sun will rise, seller&amp;amp;#039;s in MB will try hold on to &amp;amp;#039;07 perceived values with all their considerable might, all the way down.     And someday in the future, lenders will again meet qualified buyers with products that will get them in their dream home, just like they did with the adjustable rate mortgage (not around in my parent&amp;amp;#039;s generation), then the interest-only, the heart-palpitating pick-a-payment option arm, or 40-year mortgage.     When lending does come back many years from now, real estate prices  will be much lower than today.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:16:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lovely Vistas</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/lovely_vistas/#comment-10686272</link><description>I would have paid $2.2M if it was right behind El Gringo, but not El Tarasco.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:35:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lovely Vistas</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/lovely_vistas/#comment-10686274</link><description>Is Boundary an awful alley street like the dreadful Loma in HB?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:00:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/7-4/13)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_47_413/#comment-10686188</link><description>How is that change we can believe in thing working out for Y&amp;amp;#039;all?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:30:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lovely Vistas</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/lovely_vistas/#comment-10686289</link><description>You clearly have no taste</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:36:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lovely Vistas</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/lovely_vistas/#comment-10686291</link><description>true.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:37:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/7-4/13)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_47_413/#comment-10686226</link><description>Once summer is over and we are approaching the holidays, the homes which have not sold are really going to get hammered! Drop your price and get out now.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:40:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lovely Vistas</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/lovely_vistas/#comment-10686293</link><description>You are the reason people don&amp;amp;#039;t like realtors. Keep on cheerleading.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:06:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lovely Vistas</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/lovely_vistas/#comment-10686281</link><description>there are also a -plethora- of unsold listings on the market.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:13:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lovely Vistas</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/lovely_vistas/#comment-10686297</link><description>try an online dictionary</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:38:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lovely Vistas</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/lovely_vistas/#comment-10686282</link><description>Excitable, are you saying that the post:     &amp;amp;quot;there are also a -plethora- of unsold listings on the market.&amp;amp;quot;     is an &amp;amp;quot;absolutely ballistic&amp;amp;quot; response, or are you describing your response to the above?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:42:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lovely Vistas</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/lovely_vistas/#comment-10686283</link><description>yes, the &amp;amp;quot;Three Amigos&amp;amp;quot; is so highbrow, no wonder it&amp;amp;#039;s over the heads of the COTC.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 13:20:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Few Sat. Opens (4/11)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/a_few_sat_opens_411/#comment-10686302</link><description>The house isn&amp;amp;#039;t for sale, but I found this story gave an interesting glimpse into a big hill section home:    &lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.latimes.com/features/home/la-hm-homeira11-2009apr11,0,435800.story&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot; rel="nofollow"&gt;&amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http://www.latimes.com/features/home/la-hm-homeir...&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.latimes.com/features/home/la-hm-homeir...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 14:10:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Few Sat. Opens (4/11)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/a_few_sat_opens_411/#comment-10686304</link><description>oy vey</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 17:47:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Few Sat. Opens (4/11)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/a_few_sat_opens_411/#comment-10686313</link><description>of course you do dear</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 17:52:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Few Sat. Opens (4/11)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/a_few_sat_opens_411/#comment-10686305</link><description>I find it interesting that people rant about &amp;amp;quot;cookie-cutter&amp;amp;quot; homes, but then don&amp;amp;#039;t know what to do if they see something more unique.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 20:48:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Few Sat. Opens (4/11)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/a_few_sat_opens_411/#comment-10686318</link><description>You might want to read the previous article on this site before posting something so idiotic.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 21:42:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Few Sat. Opens (4/11)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/a_few_sat_opens_411/#comment-10686315</link><description>I would pay a thousand bucks to see 20 pictures off your house as the next feature on this blog and then let you see what it feels like to have people judge your miserable shack. Find something better to do with your life or shoot yourself, soon.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 22:41:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Some Recent Closings</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/some_recent_closings/#comment-10686253</link><description>480 per square foot in the Hill Section?  OH MY GOSH!!! INCREDIBLE!!!     I guess we an all buy homes in the Hill Section.  Oh wait -- that house was on the wrong side of 11th, and backed up to an alley lined with apartment buildings and commercial properties.  If every house in the Hill Section were similarly situated, then yes, $480 per square foot would be norm.   But alas, that&amp;amp;#039;s not quite the case.    Perhaps next folks will start quoting prices on the east side of Oak or along Rosecrans as the benchmark for all Tree Section sales...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 22:59:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Few Sat. Opens (4/11)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/a_few_sat_opens_411/#comment-10686308</link><description>Okay Muddled, thanks for the data. But you don&amp;amp;#039;t have to scream at us.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 00:16:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lovely Vistas</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/lovely_vistas/#comment-10686299</link><description>Just a guess here but maybe they are USC grads and are realizing what a mistake they made going there.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 13:28:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Listings This Week?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/how_many_listings_this_week/#comment-10686339</link><description>They will be renting for a looooooooong time!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:49:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Listings This Week?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/how_many_listings_this_week/#comment-10686343</link><description>What would possibly make a seller think that they will get more next year? There are alot of people who just don&amp;amp;#039;t get it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:05:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Listings This Week?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/how_many_listings_this_week/#comment-10686344</link><description>But you get it don&amp;amp;#039;t you. I bet you have a $1.87 to your name.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:21:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Listings This Week?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/how_many_listings_this_week/#comment-10686345</link><description>Does this mean you think that strategy is going to work? If so, give us a few reasons why home prices might increase if a seller waited a year to sell.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:55:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Listings This Week?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/how_many_listings_this_week/#comment-10686346</link><description>It&amp;amp;#039;s means you and no one has any idea what is going to happen, that is, except for Mookie and Nostradumba**.  They know everything.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:37:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Listings This Week?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/how_many_listings_this_week/#comment-10686355</link><description>they are buddying up, trust me.  went to an open house about a month ago and was nearly mugged by the listing realtors (all of whom were there when i showed up).  seemed like a good group of folks, truth be told, but their aggressiveness leads me to believe things are actually pretty bad out there.    it seems like the non-scraper low end is moving reasonably well, but nothing else is except some places that have a great location, great price, or something else to make buyers snap it up.  the 2.2mm tree section house is just sitting there, and it will continue to do so for the near future.  the 1.2 - 1.8m livable house seems to be of interest, but bailing out someone at a profit to their 05 purchase price doesnt seem that interesting for most folks.    i too would be interested to know what catalyst could drive prices higher in the coming year or two.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:50:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Listings This Week?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/how_many_listings_this_week/#comment-10686356</link><description>Is that crickets I hear?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:58:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Listings This Week?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/how_many_listings_this_week/#comment-10686357</link><description>No, that would be those incessant voices in your head.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:16:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Listings This Week?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/how_many_listings_this_week/#comment-10686326</link><description>Write your comment here...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:02:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Listings This Week?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/how_many_listings_this_week/#comment-10686327</link><description>in all honesty, the realtors in manhattan beach have already made their money the past 10 years. They don&amp;amp;#039;t need your validation or your snide remarks bcv it doesn&amp;amp;#039;t affect them. they are already rich. and no i am NOT a realtor and have nothing to do with real estate</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:03:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Listings This Week?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/how_many_listings_this_week/#comment-10686365</link><description>So you&amp;amp;#039;re saying the median income in MB is 500K?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:27:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Listings This Week?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/how_many_listings_this_week/#comment-10686329</link><description>Smuggly, how are those median prices treating you?  Haven&amp;amp;#039;t seen any posts from you on this, or since they don&amp;amp;#039;t meet your fancy are you choosing to ignore?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:07:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Craigslist Craziness - Update</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/craigslist_craziness_update/#comment-10686394</link><description>Would this situation make anyone else nervous if you were a potential buyer?  I mean who is handling this listing, what a joke?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:16:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Craigslist Craziness - Update</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/craigslist_craziness_update/#comment-10686404</link><description>One day huggy will simply stop posting and we&amp;amp;#039;ll all wonder what happened.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:47:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Craigslist Craziness - Update</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/craigslist_craziness_update/#comment-10686406</link><description>You mean like the time Timmy gave us his classic goodbye cruel blog post and then popped up a few months later like a wayward Moonie?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:20:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Craigslist Craziness - Update</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/craigslist_craziness_update/#comment-10686407</link><description>And your rent will have tripled.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:23:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Craigslist Craziness - Update</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/craigslist_craziness_update/#comment-10686396</link><description>Just shows what a complete dilettante you are. Here&amp;amp;#039;s a remedial Econ 101 tutorial for you: When people can no longer buy, they rent and as rental inventory diminishes, rents rise. It&amp;amp;#039;s called supply and demand. Are you really this confused or are you just trolling?    And thank you for outing yourself as a renter, you bring majesty to your station in life.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:54:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Craigslist Craziness - Update</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/craigslist_craziness_update/#comment-10686416</link><description>It&amp;amp;#039;s pretty clear what corner of hell you rent it. Econ from a good school? You wasted the University&amp;amp;#039;s time and your money as you were obviously toking up on your bong as you still continue to do. Keep up your rant, perhaps you&amp;amp;#039;ll day convince yourself that your station in life is superior.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:52:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Craigslist Craziness - Update</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/craigslist_craziness_update/#comment-10686409</link><description>No dear, you&amp;amp;#039;re under bong water.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:00:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Listings This Week?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/how_many_listings_this_week/#comment-10686381</link><description>Funny, I was thinking the exact same about RB Dude and Nostradummy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:36:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Listings This Week?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/how_many_listings_this_week/#comment-10686375</link><description>thats your value add...?  its not worth 3% to hear about mediocre deals like that.  if there were deals at actual discounts (more than 3% that is), then maybe.  even then, i would only hire one to find me off market deals and wouldnt pay one for anything thats actually listed.  got anything else on this mysterious black art you practice known as &amp;amp;#039;real estate&amp;amp;#039;?  you could learn all you need to know about the residential real estate &amp;amp;#039;business&amp;amp;#039; in 2 hours on wikipedia.  what a joke of a profession.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:30:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Listings This Week?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/how_many_listings_this_week/#comment-10686376</link><description>get the kickback, net net its all the same.  that 3% is in the price, broker or not.  rather spend the $ on some upgrades and furniture than paying for some d-bag&amp;amp;#039;s bmw lease.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:32:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Listings This Week?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/how_many_listings_this_week/#comment-10686383</link><description>Yes, that genious bought in the best location in MB, the corner of Ardmore and MB Blvd. Surely he knows something about that location that everyone else must not. He must have made so much money in the market that he was able to splurge on an $850k home. Real man of genious.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 06:20:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/15-)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_415_/#comment-10686445</link><description>So you&amp;amp;#039;re stealing from the WSJ? I&amp;amp;#039;m not clicking on that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:57:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Listings This Week?</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/how_many_listings_this_week/#comment-10686390</link><description>He&amp;amp;#039;s just bitter because others know way more about the market than he does...guess his career is over.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:00:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/15-)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_415_/#comment-10686447</link><description>Our tax system is why many of us are nearly broke and in the poor house. The Fair Tax is the only real answer. Americans are to dumb to understand that so it will never happen.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:23:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Craigslist Craziness - Update</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/craigslist_craziness_update/#comment-10686415</link><description>Amen to that. The guy is a dummy alright.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:25:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/15-)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_415_/#comment-10686446</link><description>In some areas of the country this will be the case. It will not be that way in most coastal communities in California.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:33:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nary a Trickle</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/nary_a_trickle/#comment-10686485</link><description>C.T.,    What do you feel the break even point might be?  Here&amp;amp;#039;s a rough guess.  Let me know what numbers you might change:    Lot cost $1.8M  Build Cost: $1.7M (about $400/sq ft)  Carrying costs/commission/taxes: $1M  Total: $4.5 M    Assuming that, there is about an 8% profit margin if it sells for the asking price.   Not much room to move.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:26:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nary a Trickle</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/nary_a_trickle/#comment-10686483</link><description>did not!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:43:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/15-)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_415_/#comment-10686431</link><description>I just saw a SOLD sign on the house at 35th and Pacific.  Anyone know details?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:59:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/15-)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_415_/#comment-10686437</link><description>wheels (rb dude?), the cult of the cluless realtors is headed by huggy. Haven&amp;amp;#039;t you read the fable of the frog and the scorpion? huggy is just being true to his nature. Who in their right mind would trust a realtor anyway?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 19:35:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nary a Trickle</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/nary_a_trickle/#comment-10686482</link><description>Hey everyone...it&amp;amp;#039;s a great time to buy in MB!   I&amp;amp;#039;m a realtor.  You can trust me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 01:23:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Flopped Flip</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/another_flopped_flip/#comment-10686513</link><description>This house is a POS.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:28:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Flopped Flip</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/another_flopped_flip/#comment-10686520</link><description>So MBW, with your comment on 437 1st, are you saying that homes that were purchased in June 2008 are already down close to 15% today?  In 10 months?  That is an interesting statement.  Do you have data to back that up?  Obviously things are worth less, but from $1.61 to $1.4?  Please give us your rationale / backup for that statement.  Thanks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:37:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Flopped Flip</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/another_flopped_flip/#comment-10686530</link><description>I-D-I-O-T</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:57:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Flopped Flip</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/another_flopped_flip/#comment-10686547</link><description>wtf, your point simply proves that most people in MB don&amp;amp;#039;t need to sell. This fact continually mystifies and astounds the likes of Mookie, Waiting to Buy, Nostradummy and that rapscallion of schizophrenia, RB Dude.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:47:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Flopped Flip</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/another_flopped_flip/#comment-10686538</link><description>Here is your official sell signal. We&amp;amp;#039;d like you to beat the rush for the exits also, and I think I speak for most of Manhattan Beach.   Don&amp;amp;#039;t let the door hit you on the way out.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:51:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Flopped Flip</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/another_flopped_flip/#comment-10686543</link><description>Sellers have probably decided to wait it out.  What they haven&amp;amp;#039;t figured out yet is that housing prices will not move upward for years to come. If they really need to sell, they are only hurting themselves by waiting. Housing is heading downward not upward, slowly and painfully this will become clear.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:40:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (4/18-4/19)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_opens_418_419/#comment-10686550</link><description>509 Dianthus appears to be in escrow, looking for backup offers.    Ozzy, good link.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 11:05:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nary a Trickle</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/nary_a_trickle/#comment-10686504</link><description>I&amp;amp;#039;m absolutely shocked that Nostradummy thinks it&amp;amp;#039;s the calm before the storm.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:40:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (4/18-4/19)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_opens_418_419/#comment-10686566</link><description>huh</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:15:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (4/18-4/19)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_opens_418_419/#comment-10686588</link><description>You&amp;amp;#039;ve been right since you&amp;amp;#039;ve been here? You mean how make fun of your clients when they lose money? I guess anyone who follows this blog was suppose to forget this fact. Mookie, your glee at this homeowner&amp;amp;#039;s trouble is truly sick. I sincerely hope one of your clients that you&amp;amp;#039;ve misguided teaches you a well needed lesson. The only  thing more disgusting than your twisted mind is the thought of you being able to buy here. To be sure, Huggy is piece of work, but you&amp;amp;#039;re a bad guy. And bad guys like Madoff and yourself always get it in the end.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 01:26:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (4/18-4/19)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_opens_418_419/#comment-10686589</link><description>Oh but it will boom again dude. The bottom of the market is at hand. No later than the end of June 2009.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 13:26:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (4/18-4/19)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_opens_418_419/#comment-10686594</link><description>The People&amp;amp;#039;s Republic of Santa Monica. That say&amp;amp;#039;s it all.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 13:30:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (4/18-4/19)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_opens_418_419/#comment-10686590</link><description>You also made a sarcastic reference to a female client of yours that lost $10 million. A bit of pattern there, I&amp;amp;#039;d say. As for you hoping the real estate market craters, such an event would have a devastating effect on the overall economy. Some &amp;amp;quot;financial adviser&amp;amp;quot; you are, but alas in your mind you&amp;amp;#039;ll be the last man standing. A virtual island. This explains why you&amp;amp;#039;re perpetually in a position of having to sell a home once you&amp;amp;#039;ve bought it. Personally, I don&amp;amp;#039;t have time to raise money for people in financial straits. I can only wish them the best, but you can at least try and stop losing your clients money by putting them in something more secure like Munis and T-Bills. If you can&amp;amp;#039;t, maybe you can find it in that enormous heart of yours to at least stop making fun of people after you&amp;amp;#039;ve lost them their life savings.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 13:37:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Inventory Recedes a Bit</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/inventory_recedes_a_bit/#comment-10686598</link><description>MBCon, I know this isn&amp;amp;#039;t exactly your cup of tea, but I was wondering where you would find the best info on townhouse sales in MB?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:51:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (4/18-4/19)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_opens_418_419/#comment-10686596</link><description>somewhere there&amp;amp;#039;s a village missing it&amp;amp;#039;s Idiot.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:35:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Inventory Recedes a Bit</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/inventory_recedes_a_bit/#comment-10686628</link><description>That&amp;amp;#039;s a great idea. I too am looking to buy and have to laugh at how anyone who didn&amp;amp;#039;t participate in the real estate madness of the past 7 years is a bitter renter or a loser.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:51:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Inventory Recedes a Bit</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/inventory_recedes_a_bit/#comment-10686635</link><description>So you&amp;amp;#039;ve been renting here for the last seven years? Uh huh. Right,</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:58:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Inventory Recedes a Bit</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/inventory_recedes_a_bit/#comment-10686629</link><description>Typical. Don&amp;amp;#039;t you have anything constructive to say?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:19:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Inventory Recedes a Bit</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/inventory_recedes_a_bit/#comment-10686636</link><description>Unlike your derogatory statement about anyone who bought during the last seven years? Oh that&amp;amp;#039;s right, homeowners are evil liars who have it coming to them.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:32:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Double Deal</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/double_deal/#comment-10686672</link><description>Anyone who thinks this is a bad deal is a fool. I&amp;amp;#039;d buy it in a heart beat if I could afford it right now. I&amp;amp;#039;ll bet it&amp;amp;#039;s gone in a week or so.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:44:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Double Deal</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/double_deal/#comment-10686673</link><description>A fool speaks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:46:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Double Deal</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/double_deal/#comment-10686655</link><description>thats a nice deal.  i agree that the house must have been borderline condemned, since no pics were ever shown.  i have been wondering for a while just how much total demand there is for property of 1.5m - 2m, and this is the answer.  very little.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:46:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Double Deal</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/double_deal/#comment-10686680</link><description>The typical neurosis on this blog is talk down a property that you&amp;amp;#039;ll never be able to afford no matter what happens in this market or the economy.     I prefer Nostradummy to Nostradumba**. The latter implies there might be some brain activity whereas Nostradummy likens you to crash test dummy, which is obviously what you are.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:34:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Inventory Recedes a Bit</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/inventory_recedes_a_bit/#comment-10686638</link><description>Three or three and half years is an extraordinary amount of time to look for a house, especially if you have decided on one city like Manhattan Beach, which is relatively small. Sorry it to say, but the length of your search puts you in the category of not serious. We looked for nine months before we bought and it was excruciating.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:48:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Double Deal</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/double_deal/#comment-10686657</link><description>That the price on this home gets people&amp;amp;#039;s attention on this site is entertaining (and confirms why we had this RE bubble in the first place.) Although it looks like a decent house (?) and decent location, this one has to be very carefully pencilled out, and my guess is it really won&amp;amp;#039;t.     Current home: a 1.7 money pit (or sweat equity, just what every 1.7 buyer wants!)    New construction: fuggedaboutit. Entirely too risky for spec, and if it&amp;amp;#039;s for your dream home,   there are many other opportunities out there.     Buy-and-hold-to-build-later: possibly, but let&amp;amp;#039;s face it, 5-10 years from now, priorities change.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:56:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Double Deal</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/double_deal/#comment-10686658</link><description>I think 1.2 may be a decent price for this home. Maybe lower.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:06:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Double Deal</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/double_deal/#comment-10686681</link><description>In three years Nostradamus  and his opinions will be worth the same as he is now, nothing. What a fool !</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:20:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (4/18-4/19)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_opens_418_419/#comment-10686575</link><description>Yep..... and here they are.  Real data as of today.  Should make for an interesting summer.    NODs become NOSs   NOSs become REOs    ForeclosureTypeCity                              EstimatedValueZip  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  Notice-of-DefaultMANHATTAN BEACH$2,599,90390266  Notice-of-DefaultMANHATTAN BEACH$2,149,80190266  Notice-of-DefaultMANHATTAN BEACH$1,899,70290266  Notice-of-DefaultMANHATTAN BEACH$1,795,08990266  Notice-of-DefaultMANHATTAN BEACH$1,626,59190266  Notice-of-DefaultMANHATTAN BEACH$1,620,20490266  Notice-of-DefaultMANHATTAN BEACH$1,483,47190266  Notice-of-DefaultMANHATTAN BEACH$1,308,40190266  Notice-of-DefaultMANHATTAN BEACH$1,252,32390266  Notice-of-DefaultMANHATTAN BEACH$1,242,51190266  Notice-of-DefaultMANHATTAN BEACH$1,228,05190266  Notice-of-DefaultMANHATTAN BEACH$1,193,70290266  Notice-of-DefaultMANHATTAN BEACH$1,064,00490266  Notice-of-DefaultMANHATTAN BEACH$1,062,47290266  Notice-of-DefaultMANHATTAN BEACH$1,026,16890266  Notice-of-DefaultMANHATTAN BEACH$1,017,99490266  Notice-of-DefaultMANHATTAN BEACH$981,51690266  Notice-of-DefaultMANHATTAN BEACH$961,58090266  Notice-of-DefaultMANHATTAN BEACH$958,79490266  Notice-of-DefaultMANHATTAN BEACH$946,72590266  Notice-of-DefaultMANHATTAN BEACH$940,15090266  Notice-of-DefaultMANHATTAN BEACH$938,96390266  Notice-of-DefaultMANHATTAN BEACH$927,49190266  Notice-of-DefaultMANHATTAN BEACH$800,02190266  Notice-of-DefaultMANHATTAN BEACH$718,14190266  Notice-of-DefaultMANHATTAN BEACH$714,41890266  Notice-of-DefaultMANHATTAN BEACH$713,61390266  Notice-of-DefaultMANHATTAN BEACH$636,32690266  Notice-of-DefaultMANHATTAN BEACH$560,77690266  Notice-of-Trustee SaleMANHATTAN BEACH$3,290,99890266  Notice-of-Trustee SaleMANHATTAN BEACH$2,129,19690266  Notice-of-Trustee SaleMANHATTAN BEACH$1,955,31190266  Notice-of-Trustee SaleMANHATTAN BEACH$1,708,27290266  Notice-of-Trustee SaleMANHATTAN BEACH$1,400,07090266  Notice-of-Trustee SaleMANHATTAN BEACH$1,384,14090266  Notice-of-Trustee SaleMANHATTAN BEACH$1,227,14490266  Notice-of-Trustee SaleMANHATTAN BEACH$1,135,53890266  Notice-of-Trustee SaleMANHATTAN BEACH$1,052,16990266  Notice-of-Trustee SaleMANHATTAN BEACH$1,025,16090266  Notice-of-Trustee SaleMANHATTAN BEACH$1,023,76790266  Notice-of-Trustee SaleMANHATTAN BEACH$938,28190266  Notice-of-Trustee SaleMANHATTAN BEACH$851,02390266  Notice-of-Trustee SaleMANHATTAN BEACH$827,02190266  Notice-of-Trustee SaleMANHATTAN BEACH$820,24890266  Notice-of-Trustee SaleMANHATTAN BEACH$819,32290266  Notice-of-Trustee SaleMANHATTAN BEACH$718,14190266  REO - Bank OwnedMANHATTAN BEACH$2,137,89990266  REO - Bank OwnedMANHATTAN BEACH$1,874,44390266  REO - Bank OwnedMANHATTAN BEACH$970,87990266  REO - Bank OwnedMANHATTAN BEACH$642,04490266</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:41:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekend Opens (4/18-4/19)</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/weekend_opens_418_419/#comment-10686581</link><description>wtb,    I just posted the data for you.  Look up.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:43:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Double Deal</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/double_deal/#comment-10686689</link><description>wha...?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:45:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Strand Titan</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/another_strand_titan/#comment-10686718</link><description>Nostradunderheard, must&amp;amp;#039;ve been fired because he seems to have all the time in the world to comment.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:55:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Double Deal</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/double_deal/#comment-10686677</link><description>In three years you&amp;amp;#039;ll be even more broke than you are now. Talk about &amp;amp;quot;to stupid,&amp;amp;quot; it&amp;amp;#039;s clear you&amp;amp;#039;ve cornered that market.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:17:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Strand Titan</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/another_strand_titan/#comment-10686710</link><description>huggy fawns, c.t. fumes</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:01:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Strand Titan</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/another_strand_titan/#comment-10686711</link><description>I&amp;amp;#039;m not sure I buy the &amp;amp;quot;best street&amp;amp;quot; business, but there&amp;amp;#039;s no question it&amp;amp;#039;s a premo location.  The inside looks pretty spankin&amp;amp;#039; too.  Sounds like it might come down a mil or 2 though before moving...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:37:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Strand Titan</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/another_strand_titan/#comment-10686722</link><description>seconded</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:02:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Strand Titan</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/another_strand_titan/#comment-10686713</link><description>mb strand has a separate path for bikes and pedestrians. are you talking about hermosa?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:47:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Inventory Recedes a Bit</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/inventory_recedes_a_bit/#comment-10686646</link><description>what example can you give here that is specifically libelous, NTP?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:53:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Strand Titan</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/another_strand_titan/#comment-10686754</link><description>i meant more the beach cruisers and occasional walkers/standers, in both mb and hermosa, being nearly clipped by the tools with sponsored spandex and a 50 lb gut.  lets just break it down: you paid someone significant $ for a shirt with a corporate sponsorship on your ass...that makes you a loser.  and no, we dont believe you are actually team discovery and got that crap for free.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:22:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Strand Titan</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/another_strand_titan/#comment-10686738</link><description>Please just go away.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 03:26:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Double Deal</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/double_deal/#comment-10686682</link><description>Not a chance in the world dufus.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:37:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bits from the Week</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/bits_from_the_week/#comment-10686759</link><description>whats the story with 636 29th?  the place could use a spruce, but wouldnt need to be scraped or anything like that.  its in a pretty sweet part of the trees as well, and nothing in that size/age/area is near that price.  i keep waiting for it to go, but it just sits...whats the story?  if it were 1.5 i would be a buyer, but thats a long way away.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:37:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Strand Titan</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/another_strand_titan/#comment-10686723</link><description>Thirded</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:39:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Strand Titan</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/another_strand_titan/#comment-10686740</link><description>C.T., If I had you as a realtor telling me that RE had many &amp;amp;#039;nuances,&amp;amp;#039; I would turn around and walk away laughing.     You are not worth the time this is taking me to type, you pompous ass.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:54:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bits from the Week</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/bits_from_the_week/#comment-10686771</link><description>most of the units for rent are in the sand section, not the tree or hill section.  a check of craigslist confirms this.  there are some in EMB as well.  more townhomes, proximity to beach/bars etc makes it more attractive for young folk.  walk the tree section on a sunday afternoon and its quiet (except birthdays) vs sand section where it can be pretty lively with bbqs, parties, walk street beer busts etc.    the owners dont really hate the renters, and vice versa.  however, there are about 5 bitter and twisted people here who think they are in the middle of a class war.  i suspect they are actually angry realtors with little to do and people who like to watch the world burn.  sweet.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:03:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bits from the Week</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/bits_from_the_week/#comment-10686774</link><description>Another renter here.  I&amp;amp;#039;ve been in Manhattan Beach for 2 years and three months.  Owned a house before that.  Moved here because I took a job in the area.    It was immedately obvious that house prices were out of whack with reality.    I rent for the price of my previous mortgage.......and that was on a house that cost one third of the median price here.  I rent a 2,400 square foot house.      One or two more years, and house payments will be back in line with rents.  No big deal.  I would say that most of the &amp;amp;quot;bitterness&amp;amp;quot; is on the side if the belligerent, name-calling realtors that post here.  They hate to have their bubble popped.  Might cause them to feel guilty for all the bad advice they&amp;amp;#039;ve given over the years, too.    Who knows.  It is hard to have ones belief system challenged by reality.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:40:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Inventory Recedes a Bit</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/inventory_recedes_a_bit/#comment-10686647</link><description>Oh he is policing. He is not being fair, but believe me, he is policing. This post will never pass muster.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:09:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bits from the Week</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/bits_from_the_week/#comment-10686766</link><description>ive assumed that those would be met with a sour look and a brush off, but after seeing that double lot scraper drop from 2 to 1.75 overnight, maybe not a bad idea.  considering that foreclosures are up in CA by 80% last month, and prime delinquencies have recently doubled, it still seems early in the cycle to get a great deal.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:50:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bits from the Week</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/bits_from_the_week/#comment-10686775</link><description>you are far too logical in your analysis.  prepare to be flame-bombed by huggy.  i do the same math and to me it seems simple.  i want a house that runs about 2m today, which means at least 400k down and a large monthly.  how many people can afford that right now AND want to live in the trees.  apparently not as many as there used to be.  when it goes down to match prevailing wage and total income levels, it will clear.  not before.  my guess is we see stuff thats 1.75-2m right now going for 1.2-1.5 in the next year or two.  we have already gone from 2.2-2.5 to 1.75-2 in the last 12 to 18 mos.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:54:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bits from the Week</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/bits_from_the_week/#comment-10686804</link><description>2504 Pine is rented.  I live nearby and there are two cars in the driveway now and I saw them move in.  The agent told me a few weeks ago that they are paying $7500 a month.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:06:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bits from the Week</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/bits_from_the_week/#comment-10686776</link><description>Where are your median statistics?  I guess those  facts are getting in the way of reality again.  You did not have a problem writing them one year ago when they showed a minor decline in prices.  Now that they are down 30 percent i suppose you are afraid to be proven wrong.  I consider myself lucky for not having you as an agent.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:10:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bits from the Week</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/bits_from_the_week/#comment-10686805</link><description>I must be a cheap bastard.  I live in a pretty nice place (50&amp;amp;#039;s vintage, but square footage doubled in the 90&amp;amp;#039;s), and pay 3,800./month.  Talked&amp;amp;#039;em down 20% from what they were asking (that&amp;amp;#039;s the benefit of good credit and money in the bank).  And I am thinking about trying for another 20% due to the stagnant rental inventory in the neighborhood.    I&amp;amp;#039;m really not sure why anyone would want to be a landlord.  Certainly does not pay very well for the amount of money invested.    I guess it is better than owning GM stock.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:26:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bits from the Week</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/bits_from_the_week/#comment-10686780</link><description>i dont know about closed prices, but i know the asking prices are down significantly.  new starter homes in the trees (3200 - 3600 sq feet, 1990-2008 construction, 4/5 beds etc) have dropped significantly.  i know because ive been watching and waiting.  homes listed for 2.2 - 2.5 or even 2.7mm (palm foreclosure, &amp;amp;#039;twins&amp;amp;#039;, house with funny driveway, etc) are now down to a much lower range.  funny driveway house is 1.9m and no deal, palm foreclosure went for 1.5, and there are a couple that have been sitting for a while at 2.  the clearing price today for these is probably 1.8, maybe slightly less.  might not sound like much, but if you bought it for 2.5 in 2007, it sure is...bye bye 700k in equity.  not here to gloat just telling it how i see it...the trend is firmly down, with not much to suggest pricing firmness or a rise in the near term.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:46:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Strand Titan</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/another_strand_titan/#comment-10686750</link><description>C.T., Huggy -- continue with the insults - the MB homeowners that read this blog are really seeing what goes on behind the curtain of your local real estate offices, and you&amp;amp;#039;re not doing yourselves any favors.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:21:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/23- )</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_423_/#comment-10686810</link><description>wont happen here.  thanks</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:28:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bits from the Week</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/bits_from_the_week/#comment-10686785</link><description>it aint 30%, but it also is far worse than you predicted it would ever get.  odds favor the decline hitting here, just later than the low price areas.  meaning....buying right now is the dumbest possible move, because you know whats going to happen in advance, and the trend is FIRMLY down.  if you buy right now and eat a quick 15% loss, its your fault.  hold out for prices to match incomes.  thanks huggz, maybe xmas &amp;amp;#039;10 bonus is more likely for you.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:32:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bits from the Week</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/bits_from_the_week/#comment-10686786</link><description>does anyone really know who he is?  i am looking to buy a house soon, and every time i meet a realtor, i wonder if he is huggy.  it would give me great pleasure to not hire him.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:33:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/23- )</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_423_/#comment-10686815</link><description>No big fat checks here either.     MBUSD can cry all the way to the back of the unemployment line for all I care. How they accomplish their federally-mandated education commitments is not my problem.     What is Hersman&amp;amp;#039;s salary? Can it be cut, or the position eliminated entirely?     To the poster above, if this is your first year in MB Unified (kindergarten), I say, give yourself a few or 10 more years in the district and get back to us.     I have already paid dues, taxes, and plenty of both.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:38:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/23- )</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_423_/#comment-10686849</link><description>No one was holding a gun to your head to buy an overpriced home here.   You may be the crazy one.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:56:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/23- )</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_423_/#comment-10686834</link><description>I sent my kids through the MB school system. I pay my taxes and I&amp;amp;#039;m not in fear of foreclosure. The poblem is the system. The Union is killing every school district in the state. Break the Union and Tenure. Without the Union they can hire good teachers and pay them well. I can see the possibility of more smaller private schools starting up. I would like to see a voucher system so people can send their child to whatever school they wish.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:14:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/23- )</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_423_/#comment-10686853</link><description>Well it will happen soon. Remember Mr. Obama wants to spread the wealth around.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:19:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Double Deal</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/double_deal/#comment-10686684</link><description>None, my home is paid for and has been for 7 years. My rental properties (2) are doing just fine thank you. Not wealth, just comfortable.Yes, you&amp;amp;#039;re a dufus.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:28:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/23- )</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_423_/#comment-10686866</link><description>Zero. That is how it will remain.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:35:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/23- )</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_423_/#comment-10686870</link><description>Hi Barbara, first, these people are not &amp;amp;quot;professionals&amp;amp;quot;.  That title is reserved for, well, professionals.  It takes a professional degree and certification.  Some examples of professionals are Doctors, Lawyers, Accountants, Engineers.    Realtors are sales people, and sales is NOT a profession!  It is an &amp;amp;quot;occupation&amp;amp;quot;.  Barrier to entry is low, you don&amp;amp;#039;t even need a GED.  I guess you do have to pay 300$ and take a test to be a realtor.  So it&amp;amp;#039;s kind of on the level of getting a driver&amp;amp;#039;s license.    In general, I view sales people suspiciously since their paycheck depends on extracting money from my wallet.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:48:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/23- )</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_423_/#comment-10686851</link><description>dont worry, when your house falls 50%, you can go to the assessor and get a discount.  then you will only pay 2x your neighbor.  lolz you tool.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:15:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/23- )</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_423_/#comment-10686852</link><description>gotta love the anti obama crowd.  rioting and having tea parties BEFORE taxes are actually raised.  if your taxes get raised, its to pay for the sins of the son.  get over yourself</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:16:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/23- )</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_423_/#comment-10686868</link><description>seriously, another reason to rent, like we need one besides the 50% reduction in cost.  also, when the state bumps the property tax, which they will, prices will get annihalated.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:17:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/23- )</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_423_/#comment-10686874</link><description>then how come you&amp;amp;#039;re not doing it????</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:26:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/23- )</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_423_/#comment-10686854</link><description>Dufus you are not smart enough to know they have been raised. Wise up to what is happening.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:28:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/23- )</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_423_/#comment-10686860</link><description>The democrats live in fear of losing their victims crowd. Yes, the are about Unions and the Teachers Union is one of the biggest.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:31:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/23- )</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_423_/#comment-10686867</link><description>Yeah, I guess just becasue I&amp;amp;#039;m right doesn&amp;amp;#039;t play with the liberal types. Get a life loser.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:34:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/23- )</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_423_/#comment-10686888</link><description>Followed very closely by the Teachers Union.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:36:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bits from the Week</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/bits_from_the_week/#comment-10686794</link><description>Why don&amp;amp;#039;t you just report what Mooke is asking.   This is a blog  that talks about homes on the west side of Sepulveda.  Give him the data and shut his fraudulent mouth up.  Or does the information run counter to your position.  Facts are facts, put them on the table for all to decide.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 01:13:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/23- )</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_423_/#comment-10686856</link><description>Typical liberal democrat. What riot Dufus? It is well documented that the tea parties were represented by all parties.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:19:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/23- )</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_423_/#comment-10686889</link><description>You are 100% correct. The problem is, the only way to stop him is at the ballot box. We can slow him down in 2010 and toss him out in 2012. This is possible only if he doesn&amp;amp;#039;t get us all killed first.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:37:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Forum (4/23- )</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/open_forum_423_/#comment-10686893</link><description>Exactly !!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:39:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Double Deal</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/double_deal/#comment-10686695</link><description>I could not agree more with your comment. Sorry that you and others won&amp;amp;#039;t see it since it with most likely be deleted. oh well, i tried. it&amp;amp;#039;s the world we live in.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:54:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newest Below &amp;amp;#039;06 Prices</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/newest_below_amp03906_prices/#comment-10686905</link><description>its a good start.  now if only they could sell....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:03:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newest Below &amp;amp;#039;06 Prices</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/newest_below_amp03906_prices/#comment-10686906</link><description>Good start.....but still not enough.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:22:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newest Below &amp;amp;#039;06 Prices</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/newest_below_amp03906_prices/#comment-10686907</link><description>After doing a quick scan of Redfin, it seems like this was the week of new inventory coming to market, MBC too bad your survey was a little earlier.  Also saw a bunch of homes that have recently reduced prices.  Only the sellers that take a reasonable stance and price their homes accordingly will actually sell, I still think it comes down to if people &amp;amp;quot;need&amp;amp;quot; to sell, or &amp;amp;quot;want&amp;amp;quot; to sell to where this market is going to end up.  IMO we&amp;amp;#039;ve still got a ways to the downside.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:25:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newest Below &amp;amp;#039;06 Prices</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/newest_below_amp03906_prices/#comment-10686908</link><description>511 Pacific didn&amp;amp;#039;t get memo. Off MLS @ $5.995m, re-list $6.699m  Vineyard Bank (VNBC) de-listed from NASDAQ-trading 14c/share</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:43:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newest Below &amp;amp;#039;06 Prices</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/newest_below_amp03906_prices/#comment-10686909</link><description>1.75 and below sells, above that doesnt sell.  the low end is moving.  bought for 2.2 and selling for 2.5?  sorry, you didnt get the memo.  the pool of buyers is also drastically smaller than in recent years, so those that move down aggressively will capture one of the buyers, those that hold firm wont.  simple economics 101.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:48:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newest Below &amp;amp;#039;06 Prices</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/newest_below_amp03906_prices/#comment-10686911</link><description>These listings, and those price ranges, have to be dead in the water right now.     I don&amp;amp;#039;t know how Mookie navigates Property Shark to get current loan amounts (is it a paid subscription?) but it seems like just a matter of time before many of these homes (not saying the ones featured) start attempting short sales.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:54:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newest Below &amp;amp;#039;06 Prices</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/newest_below_amp03906_prices/#comment-10686932</link><description>Your village called and believe it or not they want you back. They said we really miss our Idiot.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:07:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newest Below &amp;amp;#039;06 Prices</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/newest_below_amp03906_prices/#comment-10686937</link><description>No, but thanks so much for the opportunity.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:08:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newest Below &amp;amp;#039;06 Prices</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/newest_below_amp03906_prices/#comment-10686936</link><description>there are plenty of households that would have earned that $ in 2006 and 07, and maybe even 08.  those same households are not making that much in 09, and probably feel more uncertain about the next 30 years than they did back then.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:23:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newest Below &amp;amp;#039;06 Prices</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/newest_below_amp03906_prices/#comment-10686925</link><description>hilarious.  i wonder why people hire realtors sometimes.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:34:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newest Below &amp;amp;#039;06 Prices</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/newest_below_amp03906_prices/#comment-10686919</link><description>jesus christ you people are pathetic!  i have a real question.  how much does it cost to remove and replace the &amp;amp;#039;facade&amp;amp;#039; of a house.  so if the house is a 2 story stucco-sided cheerio box, how much to take off the &amp;amp;#039;craftsman&amp;amp;#039; front and slap on the new &amp;amp;#039;cape cod&amp;amp;#039; front.  prices for removal and the new one would be helpful.  back to your picture show.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:44:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newest Below &amp;amp;#039;06 Prices</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/newest_below_amp03906_prices/#comment-10686938</link><description>No.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:03:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newest Below &amp;amp;#039;06 Prices</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/newest_below_amp03906_prices/#comment-10686920</link><description>MBC aka the Jerry Springer show</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:41:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newest Below &amp;amp;#039;06 Prices</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/newest_below_amp03906_prices/#comment-10686929</link><description>I thought someone knocked your teeth?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:16:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newest Below &amp;amp;#039;06 Prices</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/newest_below_amp03906_prices/#comment-10686930</link><description>MBC -- please ban this poster above. I believe he may have too much to drink and starts posting violent messages (on other blogs too before you delete them), or maybe he is just chillingly violent without substances.     He is very creepy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:01:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newest Below &amp;amp;#039;06 Prices</title><link>http://mbc.disqus.com/newest_below_amp03906_prices/#comment-10686943</link><description>I&amp;amp;#039;ll beat his price and bid 136,999. I am licensed and shit too.</description><dc:crea