<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Martin Belam</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/7697e587c17ac774feca77f5d92cc9ec/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 19:23:39 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Hard News Journalism</title><link>http://oneman.disqus.com/hard_news_journalism/#comment-15770054</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That isn't funny enough..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Martin Belam</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 11:13:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Slacker, the real iPod killer?</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/slacker_the_real_ipod_killer/#comment-14673667</link><description>So basically it is the same as the Vodafone RadioDJ 3G streaming personalised radio stations, except that I have to carry an extra device around with me as well as my phone?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Martin Belam</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 07:44:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dialup sucks</title><link>http://martinstabe.disqus.com/dialup_sucks/#comment-1928006</link><description>Dial-up only eh? You should try living for a year trying to be a new media geek with only sparodic internet access. I agree with you about it being a warning when feeling evangelical. It is all too easy to fall into the trap of thinking that the social revolution of the internet is the be-all and end-all of modern society, whilst forgetting that a lot of people have no interest in or feel they have no need for Twitter / YouTube / LinkedIn etc</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Martin Belam</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:36:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BBC News: MPs call on BBC to open accounts</title><link>http://martinstabe.disqus.com/bbc_news_mps_call_on_bbc_to_open_accounts/#comment-1929818</link><description>Coming from the same people who want to exempt themselves from the FOI act that is pretty funny :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Martin Belam</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 09:41:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Independent on Sunday: The papers would blush but anything goes on their websites</title><link>http://martinstabe.disqus.com/independent_on_sunday_the_papers_would_blush_but_anything_goes_on_their_websites/#comment-1930337</link><description>Actually, at the end of the fifth para graph it does now say in brackets (The Independent made its debut in the ABCs with six million readers.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Martin Belam</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 15:49:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Short posts are where it&amp;#8217;s at</title><link>http://ash-10.disqus.com/short_posts_are_where_it8217s_at/#comment-12540150</link><description>Personally, I'm inclined to think that it is Joanna's subject matter that provokes the discussion, not her brevity. But then, as someone who regularly writes blog posts that are 1,500+ words long, I would say that, wouldn't I ;-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Martin Belam</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 19:23:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>