<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for Aswath Rao</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/759bdb754714c6e0d336e0625f56c2dd/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 08:13:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Social Graph In The Second Inning</title><link>http://avc.disqus.com/the_social_graph_in_the_second_inning/#comment-14549</link><description>A better approach may be for individuals/enterprises to run their own SNs, but federate with other similar SNs to which their friends belong. This way there s no need to worry about who owns the content, how do I port from one SN to another and other points brought up in this discussion. This is the equivalent of "intelligence at the end", a popular refrain in the VoIP word. At least we believe in this model and we are working to realize this vision.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By the way, the comment tracking system used here is another illustration of this point. Disqus issues their own identity to track my comments in various sites. But if we use a user-centric identity like OpenID, then it would have been much simpler and I will be the owner of my comments; nobody has to grant it back in the T&amp;C.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aswath Rao</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:29:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Use Google Voice without changing your number</title><link>http://marketing.disqus.com/use_google_voice_without_changing_your_number/#comment-9348784</link><description>I think the same effect can be realized by setting the Do not disturb option. This way you can temporarily override this and receive calls on your other phones.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aswath Rao</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 22:34:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How the Democratic process will likely conclude (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/how_the_democratic_process_will_likely_conclude_scripting_news/#comment-282869</link><description>I do not have a dog in this fight, but it is clear you do and many times you are betraying your impartial observations. When it was suspected that superdelegates may prefer HRC, BHO camp argued that they should vote along the lines of open primary. But then folks like Richardson argued otherwise.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regarding your third point, do you think Ted Kennedy has self-respect after 1980? Is he an outsider?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course HRC and her supporters do this sort of thing all the time as do politicians of any caliber. But BHO is supposed to be different and more importantly his supporters are looking for different ways of doing things. So the clarion call for change is losing its voice so soon?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aswath Rao</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:03:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why so quiet? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/why_so_quiet_scripting_news/#comment-384912</link><description>My reaction as I was watching the interwiew: &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/aswath/statuses/797194233" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://twitter.com/aswath/statuses/797194233&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is evident that you have to know the man, his theological underpinnings to understand his :chicken to roost" sermon. It is very likely that his congregation fully understands that. But Obama failed or at least decided to fail for tactical reasons in explaining this to us.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aswath Rao</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 07:08:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fractional Horsepower Twitters? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/fractional_horsepower_twitters_scripting_news/#comment-6886428</link><description>Assuming that everyone can have their own website, we explored how communications space would look like and came up with an application that can be explored at &lt;a href="http://www.enthinnai.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.enthinnai.com&lt;/a&gt;. Basically you can be your own service provider and there are no onerous requirements on your friends - just that they need an OpenID for authentication.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aswath Rao</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 20:26:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google's killer app (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/googles_killer_app_scripting_news/#comment-10248140</link><description>pubsubhubbub? (&lt;a href="http://code.google.com/p/pubsubhubbub/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://code.google.com/p/pubsubhubbub/&lt;/a&gt;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aswath Rao</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 01:29:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Jajah phone?</title><link>http://lucafiligheddu.disqus.com/new_jajah_phone/#comment-3050570</link><description>I thought Jajah charges by the minute for each call (except for the trial 5 minutes). I agree my proposal will not make sense if they are planning to support the service through advertising.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aswath Rao</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 16:06:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook, a fantastic source of new users</title><link>http://lucafiligheddu.disqus.com/facebook_a_fantastic_source_of_new_users/#comment-3051153</link><description>Facebook wants to be an OS of something or other. If so, there is a precedence. If I write a Windows/Mac application, who owns it? Most certainly I do. The defense rests.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aswath Rao</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:52:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Web Awards: latest post for nominations</title><link>http://lucafiligheddu.disqus.com/open_web_awards_latest_post_for_nominations/#comment-3051470</link><description>Please consider &lt;a href="http://www.enthinnai.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.enthinnai.com&lt;/a&gt; for Niche and Miscellaneous social networks. We feel it is a novel approach to realize the services of social networks in a distributed manner.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aswath Rao</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 22:22:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Universal and group-based presence and status messages</title><link>http://lucafiligheddu.disqus.com/universal_and_group_based_presence_and_status_messages/#comment-3051515</link><description>Yahoo! and MSN IMs allow for setting different status messages for different groups or buddies. Are you looking for something more/different. Are you looking for an ability to set the values programatically? I guess I am missing what is it that you are looking.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aswath Rao</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:43:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Universal and group-based presence and status messages</title><link>http://lucafiligheddu.disqus.com/universal_and_group_based_presence_and_status_messages/#comment-3051518</link><description>CTRL+mouse click on a name of a group or friend will give you a popup window and one of the choices is Stealth settings.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh I realize now my mistake. You are asking for more detailed status setting rather than just "Appear offline". Sorry about that. In Y! you can only set a custom status globally. For what you want to do, you can try EnThinnai. :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aswath Rao</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:38:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook and Friends&amp;#8217; lists</title><link>http://lucafiligheddu.disqus.com/facebook_and_friends8217_lists/#comment-3051523</link><description>I thought that FB had previously announced that they are developing the capability to group friends and provide different persona to different groups.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aswath Rao</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:34:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Create a Twitter-like service in 45 minutes</title><link>http://lucafiligheddu.disqus.com/create_a_twitter_like_service_in_45_minutes/#comment-3051750</link><description>Luca, I don't mean to dismiss your point. But the real difficulty of witter and the problem in scalability is that my tweets are shared with only the people that follow me, instead of everyone. When a follower of mine comes online, all messages shared with the people that person following and sorting in chronological order so on. Does WP platform do all that? I couldn't test it out on my own because I didn't receive confirmation email for some time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aswath Rao</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:50:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Communication - The Marriage of Social Media and Telecom</title><link>http://pravdam.disqus.com/social_communication_the_marriage_of_social_media_and_telecom/#comment-9319902</link><description>Eric:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think with the scheme Kfir is suggesting for maintaining different presence information to different people you can maintain different presence information for different clients under a single system. For example, if you use EnThinnai, you can group your clients into four groups and assign specific "Availability status" for each group.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If one uses OpenID to authenticate originator of a message/session, then I feel we can control SPAM/SPIT very effectively.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aswath Rao</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 18:37:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Communication - The Marriage of Social Media and Telecom</title><link>http://pravdam.disqus.com/social_communication_the_marriage_of_social_media_and_telecom/#comment-9319901</link><description>Tshai, we are in agreement. The problem was with my use of "you can assign". This gives the impression that it is done by a human being. But in reality it would be one or more agents, both humans and software.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aswath Rao</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 14:54:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It’s The Netbook, Stupid</title><link>http://fractalsofchange.disqus.com/its_the_netbook_stupid/#comment-8080637</link><description>Netbooks will also innovate com device market. VZW recently introduced a feature rich VoIP device for $200 with 2 year contract. They will educate the market on the benefits of such devices. Then the market wil realize that Netbooks can be used to realize all those features and without the contract.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then the enterprise market will also dispense with $300 VoIP deskphones and use netbooks instead, which can double as travel PC for office workers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I too am expecting big things with Netbooks in delivering on the promises of "intelligence at the end".</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aswath Rao</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 13:10:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to add openID sign in to your facebook account?- Yeah, it is available!!</title><link>http://mypassion.disqus.com/how_to_add_openid_sign_in_to_your_facebook_account_yeah_it_is_available/#comment-10347289</link><description>OK, I did all that. So I have associated an OpenID with my Facbook account. But how do I use that to sign into FB? I get only FB login option. Did you indeed signin with your OpenID?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aswath Rao</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 06:49:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to add openID sign in to your facebook account?- Yeah, it is available!!</title><link>http://mypassion.disqus.com/how_to_add_openid_sign_in_to_your_facebook_account_yeah_it_is_available/#comment-10348250</link><description>I used Vidoop and Verisign PIP. I don't want to use GMail b/c they want to access my GMail contacts list, which I consider to be intrusuve.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aswath Rao</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 08:13:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thinking Blogger or Writing Blogger</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/thinking_blogger_or_writing_blogger/#comment-8509963</link><description>Thinking blogger. Many potential posts have been discarded because they have been taken over by events as I am still thinking about the topic.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aswath Rao</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 15:10:45 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>