DISQUS

I'm just sickened by the two-faced comments of the media today. I haven't seen any evidence that Robinson said what he has been accused of. However on the 1pm news Robinson couldn't stop himself from called Cameron privileged in the pejorative sense. He was practically in Mirror-mode toff slinging. And on ITV they have Julia 'Exterminate' Etchingham giving completely disingenuous comments considering her known opinions.

After everything we know about how Brown despises Cameron, I think his words are two-faced and despicable. How can he sympathise when he holds such personal enmity and politicises everything for personal gain? Go to Hell Brown.

'honest hazel' that is too far.


Even Hazel is deluding herself about no 'clamour for a Conservative election victory.' She forgets her own party's history. No one was clambering for New Labour either - in '97 they rode a tidal wave of anti-government sentiment. The Tories will be very happy to ride another anti-government tidal wave into power.



No one should accept Hazel's re-writing of history especially those conservative commentators who decry a lack of Tory enthusiasm like they need people to worship the Tories before a Tory victory is truly deserved.

Great stuff Team Wally! Very much appreciate the effort plan to add to my routine readings and contributions

www.hedgeworld.com is asking for username and password - any help with this?

You have to play it to enjoy it

Mmmm, ok, so why not prophet charts?

Can you explain to me when I brought God into this argument once?

Two things.

1. answer me this, you have two human beings, involved in the process which makes another human being, at what poing is the result not a human being.

and

2. a comotose patient is not selfaware so should they be erradicated?

Link for my Vote History Post.

http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/votehistory/sro...

I would not add any exceptions in a bill for abortion. And you can tell me that Im a woman hater, or that I dont believe in women rights, but that is not the case. I just dont understand how you can say one life is worth more than another. Even in the case of a rape or the woman being in danger from giving birth. A life is still a life, and if you were dying and killing me would save you, you would not be able to do that because you would be infringing on my rights. Why should a babies life (an innocent life) be any different.

So answer this. Why do the rich deserve to pay more PERCENTAGE than anyone else. (Which they already do)

Your right, I guess adamant fools should be backing Obama.

Im not going to continue this discussion until you decide to go back through my other posts and answer the unanswered questions. (I'll even let the yes or no on the bill slide because you are apparently going to keep skirting the issue)answer my other queries.

Once Again..Did he or did he not vote for the bill

Y Donahue Y Mahar P Shadid
Y Dudycz P Molaro Y Sieben
Y Geo-Karis Y Munoz N Silverstein
P Halvorson P Myers Y Sullivan
Y Hawkinson Y Noland Y Syverson
Y Hendon Y O'Daniel P Viverito

The Bill in Question

Senate Bill No. 1094
Third Reading
MAR 30, 2001
33 YEAS 6 NAYS 13 PRESENT
Y Bomke P Jacobs Y O'Malley Y Walsh, L.
P Bowles Y Jones, W. ===> P OBAMA<=== Y Walsh, T.
Y Burzynski Y Karpiel N Parker Y Watson
P Clayborne Y Lauzen Y Peterson P Weaver
Y Cronin P Lightford Y Petka P Welch
N del Valle N Link P Radogno Y Woolard
Y DeLeo Y Luechtefeld Y Rauschenberger Y Mr. President
Y Demuzio N Madigan, L. N Ronen
Y Dillard Y Madigan, R. Y Roskam

Once again..Was Obama for or against the bill. Actions speak louder than words my friend.

Once again..We are talking about different number, you are talking about the number of people, and I am talking about the percentage of tax being paid out. Tax revenue will go UP if Barack Obama is elected. Even though a majority of PEOPLE will see a tax break, taxes on those paying the most will go UP. Therefore growing government.

I still havent heard of any of Barack Obamas Accomplishments. You are all only answering the questions you want to answer.

Answer this one question. Did Obama vote for or against the induced infant liability act, which would in effect STOP infanticide? This requires a simple yes or no. I dont want to hear what he SAID what he would vote for, I want to hear what he DID vote for.

Right on the middle class. But the middle class does not pay the majority of taxes. The Top 1% of all earners pay 40% of the taxes in this country, and the top 10% pay over 70% of the taxes in this country. So a majority of the tax payers will be seeing a tax raise.<--you have been debunked>

Policies I agree with Mccain

1-agianst government spending/earmarks (has a great record of this as well)
2-Mccain's view of drilling for oil (Has switched his opinion, but because of due cause *ie the price of gas)
3-Mccain's prolife stance (also has a strong record)


There you go, Straight forward policies, no liabel or slander. Now tell me Three accomplishments of Obama's in regards to politics.

Hmm.. Easy.

Policies I dissagree with Obama

1-Infanticide (ie voting against the induced infant liability act, which would have allowed for the care of an infant who had survived an abortion)
2-Obama's plan to raise taxes (ie his economic Policies)
3-National Defense policies (willing to meet without preconditions with terrorists, and considering Iran a tiny country and not a threat)

Mccain has a touch of elitism? How funny..you sure you werent talking about "the messiah" Mr. Obama?

In case you haven't noticed, when you go through the tolls, your RFID is read and they snap a pic of your plate. In fact, if you go through without your EzPass, you'll be billed anyway...I verified this when I tried to pay for 'missed' tolls because my EzPass wasn't read going through the toll. I stopped in Hooksett, they showed me that I'd already been billed.

If you tried to hack an RFID, it'd take almost no time before you were nailed.

Move along, nothing to see here. ;-)