<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for kav</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/70ea023036796a137f86f0f7dcbe578b/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 06:58:54 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: HDTV, first take</title><link>http://lifeisgrand.disqus.com/hdtv_first_take/#comment-1282389</link><description>Paul, just a quick question as you've obviously done your homework on this. I'm looking at getting either a 32" or 37" HDTV. My budget's fixed, so obviously I'd be getting a slightly inferior product if I went for the bigger screen. So, would you recommend investing my cash in getting a better quality, but smaller screen, or is there so little difference between them that I could just splash out on the bigger one?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kav</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 06:58:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Did Calacanis just call me fat?</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/did_calacanis_just_call_me_fat/#comment-9670628</link><description>I'm at 190 and supposedly ought to be 175. That'd involve eating less though. 214 isn't bad for six feet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You could get one of those dance mats.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kav</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:48:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>