<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for delong</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/6e827fb5f4360596590ac87338ef364a/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:27:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Another McCain Ad Dissected by FactCheck.org</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/another_mccain_ad_dissected_by_factcheckorg/#comment-1790803</link><description>You are absolutely right ajm -- Obama has been cited by &lt;a href="http://FactCheck.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;FactCheck.org&lt;/a&gt; as well. I acknowledged this in a previous post:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/view/factcheck-org" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://washingtonindependent.com/view/factcheck...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, it does appear that McCain's falsities are much more frequent, significant and systematic in nature. I will be keeping track of FactCheck.org's analyses, and I will update if/when Obama is cited again. Thanks for pointing this out.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">delong</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:42:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McCain Calls For &amp;#8216;Economic Surge,&amp;#8217; Offers No Explanation</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/mccain_calls_for_8216economic_surge8217_offers_no_explanation/#comment-1791065</link><description>I certainly am not suggesting that. You are absolutely right that the McCain campaign is replicating Obama's strategy for dealing with the press. I did not intend to dispute that, but simply illustrate the practical effect of the McCain camp's new strategy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">delong</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 11:26:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Phil Gramm: Back From Belarus?</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/phil_gramm_back_from_belarus/#comment-1791245</link><description>You're right, Piniella. I hastily misread the article yesterday. I have corrected the post. My apologies, and thanks for pointing it out.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">delong</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 11:51:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: McCain Camp Mum on Iraq Timeline (Updated)</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/mccain_camp_mum_on_iraq_timeline_updated/#comment-1791311</link><description>I didn't mean to imply that Obama's timeline was absolute. And to the "ranch" point -- you're right, that is a bit of laziness on my part. The place is more like 15-acres, I believe. "Ranch" is an easy word to describe any large estate in the Western United States. So I am guilty. "Estate" or "compound" would be a more accurate term. Apologies.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">delong</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:27:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>