<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for kay</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/6da7d4c2f8b23d862fc2f7d81b378b7a/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:38:23 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Rachel Maddow = Instant. Ratings. Hit.</title><link>http://jedreport.disqus.com/rachel_maddow_instant_ratings_hit/#comment-1494177</link><description>Join me and all the other blogs where I am urging folks to bombard MSNBC with emails recommending Rachel get her own show! Perhaps enough requests of adoration  for her and possible huge ratings grab (female moderator to boot) they will "get it" like we do!! BTW I enjoy this blog, keep up the informative work/postings , I have added this site to my daily must reads!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kay</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 00:02:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spokesman Admits McCain Broke Forum Rules</title><link>http://jedreport.disqus.com/spokesman_admits_mccain_broke_forum_rules/#comment-1583884</link><description>McClone was prepared period, this guy is a walking gaffe, even prepared yesterday, he still made em, just the applause was so loud. He was like a kid with ADD almost jumping out of his seat with the supreme court question that Warren hadn't asked yet.  I want to know why they panned to Cindy and Graham,,,in the audience? Especially when McClone unlike Obama never mentioned her name cept in Sturgis of course!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kay</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 23:36:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spokesman Admits McCain Broke Forum Rules</title><link>http://jedreport.disqus.com/spokesman_admits_mccain_broke_forum_rules/#comment-1583898</link><description>by the way I mention the pan, because the interview, there was not a pan of Obama's supporters.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kay</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 23:38:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Integrity and honor aren't results-oriented values</title><link>http://jedreport.disqus.com/integrity_and_honor_arent_results_oriented_values/#comment-1583980</link><description>Right, but yet again, as I watched in a stupor, I knew  yesterday something was off. I don't want to be a skeptic, but this guy is no longer on queque to respond that fast! My family and I, some republican even noted this who watched. He wanted to get to the Supreme court question before Warren asked. I have now re watched, it's clearer now than ever.  Dishonesty prevails! It's not about if Obama lost or not. The suTwo entirely diff interviews were to be had, and it was to McClone's base, it was bject didn't warrant a win to me. But to perhaps cheat goes to character and I think he was prepped as to not embarass the base that he has gaffed up. For goodness sakes they limit his cell phone calls! DUH!! On Daily Kos I broached this in a diary today that I am so miffed by all this!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kay</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 23:51:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Integrity and honor aren't results-oriented values</title><link>http://jedreport.disqus.com/integrity_and_honor_arent_results_oriented_values/#comment-1583998</link><description>Sorry bout that..."The suTwo"   should be simply read as ..Two entirely diff interviews were to be,,, ...yada yada....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kay</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 23:54:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Integrity and honor aren't results-oriented values</title><link>http://jedreport.disqus.com/integrity_and_honor_arent_results_oriented_values/#comment-1584036</link><description>REPOSTED EDIT FEATURE NOT WORKING: And I hate typos :)&lt;br&gt;Right, but yet again, as I watched in a stupor, I knew  yesterday something was off. I don't want to be a skeptic, but this guy is no longer on queue to respond that fast! My family and I, some republican even noted this who watched. He wanted to get to the Supreme court question before Warren asked. I have now re watched, it's clearer now than ever.  Dishonesty prevails! It's not about if Obama lost or not. Two entirely diff interviews were to be had, and it was to McClone's base, neither interview  warranted a win to me (based on the subject matter) But to perhaps cheat goes to character and I think he was prepped as to not embarrass the base that he has gaffed up with. For goodness sakes they limit his cell phone calls! DUH!! On Daily Kos I broached this in a diary today that I am so miffed by all this!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kay</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 23:59:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spokesman Admits McCain Broke Forum Rules</title><link>http://jedreport.disqus.com/spokesman_admits_mccain_broke_forum_rules/#comment-1623891</link><description>Oh please, Pro-Life? I guess McClone's stance  is let em live so we can kill them later in wars that shouldn't be fought! Pro-Lifers are the biggest hypocrites, where are you when it comes to the injustice of wars? This administration lied and troops died, youth!!! They won't have babies, get married, civil unions! And your guy who is borderline dementia, who is being propped up by the Repubs, is a walking gaffe machine, the idiot at the forum, named supreme court justices he wants to get rid of he voted for, complained about earmarks about DNA of a bear and a bridge to nowhere (like his brain) he voted for! He and only he can dispel Evil from the earth, brilliant guy eh? 5 million a year income, duh, offers his wife up at Sturgis, leaves the first because she's a cripple now. I mean  I can write a book and this is a first paragraph! And I think we underestimate him, he is worse than Bush if that's possible. From 2000 to now, he is debating himself. The guy seriously is in need of a neurospy test. He is NOT ALL THERE!  And by the way quick draw McGraw,,, our comeuppance will be in the debates, then I'll thumb my nose at folks like you, we'll prove this guy is far from lucid, he forgets questions asked from the interviewer????!!  Let's see how well your Iraq/Afghanistan, sunni/shia, czechoslovakia  , 100 yr war, Please,he does not have the mental acuity to be President of nothing other than a Senior retirement community resort  residing over the folks in his socio economic sphere making no less than with a 5 million income a year!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kay</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:47:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: John McCain, Feminist?</title><link>http://jedreport.disqus.com/john_mccain_feminist/#comment-1804011</link><description>Jed,&lt;br&gt;Can you please get that out to the MSM also Huf Post, sure Daily Kos, TPM, Keith O, very good response, needs as many folks seeing this, also DNC and move on.org!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kay</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 17:24:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The 'Idiot Winds' Of McCain's Neo-McCarthyism</title><link>http://jedreport.disqus.com/the_idiot_winds_of_mccains_neo_mccarthyism/#comment-3404840</link><description>Well when Saks Fifth Annie called him Ka la day,my hub in earshot said dayum what is she talking about now  her wedding ring, shops, clothes and now exercise, this s*it is effin unreal! Well. it went over my head initially  lolol until my hub thought she was talking about pilates. He could not believe that she got ka la day out of khalidi. If you diss a person you suspect a terrorist you're pallin with, pronounce their names correctly!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kay</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:38:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are We Ready for a Father Figure President?</title><link>http://washingtonindependent.disqus.com/are_we_ready_for_a_father_figure_president/#comment-2248963</link><description>Well perhaps we should go more for the Grandfather figure, who does as he will, you know in  48 hours protect America by throwing a VP with MUCH executive all of 18 months experience at us, who even had to ask what does a VP do anyways? But who says America's safety is SO important, right that patronly figure.  But grandpaps figured it's better to win an election that to be bothered with those American dumb whippersnappers, who shall I mention has a temperament problem.  So while you infer are we ready for Obama and his INTELLIGENCE like in understanding small things like the Constitution, not involving us in pre-emptive wars where our youth ,,,you know DIED because Bush LIED, that administration and the CHANGE WE WON"T get with McGrandad and lo and behold PTA mom? I think the consequences are VERY minor...Ya think?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kay</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:29:07 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>